Filed under: 1st amendment, abc news, al-qaeda, bilderberg, brainwashing, Britain, Child Abuse, CIA, Conditioning, Dissent, enemy combatant, Europe, european union, False Flag, Fascism, Fox News, global elite, Globalism, jim tucker, Media, Media Fear, Mi5, michael hayden, Nazi, neocons, New World Order, Pakistan, Police State, Propaganda, Protest, secret meetings, Secret Societies, State Sponsored Terrorism, Uncategorized, United Kingdom, US Constitution, War On Terror
Media Hypes Blond, Blue-Eyed Terrorists
Steve Watson
Infowars.net
June 25, 2008
Following in the footsteps of Fox News, and almost word for word repeating unsubstantiated claims by the head of the CIA, ABC News ran a piece earlier this week alleging that white westerners are being trained in Al Qaeda terror camps in Pakistan with the intention of carrying out attacks in Europe and the USA.
The ABC report appeared on World News With Charles Gibson this past Monday. Gibson stated:
“Intelligence officials say it is their number one concern. Caucasians from a European country who have graduated from an al Qaeda training camp. Such potential terrorists would be dressed in western clothing, drawing little notice as they board a plane bound for the US, coming to launch an attack. There’s no indication such an attack is imminent, but this scenario is of great concern to experts in and out of the government.”
In addition, an article from the London Telegraph today relates that police in Yorkshire have identified a 12 year old blonde haired schoolboy as an Al Qaeda extremist after he sent links to beheading videos posted on the internet to his classmates.
The boy was reported to police by his school, who also indicated that he had an “unnatural interest in guns and weapons”.
Clearly the child is a hardcore terrorist.
Police revealed that they are monitoring hundreds of children in a new anti-terrorism scheme which is designed to “target al-Qaeda inspired youths”.
As we have documented, the blue eyed blonde haired Al-Qaeda line is a familiar talking point that has been pushed on Fox News and within other Neo-Con circles in an attempt to turn the anti-terror apparatus around to target dissidents, protesters and the American people in general.
The origin of the concept was based on a comment by a single MI5 source that was subsequently picked up in a Scotsman article back in January, which claimed that Al-Qaeda have recruited 1,500 white Britons to carry out attacks in the UK.
Since that time the corporate media has increasingly focused on the idea and returned to the story again and again.
This hype culminated in a March announcement by CIA boss Michael Hayden that Al-Qaeda is training new fighters that “look western” and could easily cross U.S. borders.
“They are bringing operatives into that region for training — operatives that wouldn’t attract your attention if they were going through the customs line at Dulles (airport outside Washington) with you when you were coming back from overseas,” Hayden told NBC’s Meet The Press.
“(They) look western (and) would be able to come into this country without attracting the kinds of attention that others might,” he added, with Reuters forced to point out that Hayden offered nothing to substantiate his claim.
In addition, the concept was even debated earlier this month by elitists at the secretive 2008 Bilderberg meeting.
Sources inside the meeting leaked details of elitist talking points which included the need to highlight a new phenomenon of terrorist groups, recruits and sympathizers identified as blonde haired, blue eyed westerners.
“Under the heading of resisting terrorism there were points made about how the terrorist organizations are recruiting people who do not look like terrorists – blonde, blue eyed boys – they’re searching hard for those types to become the new mad bombers,” reported veteran Bilderberg sleuth Jim Tucker.
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/money/m..008/06/23/ccview123.xml
ABC News: White European Al-Qaeda training in Pakistan
http://www6.lexisnexis.com/publis..007216&docId=l:811400925&start=4
Filed under: airstrikes, al-qaeda, CIA, Colin Powell, Coup, False Flag, IAEA, Iran, Iraq, Israel, michael hayden, Military, military strike, nation building, north korea, Nuke, occupation, Propaganda, Raid, Saber Rattling, Saddam Hussein, Shock and Awe, Syria, Tehran, UN, Uncategorized, War On Terror, WMD, WW3, ww4
Syria says US reactor charges as fake as Iraq WMD claims
AFP
April 28, 2008
Syria said on Monday that US accusations it had been building a nuclear reactor until its destruction in an Israeli air raid last September were as bogus as American claims that Saddam Hussein’s regime had weapons of mass destruction in 2003.
The ruling Baath party’s mouthpiece daily compared the photographs of the bombed site shown to US congressmen last week to the images Washington presented to the UN Security Council as alleged evidence of Iraq’s non-conventional arsenal in the run-up to the US-led invasion.
“When you look at these pictures… a single image comes to mind — that of US Secretary of State Colin Powell accusing Iraq of hiding weapons of mass destruction and presenting as proof a dossier of photographs,” Al-Baath said.
