Filed under: Uncategorized | Tags: aerosol, anthrax, Bio Weapons, biological warfare, cancer, chemical warfare, chemtrail, chemtrails, connecticut, dengue fever, Dictatorship, doctors, Empire, epidemic, Eugenics, fascism, federal crimes, flu virus, fort detrick, Genocide, government crimes, guatemala, health and environment, Human Experiments, human ginuea pigs, influenza pandemic, malaria, man made disease, man made diseases, maryland, military, military experiment, military experiments, military industrial complex, Mosquito virus, nazi, outbreak, pandemic, Pandemic Influenza, Pentagon, plague, prison industrial complex, secretary of defense, state sponsored terrorism, super weapons, syphilis, toxicity, tuskegee, victimization, war crimes, War On Terror, whitecoats
Biological Weapons Sprayed on U.S. Soldiers
U.S. infected its own citizens with virus
Infect and observe: An army doctor watches as malaria-carrying mosquitoes bite the stomach of inmate Richard Knickerbockers, serving 10 to 14 years, in Stateville in 1945
Daily Mail
February 28, 2011
Pictures have emerged providing the shocking proof that U.S. government doctors once experimented on disabled American citizens and prison inmates.
Such experiments included giving hepatitis to mental patients in Connecticut, squirting a pandemic flu virus up the noses of prisoners in Maryland, and injecting cancer cells into chronically ill people at a New York hospital.
Much of this horrific history is 40 to 80 years old, but it is the backdrop for a meeting in Washington this week by a presidential bioethics commission.
The meeting was triggered by the government’s apology last year for federal doctors infecting prisoners and mental patients in Guatemala with syphilis 65 years ago.
U.S. officials also acknowledged there had been dozens of similar experiments in America – studies that often involved making healthy people sick.
A review by the Associated Press of medical journal reports and decades-old press clippings found more than 40 such studies.
At best, these were a search for lifesaving treatments – at worst, some amounted to curiosity-satisfying experiments that hurt people but provided no useful results.
It echoes the deadly and meritless experiments conducted on Jewish concentration camp detainees at the hands of Nazi doctors.
And it will undoubtedly be compared to the Tuskegee syphilis study, where U.S. health officials tracked 600 black men in Alabama who already had syphilis – but didn’t give them adequate treatment even after penicillin became available.
Arthur Caplan, director of the University of Pennsylvania’s Center for Bioethics, said: ‘When you give somebody a disease – even by the standards of their time – you really cross the key ethical norm of the profession.’
Most of the recently revealed studies, from the 1940s to the 1960s, apparently were never covered by news media. Others were reported at the time but the focus was on the promise of enduring new cures, while glossing over how test subjects were treated.
Many prominent researchers felt it was legitimate to experiment on people who did not have full rights in society – people like prisoners, mental patients or the poor blacks.
Laura Stark, a Wesleyan University assistant professor of science in society – who is writing a book about past federal medical experiments – said: ‘There was definitely a sense – that we don’t have today – that sacrifice for the nation was important.’
Though people in the studies were usually described as volunteers, historians and ethicists have questioned how well these people understood what was to be done to them and why, or whether they were coerced.
Prisoners have long been victimised for the sake of science. In 1915, the U.S. government’s Dr Joseph Goldberger – today remembered as a public health hero – recruited Mississippi inmates to go on special rations to prove his theory that the painful illness pellagra was caused by a dietary deficiency (The men were offered pardons for their participation).
CIA Released Dengue-Infected Mosquitoes on U.S. Population
Filed under: Uncategorized | Tags: 1984, Adam Savage, Airport Security, australia, backscatter, big brother, brain tumor, breast cancer, cancer, christmas bomber, CT, customs, deadly, Dictatorship, Digital Radiography Scanner, Digital Radiography Scanners, DNA, DRS, drug smuggling, drug trafficking, drugs, Empire, Eugenics, fascism, Flight 253, full-body scanners, Genocide, health and environment, mammograms, millimeter wave, mutallab, plane bomber, radiation, radiography, science and technology, side effects, surveillance, tomography, TSA, tumor, underwear bomber, war on drugs, War On Terror, x-ray body scanner, x-ray scanner
New Airport Scanners Will See Through Bodies
NoWorldSystem.com
February 28, 2011
Australia will be trialling x-ray scanners at airports that can provide a crisp image of a persons insides.
Australian customs found 60 pounds of drugs inside the bodies of travelers last year, now legislation is before the Federal Parliament that would allow customs officers to use these new body scanners to view all objects beyond folds of skin instead of sending drug-smuggling suspects to hospitals for internal X-rays ordered by a doctor.
Millimeter-wave and BackScatter body scanners have failed miserably in detecting dangerous weapons; an undercover TSA agent successfully passed through security multiple times with a handgun. Adam Savage from Mythbusters came out and said the “TSA x-rayed my junk, but they missed 12-inch razor blades in my coat”.
