Filed under: ban, California, climate change, Communism, Dictatorship, Empire, energy, environmentalism, environmentalist, environmentalists, Fascism, Global Warming, Hoax, nanny state, Oppression, sacramento, tv ban | Tags: TV
California considers ban on big-screen TV’s
Energy-consumption standards for televisions to be phased in over two years beginning in January 2011. A vote could come as early as Nov. 4
Examiner
October 14, 2009
In a recent report from the Los Angeles Times, it appears that California is about to take yet another choice away from its residents. Big Screen T.V.’s are apparently such a power drainer, that the legislators in California are working on legislation that would make them illegal to operate. What is the estimated annual cost of operating a big screen t.v. in your house? About $30 according to the Los Angeles Times.
Meanwhile, industry lobbyists are fighting to get this legislation revoked from the state government, saying that the free market is actually eliminating the t.v.’s in question and replacing them with more energy efficient LCD and Plasma models. Their cries are apparently falling on deaf ears though, as the legislators in California are still pushing this needless bill through.
While the proposed bill would unlikely create much additional cost to the manufacturers, who are already, primarily creating only the LCD and Plasma t.v.’s, there are two costs to consumers. The first cost is simply the cost of having to replace the older t.v. While a lot of people are already doing this, not everyone can afford to. The second cost is to the freedom for the people of California to choose what kind of television they want to own. This is just another loss of another freedom.
I suspect, that with laws like this being even considered, that there must not be enough crime to write laws about in California. It seems that California legislators are focusing more attention on buzz word laws such as gay marriage, and green energy. Bare in mind, it was also California legislators that put a stop to the electric car. I guess they are just making up for lost time.
Filed under: Airport Security, autism, autoimmune disease, big pharma, Bio Weapons, biological warfare, California, deadly vaccinations, deadly vaccines, Eugenics, forced vaccinations, Genocide, h1n1, h1n1 clinic, h1n1 vaccine, h5n1, health and environment, Human Experiments, human rights, immune system, influenza, innoculation, mandatory quarantine, mandatory vaccinations, medical Experiments, medical industrial complex, Mercury, Oppression, Pandemic Influenza, pandemic virus, Population Control, sacramento, swine flu, swine flu pandemic, swine flu vaccine, tetanus shot, Thimerosal, vaccinations, Vaccine
Sacramento International Airport Offers Flu Vaccinations
News 10 ABC
October 2, 2009
Editor: How long before getting the flu shot before you travel is mandatory? No shot, no fly.
SACRAMENTO, CA – Starting Friday morning, flu shots are available at Sacramento International Airport. An airport spokesperson says it’s a service aimed at the the busy traveler and it’s another way for the airport to try to stay flu-free.
The airport will provide flu, pneumonia, and tetanus shots in Terminal A. The vaccinations will be available in Terminal B on Wednesday, October 7. The flu and pneumonia shots cost $30 and the tetanus shots cost $35.
Passengers can get a shot either before they board a flight or after they land. Some travelers think it’s a good idea.
“There’s no reason that I wouldn’t do it,” said traveler Steve Chalkins. “I think it’s a good service for people.”
“I think it’s a wonderful idea because you have people coming in from all over the country with different germs and it would protect some of us,” said traveler Maxine Fields.
Read Full Article Here
Filed under: adjuvant, Airport Security, autism, autoimmune disease, big pharma, Bio Weapons, biological warfare, brain damage, California, cancer, CDC, deadly vaccinations, deadly vaccines, doctors, Eugenics, federal crimes, flu shot, flu vaccine, forced vaccinations, Genocide, GlaxoSmithKline, GSK, Guillain-Barré syndrome, Gulf War Syndrome, h1n1, h1n1 clinic, h1n1 vaccine, h5n1, health and environment, hospitals, Human Experiments, human rights, immune system, immunity, influenza, innoculation, mandatory vaccinations, medical Experiments, medical industrial complex, Mercury, mf59, Novartis, parental rights, patients, poll, polysortbate 80, Population Control, sacramento, squalene, squaline, super weapons, swine flu, swine flu pandemic, swine flu vaccine, Thimerosal, toxicity, vaccinations, Vaccine
Harvard Survey: Only 1/3 Of Americans Believe Swine Flu Vaccines Are Safe
Steve Watson
Infowars.net
October 2, 2009
A survey conducted by Harvard University has found that only one third of adults trust the safety of the imminently available H1N1 vaccine.
Just 40% of respondents said they would take the swine flu shot in the poll carried out by Harvard Opinion Research Program at Harvard School of Public Health.
The study, funded under a cooperative agreement with the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, also found that respondents were worried about side effects or not concerned about catching the flu at all.
44% of respondents who were parents said they were unsure over getting their children vaccinated against H1N1, with 21% of those parents saying they absolutely will not allow their kids to be vaccinated.
Parents said that they were concerned about their children getting other illnesses from the vaccine and that they do not trust public health officials to tell them about vaccine safety.
The results show a great public distrust in the vaccine with just one third (33%) of the public viewing the H1N1 vaccine as very safe “generally for most people to take”. Even less (18%) believe it is safe for children aged 6 months to 2 years, and only 13% feel it is safe for pregnant women.
Almost one third (31%) of respondents think that public health officials’ concerns over H1N1 flu have been overblown.
Of the 40% of adults who said they would not take the shot, the majority said they may reconsider if people begin dying from the virus en mass.
The survey was conducted with a broad representative national sample of 1042 adults aged 18 and over.
The survey dovetails with a similar poll from Consumer Reports, one of the top-ten-circulation magazines in the country, that found almost two thirds of Americans would either refuse the vaccine outright or wait for more information before considering vaccinating their children.
As we have previously reported, both the GlaxoSmithKilne and the Novartis H1N1 vaccines contain both the novel adjuvant squalene, which has been linked to Gulf War Syndrome, and thimerosal, the mercury based preservative that some scientists have testified can cause brain disorders.
The vaccines have been rushed through safety procedures while the government has provided pharmaceutical companies with blanket immunity from lawsuits arriving out of the vaccine causing deaths and injuries.
In related news, more hospitals are demanding that workers be mandated to take the H1N1 shot, while Sacramento International Airport is to offer vaccinations in its terminals in a precedent setting move that critics have described as concerning.
noworldsystem.com 