Filed under: 9 11 truth, 9/11, 9/11 architects, 9/11 commission report, 9/11 engineers, 9/11 Explosions, 9/11 Firefighters, 9/11 Mysteries, 9/11 police, 9/11 Truth, 9/11 workers, AIA, charlie sheen, Controlled Demolition, end the fed, False Flag, Federal Reserve, first responders, Ground Zero, inside job, investigation, larry silverstein, Luke Rudkowski, nano thermite, New York, NYC CAN, Official 9/11 Story, Official 9/11 Theory, patriot movement, Police State, private bank, private banks, Protest, thermite, Truth Action, truth movement, van jones, We Are Change, World Trade Center, wtc-7, WTc7
9/11 Truth In New York – September 11th, 2009
Shaped Charges and the World Trade Center Collapses
World Architecture News: Explosives and Thermitic Material Brought Down Buildings on 9/11
Filed under: 2-party system, 9/11, 9/11 Mysteries, 9/11 Truth, al-qaeda, Barack Obama, Controlled Demolition, False Flag, George Bush, Ground Zero, inside job, left right paradigm, New York, obama, Official 9/11 Theory, World Trade Center | Tags: Official 9/11 Story, UN, united nations
Obama Warns Not To Question Official 9/11 Story
Filed under: 9/11, 9/11 architects, 9/11 Firefighters, 9/11 Mysteries, 9/11 Physics, 9/11 steel, 9/11 Truth, 9/11 workers, AIA, Alex Jones, C-Span, Controlled Demolition, False Flag, Ground Zero, inside job, iron oxide, iron spheres, Media, metal spheres, microscopic spheres, molten metal, molten steel, nano thermite, New York, Official 9/11 Theory, pre-knowledge, richard gage, steven e. jones, steven jones, thermate, thermite, World Trade Center, wtc-7 | Tags: evaporated steel, iron oxide, iron spheres, metal spheres, microscopic spheres, molten metal, molten steel, nano thermite, steven e. jones, sulfur, thermate
AIA Architect: Evidence of 9/11 Controlled Demolition
Filed under: 9/11, 9/11 engineers, 9/11 Explosions, 9/11 Firefighters, 9/11 Physics, 9/11 planes, 9/11 Truth, 9/11 workers, al-qaeda, bin laden, Controlled Demolition, FBI, FDNY, first responders, George Bush, Ground Zero, kevin ryan, madrid, neocons, New York, NIST, NYPD, Official 9/11 Theory, Pancake Theory, spain, steven jones, War On Terror, windsor building, World Trade Center | Tags: frank de martini, underwriters laboratory, underwriters labs
Zero Investigation Into 9/11 (movie)
Filed under: 9/11, 9/11 commission, 9/11 commission report, 9/11 demolition countdown, 9/11 engineers, 9/11 Explosions, 9/11 Firefighters, 9/11 Mysteries, 9/11 Physics, 9/11 Truth, 9/11 workers, BBC, BBC foreknowledge, CNN, Controlled Demolition, FEMA, first responders, Ground Zero, kevin ryan, Media, New York, NIST, Official 9/11 Theory, Pancake Theory, pre-knowledge, steven jones, thermite, World Trade Center, wtc-7 | Tags: Danny Jowenko, Dr. David L. Griscom, Dr. James Quintiere, evaporated steel, Graham John Inman, heat transport, iron oxide, Kamal S. Obeid, molten metal, peer review, steel, steven e. jones, sulfur, thermal expansion, thermate, UL tested steel
Debunking NIST’s Conclusions about WTC 7: Easy as Shooting Fish in a Barrel
George Washington’s Blog
August 20, 2008
The Government’s side (ever changing)
9/11 truth’s side
NIST lamely tried to explain the symmetrically collapse as follows:
WTC 7’s collapse, viewed from the exterior (most videos were taken from the north), did appear to fall almost uniformly as a single unit. This occurred because the interior failures that took place did not cause the exterior framing to fail until the final stages of the building collapse. The interior floor framing and columns collapsed downward and pulled away from the exterior frame. There were clues that internal damage was taking place, prior to the downward movement of the exterior frame, such as when the east penthouse fell downward into the building and windows broke out on the north face at the ends of the building core. The symmetric appearance of the downward fall of the WTC 7 was primarily due to the greater stiffness and strength of its exterior frame relative to the interior framing.
NIST can’t have it both ways. If the exterior frame was so stiff and strong, then it should have stopped the collapse, or – at the very least – we would have seen a bowing effect where tremendous opposing forces were battling each other for dominance in determining the direction of the fall.
In real life, the thick structural beams and “stiff [and strong]” exterior frame used in the building should have quickly stopped any partial collapse, unless the support columns were all blown. At the very worst, we should see a 1 or 2 floor partial collapse.
Freefall Speed
NIST said that WTC 7 fell at 40% slower than freefall speed. But it collapsed alot faster than it would have if the structural supports were not all blown away at the same instant. 40% slower isn’t very impressive — that’s like arguing that a rock falling through concrete 40% slower than a rock falling through the air is perfectly normal.
Again, why did the building collapse at all, given that the thick structural beams should have quickly stopped any partial collapse?
Fires Knocked Down Steel-Frame Buildings
NIST said fires alone brought down Building 7, but other office fires have burned longer and hotter without causing collapse.
No Explosive Sounds
NIST also said:
“No blast sounds were heard on the audio tracks of video recordings during the collapse of WTC 7 or reported by witnesses.”
Oh, really?
What about this, this, this, this, this and this?
Moreover, as discussed below, high-tech explosives don’t necessarily make the same loud “booms” that dynamite make.
High-Tech Explosive Residues
And why were there residues for high-tech explosives at ground zero (and see this)?
Molten and Partially Evaporated Steel
And what about the pools of molten metal at ground zero for months? And why was the at and under the ground at the site of WTC 7 as hot as the ground under WTC 1 and 2?
And the New York Times wrote that partly EVAPORATED steel beams were found at WTC 7. But normal office and diesel fires are not NEARLY hot enough to evaporate steel. Hydrocarbon fires fueled by diesel (which was apparently stored at WTC 7) and normal office materials cannot evaporate steel. Steel does not evaporate unless it is heated to at least 5,000 degrees Fahrenheit. Everyone agrees that fires from conventional building fires are thousands of degrees cooler than that.
Pre-Knowledge
And why didn’t NIST address the obvious pre-knowledge by everyone around and well in advance that 7 was going to come down?
Experts
And why didn’t NIST address what these experts say?:
- The former head of the Fire Science Division of the government agency which claims that the World Trade Centers collapsed due to fire (the National Institute of Standards and Technology), who is one of the world’s leading fire science researchers and safety engineers, a Ph.D. in mechanical engineering (Dr. James Quintiere), called for an independent review of the World Trade Center Twin Tower collapse investigation. “I wish that there would be a peer review of this,” he said, referring to the NIST investigation. “I think all the records that NIST has assembled should be archived. I would really like to see someone else take a look at what they’ve done; both structurally and from a fire point of view. … I think the official conclusion that NIST arrived at is questionable.
- Two professors of structural engineering at a prestigious Swiss university (Dr. Joerg Schneider and Dr. Hugo Bachmann) said that, on 9/11, World Trade Center 7 was brought down by controlled demolition (translation here).