“Of course Mr Powell later acknowledged that he had been fooled by the US intelligence services and by conservatives within the administration.
“The new US campaign of lies should surprise nobody — it’s a continuation of the same policy of US pressure against Syria that’s been going on” for the past five years, the paper added.
“Syria again rejects the US allegations and reaffirms that it has nothing to hide concerning its legitimate national defences. Syria wants to see peace in the region, unlike the current US administration which has been behind all its wars and crises.”
Assad denies building nuclear reactor
AFP
April 27, 2008
Syrian President Bashar al-Assad denied in remarks published on Sunday that a site raided by Israel last year was a nuclear reactor under construction as charged by the United States.
Last September’s Israeli air strike “hit a military site under construction, not a nuclear site as Israel and America claimed,” Assad told the Qatari daily Al-Watan in an interview.
“Does it make sense that we would build a nuclear facility in the desert and not protect it with anti-aircraft defences?” he asked.
“A nuclear site exposed to (spy) satellites, in the heart of Syria and in an open space?
“We don’t want a nuclear bomb even if Iran acquires one,” added Assad, whose country is a close ally of Tehran, itself embroiled in a standoff with Washington over its nuclear activities.
“Where would we use it?… War in the region will effectively remain conventional,” he said.
Assad underlined that he believed Iran “does not think differently” on this score.
Iran has repeatedly rejected Western suspicions that its nuclear programme is cover for a drive to develop an atomic bomb.
It says nuclear weapons are un-Islamic and insists the programme is aimed solely at generating power for a growing population once fossil fuels run out.
The United States has accused Syria of building a secret atomic reactor with North Korean help.
On Thursday, US national security officials briefed US congressmen, presenting intelligence they said showed Syria had been building a secret nuclear reactor for military ends.
They said the plant was being built with the help of North Korea, until its destruction by Israel in an air raid on September 6.
The International Atomic Energy Agency launched an investigation into the US accusations on Friday but chided both Israel and the United States for their handling of the affair.
Syria promised its full cooperation.
http://latimesblogs.latimes.com/babylonbeyond/2008/04/syria-more-ques.html
General Hayden: Syrian site could have produced fuel for 2 weapons
http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20080428/ap_on_go_ot/nuclear_syria
Syrian envoy says CIA fabricated evidence
http://ap.google.com/article/ALeqM5h9koW8sbYaxGGzOuU1O6cntXva1AD9095UJ80
Filed under: Abu Laith al-Libi, Afghanistan, airstrikes, al-qaeda, B-52, CIA, civilian casualties, False Flag, FBI, George Bush, michael hayden, Military, military strike, Musharraf, neocons, Pakistan, Taliban, Troops, uav, War On Terror, Washington D.C., White House, William Fallon | Tags: Mike McConnell, Mike Mullen, PPP, South Waziristan
Musharraf Approves US Military Strike in Pakistan
The Times of India
March 24, 2008
The Musharraf regime has indirectly approved the US Drone (pilotless plane) attacks on al-Qaida targets in tribal areas of Pakistan bordering Afghanistan.
Since January, missiles have been fired from the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) operated Predator drones and have hit at least three suspected hideouts of Islamic militants, including a strike on March 16 in Toog village in South Waziristan that left 20 dead.
Sources said that the recent wave of Predator attacks are the result of Musharraf’s understanding with the US officials and other top Pakistanis which gave Washington virtually unrestricted authority to hit targets in the border areas.
The surge began after senior US official’s visit to Pakistan including intelligence czar Mike McConnell, CIA director General Michael Hayden and William Fallon, who recently resigned as Commander of the US forces in the region.
Bruce Riedel, a retired CIA expert on the region, said that a new wave of terrorism inside Pakistan (there were 62 suicide attacks last year, after just six in 2006) has forced Musharraf and the new military chief Ashfaq Kiyani to acknowledge that the extremists threatening Americans now also pose a growing threat to Pakistan’s internal security.
Another US strike inside Pakistan’s border region
WSWS
March 19, 2008
An air strike on Sunday on a compound in the Pakistani tribal area of South Waziristan that borders Afghanistan has left up to 20 people dead. While Washington has not acknowledged responsibility, there is little doubt that the US military or the CIA carried out the attack as part of a widening covert war against anti-American militants entrenched in the Pakistani border areas.
Up to seven missiles or bombs flattened the compound just south of the regional centre of Wana at around 3 p.m. “When I heard the explosions, I rushed to the place where it happened. I saw dead bodies scattered everywhere,” a villager Aziz Ullah Wazir told the Washington Post. Local residents and officials claimed that the house belonged to a Taliban sympathiser, Noorullah Wazir, and was frequented by “Arabs”—the term used to denote foreign supporters of the Taliban and Al Qaeda.
