Oil Will Hit $200 After Dollar Collapse in 2012
February 24, 2011, 2:47 pm
Filed under:
Uncategorized | Tags:
2012,
2012 economy,
2012 predictions,
alex jones,
big banks,
central bank,
china,
Credit Crisis,
DEBT,
dollar collapse,
dollar crash,
domestic drilling,
domestic oil,
Economic Collapse,
economic forecast,
economic predictions,
Economy,
egypt,
egyptian revolution,
elite,
end of america,
Federal Reserve,
food prices,
food shortage,
foreign oil,
gas price,
gas prices,
global currency,
global elite,
global government,
Globalism,
globalists,
Great Depression,
Greenback,
Inflation,
internationalist,
internationalists,
Jordan,
kissinger,
kuwait,
libya,
Lindsey Williams,
manipulated market,
manipulation,
market manipulation,
middle east,
Muslim Brotherhood,
new world order,
NWO,
oil,
oil price,
OPEC,
petrol,
revolution,
ruling class,
russia,
Saudi Arabia,
silver,
Stock Market,
Tunisia,
turkey,
UAE,
US Economy,
wall street,
world currency,
world government,
yemen
Lindsey Williams: Oil Will Hit $200 After Dollar Collapse in 2012
NoWorldSystem.com
February 23, 2011
Pastor Lindsey Williams shares more top insider information of what the ruling-class elite have in store for America and the rest of the world. In October 2009, Lindsey Williams predicted that by the end of 2012 the U.S. dollar would collapse, he’s now saying that when it does collapse the chaos in the Middle East will skyrocket and will cause even more hatred for the United States. We would no longer be able to buy cheap oil from the Middle East, which will in turn spur a great oil-drilling rush here in the U.S. By the time that happens Americans will be paying $7-$8 for a gallon of gasoline and oil will be around $200 a barrel of oil. When we start paying that much we will begin to see a New World Currency.
Here are some excerpts from the 2/2/2011 interview on the Alex Jones Show:
“Once they get that crude oil to the price of somewhere around $200 a barrel they would have created so much chaos in the middle east.”
“They are going to double-cross the Arabs, the Arabs will lose what they’ve put in on our T-bills, when the dollar plummets all these T-bills, securities, Federal Reserve notes that the oil producing countries agreed to buy from us will become worthless.
Mr. Kissinger went abroad in 1977-81 during the Carter administration and cut a deal with every producing major oil country in the Middle East, and the deal was ‘we will buy your oil, we will no longer produce from America’s largest oil fields, we will buy from you IF you do the following: you must take a certain portion of what we buy oil from you with and buy our Federal Reserve issues of T-bills and securities. This in turn will pay for the interest on the national debt.’ Well when the dollar dies in 2012 the billions and billions of dollars worth of T-bills and federal reserve issues that had been sold to them will be worthless.”
This means that we will not be getting Arab oil anymore because they will be enraged with us, on top of that, the Muslim Brotherhood is destabilizing nation after nation in the Middle East as they did in Egypt, as it’s doing in Libya, from one nation to the other, Jordan, Tunisia, Turkey, Kuwait, Yemen, Saudi Arabia and when it hits Saudi Arabia you will have gasoline at the gas pumps $67 per gallon.”
“the elite know all of this in advance […] just about 3 to 4 months ago I said on the Alex Jones Show that there was going to be a crisis in the Middle East, they did not tell me it would be Egypt.”
“The standard currency of the world is crude oil, it’s the most important object out there. The Muslim Brotherhood are being supported by the elite of the world who have crude oil in the palm of their hands. What you saw happen Egypt, Libya, United Arab Emirates is going to spread throughout the entire Arab world. The elite of the world plan to double-cross the Middle East and OPEC nations.”
“The Muslim Brotherhood who is supported today by the elite of the world continue to cause conflict in the Middle East as they have in Egypt and in Libya and it will spread from one country to the other, none of them will be exempt.”
“I was told at the point the U.S. is not able to get our crude oil from the Middle East or for that matter any OPEC countries, the elite plan to open up America’s own oil fields that they have been sitting on for 50 years.”
“There is going to be a mad rush for oil production in America because we would not able to get it abroad, when the Arabs are double-crossed you will see America begin to produce from its own oil fields but what’s going to happen at that time you will be paying $7-$8 a gallon for gasoline and it will be $200 a barrel, our dollar would have already collapsed and they will bring in a world currency. In the end it’s all about bringing in a New World Order in order to accomplish what they want.”
