Filed under: 1984, Big Brother, California, Dictatorship, Empire, Fascism, fat ban, food ban, gavin newsom, health and environment, nanny state, Nazi, Neolibs, Oppression, Police State, san fransisco | Tags: cigarette ban, city hall, trans-fat ban
San Fran Continues Nazi Anti-Smoking Agenda
San Fransisco Chronicle
August 4, 2008
Last week, the San Francisco Board of Supervisors voted to make the city the first in the country to ban the sale of cigarettes in pharmacies such as Walgreens and Rite Aid.
And that’s only the city’s latest effort to make us all healthier.
The supervisors also voted to require chain restaurants to post nutritional information, including calories and fat content, on menus. This follows the creation of a program to recognize restaurants that don’t use trans fats and an idea by Mayor Gavin Newsom to levy a fee on retailers of sugary sodas.
The board is also taking up legislation to dramatically curb where smokers can light up, including prohibiting puffing in taxis, lines for ATMs and common areas of apartment buildings. And Newsom wants to close some streets to cars on select Sundays so people can jog, hula-hoop and lay out their yoga mats on the pavement.
What’s next from City Hall? A mandate to eat your broccoli and hit the treadmill 30 minutes every day?
“Next, it’ll be if you’re fat and eating sugar, you’ll get a ticket,” scoffed Chris Carillo, a 41-year-old software engineer who lives in Polk Gulch. “There’s crime on the streets, homeless people congregating, a lot of grime. I’d rather see them concentrate on that.”
San Francisco famously became the first city in the nation to attempt to provide universal health care to its residents and requires employers to provide paid sick leave, both of which are mostly popular ideas in this progressive city.
But when it comes to legislating good habits, some San Franciscans have had enough.
They say they can manage their health just fine without Newsom and the supervisors wagging their fingers at them. And some think City Hall has more important matters to take up.
“The city’s looking very shabby. I’d rather have clean sidewalks than not be able to buy a pack of cigarettes in a pharmacy,” said Bobby Kiel, a 60-year-old retired real estate broker who lives in the Marina. He doesn’t smoke. “It’s not any of their business. They’re not the surgeon general or the Centers for Disease Control.”
But health experts say these kinds of measures are needed, especially as obesity rates in the country skyrocket and secondhand smoke continues to be a killer despite education about the dangers of tobacco.
Filed under: 1984, Big Brother, brainwashing, Britain, brownshirts, California, car tax, Communism, Conditioning, corporations, Dictatorship, eco nazi, Empire, Europe, european union, Fascism, garbage police, Global Warming, Hitler, litter police, litter wardens, nanny state, NASA, Nazi, nazi youth, Oppression, orwell, Police State, road tax, san fransisco, spain, stasi, stasi tactics, Surveillance, United Kingdom | Tags: greenshirts
Overfilled Garbage Bins Can Lead to Fines of £110
Daily Express
August 4, 2008
MINISTERS have ordered people who overfill their bins to be punished more severely than shoplifters, drug users and dangerous drivers.
Official guidance from the Department of the Environ-ment to local councils says they must impose fines of “not less than £75” and up to £110 on taxpayers who disobey rubbish rules.
The crackdown from the so-called “Talibin” will apply to virtually all UK households.
Anyone caught leaving their wheelie-bin lid even slightly open, placing bins or rubbish out on the day before collection or putting their bin in the wrong place could get a fixed penalty or end up in court.
Tory spokesman Eric Pickles yesterday accused Labour of creating “an army of municipal bin bullies”.
He warned they were targeting “law-abiding families with massive fines while professional criminals get the soft touch. It is clear Whitehall bureaucrats are instructing town halls to target householders with fines for minor breaches.
Anyone caught leaving their wheelie-bin lid even slightly open, placing bins or rubbish out on the day before collection or putting their bin in the wrong place could get a fixed penalty or end up in court.
Tory spokesman Eric Pickles yesterday accused Labour of creating “an army of municipal bin bullies”.
He warned they were targeting “law-abiding families with massive fines while professional criminals get the soft touch. It is clear Whitehall bureaucrats are instructing town halls to target householders with fines for minor breaches.
“Yet with the slow death of weekly collections and shrinking bins, it is increasingly hard for families to dispose of their rubbish responsibly.
“It is fundamentally unfair that householders are now getting hammered with larger fines than shoplifters get for stealing.”
Eco-Nazi Youths urged to report on family’s eco-crimes
National Post
August 1, 2008
In a recent series of ads aimed at school children, a leading British energy company has assigned a controversial summer project: police their family’s global-warming crimes.
Launched last week by NPower — the country’s fourth-largest provider — the campaign is part of a larger program to educate children about global warming and the wasteful habits that might exacerbate it.
Some activists and marketers see the site as a clever marketing gimmick to teach children to preserve their planet. Others see excessive indoctrination tactics lifted from the pages of the George Orwell novel 1984, in which children are set against their parents, or worse, the Hitler Youth, who were encouraged to betray their loved ones for the greater glory of the state.
Last Tuesday, a satirical article on the British Web site Anorak referred to these cadets as “Greenshirts” and compared them to the young Blackshirts of yore. “NPower, the electricity people, want you, the Britisher Jungvolk, to inform on your mums and your dads if they disobey the rules on climate change.”
http://www.rightsidenews.com/2..he-current-hysteria-over-global-warming.html
Old ships’ logs show temporary global warming in 1730s
http://www.theregister.co.uk/2008/08/04/ships_log_climate_change/
Drivers face higher parking charges under controversial new car tax band linked to engine emissions
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/ne..-car-tax-band-linked-engine-emissions.html
Spain Cuts Speed Limit To Fight Global Warming
http://www.independent.co.uk/..and–turns-out-lights-to-save-fuel-881401.html
SF Mayor Wants Fines For Unsorted Trash
http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-b..2008/08/01/MN47122A98.DTL
Filed under: 9/11 Truth, Bohemian Grove, Bush Sr., California, child sex slavery, CIA, Colin Powell, David Rockefeller, Donald Rumsfeld, franklin coverup, George Bush, george h. w. bush, global elite, global government, Globalism, Henry Kissinger, homosexual, homosexual prostitution, International Bankers, internationalist, internationalists, James Woolsey, jeff gannon, john decamp, neocons, New World Order, paul bonacci, san fransisco, scandal, secret meetings, Secret Societies, Sex Scandal | Tags: effigy, human sacrifice, molech, moloch, Monte Rio, owl, Sonoma County, vanity fair
George H. W. Bush on Bohemian Grove Guest List
911 Blogger
July 20, 2008
Activists from truthaction.org have obtained the official guest list for Bohemian Grove’s 2008 midsummer encampment along with a map of the Grove’s facilities. According to the guest list, this year’s attendees include George H. W. Bush, David Rockefeller, Henry Kissinger, Donald Rumsfeld, Colin Powell and several former CIA directors. Also attending are two members of the Grateful Dead, one of whom is camping with the elder Bush. During an action at the entrance of the elite retreat, several 9/11 truth information packs were accepted by Bohemian Grove campers and taken into the grove, including one by former CIA Director James Woolsey’s bunkmate.