Veteran journalist Sailab Masood told the Guardian, however, that local tribesmen were angry that innocent civilians had been killed.
Details of the attack are scanty. According to the New York Times, villagers said a B-52 bomber carried out the raid. Other reports cite locals who claim to have heard the sound of a US Predator drone—an unmanned surveillance vehicle that has been used in previous attacks inside Pakistan. The Pakistani military acknowledged that the blasts had occurred, but pointedly refused to identify the attackers, saying only that the army had no operations in the area.
Both Washington and Islamabad are deliberately playing down the attack, which will only further fuel anger at Pakistan’s support for the US-led occupation of Afghanistan. President Pervez Musharraf’s involvement in the Bush administration’s bogus “war on terrorism” and tacit approval of US operations inside Pakistan were a major factor in generating opposition to his regime.
The issue remains highly sensitive as the winners of last month’s elections—the Pakistan People’s Party (PPP) and the Pakistan Muslim League-Nawaz (PML-N)—prepare to form a government. Whatever their limited criticisms of US militarism during the campaign, both parties have a long record of supporting Pakistan’s alliance with Washington and collaborating with the US military. Significantly, neither party has protested against the latest missile strike, an indication that the new government, like Musharraf, will acquiesce to US strikes in the tribal areas.
There are many signs that the Bush administration has expanded covert operations inside Pakistan since the beginning of the year. In early January, the New York Times reported that a top-level White House meeting, involving Vice President Dick Cheney, Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice, National Security Adviser Stephen Hadley and other senior officials, discussed in detail “far more aggressive covert operations” inside Pakistani border areas.
“The new operations for expanded covert operations include loosening restrictions on the CIA to strike selected targets in Pakistan, in some cases using intelligence provided by Pakistani sources, officials said. Most counter terrorism operations in Pakistan have been conducted by the CIA… [I]f the CIA were given broader authority, it could call for help from the military or deputise some forces of the Special Operations Command to act under the authority of the agency,” the article stated.
While the New York Times claimed that no decisions were taken at the January meeting, another article last month reported that the CIA had established a base inside Pakistan. “Among other things, the new arrangements allowed an increase in the number and scope of patrols and strikes by armed Predator surveillance aircraft launched from a secret base in Pakistan—a far more aggressive strategy to attack Al Qaeda and the Taliban than had existed before,” the Times explained.
In its report of Sunday’s strike, the Times noted that Mike McConnell, director of national intelligence and General Michael Hayden, director of the Central Intelligence Agency, reached an agreement in January with the new Pakistani army chief, General Ashfaq Parvez Kayani, to allow the US greater freedom to strike targets in the tribal areas without specific permission from the Pakistani Army. The article claimed that the US was receiving “better on-the-ground human intelligence” by providing “large cash payments to tribesmen”.
There has been a marked increase in visits to Pakistan this year by senior American military officers, including two by the chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, Admiral Mike Mullen. During his latest visit on March 4, Admiral Mullen discussed US assistance to expand Pakistan’s Frontier Corps to a force of around 85,000 recruited from tribesmen in the border areas. The Pentagon has already spent around $25 million to provide the Frontier Corps with equipment, including vehicles, radios and surveillance devices, and plans to spend another $75 million over the next year.
At least two other US aerial attacks have taken place inside Pakistan this year. On January 29, a missile destroyed a compound in the village of Khushali Torikhel in North Waziristan, killing 13 people. US and Pakistani officials claimed that Abu Laith al-Libi, a senior Al Qaeda commander, was among the dead. On February 28, a missile strike destroyed an alleged Taliban safe house in the village of Kaloosha in South Waziristan, killing at least 10 people. A local tribal leader told the Washington Post that women and children were among the dead, and that at least six others were injured.
It is not possible to confirm the identity of the victims of these attacks. In neighbouring Afghanistan, US officials routinely brand the casualties of US operations as “Taliban” and “Al Qaeda” and deny civilian deaths even in cases where locals have provided clear evidence to the contrary. On-the-ground intelligence provided by paid informants is often unreliable and coloured by local rivalries and animosities. Claims about the outcome of US strikes inside Pakistan are undoubtedly just as uncertain.
Other attacks on targets within Pakistan are taking place from US bases inside Afghanistan. Pakistani officials lodged a formal complaint with the US military after artillery fire from Afghanistan hit a house in North Waziristan last Wednesday, killing two women and two children. According to the Pakistani-based News, last Friday four missiles fell on the village of Botraki, just inside the Pakistani border.
The extent of Washington’s covert war inside Pakistan remains unclear, but such operations are fuelling widespread anger and provoking a rising number of suicide bombings and attacks on Pakistani security forces and other targets. Last Saturday, a bomb blast at a restaurant in Islamabad popular with foreigners killed a Turkish woman and wounded at least 10 others, including five American officials, two Japanese journalists and a British police officer. Four of the five Americans were FBI agents operating in Pakistan.
