noworldsystem.com


McCain’s mistress has gone missing for 44 days

McCain’s mistress has gone missing for 44 days

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-wKgc3IP9Hw

Why Won’t McCain Sign the GI Bill?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pK_9sI7hzAc

McCain: Osama bin Laden and I agree on Iraq
http://rawstory.com/news/2008.._quote_as_0324.html

Buchanan: McCain would have us go to war with Russia
http://www.buchanan.org/blog/?p=975

CNN catches McCain making contradictory statements about Sadr.
http://thinkprogress.org/2008/04/..-statements-about-sadr/

 



McCain Sex Scandal Blonde Missing — Day 12

McCain Sex Scandal Blonde Missing — Day 12

Huffington Post
March 3, 2008

Jimmy Breslin says there are only two headlines that sell newspapers: WAR and BIG GUY DIES. (Here at Huffington, the two headlines are OBAMA and SOMEONE’S NOT PAYING ENOUGH ATTENTION TO OBAMA.) In cable news, the only stories anyone cares about involve missing white women, the blonder the better.

Elizabeth Smart and Chandra Levy, Laci Peterson and JonBenet Ramsey, Madeline McCann and Jessica Lynch, the Runaway Bride and the remains of Anna Nicole Smith. Those stories were made for cable. Sure, it’s fun to watch a casino implode, the first hundred times, but it doesn’t have the same urgent familiarity; the same prurient arc of tension a relief, like a cross between a nipple slip and a mining disaster. There’s something about a missing white women that just works for 24-hour news. Like shipwrecks in Shakespeare, or the way you can’t write a truly awful folk song without mentioning smoking.

Is it news that we need? Of course not. I’m sure Natalee Holloway was a perfectly nice person, but unless there are particles of her in my drinking water, I don’t need to know she’s still gone.

As unsettling as the stories are, we can take a kind of comfort in the soothing inexorability of the coverage. The message is that the medium cares. If a woman goes missing — and she’s not black or poor — CNN, Fox and MSNBC will cover it.

So what happened to the missing blonde woman in John McCain’s lobbying scandal?

It’s been twelve days.

Where on Earth is Vicki Iseman?

We’ve heard from John McCain:

“I’m very disappointed in the New York Times…”

And from Cindy McCain:

“I’m very, very disappointed in The New York Times…”

But what about Vicki Iseman? Isn’t she disappointed?

Not even in Thomas Friedman?

Until we hear her speak, or hear she’s been identified from dental records, how can we ever have closure?

It’s not just that she’s vanished, although that should be enough, considering her hair color. And it’s not just that she’s been tied to a U.S. senator with a very real chance of achieving America’s highest office and then dying in it. It’s that there are still only three pictures of her on Google.

She’s been a lobbyist for eighteen years, but she’s only been photographed three times. And one of those times was with President Bush. Unless she folds up neatly and fits inside Jack Abramoff’s hat, it doesn’t make sense.

Where’s Vicki Iseman and where’s the cable news coverage of her disappearance?

Email Nancy Grace at this address.

And demand to know.

NY Times: McCain had possible relations to Female Lobbyist
http://noworldsystem.com/2008/02/22/ny-..ns-to-female-lobbyist/

Does a McCain Presidency Guarantees a Military Draft?
http://rinf.com/alt-news/politics/doe..guarantees-a-military-draft/2574/

 



McCain: Iraq war ’will be over soon’

McCain Flip Flops on 100 Years in Iraq Statement

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Q4kWCWjyI00

 

McCain: ‘I’m The Only Candidate That The Special Interests Don’t Give Money To’

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xLfSpYULGXY

McCain Co-Chair Indicted On Fraud, Extortion
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2008..ted-mcca_n_87974.html

Files and McCain Letter Show Effort to Keep Loophole
http://www.nytimes.com/2008/02/23/us/politics/23lobby.html

McCain Adviser Does Lobbying Aboard “Straight Talk” Express
http://www.washingtonpost..02/21/AR2008022101131.html

The Real McCain: Senator Gets Millions from Lobbyist “Friends”
http://www.alternet.org/blogs/election08/77541/

McCain defends lobbyist ties
http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20080222/ap_on_el_pr/mccain_lobbyist

Well, well. Jeb Bush is also connected to Alcalde & Fay (Vicki Iseman’s firm)
http://mparent7777-2.blogs..ush-is-also-connected-to.html

FEC Warns McCain on Campaign Spending
http://www.washingtonpost.com..2103141.html?hpid=topnews

 



NY Times: McCain had possible relations to Female Lobbyist

NY Times: McCain had possible relations to Female Lobbyist

NY Times

February 21, 2008

Fbiiraqisbein_mn

Early in Senator John McCain’s first run for the White House eight years ago, waves of anxiety swept through his small circle of advisers.

A female lobbyist had been turning up with him at fund-raisers, in his offices and aboard a client’s corporate jet. Convinced the relationship had become romantic, some of his top advisers intervened to protect the candidate from himself — instructing staff members to block the woman’s access, privately warning her away and repeatedly confronting him, several people involved in the campaign said on the condition of anonymity.