The Bohemian Grove, located in the small town of Monte Rio in Sonoma County, California is notorious for its annual summer retreats for the rich and powerful during which participants kick back, relax and enjoy a simulated child sacrifice called ’Cremation of Care’. The Grove is strictly off-limits to the uninvited and much effort is made to maintain secrecy. Workers at the retreat must sign a comprehensive confidentiality agreement and the entrance to the 2,700 acre getaway is guarded not only by private security but also the local Sheriff’s department, at taxpayers expense.
This year, 9/11 truth activists have been a regular presence at the entrance to the Grove during the two week event, talking to many of the workers coming in and out and also to several of the campers. A number of workers have expressed profound gratitude for the presence and message of the activists and at least one elite camper displayed a seemingly genuine interest in the 9/11 truth materials he was given, stopping to talk for awhile and revealing that he was camping with a former CIA director before heading back into the Grove with his infopack.
http://truthaction.org/forum/viewtopic.php?t=3873
2008 Bohemian Grove Guest List Obtained By 9/11 Truth Activists
http://www.infowars.net/articles/july2008/210708Grove.htm
SF Truth Action Visits the Bohemian Club
http://truthaction.org/forum/viewtopic.php?t=1820
Vanity Fair writer arrested for sneaking into Bohemian Grove
http://www.prisonplanet.com/vanity-f..-for-sneaking-into-bohemian-grove.html
Bush, McCain & Obama To Visit Bohemian Grove?
http://noworldsystem.com/2008/07/13/bus..obama-to-visit-bohemian-grove/
Filed under: amnesty, California, CNN, crack, drug smuggling, drug trafficking, federal crime, gavin newsom, Honduras, ICE, Illegal Immigration, Immigration, lou dobbs, Neolibs, san fransisco, Taxpayers, war on drugs
San Fransisco’s Sanctuary Status for Illegal Alien Felons
http://www.upi.com/Top_News/..migrant_policy/UPI-84581214782811/
Filed under: 1984, amnesty, Big Brother, bill of rights, Britain, California, Camera Ban, Censorship, CFL, civil liberties, civil rights, Communism, Dictatorship, Empire, Europe, european union, Fascism, fascsim, Founding Fathers, george carlin, health and environment, humor, nanny state, New York, Oppression, police brutality, Police State, Racism, Raid, san fransisco, smoking ban, stasi, stasi tactics, Surveillance, United Kingdom, US Constitution, war on drugs | Tags: drew carey
Comedian Drew Carey on the Nanny State
Filed under: amnesty, California, crack, drug smuggling, drug trafficking, Honduras, Illegal Immigration, Immigration, san fransisco, war on drugs
San Fransisco Protects Illegal Immigrant Crack Dealers
UPI
June 30, 2008
San Francisco juvenile probation officials are protecting Honduran youths caught dealing crack cocaine from possible deportation, federal officials say.
Citing the city’s sanctuary city status for illegal immigrants, probation officials have even given some offenders a city-paid flight home, The San Francisco Chronicle reported Sunday.
Rather than have young drug offenders deported, probation officials have recommended that Juvenile Court judges and commissioners approve city-paid flights home to Honduras for the offenders with the aim of reuniting them with their families.
Officials familiar with the case said the city is being investigated for systematically circumventing federal immigration law.
“Our job is to uphold the nation’s immigration laws,” said Greg Palmore, spokesman for U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement. “Although San Francisco is a sanctuary city, it’s a problem whenever someone attempts to evade the law. … Our law does not allow us to turn a blind eye to any individual who has come into this country illegally.”
City officials say they are trying to balance their obligations under federal and state law with local court orders and San Francisco’s policies aimed at protecting the rights of the young immigrants, who they say are often victims of exploitation.
Filed under: 1st amendment, 2008 olympics, Alex Jones, beijing, Britain, California, China, chinese military, Communism, Concentration Camps, Conditioning, Dalai Lama, David Rockefeller, Dissent, ethnic cleansing, Europe, forced abortion, foreign troops, global elite, Globalism, greece, human rights, International Bankers, internationalist, IOC, london, Martial Law, merkel, Military, NATO, Nazi, New World Order, olympics, Oppression, organ harvesting, paris, police brutality, Police State, Propaganda, Protest, san fransisco, scotland, tibet, tibet protests, torch relay, Torture, Troops, United Kingdom, US Constitution | Tags: David Davis, Jacqui Smith, Konnie Huq, PAP, people's armed police, Sebastian Coe, Serious Organised Crime and Police Act of 2005, Yolaine De La Bigne
Chinese Paramilitary Thugs Policed London Torch Relay
Outrage after British government allowed members of China’s internal security force to manhandle protesters
Paul Joseph Watson
Prison Planet
April 9, 2008
Fresh outrage has erupted over the Olympic torch procession after it emerged that the blue-clad thugs witnessed manhandling protesters and barking orders during the torch relay in London were Chinese paramilitary police hired by Beijing and the British government to quell demonstrations.
Officially know as the 29th Olympic Games Torch Relay Flame Protection Unit, this gaggle of bullies were in actual fact, “Picked from special police units of the People’s Armed Police, China’s internal security force.”
The requirements for the job: to be “tall, handsome, mighty, in exceptional physical condition similar to that of professional athletes,” the state-run China News Service said.
The government-hired heavies were also taught to bark a few words of English for the purposes of ordering around torch bearers.
This cadre of gang members honed their expertise in martial arts, marksmanship and hand-to-hand combat, and are trained to brutally suppress demonstrations and farmer’s uprisings in China which routinely result in the slaughter of scores of protesters who dare stand up to the Communist police state.
Hiring foreign paramilitary thug cops to police the streets of our cities is not only flagrantly illegal, it is a telltale sign that we too are living in an oppressive police state.
This is a damning indictment of the attitude the British Labour Party, self-proclaimed “liberals,” holds toward the notion of freedom of speech and the right to peaceably assemble in the UK.
Since the British government effectively outlawed the right to protest with the passage of the Serious Organised Crime and Police Act of 2005, demonstrators have taken it upon themselves to flout an unjust law that is anathema to any basic notion of freedom or human rights.