“China has agreed with Russia to buy all of the crude oil and all the natural gas that they want. China will not be affected by the Middle East crisis because they are now getting their oil from Russia, U.S. will not be able to get it because they are supplying so much to China and as a result we will have to turn to our own oil fields here in America.”
“There will no no shortages on grocery store shelves, the grocery shelves will be full but you’re going to go hungry. Why are you going to go hungry? Not because there is a lack of groceries out there but because the prices are going to be too expensive.” “If you want groceries you better go to the grocery store and buy a 6 months to a year supply right now because the collapse of the dollar is going to accelerate.”
Obama’s $3.7 TRILLION Dollar Budget
February 16, 2011, 4:49 pm
Filed under:
Uncategorized | Tags:
america destroyed,
barack obama,
budget,
Communism,
DEBT,
Dictatorship,
Economic Collapse,
economic crisis,
Economy,
Empire,
fascism,
government spending,
Great Depression,
hyperinflation,
Inflation,
national debt,
new world order,
NWO,
obama,
obama deception,
socialism,
spending,
u.s. collapse,
US Economy
Obama’s $3.7 TRILLION Dollar Budget: A Complete and Total Joke
Michael Snyder
February 15, 2011
Is Barack Obama trying to play a joke on all of us? The budget that the Obama administration has submitted for fiscal 2012 is so out of touch with reality that it may as well be a budget for “Narnia”, “Fantasy Island”, “Atlantis” or some other mythical land. You can view the hard numbers for Barack Obama’s 2012 budget right here. Obama’s budget assumes that the U.S. will experience economic growth of over 5 percent for most of the coming decade. That is so far-fetched that “optimistic” is not the right word for it. It also assumes that U.S. government income (primarily made up of taxes on all of us) will more than double over the next ten years. For 2011, the budget projects that the U.S. government will take in a total of 2.1 trillion dollars, and for 2021 the budget projects that the U.S. government will take in a total of 4.9 trillion dollars. For the Obama administration to assume that the federal government will be able to drain an extra 2.8 trillion dollars per year out of the American people by the year 2021 is ridicul0us beyond belief. In his new budget Barack Obama does propose some very, very modest spending cuts that he knows have no chance of getting through Congress. Barack Obama’s budget for 2012 also does not even attempt to make any cuts to entitlement programs such as Social Security and Medicare. In essence, you can sum up Barack Obama’s budget proposal for 2012 by saying that it is a complete and total joke. This budget is so delusional and so out of touch with reality that it is hard to imagine anyone taking it seriously.
Oh, but Obama is really trying to sell it hard. When Obama unveiled this new $3.7 trillion budget for 2012 at a middle school in Baltimore, he insisted that his plan will make it “so that every American is equipped to compete with any worker anywhere in the world.”
Well, that is a nice sound bite, but as I have written about previously, unless Barack Obama suddenly finds a way to stop multinational corporations from paying slave labor wages to their workers on the other side of the globe the job losses in America are going to continue.
But that is a topic for another day. Getting back to the 2012 budget, Obama is proposing to cut more than a trillion dollars from federal budget deficits over the next ten years.
That sounds really good until you figure out that means that the cuts only amount to about $100 billion a year. Considering the fact that Obama’s budget is projecting that we will have a $1.6 trillion budget deficit this year alone, that really is not a whole heck of a lot to be cutting.
The truth is that Barack Obama should be proposing spending cuts that are at least ten times as large if he was actually serious about addressing our budget woes.
But at least Obama is not proposing an increase in spending.
Oh wait, he actually is.
In fact, under Obama’s budget, U.S. government spending will soar from 3.8 trillion dollars this year to 5.6 trillion dollars in 2021.
But the mainstream media is solely focusing on the budget cuts that Obama is proposing.
Apparently they are trying to cast him as some sort of “fiscal conservative”.
Try not to laugh.
But the modest cuts that Obama is proposing are at least some place to start.
Under Obama’s budget, approximately half of all government agencies will have their funding decreased from 2010 levels.
In fact, approximately 33 billion dollars would be saved by scaling back or shutting down 200 federal programs.
Of course Obama’s fellow Democrats in Congress will never go along with many of these cuts, but at least it is something.