The escalation of US operations can only have a profoundly destabilising impact, not just in the border regions, but throughout Pakistan, which is already wracked by deep political crisis. While the PPP and PML-N won a decisive victory in last month’s election, in part because of their criticism of Musharraf’s collaboration with the US, the mood will quickly turn as the new government seeks to maintain the US alliance amid ongoing American strikes on Pakistani soil.
Filed under: 9/11, 9/11 commission, 9/11 Families, 9/11 hijackers, 9/11 patsies, 9/11 Truth, 93 bombing, al-qaeda, Antonin Scalia, bin laden, Detainees, Extraordinary Rendition, FBI, George Bush, Guantanamo, Khalid Sheik Mohammed, KSM, michael hayden, New York, NORAD, Official 9/11 Theory, Pentagon, put options, secret camps, Torture, War On Terror, waterboarding, World Trade Center
Tortured Patsies To Take Fall For 9/11
Pentagon hopes executed scapegoats will make questions disappear
Paul Joseph Watson
Prison Planet
February 11, 2008
After half a dozen years of waterboarding, genital zapping, sleep deprivation and brainwashing, the Pentagon has finally found six patsies who will readily welcome their 72 virgins and take the fall for 9/11, providing debunkers with ample ammunition to dismiss questions about the gaping holes in the official story of the terror attacks.
“Among those held at Guantanamo is Khalid Sheik Mohammed, the suspected mastermind of the attack six years ago in which hijacked planes were flown into buildings in New York and Washington. Five others are expected to be named in sworn charges,” reports the Associated Press.
The fact that KSM’s confession included a plan to target the Plaza Bank building in Washington state, which was not founded until 2006, four years after the alleged Al-Qaeda mastermind’s arrest, should provide a clue as to the reliability of the “terror mastermind’s” culpability for 9/11.
But that was not the only plan that Sheik Mohammed was alleged to have hatched, as he claimed responsibility for everything from three assassination plots against Clinton, Carter and the Pope, to the FBI sponsored 1993 World Trade Center bombing. He surprisingly stopped short of accepting the blame for global warming and the Challenger space shuttle disaster.
Even CNN’s audience was not buying the propaganda at the time, with 74% saying they disbelieved the authenticity of KSM’s confession. CIA veteran Robert Baer wrote a stinging Time Magazine piece dismissing the supposition that KSM was “responsible for the 9/11 operation from A-Z” as he claimed in between cattle prod sessions.
It would be very clear why the establishment would be interested in hanging out the Ron Jeremy of terrorism to dry as the scapegoat for an official 9/11 story that holds about as much weight as a Milan cat-walk model. By invoking the “but he admitted it” line, any debate about the mountain of unanswered questions surrounding the attacks, which prompted 9/11 families to demand a new investigation last week, is effectively silenced. The fact that the 9/11 Commission was riddled with Bush administration cronies can also be swept under the rug.
But this cuts both ways.
In his first interview following 9/11, Osama Bin Laden denied any involvement in the attacks.
“I have already said that I am not involved in the 11 September attacks in the United States. As a Muslim, I try my best to avoid telling a lie. I had no knowledge of these attacks, nor do I consider the killing of innocent women, children and other humans as an appreciable act. Islam strictly forbids causing harm to innocent women, children and other people. Such a practice is forbidden even in the course of a battle,” Bin Laden told the Pakistani based Ummat newspaper.
If Bin Laden wasn’t involved in 9/11 then KSM’s “confession” is rendered obsolete.
Since Khalid has squealed on the “A to Z” of 9/11 and will face a lethal injection, perhaps he can provide some answers to a few troubling little questions that still have us 9/11 “conspiracy nuts” running around in circles before he kicks the bucket;
– Was Khalid Shaikh Mohammed responsible for the FBI ordering the 1993 World Trade Center bombing to go ahead? In his confession, KSM says he ran the attack but fails to explain why it was the FBI who provided the terror cell with the bomb materials through their informant.
– Was Khalid Shaikh Mohammed responsible for NORAD completely reversing its standard operating procedure on the day of 9/11?
– Was Khalid Shaikh Mohammed responsible for the collapse of three steel buildings, one that was not hit by a plane, from fire damage alone for the first and only time in history?
– Was Khalid Shaikh Mohammed responsible for warning, according to Newsweek, a group of top Pentagon officials to cancel their flights on the evening of September 10th due to security concerns?
– Was Khalid Shaikh Mohammed responsible for the record number of ‘put’ options, speculation that the stock of a company will fall, that were placed on American and United Airlines in the days preceding September 11th? This despite a September 10th Reuters report stating ‘airline stocks set to fly.’