The Millimeter-wave scanner can (supposedly) detect metal objects but is incapable of detecting plastics or liquid objects. The BackScatter can detect metal objects and some plastics but both are only capable of seeing through clothing and not folds of skin. This new scanner is a hospital-grade full-body scanner, the same method used for bone fractures and mammograms.
The scanners that will most likely roll out first are called Digital Radiography Scanners (DRS) that are being mass produced and ready to roll out as soon as governments decide to use them. They are currently used in some airports, mining and correctional facilities in a few countries, however this scanner is relatively new in U.S., Britain and Australia.
These types of x-ray machines are much more hazardous to the human organism than both of the millimeter-wave and backscatter combined. Radiography and Tomography machines are potentially deadly as they emit deep penetrating ionizing x-rays, through the human body. Researches find CT scanners will cause 29,000 cancers and kill nearly 15,000 Americans from diagnostic tests done in 2007.
Forget about scanners looking at your ‘junk’, in the near future we will all be zapped with deadly-doses of radiation for the sake of fatherland security.
Filed under: Uncategorized | Tags: bluetooth, bluetooth cancer, bluetooth tumors, cancer, cell phone, cellphone, children, EMF, Eugenics, health and environment, hearing loss, Human Experiments, neuroma, radiation, radiation side effects, side effects, tumors
Its official now: Radiation from your cell phone may be killing you
DNA India
January 2, 2011
After many years of debate over the health hazards posed by mobile phones, a recent report finally establishes it.
The exhaustive report has been submitted recently to the Department of Telecom by Prof Girish Kumar of IIT-Bombay’s department of electrical engineering.
Kumar, who has done extensive research on cell phone radiation and its effects warns against excessive use of cell phones as they put users, to increased risk of cancer, brain tumour and many other health hazards. More so in case of children.
The major health hazards of radiation from cell phones and cell towers are as given below:
_A 400% increase in the risk of brain cancer among for teenagers using cell phones. Children are more vulnerable to cell phone radiation. The younger the child, the deeper is the penetration of electromagnetic radiation as children’s skulls are thinner.
_Excessive use of mobile phones can also cause cancer in anyone. Use of cell phones for more than 30 minutes per day for 10 years increases the risk of brain cancer and acoustic neuroma.
_Cell phone radiation causes irreversible damage to male fertility. Studies have found 30% lower sperm count in intensive users of mobile phones.
_Cell phone frequencies can cause damage to the DNA of the body’s cells. Radiation causes ‘free radical formation’ inside the body’s cells; the free radicals are known to be carcinogenic.
_Cell phone frequencies interfere with the functioning of other life-saving gadgets, including implanted pace-makers, and may, therefore, cause sudden death.
_Mobile phone exposure can activate the stress response in human and animal cells which causes production of stress proteins. This is proof enough that the body recognises radiations from cell phones as potentially harmful.
_Electromagnetic fields caused by cell phone and cell tower radiation degrade the immune system and stimulate allergic\inflammatory responses, including rashes, sores, biting sensations and lesions.
_People using cell phones for more than 30 minutes a day for more than four years are at a higher risk of hearing loss. Cell phone radiation can cause tinnitus and damage the auditory hair cells present in the inner ear. Once damaged, these cells can never regenerate.
_Frequent use of mobile phones can also damage the visual system in many ways. Cell phone frequencies (900, 1800 MHz and 2450 MHz) damage epithelial cells and increase the temperature within the eye.
_Cell phone emissions weaken bones and can cause reduction in melatonin (a type of antioxidant which is immune system enhancer) levels.
_An increased risk of salivary gland cancer is linked to the use of mobile phones.
_Exposure to electromagnetic fields can cause [depression and] sleep disorders and neurodegenerative diseases like Alzheimer’s and Parkinson’s disease.
_Due to consistent electromagnetic background noise, bees and birds become disoriented and cannot return to their hives and nests. It has adverse effects on animals, plants and the environment.
Mobile Phone Radiation to Unleash Epidemic of Brain Tumors
Early radiation exposure raises breast cancer risk
Bluetooth Headsets Cause Acoustic Neuroma, Use a BlueTube Instead!