Knowing that any rough treatment towards the Tibetan protesters by the British police would reflect badly on the government’s tattered reputation, Labour gratefully acquiesced to Beijing’s demand to ship in some of China’s most brutal thug cops in order to do their dirty work for them.
Shadow home secretary David Davis wrote a letter to Jacqui Smith, the Home Secretary, yesterday and demanded to know who’s decision it was to unleash these animals onto British streets.
“They were seen manhandling protesters. They even accompanied the torch into Downing Street,” said Davis.
These blue-clad goons did not only physically assault demonstrators, but even metered out their bullying tactics to Olympic officials and the torch bearers themselves.
A CBC News report compiled eyewitness reports of the thugs’ behavior.
Yolaine De La Bigne, a French environmental journalist who was a torchbearer in Paris, told The Associated Press she tried to wear a headband with a Tibetan flag, but the Chinese agents ripped it away from her.
“It was seen and then, after four seconds, all the Chinese security pounced on me. There were at least five or six (of them). They started to get angry” and shouted “No! No! No!” in English, she said.
De La Bigne tried to push several agents away as they grabbed her arm. She said two French athletes who are martial arts experts tried to help her and clashed briefly with the security detail.
The chairman of the London 2012 Games, Sebastian Coe, was even more blunt.
“They tried to push me out of the way three times. They are horrible. They did not speak English. They were thugs,” Coe, a two-time Olympic gold medalist, was quoted as saying in British media. A spokeswoman for the London 2012 Olympics committee confirmed that Coe was quoted accurately, but added that he thought he was making private comments.
“They were barking orders at me, like ’Run! Stop! This! That!’ and I was like, ’Oh my gosh, who are these people?”’ former television host Konnie Huq told British Broadcasting Corp. radio about her encounter with the men in blue during London’s leg of the relay Sunday.
This is just the latest example of how one element of globalization, the exchange of policing and troop deployment between countries, is conditioning people to accept foreign troops.
Before the 2006 soccer World Cup, the British government allowed uniformed German police to be on UK soil to identify “potential troublemakers” who were planning on traveling to the tournament.
Before the event, Germany’s interior minister changed the country’s constitution to allow internal troop deployments for “security” reasons.
As part of NATO exercises in September 2003, armed Ukrainian and French soldiers were running checkpoints and harassing members of the public in Scotland.
Alex Jones has attended numerous military urban warfare training drills across the U.S. where role players were used to simulate arresting American citizens and taking them to internment camps. Foreign troops were routinely invited to join the training exercises.
Accepting the deployment of Chinese paramilitary thug cops to police a public event in Britain is completely illegal and indicates that Britons are living under a state of martial law and de-facto military occupation.
Despite empty rhetoric in the media on behalf of western governments supposedly slapping China on the hand for its human rights abuses, the real picture has now emerged.
The UK, the U.S. and China are one of a kind when it comes to using paramilitary police thugs and martial law tactics to silence dissent – and the governments of the three countries are joined at the hip in their efforts to stamp down the jackboot on the right to demonstrate against abuses of the state.
Police State Torch Run
Kurt Nimmo
Infowars
April 9, 2008
In San Francisco, the authorities were so worried about the prospect of thousands of people expressing their outrage over Tibet and China’s flagrant human rights violations they changed the Olympic torch relay route. It was a sneaky, last minute change that denied the people of San Francisco a chance to participate in the torch relay event, an event introduced by the Nazis at the 1936 Summer Olympics in Berlin.
It would seem our rulers, not unlike the Nazis, put a lot of credence in what is essentially a pagan event. The Olympic Flame commemorates the theft of fire from the Greek god Zeus by Prometheus. A fire permanently burned on the altar of Hestia in Olympia, Greece, in ancient times. During the Olympic Games, which honored Zeus, additional fires were lit at his temple and that of his wife, Hera. The modern Olympic flame is ignited at the site where the temple of Hera once stood.
But so much for the history lesson. In San Francisco this afternoon, pagan symbolism was difficult to make out, as it was buried under a phalanx of SWAT cops, regular cops mounted on bikes, motorcycles, and marching on foot, not to mention tightly surrounded by Chinese secret police in snazzy tracksuits. In fact, after watching a helicopter video feed on CNN, it appears the preponderance of SFPD cops were on hand to provide “security” — from the vagaries of the First Amendment — not only for the torch runners but the detachment of Chinese PAP, short for People’s Armed Police, as well.
Time reports:
The tracksuit-clad Sacred Torch Guard Team was drawn from China’s paramilitary People’s Armed Police, which is used for internal security. The group formed last August and trained by running six miles daily. While their chief mission is to protect the flame, they’ve also cracked down on protesters. Sebastian Coe, a two-time medalist and chairman of the London Games in 2012, called them “thugs” and said they tried to push him. A torchbearer in Paris, environmental journalist Yolaine De La Bigne, told the Associated Press that the team snatched away the Tibetan flag headband she was wearing.
It might be expected that PAP and China’s ruling clique might get away with this in China, even Europe, but here in the United States?
Of course they can get away with it. Because the United States is but a mere shadow of what it was even fifty years ago and today few know what national sovereignty is. Now the corporate media feels obliged to make comments in passing about the “heavy security” at such events but does not bother to follow this aside through — an observer not brainwashed by years of unrelenting police state propaganda supposedly inspired by the horrific events of cave dwelling terrorists, the heavy presence of black-clad cops, including a close quarter SWAT contingent, would be reminded of a police state.
It was breathtaking how easily China’s PAP goons interacted with San Francisco’s finest, the latter who spent at least a little time pushing and shoving a pathetic handful of demonstrators who managed to discover the last minute route change. But then, with every passing day, the U.S. and China become more and more alike, including the same overriding contempt for free speech and dissent.
But then they both have the same bastard father — the New World Order. David Rockefeller was deadly serious when he declared in 2001 that the relationship between China and the United States “is one of the most important bilateral relations in the world. Although US-China relations have experienced misunderstanding in recent years, he said, he is glad to see the recent encouraging improvement in this respect.”
In other words, much of the world misunderstands China’s torture of prisoners, its organ harvest program, its policy of forced abortion, its restrictions on free speech and political organizing, its absence of due process, its suppression of religion, its arbitrary detention of dissidents, and its obsessive use of the death penalty, even for nonviolent property crimes such as theft, embezzlement and forgery.
David Rockefeller, the international bankers, and transnational corporations are not concerned with any of this, of course, as their focus is upon the China Model — that is to say, China’s successful effort to turn the most populated country in the world into a sprawling industrialized slave labor gulag churning out a nearly unimaginable number of “consumer goods, ” never mind the lead paint, heavy metals and other toxins.