When news organizations reported that McCain had written letters to government regulators on behalf of the lobbyist’s clients, the former campaign associates said, some aides feared for a time that attention would fall on her involvement.

McCain, 71, and the lobbyist, Vicki Iseman, 40, both say they never had a romantic relationship. But to his advisers, even the appearance of a close bond with a lobbyist whose clients often had business before the Senate committee McCain led threatened the story of redemption and rectitude that defined his political identity.

It had been just a decade since an official favor for a friend with regulatory problems had nearly ended McCain’s political career by ensnaring him in the Keating Five scandal. In the years that followed, he reinvented himself as the scourge of special interests, a crusader for stricter ethics and campaign finance rules, a man of honor chastened by a brush with shame.

But the concerns about McCain’s relationship with Iseman underscored an enduring paradox of his post-Keating career. Even as he has vowed to hold himself to the highest ethical standards, his confidence in his own integrity has sometimes seemed to blind him to potentially embarrassing conflicts of interest.

Read Full Article Here

 

McCain: I did not have sexual relations with that woman

Nick Juliano
Raw Story
February 21, 2008

‘Disappointed’ in NY Times piece; ‘It’s not true’

Fbiiraqisbein_mn

Republican presidential candidate John McCain faced the explosion of a long-ticking timebomb Thursday morning when the New York Times revealed allegations of his questionable conduct with a woman who lobbied for the telecommunications industry.

In a 9 a.m. press conference, McCain denied the Times report, saying he was disappointed with the paper of record’s handling of the story.

“I’m very disappointed in The New York Times piece,” McCain said. “It’s not true.”

The Arizona Senator flatly denied that he had a romantic relationship with the lobbyist, Vicki Iseman, and he said campaign aides never warned him about speculation the two were having an affair nor intervened to keep her from campaign events.

While he said he was unaware whether aides discussed the alleged relationship amongst themselves, McCain said he never heard the concerns personally. He went on to pan the Times‘ sourcing of the article.

“I do notice with some interest that it’s, quote, ‘former aides,’ that this whole story is based on anonymous sources. … I’m very disappointed in that,” McCain said.

One former top campaign aide, John Weaver, did speak on the record to the Times and the Washington Post, which produced its own story on McCain and Iseman Thursday.

Weaver told the papers he met Iseman in person at Union Station in Washington, DC, to warn her to stay away from McCain. In his press conference Thursday, McCain said he had not spoken about the Times investigation with Weaver before it was published and he denied knowing about the Union Station meeting.

Right off the bat, McCain was asked about the most salacious implications of the Times article.

Q Senator, did you ever have any meeting with any of your staffers in which they would have intervened to ask you not to see Vicki Iseman or to be concerned about appearances of being too close to a lobbyist? SEN. MCCAIN: No. Q No meeting ever occurred? SEN. MCCAIN: No. Q No staffer was ever concerned about a possible romantic relationship? SEN. MCCAIN: If they were, they didn’t communicate that to me. Q Did you ever have such a relationship? SEN. MCCAIN: No.

McCain also acknowledged speaking to Times editor Bill Keller while the paper was reporting its story, but he said he never tried to dissuade him from publishing it.

“I called him up when the investigation was going on and I asked him basically what was happening and that we hoped that we could bring this to closure,” McCain said. “But it was a very brief conversation.”

At one point, Cindy McCain took to the microphone to share her own criticism of the paper.

“My children and I not only trust my husband but know that he would never do anything to not only disappoint our family, but [to] disappoint the people of America,” she said. “He’s a man of great character, and I’m very, very disappointed in The New York Times.”

http://youtube.com/watch?v=2ueSREqe3qc

FEC: John McCain’s campaign was effectively broke
http://www.openleft.com/showDiary.do?diaryId=4056

McCain Statement Repudiating NY Times Piece
http://www.electiongeek.com/blo..-repudiating-ny-times-piece/

Why Did The NYT Hold McCain-Lobbyist Story?
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2008/0..the-nyt-hold-mcca_n_87704.html

Employer of McCain linked lobbyist Vicki Iseman removes her bio from Web but doesn’t understand concept of Internet Archive
http://www.electiongeek.com/blog/20..io-pulled-from-web/

McCain and the Lobbyist – Is This Why Romney Only ‘Suspended’ His Campaign?
http://www.pensitoreview.com/20..-lobbyist-relationship/

Kristol: Fear is a pretty good argument for McCain
http://thinkprogress.org/2008/02/20/mccain-more-occupations/

McCain: I Could Send U.S. Troops ‘Anywhere’ For ‘A Long Period of Time’
http://thinkprogress.org/2008/02/20/mccain-more-occupations/

McCain’s Advisors Don’t Appear Too Close To Bush
http://www.nytimes.com/2008/../16%2BUdc/9dQPxJLHa2A

Bush 41 Endorses McCain
http://ap.google.com/article/A..Jn95tAD8UQQHM80