- Kamal S. Obeid, structural engineer, with a masters degree in Engineering from UC Berkeley, of Fremont, California, says:
“Photos of the steel, evidence about how the buildings collapsed, the unexplainable collapse of WTC 7, evidence of thermite in the debris as well as several other red flags, are quite troubling indications of well planned and controlled demolition”
- Ronald H. Brookman, structural engineer, with a masters degree in Engineering from UC Davis, of Novato California, writes:
“Why would all 47 stories of WTC 7 fall straight down to the ground in about seven seconds… ? It was not struck by any aircraft or engulfed in any fire. An independent investigation is justified for all three collapses including the surviving steel samples and the composition of the dust.”
- Graham John Inman, structural engineer, of London, England, points out:
“WTC 7 Building could not have collapsed as a result of internal fire and external debris. NO plane hit this building. This is the only case of a steel frame building collapsing through fire in the world. The fire on this building was small & localized therefore what is the cause?”
- A Dutch demolition expert (Danny Jowenko) stated that WTC 7 was imploded
- A prominent physicist with 33 years of service for the Naval Research Laboratory in Washington, DC (Dr. David L. Griscom) said that the official theory for why the Twin Towers and world trade center building 7 collapsed “does not match the available facts” and supports the theory that the buildings were brought down by controlled demolition
Paul Joseph Watson
Prison Planet
August 22, 2008
In its final report on the collapse of WTC 7 that news outlets are reporting “puts 9/11 conspiracy theories to bed,” NIST claims that the never before observed “new phenomenon” of “thermal expansion” was to blame for the destruction of the building, a completely ludicrous conclusion in a report that simply ignores eyewitness testimony and hard evidence that points to the deliberate demolition of the structure.
NIST completely fails to address prior knowledge of the building’s collapse, including why news outlets like the BBC and CNN reported that the building had collapsed an hour before it actually fell, as well as firefighters on the scene who are heard on video saying, “Keep your eye on that building, it’ll be coming down soon.”
If the collapse of WTC 7 came as a result of a “new phenomenon” and an “extraordinary event” that had never happened before in the history of building collapses, then why did news stations and ground zero workers know it was about to happen a hour or more in advance?
This on its own completely destroys the very foundation of NIST’s assertion that a “new phenomenon” was responsible for the collapse.
Which is the more likely scenario – that ground zero officials and media outlets got word that the building was going to be “pulled” – or that they employed clairvoyant powers of deduction that enabled them to foresee an event that had never happened before in history to a building that was structurally reinforced and had suffered limited fires?
NIST claims that the collapse of Building 7 is “The first known instance of fire causing the total collapse of a tall building”.
We are actually being asked to believe the impossible – that WTC 7 was the only building in history to have defied all precedent and suffered a complete and almost instantaneous collapse from fire damage alone, despite this being an impossibility if one accepts the basic laws of physics as accurate.
The issue of molten metal, which was discovered under both the twin towers and WTC 7, suggesting an extremely hot burning agent was used in the demolition process, is completely ignored in NIST’s report, despite it being acknowledged in Appendix C of FEMA’s World Trade Center Building Performance Study, which stated:
Evidence of a severe high temperature corrosion attack on the steel, including oxidation and sulfidation with subsequent intergranular melting, was readily visible in the near-surface microstructure. A liquid eutectic mixture containing primarily iron, oxygen, and sulfur formed during this hot corrosion attack on the steel… The severe corrosion and subsequent erosion of Samples 1 and 2 are a very unusual event. No clear explanation for the source of the sulfur has been identified.
Speaking during a press conference that was called to counter NIST, Richard Gage, founder of Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth and a member of the American Institute of Architects, dismissed the report.
“Tons of [molten metal] was found 21 days after the attack,” said Gage in an interview with a Vancouver, Canada television station. “Steel doesn’t begin to melt until 2,700 degrees, which is much hotter than what these fires could have caused.”
“There are holes in this story that you can drive a truck through,” he added, citing NIST’s claim that no evidence suggested loud explosive booms accompanied the collapse of the building by reminding that Thermite, a steel cutting agent, makes no explosive sound.
Even aside from this argument, there were numerous close proximity eyewitnesses who reported loud explosions, including NYPD officer Craig Bartmer and ground zero first responder Kevin McPadden (who also experienced the countdown before the building fell), but this fact was again simply ignored by NIST.
“FEMA found it,” said Gage. “Dr. Steven Jones found it, in the dust that landed in the entire area of lower Manhattan. And he finds it in the chunks of previously molten metal [from the towers].”
The core of NIST’s explanation, that an “extraordinary event” called “thermal expansion” was to blame for the sudden total collapse of the building is of course on the face of it a fraud when one considers the innumerable number of buildings that have suffered roaring fires across the majority of their floors and remained standing, whereas WTC 7 suffered limited fire damage across a handful of floors.
NIST also claims that the building only fell at 40% free fall speed, as if this isn’t suspicious in itself. Remember that this 47-story behemoth took just 7 seconds to completely collapse within its own footprint falling through the path of most resistance.
As the George Washington blog points out, “NIST said that WTC 7 fell at 40% slower than free fall speed. But it collapsed a lot faster than it would have if the structural supports were not all blown away at the same instant. 40% slower isn’t very impressive — that’s like arguing that a rock falling through concrete 40% slower than a rock falling through the air is perfectly normal.”
BYU Professor Steven E Jones WTC Lecture UVSC
http://rawstory.com/news/2008/B..oses_theory_on_0821.html
NIST Claims Fires Brought Down WTC-7
http://www.nytimes.com/2008..em=&pagewanted=print
Filed under: 2-party system, 9/11, 9/11 commission, 9/11 Mysteries, 9/11 Physics, 9/11 Truth, Alex Jones, Barack Obama, Controlled Demolition, Hillary Clinton, jesse ventura, Larry King, left right paradigm, Loose Change, michelle malkin, neocons, Neolibs, Official 9/11 Theory, willie nelson, World Trade Center, wtc-7
Former Governor Jesse Ventura: WTC Collapse A Controlled Demolition
Paul Joseph Watson
Prison Planet
April 2, 2008
Former Minnesota Governor Jesse Ventura vehemently savaged the official 9/11 story on a syndicated national radio show today, saying the WTC collapsed like a controlled demolition and was pulverized to dust as he also highlighted the impossible 10 second free fall speed of the towers.
Appearing on The Alex Jones Show, Ventura said that his initial reaction to 9/11 was much like most people at the time, and he accepted the official story outright, a response he now regrets because he was in a position of power and could have used it to raise a lot of pointed questions.
“I kicked myself when it initially happened that the light didn’t go off but I was so shocked that this thing had even taken place that I apologize for not being more aware,” said Ventura, adding that watching Loose Change at the insistence of his son was part of the catalyst for his wake up call.
Host Alex Jones is executive producer of Loose Change (get it here), the most watched Internet movie of all time. Ventura said he ran through a rollercoaster of emotions when he saw the film.
“When I finally did watch it I went through every emotion you could imagine, from laughing, crying, getting sick to my stomach, to the whole emotional thing,” said the former Governor.
“To me questions haven’t been answered and are not being answered about 9/11,” said Ventura, before highlighting the collapse of Building 7, a 47-story tall skyscraper that was not hit by a plane but collapsed in its own footprint in the late afternoon of September 11.
“Two planes struck two buildings….but how is it that a third building fell 5 hours later?” asked Ventura, “How could this building just implode into its own footprint 5 hours later – that’s my first question – the 9/11 Commission didn’t even devote one page to that in their big volume of investigation,” added the former Governor.
Ventura then explored how it was possible that all three buildings could rapidly collapse at almost free fall speed.
“How could those buildings fall at the speed of gravity – if you put a stopwatch on them both of those World Trade Center buildings were on the ground in ten seconds – how can that be?” asked Ventura.