– Was Khalid Shaikh Mohammed responsible for blocking FBI anti-terrorism investigations before 9/11 related to the bin Laden family and Saudi charities that were front groups for Al-Qaeda?
– Was Khalid Shaikh Mohammed responsible for advising the Secret Service not to remove President Bush from a completely unsecured Florida elementary school by letting them know he wasn’t a target on 9/11?
Of course if the Pentagon gets their way, such questions will disappear along with any chance that the executed patsies could ever recant and contribute to the true perpetrators of 9/11 being identified.
http://prisonplanet.com/articles/february2008/120208_scalia.htm
U.S. Wants To Execute Six Patsies For 9/11
http://www.roguegovernment.com/news.php?id=6592
US to Try 9/11 Suspects in “Kangaroo Court”
http://www.independent.co..ptember-11-attacks-781007.html
More evidence of Pre-9/11 Inside Trading: Follow the Money? God forbid
http://globalresearch.ca/index.php?c..va&aid=8046
‘I was waterboarded during my training as a Navy flight crew member… [C]utting off a finger would have been preferable’
http://www.washingtonpo..008020803156.html?nav=rss_print/outlook
Hayden Admits: Contractors Lead ‘Enhanced Interrogations’ at CIA Black Sites
http://blog.wired.com/defense/2008/02/in-testimony-be.html
CIA chief doubts waterboarding tactic is still legal
http://www.iht.com/articles/2008/02/08/america/08intel.php
AP Confirms Secret Camp Inside Gitmo
http://www.guardian.co.uk/worldlatest/story/0,,-7288144,00.html
6 Guantánamo Detainees Are Said to Face Trial Over 9/11
http://www.nytimes.com/200..&hp&oref=slogin&oref=slogin
Filed under: Abu Zubaydah, al-qaeda, Alberto Gonzales, CIA, Congress, Detainee, Geneva Convention, George Bush, Guantanamo, Iran, larry johnson, lindsey graham, michael hayden, neocons, obstruction of justice, rockefeller, Senate, Torture, waterboarding, White House
The White House and Congress Knew about the CIA Interrogation Videotapes
George Washington’s Blog
December 12, 2007
According to a former “senior intelligence official”, the White House knew of the existence of the CIA interrogation tapes since 2003, at the very latest, and tacitly approved the destruction of the tapes in 2005.
Indeed, former CIA agent and State Department counterterrorism official Larry Johnson said that it was “highly likely” that President Bush himself had viewed the videotapes of the 2002 interrogations that were later destroyed. Is that why the White House has instructed its spokesperson not to answer any questions on the subject?
And according to the Director of the CIA, Congress was also informed about the existence of the tapes, and — later — of the CIA’s intention to destroy them.
Indeed, Senator Rockefeller has confirmed that the Senate Intelligence Committee knew of the existence of the videotapes in 2003. And Congresswoman Harman has confirmed that the House Intelligence Committee also learned of the existence of the videotapes in 2003. Is that why Senator Rockefeller opposes any real investigation into the destruction of the tapes, saying “I don’t think there’s a need for a special counsel, and I don’t think there’s a need for a special commission”?
The obstruction of justice regarding the tapes appears to have been orchestrated by the very highest levels of the U.S. Government.
Guantanamo Legal Adviser Refuses To Say Iranians Waterboarding Americans Would Be Torture
Think Progress
December 12, 2007
During a Senate Judiciary Committee hearing on “The Legal Rights of Guantanamo Detainees” this morning, Brigadier General Thomas W. Hartmann, the legal adviser at Guantanamo Bay, repeatedly refused to call the hypothetical waterboarding of an American pilot by the Iranian military torture. “I’m not equipped to answer that question,” said Hartmann.
Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-SC), who asked the hypothetical, pushed Hartmann on his answer, asking him directly if it would be a “violation of the Geneva Convention”:
GRAHAM: You mean you’re not equipped to give a legal opinion as to whether or not Iranian military waterboarding, secret security agents waterboarding downed airmen is a violation of the Geneva Convention?
HARTMANN: I am not prepared to answer that question, Senator.
After Hartmann twice refused to answer, Graham dismissed him in disgust, saying he had “no further questions.” Watch it:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=89cYbggdGVQ
Longer Version: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3jbcWzSVcco
Hartmann’s non-answer is reminiscent of State Department Legal Adviser John Bellinger’s refusal in October to condemn “the use of water boarding on an American national by a foreign intelligence service.”
But not every lawyer who’s worked for the Bush administration has been so hesitant to call waterboarding torture.
