Filed under: Ahmadinejad, AIPAC, airstrikes, blockade, China, CIA, Coup, Economy, False Flag, George Bush, gulf, Gulf of Tonkin, h.con.res.362, Hegelian Dialectic, Holocaust, inside job, Iran, Iran war resolution, Iraq, Israel, jewish, michael mullen, middle east, Mike Mullen, Military, military strike, mofaz, muslim, nation building, neocons, Nuke, occupation, Preemptive Strike, preemptive war, Problem Reaction Solution, Ray McGovern, Russia, Sanctions, shaul mofaz, Shock and Awe, staged provocation, State Sponsored Terrorism, Tehran, tel aviv, Troops, Uncategorized, US Economy, USS Liberty, War On Terror, White House, WW3, ww4, Zionism | Tags: Phillip Giraldi, soldiers, u.s. soldiers
Mullen Warns Israel: Don’t Even Think About Another USS Liberty
Mark Glenn
American Free Press
August 4, 2008
Recently appointed Chairman of the Joint Chiefs Adm. Mike Mullen flew to Tel Aviv to warn Israel’s military establishment how “important” it was that “history not repeat itself ”—referring to Israel’s deliberate attack on the USS Liberty in June, 1967. The Establishment media blacked out the event (in which 34 American men were killed) for decades—and still does.
Given the fact that this brazen two-hour attack upon the United States has been hushed up for 41 years, the reason for Mullen’s meeting is obvious—someone within the intelligence or military apparatus of the United States has concluded that Israel is planning a “USS Liberty Part II,” meaning an attack on a U.S. ship, most likely in the Persian Gulf, leading to a massive loss of life to be blamed on Iran.
As was intended in 1967, when Israel attacked the Liberty, angry Americans would demand the “obliteration” of the guilty party, the false identity of which the Jewish media establishment in America would provide. And while all players involved have been tight-lipped about the particulars of this meeting, Mullen’s impromptu trip to Israel and subsequent discussion was in effect a stern warning to Israel to “Not even think about it.”
Some in Washington are beginning to realize that they’ve just put their foot into something nasty with regards to Israel’s dirty wars in the Middle East that will never be finished as long as it exists. With oil and virtually all consumer products skyrocketing in price simultaneous to the U.S. economy going down the drain, some now understand that by signing on as Israel’s pit bull in the Muslim world that America will wind up paying the ultimate price for her devotion to the Jewish state, meaning the complete destruction of her economy and her position as a world power.
America’s top general officer seems to be wary of widening the present debacle to include war with Iran that may bring into the fray nuclear-armed nations such as Russia and China. He has now joined with saner voices both inside and outside the Bush administration who are trying to prevent an otherwise apocalyptic end to America.
In discussing an attack on Iran, Mullen recently stated that opening a third front would be “extremely stressful” on the U.S. military and added that it would lead to consequences “difficult to predict,” adding that “There is need for better clarity, even dialogue.”
Is this making Israel jittery to the point she would contemplate pulling off another USS Liberty?
“Respectable” people have begun to openly voice such thoughts as well. In a recent provocative article entitled “If Iran is Attacking, It Might Really Be Israel,” ex-CIA officer Phillip Giraldi wrote:
Some intel types are beginning to express concerns that the Israelis might do something completely crazy to get the U.S. involved. There are a number of possible “false flag” scenarios in which the Israelis could stage an incident that they will make to look Iranian, either by employing Iranian weapons or by leaving a communications footprint that points to Teheran’s involvement. Those who argue Israel would never do such a thing should think again. Israel is willing to behave with complete ruthlessness towards the U.S. if they feel that the stakes are high enough. Witness the attack on the USS Liberty and the bombing of the U.S. Consulate in Alexandria in the 1950s. If they now believe that Iran is a threat that must be eliminated it is not implausible to assume they will stop at nothing to get the United States to do it for them, particularly as their air force is only able to damage the Iranian nuclear program, not destroy it. . . .