However, this is where most in the mainstream media stop their analysis.
They don’t take a closer look at the numbers in Obama’s budget.
They don’t question the wacky economic growth assumptions.
They don’t question the bizarre government income projections.
But even with the Obama administration’s crooked numbers, the federal deficit still never drops below 600 billion dollars over the next decade and a total of 7.2 trillion dollars is still added to the national debt over the next decade.
If economic growth ends up being much lower, or if the U.S. government is not able to get twice as much money out of the American people by the end of the decade then the projections would look much, much different.
So where does the Obama administration assume all of that extra money for the government is going to come from?
Oh, from raising taxes of course.
The Obama budget assumes that there will be significant tax increases starting in the year 2013.
A recent article on CNBC summarized some of the tax increases that the Obama budget calls for….
There are many liberals (such as my friend Gary) that would love to see these tax increases go into effect, but Obama knows that there is no chance that they will ever see the light of day unless the Democrats retake the House of Representatives.
But most of Obama’s budget for 2012 is based on things that simply never even have a chance of happening.
The reality is that Obama’s budget for 2012 is a great work of fiction.
Meanwhile, the U.S. government continues to accumulate staggering amounts of debt.
In fact, Obama’s budget admits that we will witness the biggest one year debt increase in history this year.
In 2011, the gross federal debt with surpass 15 trillion dollars. In fact, it is being projected by some analysts that this will be the year when the debt finally becomes larger than the size of the entire U.S. economy.
Ouch.
But Obama insists that he is taking this debt problem very seriously.
Obama insists that he is committed to making “deep” cuts.
In fact, as he announced this new budget Obama stated that these budget cuts hit “many programs whose mission I care deeply about, but meeting our fiscal targets while investing in our future demands no less.”
Do any of you actually believe him?
Not that the Obama administration is in an easy position. The truth is that the U.S. government (both Republicans and Democrats) have been horribly irresponsible with our money for decades.
The 14 trillion dollar national debt problem that we have now did not develop overnight.
Neither will it be solved overnight.
But Obama is not even trying to address the tough issues such as Social Security and Medicare.
The truth is that the federal debt problem cannot be solved without addressing our out of control entitlement programs.
So why didn’t Obama address them in his budget?
Well, the reality is that Obama is not stupid. Social Security and Medicare are political sacred cows. Obama is not going to do anything at this point that would cost him millions of votes in 2012.
So Barack Obama ignored most of the $4 trillion in budget cuts recommended by the White House-appointed deficit commission.
It kind of makes you wonder why Obama ever appointed a “deficit commission” in the first place.
One area that Obama does attempt to cut in his new budget is military spending. Obama’s budget for 2012 sets military spending at 5 percent below what the Pentagon requested for 2011.
In fact, Obama’s defense budget would slash military spending by $78 billion over the next five years.
His budget also assumes that we are not going to get involved in any more wars, which is not necessarily a safe assumption.
So will these military spending cuts actually get through Congress?
Not likely.
The Republicans control the House of Representatives, and they are not likely to take too kindly to large cuts to the defense budget.
In fact, the truth is that not too many of Barack Obama’s spending cuts are likely to survive in Congress.
As a recent article on CNN explained, Barack Obama’s budget plan must navigate a vast array of congressional committees in the coming months and by the time it emerges it is likely to be radically changed from its current form….
Before it gets back to Obama’s desk for a signature, the spending blueprint will go through no less than 40 congressional committees, 24 subcommittees, countless hearings and a number of floor votes in the House and Senate.
As our Congress critters have demonstrated over and over and over, they love to spend our money on some of the most wasteful things imaginable.
For example, a total of $3 million has already been granted to researchers at the University of California at Irvine so that they can play video games such as World of Warcraft.
Something seems to happen to people who get elected to Congress. Almost all of them seem to develop an addiction to spending our hard-earned money.
Let us hope that something changes in that regard, because right now government debt is completely and totally out of control.
In fact, the U.S. national debt is currently increasing by approximately 4 billion dollars every single day.
In the end, if something is not done about all this debt it will destroy the entire U.S. financial system.
But our politicians just keep putting it off and putting it off.
Eventually we will reap what we have sown. Debt is a very cruel master, and nobody can run from it forever – not even the U.S. government.