“If you took a billiard ball and dropped it from the height of the World Trade Center in a vacuum it would hit the ground in 9.3 seconds and if you took that same billiard ball and dropped it 10 stories at a time and merely stopped it and started it it would take 30 seconds – if you dropped it every floor of the World Trade Center to the ground, simply stopping and starting it on gravity it would take over 100 seconds to reach the ground,” he surmised.
The former wrestling star then questioned how low-temperature burning jet fuel could melt steel.
“Jet fuel is four fifths kerosene – which is not a hot burning fuel – and they wanted us to believe it melted these steel structured girders and caused these buildings to pancake collapse to the ground?” he stated.
“I was on the site within two weeks after it happened and I saw none of these pancakes – wouldn’t they all be piled up in a huge mass on the ground and yet everything was blown into dust – when you look at it from that aspect none of it makes any sense,” said Ventura.
“Never before in the annuls of history has a fire caused a steel structure building to fall to the ground like these two did,” he concluded.
Having undergone Basic Underwater Demolition Seal training, Ventura is speaking from an experienced standpoint and he unequivocally stated that he thought the buildings were deliberately imploded.
“Upon looking at the film in super-slow motion and the way the buildings fell and comparing that to the way that they do like a controlled demolition of a hotel in Las Vegas, they both fell identical.”
“I did watch the film of Building 7 going down and in my opinion there’s no doubt that that building was brought down with demolition,” said the former Governor.
Ventura also questioned the lack of wreckage outside of the Pentagon after Flight 77 allegedly struck the building.
“When I was watching Loose Change with a friend of mine – he happens to work for a company that helps build the Boeing airplanes and they said that when the engines completely disappeared and were destroyed, his response was, excuse my French – bullshit!,” said Ventura.
“I turned to him and said why and he said because they’re made of titanium steel – they can’t disintegrate.”
Ventura said that the corporate media were going to continue to cover-up the truth about 9/11, but that the number of credible people speaking out and increasing education and knowledge about the subject would eventually reap dividends.
“We don’t want to lose our country, after all it’s still our country and until they put us down we have the power,” Ventura concluded.
The Governor’s bold comments about 9/11 come on the heels of similar views expressed by American icon Willie Nelson during an interview on the same radio show in February.
Click here to listen to the full interview.
Jesse Ventura Speaks the Truth on Larry King Live
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wRjmwKnz1G4
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=y5mdwFLY4WQ
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uPNnUAr_DsM
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Hk7nYA4–aU
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yq2iqGRxrdM
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UzBb427tb9A
http://www.rawstory.com/comments/47251.html
Malkin’s Hot Air Targets Jesse Ventura
http://www.infowars.com/?p=1248
Ventura wrestles with what really happened on 9/11
http://www.minnpost.com/politica..tles_with_what_really_happened_on_911
Former Governor Jesse Ventura Says WTC Collapse a Controlled Demolition
http://www.send2press.com/newswire/2008-04-0403-004.shtml
Ventura says he regrets initial acceptance of 9/11 explanations
http://wkbt.com/Global/story.asp?S=8115056
Filed under: 9/11, 9/11 Mysteries, anthrax, Bio Weapons, biochemicals, Biological Attack, biological warfare, False Flag, FBI, Fort Detrick, Ft. Detrick, Hegelian Dialectic, History Channel, inside job, maryland, Military Industrial Complex, Official 9/11 Theory, Pentagon, Problem Reaction Solution, State Sponsored Terrorism, super weapons, super-weapons-grade anthrax, USAMRIID, War On Terror
FBI Focusing on ’About Four’ Anthrax Suspects: At least 3 linked to US Military
Fox News
March 28, 2008
The FBI has narrowed its focus to “about four” suspects in the 6 1/2-year investigation of the deadly anthrax attacks of 2001, and at least three of those suspects are linked to the Army’s bioweapons research facility at Fort Detrick in Maryland, FOX News has learned.
Among the pool of suspects are three scientists — a former deputy commander, a leading anthrax scientist and a microbiologist — linked to the research facility, known as USAMRIID.
The FBI has collected writing samples from the three scientists in an effort to match them to the writer of anthrax-laced letters that were mailed to two U.S. senators and at least two news outlets in the fall of 2001, a law enforcement source confirmed.
Filed under: 9/11, 9/11 engineers, 9/11 hijackers, 9/11 Mysteries, 9/11 Physics, 9/11 Truth, al-qaeda, Alex Jones, charlie sheen, False Flag, George Bush, humor, inside job, katrina, New York, Official 9/11 Theory, Pentagon, willie nelson, World Trade Center | Tags: Margaret Cho
Comedian Margaret Cho Believes 9/11 Truth
Actress Cho says Americans will be angry when they realize true agenda behind attacks
Top comedian and actress Margaret Cho has joined Willie Nelson and Charlie Sheen in questioning the official 9/11 story, stating that the public were going to become very angry when they realized there was a conspiracy behind the terror attacks.
Appearing on the nationally syndicated Alex Jones Show, Cho said her doubts about 9/11 were sparked by President Bush’s non-reaction to the unfolding crisis.
“I got concerned right after 9/11 where the plane had hit the World Trade Center and he was in that classroom with all those children and they told him what was going on and he did nothing,” said Cho.
“We were attacked for the first time on American soil and he did nothing – that’s when I realized there was something very very wrong,” she added.
http://youtube.com/watch?v=373rxwSspwI
http://youtube.com/watch?v=o2OsHEmJawU
Cho questioned the official story of what happened at the Pentagon, asking why so much footage of the twin towers being attacked was available in comparison with not even a clear picture of what occurred at the Pentagon – a far more sensitive and symbolic target.
“Why are they not focusing on that? What are they hiding?” asked Cho, “Of course it’s going to be monitored from every angle at every second and yet we have no footage of it – it’s very mysterious.”
Cho said that there was usually a conspiracy behind every major event in American history and that when the conspiracy behind 9/11 was fully uncovered, people were going to be very angry.
The actress said that many of her Arab-American friends doubted the organizational skills of Al-Qaeda in being able to pull off the terror attacks and questioned the plausibility of the passengers on the plane not fighting back against the hijackers.
http://www.iht.com/articles/ap/2008..-Embattled-Engineers.php
Call For New 9/11 Investigation Reaches Crescendo
http://prisonplanet.com/articles/march2008/032808_reaches_crescendo.htm
Govt investigators lied about inability of WTC towers to withstand airliner impacts
http://www.prisonplanet.com/article..032608_wtc_coverup.htm
WTC molten molybdenum cover-up
http://www.wakeupfromyourslumber.com/node/6178
Government-Funded Investigators Accused Of WTC Cover-Up
http://prisonplanet.com/articles/march2008/032608_wtc_coverup.htm
Court Clears Way for 9/11 Illness Lawsuit
http://www.nysun.com/news/new-york/court-clears-way-911-illness-lawsuit
Filed under: 9/11, 9/11 demolition countdown, 9/11 Explosions, 9/11 Firefighters, 9/11 Mysteries, 9/11 Physics, 9/11 Truth, 9/11 workers, Controlled Demolition, first responders, Ground Zero, larry silverstein, Official 9/11 Theory, We Are Change, World Trade Center, wtc-7 | Tags: kevin mcpadden, Manhattan
Larry Silverstein Confronted on WTC-7
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EtPC0W4HII8
Filed under: 9/11, 9/11 commission, 9/11 Firefighters, 9/11 hijackers, 9/11 Mysteries, 9/11 patsies, 9/11 survivors, 9/11 Truth, 9/11 workers, al-qaeda, Al-Qaeda Tapes, bin laden, CIA, False Flag, FBI, first responders, FOIA, inside job, Official 9/11 Theory, Robert Baer, state sponsored terror, Washington D.C., World Trade Center
Alleged Hijacker Booked On Post-9/11 Flights
Astounding FBI documents contradict 9/11 Commission report as CIA veteran Robert Baer calls for investigation to be re-opened
Paul Joseph Watson
Prison Planet
February 28, 2008
Astounding newly released FBI documents obtained via the Freedom Of Information Act show that alleged 9/11 hijacker Hamza Al-Ghamdi had booked future flights to San Francisco and Riyadh, suggesting that he was unaware of his eventual fate aboard United Airlines Flight 175, the plane that hit the World Trade Center’s south tower.