Joined alongside Giraldi is former long-time CIA analyst Ray McGovern who in a recent essay entitled “Israel Planning a September/October Surprise?” writes the following with regards to the U.S. pulling out of the Middle East and what Israel might do as a result:
My guess is the Israeli leaders are apoplectic. . . . This dramatic change—or even just the specter of it—greatly increases Israel’s incentive to ensure U.S. involvement in the area that would endure for several years. The Israelis need to create “facts on the ground”—something to guarantee Washington will stand by “our ally.” The legislation drafted by AIPAC calls for a blockade of Iran. That would be one way to entangle; there are many others. The point is that the growing danger the Israelis perceive will probably prompt them to find a way to get the U.S. involved in hostilities with Iran. All Israel has to do is to arrange to be attacked. Not a problem. There are endless possibilities among which Israel can choose to catalyze such a confrontation. Viewed from Tel Aviv it appears an increasingly threatening situation, with more urgent need to “embed” (so to speak) the United States even more deeply in the region—in a confrontation involving both countries with Iran. A perfect storm is brewing. . . . In sum, Israel is likely to be preparing a September/October surprise designed to keep the U.S. bogged down in Iraq and in the wider region by provoking hostilities with Iran. And don’t be surprised if it starts as early as August. . . .
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/..ens-to-shut-Gulf-shipping-lanes.html
Israel Ready To Attack Iran Without U.S. Permission
http://english.pravda.ru/world/asia/01-08-2008/105968-israel-0
http://www.presstv.ir/detail.aspx?id=65490§ionid=3510203
Mofaz on Iran: We won’t allow a second Holocaust to occur
http://www.haaretz.com/hasen/spages/1007710.html
Iran to face sanctions if it does not cooperate : French diplomat
http://www.spacewar.com/2006/080804172147.64wyi9eg.html
Iran tests ’new weapon’ for use at sea
http://www.boston.com/news/wo.._at_sea_tested/?s_campaign=8315
US backs down from Iran deadline
http://www.presstv.ir/detail.aspx?id=65325§ionid=351020104
Bush must be stopped before starting war with Iran
http://www.tennessean.com/apps/p..PINION03/807280349/1008/OPINION01
Filed under: 9/11, 9/11 commission, 9/11 commission report, 9/11 Families, 9/11 Firefighters, 9/11 Truth, 9/11 workers, al-qaeda, catastrophic event, CIA, Condoleezza Rice, Dick Cheney, Donald Rumsfeld, EPA, False Flag, first responders, Ground Zero, health and environment, inside job, Iraq, jeb bush, Joe Lieberman, John McCain, nation building, New York, NYPD, occupation, ohio, paul wolfowitz, pearl harbor, PNAC, Ray McGovern, smear campaign, Truth Action, We Are Change, World Trade Center
Christie Todd Whitman Confronted on 9/11 Air Quality
On September 11, 2001 former NJ governor Christie Todd Whitman was the Environmental Protection Agency Director. The agency issued false statements and declared the air safe to breathe. Here is the former EPA Director’s response to critical questions nearly seven years later.
John McCain questioned about PNAC, 9/11
http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2008/jul/14/september11.usa
Christie Todd Whitman should be tried for manslaughter!