In 2004, after then-acting assistant attorney general Daniel Levin had himself waterboarded, he concluded that the interrogation technique “could be illegal torture.” For his efforts, “Levin was forced out of the Justice Department when Alberto Gonzales became Attorney General.”
Sen. Graham, a former military judge advocate, has said before that someone doesn’t “have to have a lot of knowledge about the law to understand this technique violates Geneva Convention Common Article Three.”
Let’s (Not) Go to the Videotape!
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bX_1Qsq0DTM
Related News:
Ex-CIA Larry Johnson: ‘Highly likely’ Bush saw torture tapes
http://billpressmedia.com/highlylikely.mp3
Ex-CIA agent: Waterboarding approved at top levels
http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20…co/cia_videotapes
White House Was Ordered Not To Destroy Torture Evidence
http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/2007…eotapes_courts
CIA may have more interrogation tapes, detainee’s lawyer suggests
http://rawstory.com/news/2007/White_H…on_of_1211.html
CIA Failed To Inform Congress About Tapes
http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2…ecrypt/main3611381.shtml
White House goes ‘no comment’ on CIA video case
http://rawstory.com/news/afp/W…video_c_12102007.html
Former CIA: Waterboarding Useful But Torture
http://in.reuters.com/article/worldNews…0938320071211
CIA Director To Testify About Destroyed Tapes
http://www.reuters.com/articl…654798320071210?sp=true
Secretly briefed, Pelosi did not object to waterboarding in 2002
http://rawstory.com/news/200…t_to_waterboarding_1209.html
Destroyed CIA torture tapes said to implicate Pakistan and Saudi Royal Family in 9/11 attacks
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/ge….destroyed-inter_b_75850.html
Photos Show UK Gitmo Detainee Was Tortured
Man Held By CIA Says He Was Tortured
McCain: No Investigation Needed
Congress Looks Into C.I.A. Obstruction As Calls for Justice Inquiry Rise
‘Well-Informed’ Source Tells CBS That Tapes Were Destroyed To Prevent Prosecution
Lee Hamilton Says the CIA Obstructed the 9/11 Commission
Inquiry into CIA interrogation tapes’ destruction begins
CIA destroyed video of ‘waterboarding’ al-Qaida detainees
C.I.A. Destroyed Tapes of Interrogations
C.I.A. Destroyed 2 Tapes Showing Interrogations
CIA admits destroying interrogation tapes
Filed under: 9/11, 9/11 commission, 9/11 Truth, Abu Zubaydah, Afghanistan, al-qaeda, CIA, Detainee, False Flag, Guantanamo, Iran, ISI, John McCain, lee hamilton, michael hayden, neocons, obstruction of justice, Pakistan, Saudi Arabia, State Sponsored Terrorism, sunni, Torture, waterboarding, Zacarias Moussaoui
Destroyed CIA torture tapes said to implicate Pakistan and Saudi Royal Family in 9/11 attacks
Huffington Post
December 7, 2007
On December 5, the CIA’s director, General Michael V. Hayden, issued a statement disclosing that in 2005 at least two videotapes of interrogations with al Qaeda prisoners were destroyed. The tapes, which the CIA did not provide to either the 9/11 Commission, nor to a federal court in the case of Zacarias Moussaoui, were destroyed, claimed Hayden, to protect the safety of undercover operatives.
Hayden did not disclose one of the al Qaeda suspects whose tapes were destroyed. But he did identify the other. It was Abu Zubaydah, the top ranking terror suspect when he was tracked and captured in Pakistan in 2003. In September 2006, at a press conference in which he defended American interrogation techniques, President Bush also mentioned Abu Zubaydah by name. Bush acknowledged that Zubaydah, who was wounded when captured, did not initially cooperate with his interrogators, but that eventually when he did talk, his information was, according to Bush, “quite important.”
In my 2003 New York Times bestseller, Why America Slept: The Failure to Prevent 9/11, I discussed Abu Zubaydah at length in Chapter 19, “The Interrogation.” There I set forth how Zubaydah initially refused to help his American captors. Also, disclosed was how U.S. intelligence established a so-called “fake flag” operation, in which the wounded Zubaydah was transferred to Afghanistan under the ruse that he had actually been turned over to the Saudis. The Saudis had him on a wanted list, and the Americans believed that Zubaydah, fearful of torture and death at the hands of the Saudis, would start talking when confronted by U.S. agents playing the role of Saudi intelligence officers.
Instead, when confronted by his “Saudi” interrogators, Zubaydah showed no fear. Instead, according to the two U.S. intelligence sources that provided me the details, he seemed relieved. The man who had been reluctant to even confirm his identity to his U.S. captors, suddenly talked animatedly. He was happy to see them, he said, because he feared the Americans would kill him. He then asked his interrogators to call a senior member of the Saudi royal family. And Zubaydah provided a private home number and a cell phone number from memory. “He will tell you what to do,” Zubaydah assured them
That man was Prince Ahmed bin Salman bin Abdul-Aziz, one of King Fahd’s nephews, and the chairman of the largest Saudi publishing empire. Later, American investigators would determine that Prince Ahmed had been in the U.S. on 9/11.