And that’s one reason the Olympic torch relay was hemmed in by cops and secret police — because the U.S. does not want to upset the Chinese, who often react violently at the least provocation, or opposition to their totalitarianism, at any rate.
Finally, it should be added that China practically owns the United States. It holds over $1 trillion in dollar denominated assets, of which $330 billion are U.S. Treasury notes.
It’s not really a good idea to anger somebody who holds a large number of chits — and people filling the streets complaining about China’s notorious and multifaceted abuses certainly anger the Chicom leadership.
http://www.spiegel.de/international/germany/0,1518,546078,00.html
SF Welcomes China’s Secret Police
http://www.indybay.org/newsitems/2008/04/08/18491371.php
Chinese Paramilitary Cops Police Americans
http://infowars.net/articles/april2008/090408Chinese.htm
Chinese Paramilitary Force Protecting Torch
http://www.cbc.ca/cp/world/080408/w040863A.html
Olympic torch fiasco: Lord Coe blasts ’horrible Chinese thugs’ who barged their way through London
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/pages/liv..id=557941&in_page_id=1770
Unmasked: Chinese guardians of Olympic torch
http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/world/asia/article3671368.ece
Filed under: 1st amendment, 2008 olympics, beijing, Britain, California, Censorship, China, chinese military, CNN, Communism, Conditioning, Dalai Lama, Dissent, ethnic cleansing, Europe, foreign troops, France, Globalism, human rights, internet blackout, internet police, IOC, london, merkel, Military, olympics, Oppression, paris, police brutality, Police State, Propaganda, Protest, san fransisco, smoking ban, swat, tibet, tibet protests, torch relay, Troops, United Kingdom, US Constitution | Tags: Golden Gate Bridge, Konnie Huq, Laurel Sutherlin, PAP, people's armed police, richard gere, Sir Clive Woodward, Yahoo!
CNN camera-man knocked down and kicked by police in London
http://youtube.com/watch?v=t_QqtMVGC3Y
http://youtube.com/watch?v=hRHofFA7vuQ
Protestor grabs Olympic torch as it journeys through London
Scott Anthony
The Observer
April 6, 2008
http://youtube.com/watch?v=ojXr6BTAjow
Despite being shielded by a 50-strong pack of British policeman and Chinese security guards, the Olympic torch parade has been continually interrupted along its 31-mile journey from Wembley Stadium to the O2 Arena by those protesting at China’s human rights record.
A Free Tibet protestor attempted to wrestle the Olympic flame from Blue Peter TV presenter Konnie Huq before being bundled to the ground by police in Ladbroke Grove; two others were taken away after trying to put out the torch with a fire extinguisher in Holland Park and the relay was temporarily stopped near Bloomsbury after three people went too close to Sir Clive Woodward. Throughout its journey, several other protestors also threw themselves in front of those carrying the torch. So far 10 people have been arrested, although this figure is expected to grow.
Read Full Article Here
Protesters scale Golden Gate Bridge
AP
April 8, 2008
http://youtube.com/watch?v=wzao9-BRYxI
Three people protesting China’s human rights record and the impending arrival of the Olympic torch climbed up the Golden Gate Bridge on Monday and tied the Tibetan flag and two banners to its cables.
The banners read “One World One Dream. Free Tibet” and “Free Tibet 08.”
The protesters wore helmets and harnesses as they made their way up the cables running next to the south tower of the famed span. The climb had the group suspended several 150 feet above traffic.
Reached by cell phone as he dangled from the bridge, demonstrator Laurel Sutherlin said he was worried that the torch’s planned route through Tibet would lead to more arrests and Chinese officials would use force to stifle any visible dissent.
“The leaders of China have said they’ll maintain order at all costs, and we know what that means — bloodshed and violent oppression,” he said. “If the IOC allows the torch to proceed into Tibet they’ll have blood on their hands.”
Richard Gere and Desmond Tutu Speak
Archbishop Desmond Tutu and actor Richard Gere attend a candle-light vigil in San Fransisco on tuesday asking China to “talk to the Dalai Lama”.
http://youtube.com/watch?v=-qwaYlqlqjo
Police Brutality in Paris leaves Tibetian protester with bloody mouth
An internal investigation is being sought out for claims of police ripping-away tibetian flags from demonstrators, police are seen roughing up pro-tibetians leaving one with a bloody mouth shouting “Free Tibet!”.
http://youtube.com/watch?v=pwVQuJs8EsY
Dalai Lama backs Olympics, says violence outdated
Chisa Fujioka
Reuters
April 10, 2008
http://youtube.com/watch?v=-7z_-wqAV2Q
The Dalai Lama, Tibet’s exiled spiritual leader, said on Thursday he supports the Beijing Olympics and opposed violent protests that have disrupted the Olympic torch relay around the world.
“It is really deserving for the Chinese people to host the Olympic Games,” he told reporters in Japan. “(Despite) the recent unfortunate event in Tibet, my position won’t change.”
But China’s use of violence was an outdated way to suppress unrest in Tibet, he said during a brief stopover on his way to the United States for a two-week visit he said was not political.
The Dalai Lama told reporters he had sent a message to Tibetans in San Francisco, where the torch relay was held on Wednesday.
“I sent a message to the Tibetans in San Francisco area, please don’t make any violent actions,” he said.
But he added: “Nobody has the right to say ‘shut up’.”
The torch was a magnet last week for chaotic demonstrations in London and Paris and the torch’s only stop in North America turned into a game of hide-and-seek after the San Francisco route was abruptly changed by city officials.