The papers consist of a
300 page Federal Bureau of Investigation timeline (PDF link) that was used by the 9/11 Commission but not made public until now.
The 9/11 Commission failed to mention in its final report that Al-Ghamdi was booked onto several flights scheduled to take place after 9/11, including another flight on the very day of the attacks.
The fact that Al-Ghamdi had booked post-9/11 flights obviously gives rise to doubts about whether the alleged hijacker knew the 9/11 attack was a suicide mission and even brings into question if he was on the flight at all.
Citing “UA passenger information,” on page 288 under an entry pertaining to “H AlGhamdi,” the FBI timeline reads: “Future flight. Scheduled to depart Los Angeles International Airport for San Francisco International Airport on UA 7950,” reports Raw Story (excerpt below).
Al-Ghamdi was also booked to fly on September 20, 2001 from Casablanca, Morocco to Riyadh, Saudi Arabia and September 29, where he planned to fly from Riyadh to Damman, Saudi Arabia.
The FBI timeline documents also contradict with several other details of the 9/11 Commission Report, notably on the movements of alleged Flight 77 hijackers Nawaf al-Hazmi and Khalid al-Mihdhar.
According to researcher Paul Thompson, he believes the Commission cherry-picked the dates of the alleged hijacker’s movements in order to shield their ties with high-level Saudi Arabian officials.
He points to the redaction of the name of a person who is a known employee of a Saudi defense contractor, Omar al-Bayoumi, who lived at the same location, reports Raw Story.
“We know it’s Bayoumi,” said Thompson, “because after 9/11, the Finnish Government mistakenly released a classified FBI list of suspects that showed Bayoumi living in apartment 152 of Parkwood Apartments.” That information is available here.
“But also important is that it strongly suggests that the hijackers already had a support network in Southern California before they arrived,” Thompson continued.
“In the official version of the story now, the hijackers drift around L.A. listlessly for two weeks before chancing to come across Bayoumi in a restaurant [according to Bayoumi’s account],” Thompson added. “Whereupon he’s an incredible good Samaritan and takes them down to San Diego, pays their rent, etc.”
“But from the FBI’s timeline, we now know the hijackers started staying at Bayoumi’s place on Jan. 15 – the very same day they arrived,” Thompson says. “So obviously they must have been met at the airport and taken care of from their very first hours in the US. That’s huge because the FBI maintains to this day that the hijackers never had any accomplices in the US.”
Alleged Hamza Al-Ghamdi appears in his “martrydom tape,” which interestingly enough was only released in September 2006, post-9/11 just like his flight plans were.
Former 20-year veteran CIA case officer Robert Baer, who has previously asserted that 9/11 has aspects of being an inside job, told Raw Story that the new developments immediately demand the 9/11 investigation be re-opened.
“There are enough discrepancies and unanswered questions in the 9/11 Commission report that under a friendly administration, the 9/11 investigation should be re-opened,” wrote Baer.
“Considering that the main body of evidence came from tortured confessions, it’s still not entirely clear to me what happened on 9/11,” he concluded.
Raw Story provides further details concerning how the documents shed more light on the role of Saudi authorities and their complicity in the attack.
These new revelations mark the most astounding 9/11-related developments in many months and are sure to kick of a firestorm of new doubts about the crumbling official government story.
http://911blogger.com/node/14104
1000’s Of Aliens In U.S. Flight Schools Illegally
http://abcnews.go.com/Blotter/story?id=4353991&page=1
Lawyer Says Bin Laden Did Not Orchestrate 9/11 During Terror Trial
http://prisonplanet.com/articles/february2008/022808_bin_laden.htm
Filed under: 9/11, 9/11 commission, 9/11 hijackers, 9/11 Truth, 9/11 whistleblowers, al-qaeda, bin laden, David Ray Griffin, False Flag, inside job, Official 9/11 Theory, War On Terror
Lawyer opens defense claiming 9/11 an inside job
Sky News
February 27, 2008
Osama bin Laden’s role in the September 11 attacks has been called into doubt during Melbourne’s terror trial.
His involvement was questioned by a lawyer acting for the accused leader of the group, Abdul Benbrika.
Defence lawyers were today given their first chance to address the jury.
Benbrika’s lawyer Rudy Van De Wiel QC asked the jury to ‘have a good look’ client claiming,
‘There is a man who is not a terrorist.’
The Algerian father-of-seven was instead ‘a man deeply committed to his religion.’
The defence suggested the media had unfairly targeted Muslims in the wake of the September 11 terror attacks suggesting people ‘not forget America has done many evil things too.’
Van de Wiel brazenly declared, ‘to say all of this was orchestrated by Osama Bin Laden is a silly thing to do. He’s never claimed responsibility for the attacks.’
Counsel for another of the accused, said the prosecution’s case was entirely circumstantial.
Determining the content of taped conversations among the accused will be central to the outcome of the case.
9/11 may have been an insiders’ job – Dr. Hans Koechler
Scoop
February 21, 2008
In a significant observation many time UN contributor & international observer Professor Hans Koechler said “9/11 may have been an insider’s job” in response to a question from one of the delegates attending his lecture The ‘Global War on Terror – Contradictions of an Imperial Strategy’ last night at the Trades Hall in Auckland.
“I am not a boy-I am 59. There are many inconsistencies and inaccuracies in the official version of events. Those who could not handle a Cessna pulled off 9/11,” he said.
But he was quick to note that the official version has to be challenged. Quoting David Ray Griffin he said these events, in terms of destruction caused, these incidents cannot have been exclusively organized by a shadowy network of Mujahedeen from the remote places of the globe.
The causes officially given for the incidents are not a sufficient explanation for what actually happened on that day, especially as regards the logistics of this highly sophisticated operation and the very advanced infrastructure required for it.
He has published more than 300 books, reports and scholarly articles in several languages. In his book The Global War on Terror and the Metaphysical Enemy he writes the atrocities of September 11, 2001- Instead of dealing with the contradictions and inconsistencies in the official version of events and the numerous gaps in terms of the factual information, a “dogma of political correctness” has been promulgated according to which 19 Islamic-inspired Arab hijackers, directed by an elusive “Al-Qaeda” (“base”), succeeded in carrying out the atrocities all by themselves.
Filed under: 9/11, 9/11 hijackers, 9/11 patsies, 9/11 Truth, bin laden, brainwashing, Child Abuse, Extraordinary Rendition, FBI, George Bush, Guantanamo, Khalid Sheik Mohammed, Official 9/11 Theory, Pentagon, Torture, United Kingdom, War On Terror, waterboarding
Rigged Gitmo Trials Prove 9/11 Official Story Wrong
Scant evidence against suspects say prosecutors, yet convictions already assured
Paul Joseph Watson
Prison Planet
February 22, 2008
Four prosecutors In the Guantánamo Bay case assert that the trials are rigged and that convictions are already assured despite the fact that there is scant evidence to link Khalid Sheik Mohammed and his cohorts with 9/11, proving that the official story is a fable and the real perpetrators are being protected.