Full-Body Scanners Increase Cancer Risk
14 Living Next To Cell Tower End Up Dead
2 Billion may suffer from Mobile Cancer by 2020: Study
Frequent Cell Phone Users Likely To Get Tumors
Cell phones ’more dangerous than smoking’
Filed under: Uncategorized | Tags: BP, bp coverup, cancer, corexit, coverup, dispersant, ecocide, environmental catastrophe, environmental disaster, Eugenics, Genocide, gulf, gulf of mexico, health and environment, Human Experiments, Louisiana, ocean, offshore oil, oil, oil dispersant, oil leak, oil rig, oil spill, Population Control, soft kill, toxic dispersant, toxic earth, toxic environment, toxicity, Wilma Supra
BP’s Toxic Legacy
Filed under: Uncategorized | Tags: BP, cancer, ecocide, environmental catastrophe, environmental disaster, florida, gulf, gulf of mexico, health and environment, Human Experiments, ocean, offshore oil, oil, oil leak, oil rig, oil spill, pensacola, soft kill, toxic earth, toxic environment, toxicity
Cleanup Worker: Tons of Oil on Pensacola Beach
Filed under: Uncategorized | Tags: aspartame, aspartame side effects, brain damage, cancer, chemical warfare, coke, corruption, coverup, deception, depopulation, dumbed down, Eugenics, eugnics, fascism, FDA, food market, food safety, formaldehyde, Genocide, health and environment, mercola, msg, nutrasweet, pepsi, pepsi zero, Population Control, scandal, softkill, splenda, sugar free, toxicity, tumor
Studies Link Aspartame to Cancer
Filed under: Uncategorized | Tags: beef, bladder cancer, cancer, chicken, Eugenics, FDA, food market, food safety, Genocide, health and environment, hillshire farms, lunch meat, meat market, nitrates, nitrites, Population Control, prostate cancer, softkill, toxicity, tumors, turkey
Lunch meat may cause bladder cancer
Natural News
August 4, 2010
A recent study published in the journal Cancer links nitrate-containing cold cut meats to bladder cancer. According to the study, people who eat red meat cold cuts that contain nitrates or nitrites have a nearly 30 percent increased risk of developing bladder cancer.
“Nitrate and nitrite are precursors to N-nitroso compounds (NOCs), which induce tumors in many organs, including the bladder, in multiple animal species,” explains the study.
Nitrates are added to meats as a preservative and as a color-protector. They make the meat appear fresher for a longer period of time. But these additives are highly toxic and dangerous to health.
“[S]odium nitrite, when consumed by the human body, forms some of the most highly carcinogenic chemical compounds ever recorded in the world of foods and nutrition. They’re call nitrosamines, and these nitrosamines directly promote cancers throughout the body, most notably colorectal cancer,” explains Mike Adams, the Health Ranger, in his book Spam Filters for Your Brain.
Roughly 300,000 men and women from eight U.S. states participated in the study. Researchers followed participants for up to eight years and found that people whose diets were high in nitrites — no matter where the additives came from — had an increased risk of developing bladder cancer.
They also discovered that participants who ate a lot of nitrite-containing foods tended to eat less fruits, vegetables and other nutrient-rich foods.
According to the research, non-Hispanic Caucasians who smoke and have a higher body-mass index (BMI) represent the biggest consumers of processed red meats.
Sources:
http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933…
http://www.naturalpedia.com/sodium_…
Filed under: Uncategorized | Tags: brain damage, cancer, Eugenics, fatty liver, FDA, food market, food safety, fructose, Genocide, health and environment, heart disease, HFCs, high blood pressure, high fructose corn syrup, kidney disease, Mercury, Population Control, softkill, toxicity, tumors
Cancer cells feed on fructose, study finds
MSNBC
August 3, 2010
Pancreatic tumor cells use fructose to divide and proliferate, U.S. researchers said on Monday in a study that challenges the common wisdom that all sugars are the same.
Tumor cells fed both glucose and fructose used the two sugars in two different ways, the team at the University of California Los Angeles found.
They said their finding, published in the journal Cancer Research, may help explain other studies that have linked fructose intake with pancreatic cancer, one of the deadliest cancer types.
“These findings show that cancer cells can readily metabolize fructose to increase proliferation,” Dr. Anthony Heaney of UCLA’s Jonsson Cancer Center and colleagues wrote.
“They have major significance for cancer patients given dietary refined fructose consumption, and indicate that efforts to reduce refined fructose intake or inhibit fructose-mediated actions may disrupt cancer growth.”
Americans take in large amounts of fructose, mainly in high fructose corn syrup, a mix of fructose and glucose that is used in soft drinks, bread and a range of other foods.
Politicians, regulators, health experts and the industry have debated whether high fructose corn syrup and other ingredients have been helping make Americans fatter and less healthy.
Too much sugar of any kind not only adds pounds, but is also a key culprit in diabetes, heart disease and stroke, according to the American Heart Association.
Several states, including New York and California, have weighed a tax on sweetened soft drinks to defray the cost of treating obesity-related diseases such as heart disease, diabetes and cancer.
The American Beverage Association, whose members include Coca-Cola and Kraft Foods have strongly, and successfully, opposed efforts to tax soda.
The industry has also argued that sugar is sugar.
Heaney said his team found otherwise. They grew pancreatic cancer cells in lab dishes and fed them both glucose and fructose.
Tumor cells thrive on sugar but they used the fructose to proliferate. “Importantly, fructose and glucose metabolism are quite different,” Heaney’s team wrote.
“I think this paper has a lot of public health implications. Hopefully, at the federal level there will be some effort to step back on the amount of high fructose corn syrup in our diets,” Heaney said in a statement.
Now the team hopes to develop a drug that might stop tumor cells from making use of fructose.
U.S. consumption of high fructose corn syrup went up 1,000 percent between 1970 and 1990, researchers reported in 2004 in the American Journal of Clinical Nutrition.