American interrogators used painkillers to induce Zubaydah to talk — they gave him the meds when he cooperated, and withdrew them when he was quiet. They also utilized a thiopental sodium drip (a so-called truth serum). Several hours after he first fingered Prince Ahmed, his captors challenged the information, and said that since he had disparaged the Saudi royal family, he would be executed. It was at that point that some of the secrets of 9/11 came pouring out. In a short monologue, that one investigator told me was the “Rosetta Stone” of 9/11, Zubaydah laid out details of how he and the al Qaeda hierarchy had been supported at high levels inside the Saudi and Pakistan governments.
He named two other Saudi princes, and also the chief of Pakistan’s air force, as his major contacts. Moreover, he stunned his interrogators, by charging that two of the men, the King’s nephew, and the Pakistani Air Force chief, knew a major terror operation was planned for America on 9/11.
It would be nice to further investigate the men named by Zubaydah, but that is not possible. All four identified by Zubaydah are now dead. As for the three Saudi princes, the King’s 43-year-old nephew, Prince Ahmed, died of either a heart attack or blood clot, depending on which report you believe, after having liposuction in Riyadh’s top hospital; the second, 41-year-old Prince Sultan bin Faisal bin Turki al-Saud, died the following day in a one car accident, on his way to the funeral of Prince Ahmed; and one week later, the third Saudi prince named by Zubaydah, 25-year-old Prince Fahd bin Turki bin Saud al-Kabir, died, according to the Saudi Royal Court, “of thirst.” The head of Pakistan’s Air Force, Mushaf Ali Mir, was the last to go. He died, together with his wife and fifteen of his top aides, when his plane blew up — suspected as sabotage — in February 2003. Pakistan’s investigation of the explosion — if one was even done — has never been made public.
Zubaydah is the only top al Queda operative who has secretly linked two of America’s closest allies in the war on terror — Saudi Arabia and Pakistan — to the 9/11 attacks. Why does Bush, and the CIA, continue to protect the Saudi Royal family and the Pakistani military, from the implications of Zubaydah’s confessions? It is, or course, because the Bush administration desperately needs Pakistani and Saudi help, not only to keep Afghanistan from spinning completely out of control, but also as counterweights to the growing power of Iran. The Sunni governments in Riyadh and Islamabad have as much to fear from a resurgent Iran as does the Bush administration. But does this mean that leads about the origins of 9/11 should not be aggressively pursued? Of course not. But this is precisely what the Bush administration is doing. And now the cover-up is enhanced by the CIA’s destruction of Zubaydah’s interrogation tapes.
The American public deserves no less than the complete truth about 9/11. And those CIA officials now complicit in hiding the truth by destroying key evidence should be held responsible.
Related News:
Man Held By CIA Says He Was Tortured
http://www.nytimes.com/2007/12/09/washin…./hArvvL67u7/dpvA
McCain: No Investigation Needed
http://politicalinquirer.com/2007/1…stigation-needed/
Congress Looks Into C.I.A. Obstruction As Calls for Justice Inquiry Rise
http://www.nytimes.com/2007/12/08/washi….Uioe%2BjiIYg
‘Well-Informed’ Source Tells CBS That Tapes Were Destroyed To Prevent Prosecution
http://thinkprogress.org/2007/12/08/cbs-source-tapes/
Lee Hamilton Says the CIA Obstructed the 9/11 Commission
http://www.911blogger.com/node/12894
Inquiry into CIA interrogation tapes’ destruction begins
http://rawstory.com/news/2007/Inquiry_…s_1208.html
CIA destroyed video of ‘waterboarding’ al-Qaida detainees
http://www.guardian.co.uk/usa/story/0,,2223738,00.html
C.I.A. Destroyed Tapes of Interrogations
C.I.A. Destroyed 2 Tapes Showing Interrogations
CIA admits destroying interrogation tapes
Filed under: Abu Ghraib, Afghanistan, Alberto Gonzales, CIA, Congress, Detainees, Geneva Convention, George Bush, Guantanamo, House, Iraq, John McCain, michael hayden, Torture, War On Terror, waterboarding, White House
Bush says U.S. ‘does not torture people’
President responds to report that 2005 memo relaxed interrogation rules
MSNBC
October 5, 2007
WASHINGTON – President Bush defended his administration’s detention and interrogation policies for terrorism suspects on Friday, saying they are both successful and lawful.