As we previously highlighted, after half a dozen years of waterboarding, genital zapping, sleep deprivation and brainwashing, the Pentagon has finally found six patsies who will readily welcome their 72 virgins and take the fall for 9/11, providing debunkers with ample ammunition to dismiss questions about the gaping holes in the official story of the terror attacks and allowing the government to close the book.
Included amongst them is alleged 9/11 mastermind Khalid Sheik Mohammed, who also admitted to a raft of other terror attacks and plots, some of which he could not possibly have been involved with because they occurred after his capture or related to targets that did not even exist until after his incarceration.
As reported by The Nation this week, Col. Morris Davis, former chief prosecutor for Guantánamo’s military commissions, was told directly by Pentagon general counsel William Haynes, that the final verdicts in the trials had already been decided before they had even begun.
“Wait a minute, we can’t have acquittals. If we’ve been holding these guys for so long, how can we explain letting them get off? We can’t have acquittals, we’ve got to have convictions,” Haynes told Davis.
In addition, Harper’s Magazine reports that, “Three more former Guantánamo prosecutors — Major Robert Preston, Captain John Carr and Captain Carrie Wolf — “asked to be relieved of duties after saying they were concerned that the process was rigged. One said he had been assured he didn’t need to worry about building a proper case; convictions were assured”.
Preston wrote in an e mail to his supervisors “that there was thin evidence against the accused.”
A defense attorney for the suspects, Clive Stafford Smith, said the prosecutors informed him that “they were told by the chief prosecutor at the time that they didn’t need evidence to get convictions.”
If there is scant evidence against the alleged mastermind of 9/11, as four top prosecutors assert, and yet the government has already decided to rig Mohammed’s trial to secure a conviction, then that means the government is knowingly protecting the real 9/11 masterminds and allowing patsies to take the fall for the attacks.
Despite the fact that it only took three months to charge him with the 1998 embassy bombings, there has been no formal indictment of bin Laden over six years after 9/11 and the FBI’s wanted poster makes no reference of Bin Laden’s involvement in 9/11.
When asked by reporters why no reference was made, FBI agent Rex Tomb was forced to admit that “the FBI has no hard evidence connecting Bin Laden to 9/11.”
The assertion of four top prosecutors and a defense attorney – that the Guantánamo trials are rigged and convictions are already assured despite little evidence against the accused – proves that the suspects are mere patsies, that the perpetrators of 9/11 remain free, and that the government’s only motivation is to sweep questions under the rug by conducting a show trial which is an insult to the very notion of justice.
http://ca.news.yahoo.com/s/reuters/08.._news/news_guantanamo_col
Foreign Secretary: CIA did use UK for torture flights
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/pages/live/a..id=517228&in_page_id=1811
Filed under: 9/11, 9/11 commission, 9/11 Families, 9/11 hijackers, 9/11 patsies, 9/11 Truth, 93 bombing, al-qaeda, Antonin Scalia, bin laden, Detainees, Extraordinary Rendition, FBI, George Bush, Guantanamo, Khalid Sheik Mohammed, KSM, michael hayden, New York, NORAD, Official 9/11 Theory, Pentagon, put options, secret camps, Torture, War On Terror, waterboarding, World Trade Center
Tortured Patsies To Take Fall For 9/11
Pentagon hopes executed scapegoats will make questions disappear
Paul Joseph Watson
Prison Planet
February 11, 2008
After half a dozen years of waterboarding, genital zapping, sleep deprivation and brainwashing, the Pentagon has finally found six patsies who will readily welcome their 72 virgins and take the fall for 9/11, providing debunkers with ample ammunition to dismiss questions about the gaping holes in the official story of the terror attacks.
“Among those held at Guantanamo is Khalid Sheik Mohammed, the suspected mastermind of the attack six years ago in which hijacked planes were flown into buildings in New York and Washington. Five others are expected to be named in sworn charges,” reports the Associated Press.
The fact that KSM’s confession included a plan to target the Plaza Bank building in Washington state, which was not founded until 2006, four years after the alleged Al-Qaeda mastermind’s arrest, should provide a clue as to the reliability of the “terror mastermind’s” culpability for 9/11.
But that was not the only plan that Sheik Mohammed was alleged to have hatched, as he claimed responsibility for everything from three assassination plots against Clinton, Carter and the Pope, to the FBI sponsored 1993 World Trade Center bombing. He surprisingly stopped short of accepting the blame for global warming and the Challenger space shuttle disaster.
Even CNN’s audience was not buying the propaganda at the time, with 74% saying they disbelieved the authenticity of KSM’s confession. CIA veteran Robert Baer wrote a stinging Time Magazine piece dismissing the supposition that KSM was “responsible for the 9/11 operation from A-Z” as he claimed in between cattle prod sessions.
It would be very clear why the establishment would be interested in hanging out the Ron Jeremy of terrorism to dry as the scapegoat for an official 9/11 story that holds about as much weight as a Milan cat-walk model. By invoking the “but he admitted it” line, any debate about the mountain of unanswered questions surrounding the attacks, which prompted 9/11 families to demand a new investigation last week, is effectively silenced. The fact that the 9/11 Commission was riddled with Bush administration cronies can also be swept under the rug.
But this cuts both ways.
In his first interview following 9/11, Osama Bin Laden denied any involvement in the attacks.
“I have already said that I am not involved in the 11 September attacks in the United States. As a Muslim, I try my best to avoid telling a lie. I had no knowledge of these attacks, nor do I consider the killing of innocent women, children and other humans as an appreciable act. Islam strictly forbids causing harm to innocent women, children and other people. Such a practice is forbidden even in the course of a battle,” Bin Laden told the Pakistani based Ummat newspaper.
If Bin Laden wasn’t involved in 9/11 then KSM’s “confession” is rendered obsolete.
Since Khalid has squealed on the “A to Z” of 9/11 and will face a lethal injection, perhaps he can provide some answers to a few troubling little questions that still have us 9/11 “conspiracy nuts” running around in circles before he kicks the bucket;
– Was Khalid Shaikh Mohammed responsible for the FBI ordering the 1993 World Trade Center bombing to go ahead? In his confession, KSM says he ran the attack but fails to explain why it was the FBI who provided the terror cell with the bomb materials through their informant.
– Was Khalid Shaikh Mohammed responsible for NORAD completely reversing its standard operating procedure on the day of 9/11?
– Was Khalid Shaikh Mohammed responsible for the collapse of three steel buildings, one that was not hit by a plane, from fire damage alone for the first and only time in history?
– Was Khalid Shaikh Mohammed responsible for warning, according to Newsweek, a group of top Pentagon officials to cancel their flights on the evening of September 10th due to security concerns?
– Was Khalid Shaikh Mohammed responsible for the record number of ‘put’ options, speculation that the stock of a company will fall, that were placed on American and United Airlines in the days preceding September 11th? This despite a September 10th Reuters report stating ‘airline stocks set to fly.’
– Was Khalid Shaikh Mohammed responsible for blocking FBI anti-terrorism investigations before 9/11 related to the bin Laden family and Saudi charities that were front groups for Al-Qaeda?
– Was Khalid Shaikh Mohammed responsible for advising the Secret Service not to remove President Bush from a completely unsecured Florida elementary school by letting them know he wasn’t a target on 9/11?