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=axdzkvW90Rs
Filed under: 2008 Election, Afghanistan, Ahmadinejad, AIPAC, airstrikes, Bill Kristol, CIA, Coup, Dictatorship, Economy, False Flag, Fox News, global elite, H. Con. Res 362, Iran, Iran war resolution, Iraq, Israel, John Bolton, military strike, MKO, nation building, neocons, Nuke, occupation, Oil, PNAC, Preemptive Strike, preemptive war, Propaganda, Ray McGovern, Revolutionary Guards, Saber Rattling, Sanctions, Shiite, Shock and Awe, State Sponsored Terrorism, Tehran, Troops, Turkey, UN, US Economy, War On Terror, WW3, ww4 | Tags: norman finkelstein
Tell your representatives to oppose Iran War Resolution H.Con.Res.362
http://capwiz.com/justforeignpolicy/issues/alert/?alertid=11518951
http://stopaipac.org/iranresolution.htm
Bolton: Israel Will Attack Iran After U.S. Election But Before Inauguration, Arab States Will Be ‘Delighted’
Bolton predicts “likely period” for Israel strike on Iran is between November 4, 2008 and January 20, 2009
Think Progress
June 22, 2008
This morning on Fox News, former U.N. Ambassador John Bolton continued his drumbeat for war against Iran. Adopting Bill Kristol’s argument, Bolton suggested that an attack on Iran depends on who Americans elect as the next President:
I think if they [Israel] are to do anything, the most likely period is after our elections and before the inauguration of the next President. I don’t think they will do anything before our election because they don’t want to affect it. And they’d have to make a judgment whether to go during the remainder of President Bush’s term in office or wait for his successor.
Bolton gamed out the fallout from an attack on Iran. He claimed that Iran’s options to retaliate after being attacked are actually “less broad than people think.” He suggested that Iran would not want to escalate a conflict because 1) it still needs to export oil, 2) it would worry about “an even greater response” from Israel, 3) and it would worry about the U.S.’s response.
Bolton then concluded that Arab states would be excited if the U.S. or Israel attacked Iran:
I don’t think you’d hear the Arab states say this publicly, but they would be delighted if the United States or Israel destroyed the Iranian nuclear weapons capability.
Bolton: Israel Would Be “Delighted” If U.S. Strikes Iranian Training Camps
Think Progress
May 8, 2008
In a Fox News interview this afternoon, former UN Ambassador John Bolton discussed his desire to bomb camps inside Iran that are reportedly training and arming Shiite insurgents who fight in Iraq. Fox host Martha McCallum asked, “Can you imagine a scenario where President Bush would do that before the end of his term?” Bolton responded, “I think so, definitely.” He added later, “This is entirely responsible on our part.”
Asked by McCallum whether Israel would be supportive of the strikes given the possibility of Iranian retaliation, Bolton responded, “I think they’d be delighted.”
Fox News claims Iranian missile could ‘hit some military installations’ in the U.S.
Neocon “Scholars” Target Iran’s Oil Infrastructure
Kurt Nimmo
Infowars
June 20, 2008
The L.A. Times’ Babylon & Beyond blog reports on “a serious recommendation made by two neoconservatives in case sanctions fail to persuade Iran to abandon its enrichment of uranium, a process that can be used to make nuclear weapons or fuel for peaceful energy production.” Patrick Clawson and Michael Eisenstadt, described as two “scholars” working for the Washington Institute for Near East Studies, have suggested taking out Iran’s oil infrastructure.
Because the ultimate goal of prevention is to influence Tehran to change course, effective strikes against Iran’s nuclear infrastructure may play an important role in affecting Iran’s decision calculus. Strikes that flatten its nuclear infrastructure could have a demoralizing effect, and could influence Tehran’s assessment of the cost of rebuilding. But the most effective strikes may not necessarily be against nuclear facilities. Iran is extraordinarily vulnerable to attacks on its oil export infrastructure…. The political shock of losing the oil income could cause Iran to rethink its nuclear stance — in ways that attacks on its nuclear infrastructure might not.
Or it may move Iran’s “decision calculus” in a different direction — deadly missile salvos against U.S. troops in Iraq and Afghanistan and smoldering oil tankers clogging up passage of the Persian Gulf. If these two criminal minds have their way, you will be paying $10 a gallon or more at the pump for gasoline. No problem for the WINEP “scholars,” who write:
To be sure, in a tight world oil market, attacking Iran’s oil infrastructure carries an obvious risk of causing world oil prices to soar and hurting consumers in the United States and other oil-importing countries…. If the choice is between higher oil prices and a Middle East with several nuclear powers, higher oil prices and reduced economic growth are not clearly the greater evil.