McChrystal: Americans Must Serve the State
January 30, 2011, 3:04 am
Filed under:
Uncategorized | Tags:
barack obama,
catastrophic event,
civil defense,
civil liberties,
civil rights,
civil service,
civilian service,
Communism,
communist america,
DEBT,
Dictatorship,
Draft,
Empire,
fascism,
homeland security,
HR 5741,
human rights,
left right paradigm,
mandatory service,
mandatory volunteerism,
mcchrystal,
military,
military industrial complex,
national guard,
national service,
Neolibs,
new world order,
obama,
Oppression,
Police State,
servitude,
slavery,
socialism,
Stanley McChrystal,
War On Terror
McChrystal: Americans Must Serve the State
Brandon Turbeville
Activist Post
January 26, 2011
For anyone who might have thought General Stanley McChrystal and Barack Obama no longer saw eye to eye, it might surprise them to read McChrystal’s recent article, “ Step Up For Your Country,” published in the January 31 issue of Newsweek. For all the hype having to do with McChrystal being relieved of command, it seems the General and the President have more in common than the average television watcher might think. That is, at least when it comes to implementing civilian labor programs along the lines of Joseph Stalin or Mao. The illustration to the right is an interesting choice to represent McChrystal’s article in Newsweek, as it echoes the very same work camp and civilian service propaganda posters of former totalitarian regimes.
In his op-ed piece for Newsweek, McChrystal makes the case for the creation of a national civilian service program and laments the fact that we have “allowed the obligations of citizenship to narrow.”
McChrystal writes, “’Service member’ should not apply only to those in uniform, but to us all . . . the concept of national service is not new, nor is it outdated.” Of course, the General is correct in this assessment, as dictators from all political backgrounds have found “national service” to be an indispensable tool of tyranny.
He goes on, “All of us bear an obligation to serve – an obligation that goes beyond paying taxes, voting, or adhering to the law. America is falling short in endeavors that occur far away from any battlefield: education, science, politics, the environment, and cultivating leadership, among others.”
This obligation, which McChrystal defines as “community responsibility,” goes beyond merely providing services to the community. In the end, he writes, “ . . . we must understand that our real objective must be in shaping Americans. We must build into our society, and into ourselves, a sense of ability and responsibility.”
One would be justified in asking who is this “we” whose real objective is shaping Americans? To be sure, if Americans wanted to shape themselves they would be able to do so without their government forcing them wouldn’t they? If Americans have decided that, as a country, they would prefer not to accept these “responsibilities,” then their government would be operating openly against the will of the people. Either way, it is clear that “we” does not mean “we the people” and, instead, “we the controlling elite.”
If one were wondering exactly what this “community responsibility” would entail, McChrystal provides a definition. He writes:
We must recognize that service is typically doing things that you would not choose to do, but that must be done. It can be rewarding; it can also be difficult, onerous, and even dangerous. It cannot rely on short-term volunteers any more than our independence could be won by the people Tom Paine termed ‘summer soldiers and sunshine patriots.’ It must have people with a firm commitment, backed by a society that values their contribution.
First, it should be pointed out that in the quotation McChrystal utilizes, Tom Paine was in no way referring to forcing Americans to engage in work projects. In fact, Paine’s position was quite the opposite of the McChrystal’s.
Second, McChrystal’s definition of service is steeped in Orwellian doublethink. If service is “doing things that you would not choose to do,” then it is no longer service. Serving without one’s choice or consent is therefore slavery. Interestingly enough, the term service is derived from the Latin servus which means “slave.”[1]
Third, it is important to note McChrystal’s claim that service can be “difficult, onerous, and even dangerous.” This sounds a bit different than Habitat for Humanity or teaching in low-income communities. One must wonder exactly what kind of “service” McChrystal has in mind for the useless eaters that will be working beneath him.
Barack Obama famously called for a program of national civilian service in a campaign speech two years ago that drew a great deal of attention. Obama’s former Chief of Staff Rahm Emanuel echoed his desire for a domestic work and re-education program as well.
McChrystal concludes his article by claiming that “we” will realize “we” have succeeded when “new graduates of high schools and colleges talk with each other about how, not whether, they will serve America.” In this statement, Gen. McChrystal is quite correct. Unfortunately, we will know that America has officially been turned into a tyrannical and dictatorial state who is as dead and lifeless as all of its historical and current parallels.