Read Full Article Here
Recent News:
http://www.latimes.com/news/natio..ucate8apr08,1,6576960.story
Thousands of Workers Protest in Southern China
http://en.epochtimes.com/news/8-4-10/68933.html
Chinese Cops Fire On Tibet Protesters Kill 8
http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/world/asia/article3683878.ece
China jails rights activist outspoken on Tibet
http://www.reuters.com/article/worldNews/idUSPEK11067920080403
Yahoo fund aids ’cyber dissidents’ in China
http://rawstory.com/news/afp/Yahoo.._dissidents_in_04022008.html
Olympic Torch Relay in Paris; Flame Put Out, AP Says
http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/new..bLxJNY.Lo3w&refer=home
IOC To Beijing: Don’t Censor Internet
http://news.yahoo.com/s/a..AlQ1HA7RvNKiSFs0F
Olympics ’worsening China rights’
http://www.reuters.com/news/video?videoId=79347&videoChannel=1
China Claims Tibetans Planning Suicide Attacks
http://apnews.myway.com/article/20080401/D8VP0TVO0.html
Beijing To Ban Smoking Ahead Of Olympics
http://www.breitbart.com/article..32.8zb4q4yg&show_article=1
Chinese Regime Implicated in Staging Violence in Lhasa
http://en.epochtimes.com/news/8-3-28/67906.html
Merkel says she will not attend opening of Beijing Olympics
http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2008/mar/29/germany.olympicgames2008
Olympic Torch Rerouted For U.S. Relay
Torch headed out of San Francisco after surprise route designed to thwart protesters
China Readies for Protests During Olympic Torch Relay
China cloaking soldiers as monks to incite riots
Chinese Foreign Ministry Alleges Western Media Faking, Distorting Riot Reports
China condemns ’vile’ Olympic torch protests
Filed under: 2008 Election, boston, Censorship, Federal Reserve, GOP, Hillary Clinton, HR 1955, IRS, Media, New Hampshire, republican straw poll, Ron Paul, Ron Paul Banned, Ron Paul Exclusions, san fransisco
San Fransisco GOP Cancels Straw Poll — too many Ron Paul supporters show up!
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lrKa-Mdq0Vo
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=j_GADQv3vKs
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KCwFrhwLrpY
Ron Paul Wins Presidential Election
Resist / Revolt
December 5, 2007
According to Google Trends, if the election happened today, Ron Paul would be the next U.S. President. In a competition between Hillary Clinton, Ron Paul is the most searched for presidential candidate in the 2008 election. What CNN doesn’t realize, what the neocons don’t realize, is that Google is all-powerful, even beyond them. Google Trends accurately predicted the last U.S. President, George W. Bush.Will Ron Paul’s popularity continue to rise and spread? We hope so.
First Hand Account of San Francisco GOP Straw Poll
http://www.dekorte.com/blog/blog.cgi?do=item&id=3097
San Francisco GOP Group Cancels Straw Poll After Ron Paul Supporters Pour In
http://www.lewrockwell.com/blog/lewrw/archives/017444.html
Wall Street Poll Has Ron Leading as most talked about Republican candidate
http://biz.yahoo.com/iw/071203/0335183.html
AOL Poll: Ron Paul Blimp in Every Pot
http://news.aol.com/political-mac….p-in-every-pot/
Ron Paul fires back at Newsweek ‘hit’ piece
http://www.worldnetdaily.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=59060
Loneliness of the long-distance Ron Paul
http://mparent7777-2.blogspo…-distance-ron-paul.html
Get ready Boston for the Ron Paul … blimp
http://www.boston.com/news/local…e/2007/12/get_ready_bosto.html
Money pouring in to Ron Paul campaign
http://www.ajc.com/news/content…AULMONEY_1207.html
Ron Paul Being Censored In Telephone Polls
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JPpCvF7N3Vg
Will Ron Paul Double His Record Breaking $4 Million fundraiser On December 16th?
http://infowars.net/articles/december2007/051207Double.htm
Ron Paul on the Evil Fed, the IRS, and Saving the Buck: BusinessWeek
http://www.businessweek.com/…_topStories_ssi_5
Ron Paul Remarks on Violent Radicalization & Homegrown Terrorism Prevention Act, HR 1955
http://www.house.gov/paul/congrec/congrec2007/cr120507h.htm
Paul May Make Push In NH
http://www.washingtonpost.com/…2007120502608_pf.html
Filed under: Al Gore, carbon credit, carbon credit system, carbon dioxide, carbon ration, Carbon Tax, Co2, environmental taxation, EPA, european union, Federal Reserve, George Bush, global elite, global tax, Global Warming, Globalism, Joe Lieberman, John McCain, Military Industrial Complex, New World Order, ration, s. 2191, san fransisco, Senate, UN
S 2191: The Carbon Credit Enslavement System
Lee Rogers
Rogue Government
November 21, 2007
The push towards a global carbon credit mechanism continues to be one of the top agendas of the world elite. Despite the fact that numerous scientific studies have concluded that the entire solar system is getting warmer as part of a natural cycle, non-stop propaganda from the major corporate news networks continue to blame man made carbon emissions for planetary warming. In addition, the establishment media pushes unfounded claims that global warming will result in a myriad of environmental disasters. Despite the fact that man made global warming is a complete fraud, the world elite are selling fear as a way for them to bring in a world carbon credit enslavement system. This carbon credit system will be used as a funding mechanism to consolidate wealth into the hands of the big global corporations and to potentially fund regional and global governmental institutions.
In 2005, the European Union began the foundational steps to setup a credit system based off of carbon emissions through the European Union Emission Trading Scheme. Now, they are seeking to expand that system to include airliners. Peter Liese a German member of the European Parliament even stated that they want this carbon credit scheme to be global in scale. Below is a blurb from the International Herald Tribune, in which he advocates the need for this carbon credit enslavement system.
A bold attempt by the European Union to impose caps on aircraft emissions received a boost on Tuesday as legislators voted to raise the costs on airlines and to include international flights sooner than expected.
The measures, approved by the European Parliament, are fiercely opposed by the United States and the airline industry, which could cost companies billions of dollars and lead to sharp price rises for passengers. On the opposing side, some environmental groups criticized the proposed measure, which still must be approved by individual EU states, as far too timid.
But members of the European Parliament said that regulating aircraft pollution would set a important precedent and could be emulated by other countries.
“We want a worldwide system as soon as possible,” said Peter Liese, a German member of parliament who helped to guide the legislation through parliament, which met in Strasbourg, France. “There must be an end to the status quo that nothing is done in the aviation sector and which has predominated for many years now,” Liese said.
As the European Union pushes the carbon credit scam forward in Europe, the United States Senate is now pushing Senate Bill 2191 which is called America’s Climate Security Act of 2007. The bill originally proposed by Joe Lieberman and co-sponsored by establishment hacks on both sides of the phony right-left political paradigm if passed into law will establish a draconian carbon credit system here in the United States that will give the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) extraordinary enforcement powers over this system. Below is a full analysis of this bill which promises nothing short of total enslavement.
Facilities that emit or import fuel that could potentially emit more than 10,000 metric tons of carbon dioxide per year would be affected by this bill. This is described in section 4 of the bill and labels these facilities as a “covered facility” and they would be forced to abide by the rules and regulations established by this bill. Considering that the average automobile emits approximately six tons of carbon dioxide on a yearly basis, 10,000 metric tons is really not a whole lot of carbon dioxide. The relevant subsections of section 4 are listed below.