Of course if the Pentagon gets their way, such questions will disappear along with any chance that the executed patsies could ever recant and contribute to the true perpetrators of 9/11 being identified.
http://prisonplanet.com/articles/february2008/120208_scalia.htm
U.S. Wants To Execute Six Patsies For 9/11
http://www.roguegovernment.com/news.php?id=6592
US to Try 9/11 Suspects in “Kangaroo Court”
http://www.independent.co..ptember-11-attacks-781007.html
More evidence of Pre-9/11 Inside Trading: Follow the Money? God forbid
http://globalresearch.ca/index.php?c..va&aid=8046
‘I was waterboarded during my training as a Navy flight crew member… [C]utting off a finger would have been preferable’
http://www.washingtonpo..008020803156.html?nav=rss_print/outlook
Hayden Admits: Contractors Lead ‘Enhanced Interrogations’ at CIA Black Sites
http://blog.wired.com/defense/2008/02/in-testimony-be.html
CIA chief doubts waterboarding tactic is still legal
http://www.iht.com/articles/2008/02/08/america/08intel.php
AP Confirms Secret Camp Inside Gitmo
http://www.guardian.co.uk/worldlatest/story/0,,-7288144,00.html
6 Guantánamo Detainees Are Said to Face Trial Over 9/11
http://www.nytimes.com/200..&hp&oref=slogin&oref=slogin
Filed under: 9/11, 9/11 Truth, ad hominem, Alex Jones, Controlled Demolition, Fox News, Martial Law, Official 9/11 Theory, willie nelson, World Trade Center, wtc-7
Willie Nelson: Twin Towers Were Imploded On 9/11
American icon tells Alex Jones Show he questions official story
Paul Joseph Watson
Prison Planet
February 4th, 2008
Straight talking American icon Willie Nelson today told a national radio show that he thought the twin towers were imploded like condemned Las Vegas casino buildings, as the country music superstar forcefully voiced his doubts about the official 9/11 story.
Agreeing with host Alex Jones that he questioned the official story, Nelson elaborated, “I saw those towers fall and I’ve seen an implosion in Las Vegas – there’s too much similarities between the two, and I saw a building fall that didn’t get hit by nothing,” added Nelson, referring to WTC Building 7 which collapsed in the late afternoon of September 11
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=I1en0rUx_s0
“How naive are we – what do they think we’ll go for?,” asked Nelson, pointing out that his doubts began on the very day of 9/11.
“I saw one fall and it was just so symmetrical, I said wait a minute I just saw that last week at the casino in Las Vegas and you see these implosions all the time and the next one fell and I said hell there’s another one – and they’re trying to tell me that an airplane did it and I can’t go along with that,” said Nelson.
O’Reilly Smears Willie Nelson and Calls Himself a Patriot
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nSByug87_gY
http://prisonplanet.com/articles/february2008/020408_election_cancelled.htm
KVUE Coverage On Willie Nelson 9/11 Story
http://www.kvue.com/news/local/stories/020408kvuenelson-bkm.8e5c8740.html
Breitbart Covers The Willie Nelson 9/11 Story
http://www.breitbart.tv/?p=41684
AP Covers Willie Nelson Story
http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,328726,00.html
Willie Nelson stands up for Isaac Newton!
http://www.opednews.com/maxwrite/diarypage.php?did=6015
Filed under: 9/11, 9/11 Truth, al-qaeda, Bill Clinton, bin laden, False Flag, heckler, Hillary Clinton, inside job, Neolibs, Official 9/11 Theory, Truth Action, We Are Change
Bill Clinton has angry response for 9/11 heckler
David Edwards
Raw Story
January 31, 2008
http://youtube.com/watch?v=bp8urnF6NA8
The Clinton campaign may be stopping President Bill from taking on Senator Barack Obama in his public appearances on his wife’s behalf. But that doesn’t mean he can’t go on the rampage against ‘9/11 hecklers.’
“9/11 was not an inside job, it was an Osama Bin Laden job,” President Clinton proclaimed in the campaign stop.
“We look like idiots, folks, denying that the people who murdered our fellow citizens didn’t when they are continuing to murder people all around the world,” he added. “So we heard from you, you go away.”
Clinton to 9/11 Truther: “An inside job? How DARE you!”
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VEGnllIW0PY
Filed under: 9/11, 9/11 Mysteries, anthrax, Bio Weapons, biochemicals, Biological Attack, biological warfare, False Flag, FBI, Fort Detrick, Ft. Detrick, Hegelian Dialectic, History Channel, inside job, maryland, Military Industrial Complex, Official 9/11 Theory, Pentagon, Problem Reaction Solution, State Sponsored Terrorism, super weapons, super-weapons-grade anthrax, War On Terror
History Channel: Anthrax Attacks Inside Job
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YdamOzrfZI0
US Government Biological Weapons Legislator Says 2001 Anthrax Attacks Part Of Government Bio-warfare Program
http://www.infowars.net/articles/december2006/131206Anthrax.htm
Filed under: 9/11, 9/11 Truth, Charles Gibson, Media, Military, Military Officers, Official 9/11 Theory, Ron Paul, Troops, Truth Action, We Are Change, wtc-7
We Change Confronts Charles Gibson
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LFjPry9wJIE
25 U.S. Military Officers Challenge 9/11 Story
http://www.opednews.com/articles..080112_twenty_five_u_s__mil.htm
Filed under: 9/11, 9/11 commission, 9/11 hijackers, 9/11 Mysteries, 9/11 Truth, al-qaeda, Chechnya, CIA, False Flag, flight 77, georgia, Hani Hanjour, Iraq, Israel, kabul, kandahar, Nuke, Official 9/11 Theory, Pentagon, State Sponsored Terrorism, Syria, Turkey
Alleged Trainer Of 9/11 Hijackers a CIA Informant
Sakka attempts to plug holes in 9/11 official story, claims Hanjour did not pilot Flight 77
Paul Joseph Watson
Prison Planet
November 27, 2007
The man who claims to have trained six of the 9/11 hijackers is a paid CIA informant according to Turkish intelligence specialists, who also assert that Al-Qaeda is merely the name of a secret service operation designed to foment a strategy of tension around the world.
In a London Times report, Louai al-Sakka, now incarcerated in a high-security Turkish prison 60 miles east of Istanbul, claims that he trained six of the 9/11 hijackers at a camp in the mountains near Istanbul from 1999-2000.
Sakka was imprisoned in 2005 after being caught making bombs that he planned to use to blow up Israeli vessels.
Sakka asserts that he is a leading Al-Qaeda operative, having directed insurgency attacks in Iraq and also the beheading of Briton Kenneth Bigley in October 2004.
Some of Sakka’s account is corroborated by the US government’s 9/11 Commission. It found evidence that four of the hijackers – whom Sakka says he trained – had initially intended to go to Chechnya from Turkey but the border into Georgia was closed. Sakka had prepared fake visas for the group’s travel to Pakistan and arranged their flights from Istanbul’s Ataturk airport. The group of four went to the al-Farouq camp near Kandahar and the other two to Khaldan, near Kabul, an elite camp for Al-Qaeda fighters.
When Moqed and Suqami returned to Turkey, Sakka employed his skills as a forger to scrub out the Pakistani visa stamps from their passports. This would help the Arab men enter the United States without attracting suspicion that they had been to a training camp.
“But, as with many things in the world of Al-Qaeda, there might be smoke and mirrors,” reports the Times. “Some experts believe that Sakka could be overstating his importance to the group, possibly to lay a false track for western agencies investigating his terrorist colleagues.”