Talk about hubris. But then neocons are more than comfortable with imposing economic hardship on you, considered a lowly commoner and easily distracted chump by the neocons and their globalist associates. It should be remembered that the neocons consider themselves “philosopher-kings,” a self-appointed elite, and advocate benevolent dictatorship – a process well underway — although it remains to be seen how benevolent it would be to freeze to death thousands of people unable to heat their homes or starve them to death because the cannot afford to drive to work.
Read Full Article Here
Norman Finkelstein Talks About Israeli Military “Rehearsals” Against Iran
Recent News:
http://www.presstv.ir/detail.aspx?id=61187§ionid=351020104
US applauds new EU sanctions against Iran
http://rawstory.com/news/afp/US_a..tions_agains_06232008.html
Fmr Top CIA Analyst: Iran Will Be Attacked Before Election
http://www.consortiumnews.com/2008/061908c.html
Did the NYT Just Out Another CIA Agent to Help the NeoCons Invade Iran?
http://journals.democraticunderground.com/McCamy%20Taylor/247
Leaked Israeli drill seen as U.S. pressure on Iran
http://www.reuters.com/article/newsOne/idUSL2147745920080622
AIPAC approves Iran sanctions
http://www.jta.org/cgi-bin/iowa/breaking/109127.html
Iraq urges US to stop backing MKO
http://www.presstv.ir/detail.aspx?id=60407§ionid=351020201
Stop the resolution for military aggression in Iran!
http://stopaipac.org/iranresolution.htm
Coming war against Iran: Increasing Anglo-American pressure on Turkey
http://www.globalresearch.ca/index.php?context=va&aid=9407
Russia warns against attacking Iran
Gallup poll confirms majority of Americans favor diplomacy with Iran
Ahmadinejad Says U.S. Planned to Kidnap, Murder Him in Iraq
Congressman: Bush may bomb Iran, declare martial law, suspend elections
U.S. Says Israel Military Exercise Directed At Iran
Your last chance: Israel’s warning
Greeks help Israel prepare for Iran war?
Filed under: 2008 Election, airstrike, al-qaeda, CIA, Coup, Ehud Barak, False Flag, George Bush, Iran, Israel, military strike, Mossad, NIE, Nuke, Pakistan, Propaganda, Psyops, Ray McGovern, Russia, Saber Rattling, Saudi Arabia, Shock and Awe, Syria, Tehran, White House, ww4
Ex-CIA: US, Israel Planning Iran Attack Before 2008 Election
Press TV
December 19, 2007
A former senior CIA analyst says the United States and Israel are planning war against Iran before the next presidential election.
Ray McGovern said Monday despite a recent National Intelligence Estimate conceding that Iran is not conducting a nuclear weapons program, a joint US and Israeli war on the Islamic Republic is likely to happen.
The former analyst expounded that the close American relationship with Israel, which alleges Iran is a threat to its existence and to the international community, is the driving force behind a potential strike.
McGovern called on those wishing to prevent a military conflict with Iran to voice their opposition to President Bush’s headstrong approach towards Tehran and its nuclear program.
Although the report by US intelligence services has meant another embarrassment for the White House over its accusation against Tehran, the US president seems to be indifferent to the assessment.
President Bush, who is scheduled to visit Jerusalem in January, bald-facedly continues his rhetoric against the Islamic Republic, claiming Tehran poses a threat to the international community.
Former US Intelligence official: Israel will attack Iran
Y Net News
December 21, 2007
“I came back from a trip to Israel in November convinced that Israel would attack Iran,” Bruce Riedel, a former career CIA official and senior adviser to three US presidents – including George W. Bush – on Middle East and South Asian issues, told Newsweek Thursday, citing conversations he had with Mossad and Israeli defense officials.