(5) CARBON DIOXIDE EQUIVALENT- The term `carbon dioxide equivalent’ means, for each greenhouse gas, the quantity of the greenhouse gas that the Administrator determines makes the same contribution to global warming as 1 metric ton of carbon dioxide.
(7) COVERED FACILITY- The term `covered facility’ means–
(A) any facility within the electric power sector that contains fossil fuel-fired electricity generating units that together emit more than 10,000 carbon dioxide equivalents of greenhouse gas in any year;
(B) any facility within the industrial sector that emits more than 10,000 carbon dioxide equivalents of greenhouse gas in any year;
(C) any facility that in any year produces, or any entity that in any year imports, petroleum- or coal-based transportation fuel, the use of which will emit more than 10,000 carbon dioxide equivalents of greenhouse gas, assuming no capture and permanent sequestration of that gas; or
(D) any facility that in any year produces, or any entity that in any year imports, nonfuel chemicals that will emit more than 10,000 carbon dioxide equivalents of greenhouse gas, assuming no capture and destruction or permanent sequestration of that gas.
Based off of the definition of a “covered facility”, the bill defines what an “affected facility” is defined as. It defines any “covered facility” as also being an “affected facility” but the broad language goes well beyond that. In the definition it essentially states that the Administrator of the EPA can actually designate whatever facility they want to designate as to be an affected facility if it emits a greenhouse gas. If you have farm animals, operate a fireplace or any number of things, the EPA at their discretion could declare that you are an “affected facility” and you will be forced to abide by the regulations set forth in the bill. It also states that “in general”, this is what is defined as an “affected facility”, so the bill allows the EPA to bend the rules and use an outrageous amount of discretion. So if you get on the bad side of the people at the EPA, they will have the power to designate your place of business or home as an “affected facility” even if you do not emit or import fuel that could potentially emit over 10,000 tons of carbon dioxide.
SEC. 1102. DEFINITIONS.
In this subtitle:
(1) AFFECTED FACILITY-
(A) IN GENERAL- The term `affected facility’ means–
(i) a covered facility;
(ii) another facility that emits a greenhouse gas, as determined by the Administrator; and
(iii) at the option of the Administrator, a vehicle fleet with emissions of more than 10,000 carbon dioxide equivalents per year, assuming no double-counting of emissions.
Any facility considered to be an “affected facility” would be forced to report annually and quarterly an obscene amount of data to the Administrator of the Environmental Protection Agency. The bill establishes a federal greenhouse gas registry where this information would be collected. Section 1103 describes the reporting requirements of “affected facilities” which would force these facilities to report the quantity and type of fossil fuels utilized, the amount of electricity generated or consumed, the amount of greenhouse gases emitted and more. These facilities would undoubtedly be forced to operate under the carbon credit enslavement system. The full list is shown below.
SEC. 1103. REPORTING REQUIREMENTS.
(a) In General- Subject to this section, each affected facility shall submit to the Administrator, for inclusion in the Registry, periodic reports, including annual and quarterly data, that–
(1) include the quantity and type of fossil fuels, including feedstock fossil fuels, that are extracted, produced, refined, imported, exported, or consumed at or by the facility;
(2) include the quantity of hydrofluorocarbons, perfluorocarbons, sulfur hexafluoride, nitrous oxide, carbon dioxide that has been captured and sequestered, and other greenhouse gases generated, produced, imported, exported, or consumed at or by the facility;
(3) include the quantity of electricity generated, imported, exported, or consumed by or at the facility, and information on the quantity of greenhouse gases emitted when the imported, exported, or consumed electricity was generated, as determined by the Administrator;
(4) include the aggregate quantity of all greenhouse gas emissions from sources at the facility, including stationary combustion source emissions, process emissions, and fugitive emissions;
(5) include greenhouse gas emissions expressed in metric tons of each greenhouse gas emitted and in the quantity of carbon dioxide equivalents of each greenhouse gas emitted;
(6) include a list and description of sources of greenhouse gas emissions at the facility;
(7) quantify greenhouse gas emissions in accordance with the measurement standards established under section 1104;
(8) include other data necessary for accurate and complete accounting of greenhouse gas emissions, as determined by the Administrator;
(9) include an appropriate certification regarding the accuracy and completeness of reported data, as determined by the Administrator; and
(10) are submitted electronically to the Administrator, in such form and to such extent as may be required by the Administrator.
Failure to abide by these reporting requirements will result in draconian fines. Section 1106 declares that the Administrator of the Environmental Protection Agency could bring civil action against owners or operators of facilities that do not abide by the regulations outlined in this bill. It also outlines a fine of $25,000 each day of non-compliance.
SEC. 1106. ENFORCEMENT.
(a) Civil Actions- The Administrator may bring a civil action in United States district court against the owner or operator of an affected facility that fails to comply with any requirement of this subtitle.
(b) Penalty- Any person that has violated or is violating this subtitle shall be subject to a civil penalty of not more than $25,000 per day of each violation.
In Section 1201 the bill gives the Administrator of the EPA authority to enforce a total amount of carbon dioxide emissions allowed in the country. Each year, the EPA will enforce rules in which fewer total carbon dioxide emissions will be allowed. It even states that carbon emissions will not be considered a property right.
SEC. 1201. EMISSION ALLOWANCE ACCOUNT.
(a) In General- The Administrator shall establish a separate quantity of emission allowances for each of calendar years 2012 through 2050.
(b) Identification Numbers- The Administrator shall assign to each emission allowance established under subsection (a) a unique identification number that includes the calendar year for which that emission allowance was established.
(c) Legal Status of Emission Allowances-
(1) IN GENERAL- An emission allowance shall not be a property right.
(2) TERMINATION OR LIMITATION- Nothing in this Act or any other provision of law limits the authority of the United States to terminate or limit an emission allowance.
(3) OTHER PROVISIONS UNAFFECTED- Nothing in this Act relating to emission allowances shall affect the application of, or compliance with, any other provision of law to or by a covered facility.
Even more ridiculous is that facilities that emit more carbon than they are allowed will be subject to more outrageous fines under the authority of the EPA.
The bill states in section 2501 that “affected facilities” would be able to use international allowances or credits to satisfy up to 15% of their carbon emission allowance. This indicates without a doubt that the grand plan is to have an international carbon credit system in place. Why would they include this section in the bill, if there wasn’t discussion of plans for an international system? Section 2501 is listed below.
SEC. 2501. USE OF INTERNATIONAL ALLOWANCES OR CREDITS.
The owner or operator of a covered facility may satisfy up to 15 percent of the allowance submission requirement of the covered facility under section 1202(a) by submitting allowances or credits obtained on a foreign greenhouse gas emissions trading market, on the condition that the Administrator has certified the market in accordance with the regulations promulgated pursuant to section 2502(a).