However, when one considers what other experts have said about Sakka, it appears that his intentions towards “western agencies” are anything but deceptive – since Turkish intelligence analysts concluded that Sakka has been a CIA asset all along.
Prominent Turkish newspaper Zaman reported that Sakka was hired as a CIA informant in 2000, after receiving a large sum of money from the agency. This would explain why he was “captured” but then released on two separate occasions by the CIA during the course of 2000.
Sakka was later captured by Turkish intelligence but again ordered to be released after which he moved to Germany to assist the alleged 9/11 hijackers.
Shortly before 9/11, Sakka was allegedly hired by Syrian intelligence – to whom he gave a warning that the attacks were coming on September 10th, 2001.
In his book At the Center of the Storm, former CIA director George Tenet writes, that “a source we were jointly running with a Middle Eastern country went to see his foreign handler and basically told him something big was about to go down.”
“This is very likely a reference to Sakra, since no one else comes close to matching the description of telling a Middle Eastern government about the 9/11 attacks one day in advance, not to mention working as an informant for the CIA at the same time. Tenet’s revelation strongly supports the notion that Sakra in fact accepted the CIA’s offers in 2000 and had been working with the CIA and other intelligence agencies at least through 9/11 ,” writes 9/11 researcher Paul Thompson, who was also interviewed for the London Times article.
Were the alleged “interrogations” of Sakka on behalf of the CIA merely a smokescreen to enable instructions to be passed on? This is certainly the view of Turkish intelligence experts, who go further and conclude that “Al-Qaeda” as a whole is merely a front group for western intelligence agencies used to foment a “strategy of tension” around the world.
Is Sakka still in the employ of western intelligence agencies? His apparent effort to plug the holes in the official 9/11 story is fascinating.
According to Sakka, Nawaf al-Hazmi was a veteran operative who went on to pilot the plane that hit the Pentagon. Although this is at odds with the official account, which says the plane was flown by another hijacker, it is plausible and might answer one of the mysteries of 9/11.
The Pentagon plane performed a complex spiral dive into its target. Yet the pilot attributed with flying the plane (Hani Hanjour) “could not fly at all” according to his flight instructors in America. Hazmi, on the other hand, had mixed reviews from his instructors but they did remark on how “adept” he was on his first flight.
Exactly how “adept” one has to be to pull off maneuvers that would be impossible for veteran crack fighter pilots is not explored in the Times report.
Related News:
AMSI – Iraqi Voice : Al-Qaeda is an American creation
http://musliminsuffer.wordpress.com/2007/1….merican-creation/
Fake Al-qaeda
http://www.whatreallyhappened.com/fakealqaeda.html
Top Police Officer Warns That Nuclear Attack Is Inevitable
http://www.sundayherald.com/news/he….ear_attack_is_inevitable.php
Al-Qaeda’s Rolodex
http://www.truthnews.us/?p=946
Saudis make up 41% of foreign fighters in Iraq
http://www.guardian.co.uk/Iraq/Story/0,,2215798,00.html?gusrc=rss&feed=12
Iraq’s foreign militants ‘come from US allies’
http://www.guardian.co.uk/Iraq/Story/0,,2215380,00.html
New Al-CIAda To Fight Old Al-CIAda
http://www.kavkazcenter.com/eng/content/2007/11/19/9101.shtml
Pentagon: Double funds for Pakistani force
http://www.usatoday.com/news/w..gon-pakistan_N.htm
A plan to attack Iran swiftly and from above
http://www.theglobeandmail.com/servlet/sto…pageRequested=2
Market Bomb Blamed on Iran – Backed Groups
http://www.nytimes.com/glogin?URI=http://www.nytimes….wCkR0S7cU
New Al-Qaeda Same As Old Al-Qaeda
http://intelstrike.com/?p=138
Al-Qaeda, the Muslim Blackwater
http://www.truthnews.us/?p=911
U.S. Blames Shiites in New Iraq Violence
Over Half of Afghanistan under Taliban Control
Time for Reality Check in Iran
Look Who’s Downplaying Iran’s Nuclear Threat
US general says Iran helping stop Iraq bloodshed
Iran heeding transparency pledge: IAEA
Powell: No military strike on Iran
Neocon accused of misquoting Iran’s leader to push case for invasion
A focus group is test marketing language that could be used to sell war with Iran
Powell: Iran is a long way from having nuclear weapon
IAEA: Iran generally truthful on nukes
US, Israel refuse to cooperate with inquest into Syria strike
So will Bush nuke Iran?
Reps: Bush doesn’t have authority to attack Iran; AIPAC interferes
‘Pentagon is preparing for nuclear Iran’
US PKK policy ‘provokes Turkish attack’
Taking Aim at the Cheney Threat
Why Must We Be the Loudest Drum-Beaters?
Bush Awards Historian Who Downplayed Abu Ghraib, Said We Need To Bomb ‘Paper Tiger’ Iran
Israel slams IAEA for ‘failing to expose’ Iran ambitions
Chávez sees oil at $200 if Iran invaded
Iraqi fighters ‘grilled for evidence on Iran’
Fallon: Iran strike ‘strategic mistake’
British PM open to military role in Iran
US strike on Iran ‘not being prepared’
FOX Anchor Calls for Terrorist Car Bombings In Iran
Brown warns Iran of investment sanctions
Report: Israel, US teaming up to take on Iran
Israel training intensively for nuclear strike on Iranian nuclear plants
In the Hands of the Military: We’re in Trouble
Experts: Danger of nuclear-armed Iran may be hyped
Bolton Smears ElBaradei As Iran Apologist, Says ‘Even A Stopped Clock Is Right Twice A Day’
White House frustrated with Brown over Iran
Lieberman: ‘Paranoid, Hyper-Partisan’ ‘Left-Wing Blogs’ Wrote ‘Conspiracy Theories’ On Iran
US: Iran attack plans ready if needed
Spooks refuse to toe Cheney’s line on Iran
US okays $155m arms package for Israel
Washington worried Israel gearing up to attack Iran
PGCC ‘ready for Iran-US confrontation’
‘Apocalyptic’ if Egypt, Saudi go nuclear: Israel minister
Two Iranian diplomats freed in Iraq
Bush defends World War Three comments on Iran
US generals planning revolt over Iran
U.S. Fifth Fleet in Gulf exercise for possible war in Iran
U.S. establishment’s acceptance of a possible war with Iran shows that the folly that led to Iraq still rules Washington
Italy’s Prodi opposed to military action against Iran
Iran’s nuclear programme irreversible
Giuliani: U.S. can’t afford to rule out war with Iran
What kind of nut wants war with Iran? : Joseph Galloway
Poll: Americans split on Iran
Bush Plan Envisioned Nuking Iran, Syria, Libya
Rod Dreher: Launching a war on Iran would be demented
War with Iran = Democrats’ Defeat?: Frank Rich
Lecture by Naomi Wolf – ‘End of America’
Bolton: U.S. should pursue “regime change” in Iran
Cheney : Military action still an option with Iran
B-2s drop dummy bombs on Big Island
Coup on Iran & False Flag News Archive
Filed under: 9/11, 9/11 commission, 9/11 engineers, 9/11 Explosions, 9/11 Eyewitness, 9/11 Families, 9/11 Financiers, 9/11 Firefighters, 9/11 hijackers, 9/11 Mysteries, 9/11 Physics, 9/11 survivors, 9/11 Truth, 9/11 wargames, Able Danger, al-qaeda, BBC, BBC foreknowledge, bin laden, Bin Laden Tapes, christy todd whitman, CIA, Condoleezza Rice, Controlled Demolition, Department of Defense, Dick Cheney, DoD, Donald Rumsfeld, False Flag, FBI, George Bush, George Tenent, inside job, ISI, Loose Change, Military, Mineta Testemony, mohammed atta, Mystery Plane, New York, NIST, NORAD, Official 9/11 Theory, Pentagon, Rudy Giuliani, secret service, State Sponsored Terrorism, thomas kean, war games, Washington D.C., White House, World Trade Center, wtc-7
Loose Change Final Cut
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-3719259008768610598&hl=en
Filed under: 9/11 Mysteries, 9/11 Truth, BBC foreknowledge, Controlled Demolition, Fox News, george carlin, larry silverstein, mark ruffalo, martin sheen, NIST, NORAD, Official 9/11 Theory, Pancake Theory, Propaganda, We Are Change, World Trade Center, wtc-7
Martin Sheen Questions Official 9/11 Story
Follows in footsteps of son Charlie Sheen, highlights implausible collapse of WTC 7, asks why building was “rigged”
Paul Joseph Watson
Prison Planet
October 29, 2007
Actor Martin Sheen questioned the official 9/11 story, as well as the collapse of Building 7 and Larry Silverstein’s “pull it” comment during an anti-war march this past weekend in Los Angeles, saying that recent revelations about the attacks had caused him to have doubts.