“And that was before the National Intelligence Estimate (NIE). This makes it even more likely. Israel is not going to allow its nuclear monopoly to be threatened,” the American magazine quoted Riedel as saying in an article titled, “What will Israel do?”.
Published in early December, the American NIE determined that Iran had shelved its nuclear weapons program in 2003.
According to Newsweek, “a rising tide of opinion in Israel’s intelligence and national-security circles believes that the NIE does signal American retreat-and, more profoundly, renewed Israeli isolation over what is deemed an existential threat out of Tehran.”
‘Israel has gotten away with it’
The magazine quoted Knesset Member Ephraim Sneh, a former deputy defense minister who has “warned for years that Israel would eventually have to confront Iran alone,” as saying that “today we are closer to this situation than we were three weeks ago … we have to be prepared to forestall this threat on our own.”
David Albright of the Institute for Science and International Security in Washington told Newsweek that Israel was likely encouraged by the non-reaction to their September air strike on a reported Syrian nuclear facility, “which may have been a test run for Iran, or at least a warning directed at Tehran”.
“Israel has gotten away with it in a sense,” Albright was quoted as saying. He suggested that any Israeli pre-emptive action might not be a “traditional strike” but could involve more “sabotage of equipment”.
Newsweek said Israel also knows that the Arab states are “terrified of an Iranian nuclear power, possibly to the point of looking the other way at another such strike”.
Read Full Article Here
Related News:
Barak: Israel will win the next war
http://www.jpost.com/servlet/Satellite?cid…t%2FJPArticle%2FShowFull
Bush ‘hell-bent’ on war with Iran?
http://www.finalcall.com/artman/publish/article_4228.shtml
Russia Deepens Military Ties With Iran
http://www.smh.com.au/news/world/r….98345111754.html
‘Enemies to regret attacking Iran’
http://www.presstv.ir/detail.aspx?id=3…nid=351020101
Bush ‘loses patience’ with Syria
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/middle_east/7154473.stm
Saudi’s Biggest Group Of Al-CIAda Fighters
http://today.reuters.com/news/arti…DI-FIGHTERS.xml
Pakistan reportedly frees terror suspects
http://www.boston.com/news/world/asia/articles/20…p1=email_to_a_friend
Gov’t official: No ‘smoking gun’ on Iran
http://www.jpost.com/servlet/Sat…rticle/ShowFull
US to blame Iran for attacks in Iraq despite decline in use of bombs linked to Iran
http://rawstory.com/news/2007/US_to_blame_Iran_for_attacks_1218.html
Hillary & Bush Agree On Iran
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7fSW-ellXzM
Bush insists Iran is ‘dangerous’
http://www.spacewar.com/2006/071211173746.5r6si5hc.html
Israel PM warns Iran can develop nuclear bomb by 2010
Sarkozy: Iran-Israel war likely
Iran N-fuel ‘cannot be used in bombs’
White House Is Confident of Broad Support on Iran
Merry Christmas, Hawaii – and Bombs Away!
Bush Demands Iran Explain Nuke Program
Gates says Iran seeks to cause chaos
Baer Suggests Saudis Could Stage Terror In America to Instigate Iran Attack
Prosor: War with Iran may be unavoidable
Gates: Israel doesn’t pose nuclear threat like Iran
Scott Ritter: Cheney’s Iran Policy Still Stands
Poll: Americans split on Iran
Report on Iran may scupper future sanctions
Hostile questions baffle US army official
Kristol: Iran Halting Nuclear Weapons Program Is ‘Another Feather In The Cap For Iraq Invasion’
Rice Fails to Convince Lavrov on Iran
White House Quietly Admits Bush Lied About When He Learned That Iran Had Suspended Its Nuclear Program
Keith Olbermann special comment on NIE
Coup on Iran & False Flag News Archive
noworldsystem.com 