The bill would also establish a nonprofit private corporation called the “Climate Change Credit Corporation” that would essentially collect money based off of carbon credit auctions. This is outlined in Section 4201 of the bill which is shown below.
SEC. 4201. ESTABLISHMENT.
(a) In General- There is established, as a nonprofit corporation without stock, a corporation to be known as the `Climate Change Credit Corporation’.
(b) Treatment- The Corporation shall not be considered to be an agency or establishment of the Federal Government.
This private corporation in the bill would be run by a board of directors composed of 5 people all appointed by the President and confirmed by the Senate. Essentially, the President and the Senate would have a staged theatrical confirmation hearing much like they do when a new Chairman of the Federal Reserve is selected. It is specifically stated that this institution will not be an agency or establishment of the U.S. government, so therefore it would not be directly accountable to the people. Since that’s the case, why even have a staged confirmation hearing if the corporation is going to exist outside of the scope of the U.S. government?
The bill does state that the intention of the corporation is to use the money they collect to be used towards alternative fuels, but since it operates outside of the scope of the federal government, there is no way to determine how this private corporation would be held accountable for their actions. It would essentially give them a blank check to funnel money back into the military industrial complex under the guise of researching non-carbon emitting alternative fuels. Even the language in section 4401, states that “in general”, the corporation will use the amounts collected via their carbon credit auctions but it doesn’t force them to do this.
SEC. 4401. IN GENERAL.
For each calendar year, the Corporation shall use the amounts described in section 4301(c) and 4302(b) to carry out the programs established under this subtitle, as follows:
(1) Not more than 45 percent of the funds shall be used to carry out the zero- or low-carbon energy technologies program under section 4402.
(2) Not more than 35 percent of the funds shall be used as follows:
(A) Not more than 28 percent shall be used to carry out the advanced coal and sequestration technologies program under section 4403.
(B) Not more than 7 percent shall be used to carry out the cellulosic biomass ethanol technology deployment programs under section 4404.
(3) Not more than 20 percent shall be used to carry out the advanced technology vehicles manufacturing incentive program under section 4405.
The market of carbon credits will be overseen by a new institution called the “Carbon Market Efficiency Board”. This board will essentially serve as a price fixer for the carbon credit market. Section 2601 through Section 2605 describes the duties of the board. The bill gives the board the ability to set interest rates on the borrowing of carbon credits and to determine if at certain periods of time, more carbon credits are needed to ensure the economy functions properly. It will essentially be a Federal Reserve System for carbon credits, and they will be given the power to manipulate the carbon credit market as they see fit.
Boiling the bill down to brass tax, it gives the EPA draconian powers to determine who and who doesn’t need to abide by the regulations in this bill. The language is so broad that the EPA can literally decide that any business or facility must abide by these rules and regulations at their discretion even if they fall outside the scope of a “covered facility”. The EPA could even decide that homes with fireplaces could be considered an “affected facility” by the bill considering the amount of discretion they are given in determining what is considered to be an “affected facility”. Whomever the EPA decides is affected by this bill must report all sorts of ridiculous information detailing their carbon footprint to the EPA on a quarterly basis. It gives the EPA extraordinary powers to enforce a carbon credit system and gives them the mandate to levy draconian fines on those in non-compliance with this legislation. There is no exemption for humans or animals which naturally emit carbon dioxide so the EPA at some point could even include employees and farm animals as contributing to a facilities carbon footprint. The broad language in the bill gives a blank check to the EPA to be the nation’s carbon police where people would need permission from the government by way of carbon credits to conduct normal everyday activities including breathing.
The bill also sets up the carbon credit system so that fewer and fewer carbon credits are issued on a yearly basis. This will not be a problem for the big multinational corporations, but it will be a huge problem for smaller and medium sized businesses trying to grow. The “Climate Change Credit Corporation” which the bill establishes would collect large amounts of money by auctioning off increasingly more valuable carbon credits. The bill authorizes this corporation to auction off an increasing amount of carbon credits over time. Considering that the bill mandates that fewer and fewer carbon credits will be made available over time, these carbon credits will become increasingly more valuable and more money will be funneled into this tax exempt corporation.
The “Carbon Market Efficiency Board” that the bill establishes would serve to be price fixers for the market of carbon credits. Much like how the Federal Reserve manipulates the value of Federal Reserve Notes, the Carbon Market Efficiency Board will manipulate the value of carbon credits.
This is a horrible piece of legislation and essentially gives the EPA the ability to enforce a credit system on life itself. This is nothing more than an enslavement system which will consolidate more wealth into the hands of the military industrial complex and ensure that smaller and medium sized businesses can’t grow and compete with them. This bill represents nothing more than out of control corporate fascism giving broad police powers to the EPA, establishing a board with the power to manipulate the value of carbon credits and establishing a nonprofit corporation with no definitive government accountability that will have a great deal of wealth funneled into it by auctioning off what in the future will be increasingly more valuable carbon credits. Joe Lieberman and the associated gaggle of the bill’s co-sponsors are traitors and care not about the American people or their welfare by introducing this legislation.
It is clear that this global carbon credit system is at the very forefront of the elite’s agenda to completely enslave the middle class and poor in developed nations. This bill needs to be defeated, and the traitors that are supporting this should be removed from office immediately.
Related News:
The truth about global warming – it’s the Sun that’s to blame
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/new…/18/wsun18.xml&s
U.S. Reduced CO2 Emissions in 2006
http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=….w_article=1
Bush and Gore reunited at the White House
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WwYHMRh2Ngk
World Must Fix Climate In Less Than 10 Years: UN
http://www.commondreams.org/archive/2007/11/26/5457/
Self Sterilization To Fight Climate Change
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/pages/….ge_id=1879
McCain Takes On Global Warming
http://www.boston.com/news/polit…/mccain_takes_on.html
Mankind Supposedly Shortening Universe’s Life
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/earth/mai…tviewedbox
San Francisco Mulls Banning Fireplaces
http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/articl…S.DTL
Carbon Tax Bill Could Hit Senate Floor
http://www.ocregister.com/news/bill-is…oxer-global
Weather Channel Founder: Global Warming ‘Greatest Scam in History’
Who Is Hoaxing The Global Warming Skeptics?