Sheen was interviewed by We Are Change L.A. along with fellow actor Mark Ruffalo during an event hosted by the ANSWER Coalition at which around 20,000 people attended.
Emmy and Golden Globe Award-winning Martin Sheen, star of blockbuster films like Apocalypse Now and hit series The West Wing, follows in the footsteps of his son Charlie Sheen, who publicly spoke of his doubts about the official 9/11 story back in March 2006.
Martin Sheen said that he was dubious about questioning the official story until his son introduced him to new information about the anomalies of what happened on that day.
“Up until last year, I was very dubious,” said Sheen, “I did not want to believe that my government could possibly be involved in such a thing, I could not live in a country that I thought could do that – that would be the ultimate betrayal,” he added.
“However, there have been so many revelations that now I have my doubts, and chief among them is Building 7 – how did they rig that building so that it came down on the evening of the day?” said Sheen.
Sheen also questioned the comments of Larry Silverstein, the leaseholder of the WTC complex, who told a September 2002 documentary that the decision was made to “pull” Building 7, a demolition industry term for the deliberate implosion of a structure.
“How convenient,” said Sheen, “When did they rig that building? That’s the most interesting question and I have not received a satisfactory answer – nobody could give me an answer to how you rig the building – what a coincidence – two weeks prior and then bring it down on the day, that is the one thing that I have not got a sensible answer about from anyone,” he concluded.
Sheen also stated that NORAD’s failure to follow its standard operating procedure on 9/11 was “something to wonder about”.
Watch the video below.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ocUxplGLnT4
Click here to listen to the audio MP3.
Though Fox News and other attack dogs are likely to seize upon Sheen’s comments and run hit pieces, the National Institute of Standards and Technology itself had to admit recently that the total collapse of the twin towers at free fall speed could not be explained.
NIST also promised to investigate whether explosive devices were involved in the collapse of Building 7 in August last year.
The issue of Building 7 stoked controversy earlier this year when archive footage from news networks including BBC and CNN emerged that showed correspondents reporting the collapse the 47-story skyscraper over 20 minutes before it fell, leading some to charge that people with foreknowledge of the collapse were feeding networks a script as the events of 9/11 unfolded.
Actor Ruffalo “Baffled” At Collapse Of Twin Towers
http://prisonplanet.com/articles/october2007/301007_ruffalo_baffled.htm
George Carlin Questions “Received Reality” Of 9/11 Story
http://www.prisonplanet.com/articl…91007_carlin_questions.htm
Filed under: 9/11, 9/11 Truth, al-qaeda, CIA, Detainees, Geneva Convention, George Bush, Guantanamo, hamas, Keith Olbermann, khalid sheikh mohammed, Official 9/11 Theory, Pentagon, Robert Baer, Torture, War Crimes, War On Terror
Ex-CIA Robert Baer Questions Use of Torture, Official 9/11 Story
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=90B-Ii4lz3Q
From last night’s Countdown with Keith Olbermann:
(excuse the poor quality)
Robert Baer spent 20 years working for the CIA. He was a field officer in the Middle East and has seen it all. He says torture is useless – it leads to false confessions. And he doesn’t believe the official story about 9/11. If CIA agents are questioning 9/11, then maybe you should be too. Do you even know the story of Building 7? What about the military drills going on that day – can you name them? Don’t bother looking in the 9/11 Commission Report for this information. They conveniently left out all the many suspicious details that point to 9/11 being an inside job.
War-Crimes Prosecutor Quits in Pentagon Clash
http://www.nytimes.com/200..20ocYnslWAI7nQc8UoQ
CIA still operates ‘black sites’ overseas, senior counterterrorism official says
http://rawstory.com/news/2007/CIA_still_operating_black_sites_overseas_1005.html
Bush says U.S. ‘does not torture people’
http://noworldsystem.com/2007/10/06/bush-says-us-does-not-torture-people/
Filed under: 9/11, 9/11 Truth, Air Force, Flight 93, Official 9/11 Theory, World Trade Center
Pilot who flew 2 planes used on 9/11 doesn’t believe official story
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=3606159506368831731&hl=en-GBF
Former Air Force fighter pilot Russ Wittenberg, who flew over 100 combat missions in Vietnam, sat in the cockpit for Pan Am and United for over 30 years, and previously flew two of the actual airplanes that were allegedly hijacked on 9/11 (United Airlines Flight 175 & 93), does not believe the government’s official 9/11 conspiracy theory…
RUSS WITTENBERG: “I flew the two actual aircraft which were involved in 9/11… Fight number 175 and Flight 93, the 757 that allegedly went down in Shanksville and Flight 175 is the aircraft that’s alleged to have hit the South Tower. I don’t believe it’s possible for… a so-called terrorist to train on a 172, then jump in a cockpit of a 757-767 class cockpit, and vertical navigate the aircraft, lateral navigate the aircraft, and fly the airplane at speeds exceeding it’s design limit speed by well over 100 knots, make high-speed high-banked turns,.. pulling probably 5, 6, 7 G’s… I couldn’t do it and I’m absolutely positive they couldn’t do it.”
Filed under: 9/11, 9/11 Truth, Bill Maher, Controlled Demolition, Official 9/11 Theory, Propaganda, World Trade Center
Bill Maher: 9/11 Truthers need professional help, not publicity
Mike Aivaz
Raw Story
September 16, 2007
Bill Maher takes a jab at the 9/11 Truth movement in a recent “New Rules” segment.
“Crazy people who still think the government brought down the Twin Towers in a controlled explosion have to stop pretending that I’m the one who’s being naive,” says Maher.
How big a lunatic do you have to be to watch two giant airliners packed with jet fuel slam into buildings on live TV, igniting a massive inferno that burned for two hours, and then think ‘Well, if you believe that was the cause…’
Stop asking me to raise this ridiculous topic on the show and start asking your doctor if Paxil is right for you.”
The following video is from HBO’s Real Time With Bill Maher, broadcast on September 14, 2007
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qxOljd9oOzo
Bill Maher: Corporate “Comic” and Shill for the Official 9/11 Fable
http://adereview.com/blog/?p=41
noworldsystem.com 