Gore: No Equal Time For Non Believers
Myth of ‘thousands’ of UNIPCC climate scientists
Climate change is like ‘World War Three’
Bloomberg Calls for Tax on Carbon Emissions
Al Gore’s ‘nine Inconvenient Untruths’
The deceit behind global warming
Think Tank: Climate Affects Security
Keeping People Poor And Stupid For the Environment
Global Warming Hoax News Archive
Filed under: Alex Jones, Amero, avian flu, Big Brother, bird flu, Canada, Drivers License, european union, Fox News, Globalism, Illegal Immigration, Michael Medved, NAFTA, neocons, North American Union, Pandemic Influenza, Protest, Robert Pastor, Ron Paul, san fransisco, SPP, Vicente Fox
Denying the North American Union
Kurt Nimmo
TruthNews
November 26, 2007
Now that Alex Jones, Jerome Corsi, and others have exposed the plot to establish a “North American community,” that is to say eradicate the national sovereignty of the United States, Canada, and Mexico in favor of a “United Nations of America” based on the European Union, the corporate media and globalist apologists have kicked into over-drive with a propaganda effort to deny reality.
“Nobody is proposing a North American Union,” declared Robert Pastor, correctly identified as the father of the NAU and author of “Towards a North American Community: Lessons from the Old World for the New,” a book published by the Council on Foreign Relations Press in association with the Canadian Council of Chief Executives and the Consejo Mexicano de Asuntos Internacionales. Pastor may insist the elite of the three countries, at the behest of transnational corporations, are not interested in a merged superstate, but his argument betrays the fact the former national security advisor dreams of an American version of the European Union.
Pastor is an advocate of NAFTA on steroids, or “NAFTA Plus.” According to Miguel Pickard, in “the early 1990s, when NAFTA negotiators were still wrangling over arcane language, Pastor was proposing ways to ‘improve’ the treaty. According to Pastor, NAFTA was off to a bad start, since negotiators were mostly seeking to dismantle trade tariffs. For Pastor it was crucial to find ways of integrating the three countries, similarly (but with important differences) to what the Europeans had done since the 50s. Years later, Pastor would bemoan that NAFTA’s promise had gone unfulfilled, since it lacked a ‘grand vision’ for the three countries, i.e., a much richer perspective than the emphasis put on trade.” In other words, NAFTA was simply a trade treaty minus the “grand vision” of global integration.
But there is a problem with Pastor’s “grand vision,” namely the people of the United States, Canada, and Mexico are reluctant to give up their national sovereignty.
Pastor, in a conversation with Jerome R. Corsi, “was careful to distinguish that his proposals were designed to create a North American Community and that he never has proposed to create a North American Union as an EU-style regional government,” thus Pastor’s insistence “nobody is “proposing a North American Union.”
But this is, to say the least, deceptive. “The idea seems to be to put new structures in place that change the look of the landscape,” writes Corsi. “[WorldNetDaily] pointed out to Pastor that this step-by-step approach is the same approach taken to create the European Union. The memoirs of Jean Monnet, regarded as the architect of European unity, finally disclosed he had used a strategy of deceit, knowing his plan to form a European Union would never succeed if it were openly disclosed.”
“Pastor in an article entitled ‘NAFTA is Not Enough,’ argued for an incremental process that could head toward the creation of the NAU, all the while providing cover for participating politicians and governments to deny that creating the NAU was their goal,” Corsi argues in a News with Views editorial. In the article, Pastor provides key details on how this stealth process works:
While the three governments of North America are unlikely to step into the debate on long-term goals at the current time, nongovernmental organizations, research institutes, and universities should fill the void with new ideas and old-fashioned cross-border dialogue.
Short of this sort of shadowy incrementalism, the NAU project may be dropped on the fast track by other means, according to Corsi. “Dr. Pastor seems to prescribe that a fear formula is all that is needed for the American people need to begin begging SPP to produce the NAU right now. Pastor openly writes as if the next 9/11 terrorist attack or a future outbreak of some health epidemic such as the avian flu could be just what the NAU doctor ordered as the prescription for the American people to abandon sovereignty in favor of super-regional government control, all in the interest of ‘security’ leading to ‘prosperity.’ Or, is it ‘prosperity’ which necessitates more ‘security’ via surrender to Big Brother government?”
In predictable fashion, the corporate media is tasked with characterizing those who document the emerging NAU as tinfoil hatters, nut cases, mental patients, conspiracy theorists, etc.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TT4tBvRDy38
For instance, neocon Charles Krauthammer told Fox News: “I love this stuff because if you ever doubt your own sanity, all you have to do is read this stuff and realize that you’re okay” (see video), while “conservative” Michael Medved lamented what he calls the “paranoid and groundless frenzy… fomented and promoted by a shameless collection of lunatics and losers; crooks, cranks, demagogues and opportunists, who claim the existence of a top secret master plan to join the U.S., Canada and Mexico in one big super-state,” never mind the above, well-documented. “I’m sorry to sound cynical and intolerant about this stupidity, but I’m furious, actually – ashamed to be part of a proud medium (conservative talk radio) that increasingly encourages this paralyzing, puerile paranoia,” apparently a reference to Alex Jones and others who continue to flesh out the “incremental” conspiracy Medved refuses to acknowledge.
Drake Bennett writes for the Boston Globe:
Government officials say a continental union is out of the question, and economists and political analysts overwhelmingly agree that there will not be a North American Union in our lifetimes. But belief in the NAU — that the plans are very real, and that the nation is poised to lose its independence — has been spreading from its origins in the conservative fringe, coloring political press conferences and candidate question-and-answer sessions, and reaching a kind of critical mass on the campaign trail. Republican presidential candidate and Texas congressman Ron Paul has made the North American Union one of his central issues.
Government officials of the sort, no doubt, that told us Saddam Hussein was about use weapons of mass destruction against the United States or that the air at Ground Zero in New York was safe to breathe.
Finally, it is no mistake the Boston Globe has rolled Ron Paul into its diatribe of transparent denial, as Paul must be roundly discredited and characterized as a kook, primarily because a Paul presidency would most certainly put an end to Robert Pastor’s dream of an American version of the European Union once and for all.
Media Hoax Attempts To Hide Advance Of North American Union
http://prisonplanet.com/articles/novem…ia_hoax.htm
Nothing To See Here, Move Along
http://www.lewrockwell.com/blog/lewrw/archives/017156.html
Vicente Fox Admits North American Union Parliament
http://www.opednews.com/ar….8_internet_under_attac.htm
North American Union A Couple Years Away
http://www.worldnetdaily.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=58778
North American Union Protest Leader Shot At
http://infowars.net/articles/november2007/201107Protest.htm
Protesters object to North American alliance
http://www.yakima-herald.com/page/dis/307135005837308
San Francisco to give illegal aliens ID cards
http://www.reuters.com/article/domesticNews/idUSN2017064020071121
What is the ‘North American Union’?