“When we find somebody who may have information regarding a potential attack on America, you bet we’re going to detain them, and you bet we’re going to question them,” he said during a hastily called appearance in the Oval Office. “The American people expect us to find out information, actionable intelligence so we can help protect them. That’s our job.”
Bush was referring to a report on two secret memos in 2005 that authorized extreme interrogation tactics against terror suspects. “This government does not torture people,” the president said.
The two Justice Department legal opinions were disclosed in Thursday’s editions of The New York Times, which reported that the first 2005 legal opinion authorized the use of head slaps, freezing temperatures and simulated drownings, known as waterboarding, while interrogating terror suspects, and was issued shortly after then-Attorney General Alberto Gonzales took over the Justice Department.
That secret opinion, which explicitly allowed using the painful methods in combination, came months after a December 2004 opinion in which the Justice Department publicly declared torture “abhorrent” and the administration seemed to back away from claiming authority for such practices.
A second Justice opinion was issued later in 2005, just as Congress was working on an anti-torture bill. That opinion declared that none of the CIA’s interrogation practices would violate the rules in the legislation banning “cruel, inhuman and degrading” treatment of detainees, The Times said, citing interviews with unnamed current and former officials.
“We stick to U.S. law and international obligations,” the president said, without taking questions afterward.
‘Highly trained professionals’
White House and Justice Department press officers have said the 2005 opinions did not reverse the 2004 policy.
Bush, speaking emphatically, noted that “highly trained professionals” conduct any questioning. “And by the way,” he said, “we have gotten information from these high-value detainees that have helped protect you.”
He also said that the techniques used by the United States “have been fully disclosed to appropriate members of the United States Congress” — an indirect slap at the torrent of criticism that has flowed from the Democratic-controlled Congress since the memos’ disclosure.
“The American people expect their government to take action to protect them from further attack,” Bush said. “And that’s exactly what this government is doing. And that’s exactly what we’ll continue to do.”
The 2005 opinions approved by Gonzales remain in effect despite efforts by Congress and the courts to limit interrogation practices used by the government in response to the Sept. 11, 2001, terrorist attacks. The authorizations came after the withdrawal of an earlier classified Justice opinion, issued in 2002, that had allowed certain aggressive interrogation practices so long as they stopped short of producing pain equivalent to experiencing organ failure or death. That controversial memo was withdrawn in June 2004.
The dispute may come down to how the Bush administration defines torture, or whether it allowed U.S. interrogators to interpret anti-torture laws beyond legal limits. CIA spokesman George Little said the agency sought guidance from the Bush administration and Congress to make sure its program to detain and interrogate terror suspects followed U.S. law.
Democrats want memos
Senate and House Democrats have demanded to see the memos.
“Why should the public have confidence that the program is either legal or in the best interests of the United States?” Senate Intelligence Committee Chairman Jay Rockefeller, D-W.Va., wrote in a letter to the acting attorney general.
House Judiciary Chairman John Conyers and Rep. Jerrold Nadler, D-N.Y., promised a congressional inquiry.
Sen. John McCain, R-Ariz., said he was “personally assured by administration officials that at least one of the techniques allegedly used in the past, waterboarding, was prohibited under the new law.”
A White House spokesman, meanwhile, criticized the leak of such information to the news media and questioned the motivations of those who do so.
“It’s troubling,” Tony Fratto said Friday. “I’ve had the awful responsibility to have to work with The New York Times and other news organizations on stories that involve the release of classified information. And I can tell you that every time I’ve dealt with any of these stories, I have felt that we have chipped away at the safety and security of America with the publication of this kind of information.”
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-kWGwOVuLBY
CIA detention program still active: official
http://today.reuters.com/news/articlenew….TERROGATIONS.xml
White House Says US Does Not Torture
http://www.globalsecurity.org/intell/library/news/2007/intell-071004-voa01.htm
The Guantanamo Guidebook (2005)
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-1403370850111668271&hl=en
Filed under: al-qaeda, Al-Qaeda Tapes, bin laden, Bin Laden Tapes, CIA, Globalism, IntelCenter, Iraq, michael hayden, Pakistan, Propaganda, Psyops, sunni
Number Of AlCIAda Tapes On The Rise
UPI
September 24, 2007
United Press International – Seemingly untroubled by the worldwide search for Osama bin Laden and his allies, al Qaeda maintains a state-of-the-art multimedia production facility that is pumping out increasingly sophisticated audiotapes and videotapes at a rate of two or three a week.
Ironically, however, there is evidence that Muslim audiences are tuning out the al Qaeda propaganda even as the quality and frequency of the offerings increase.
A rash of recent bin Laden tapes, most recently a message to the people of Pakistan last week, has been the work of the as-Sahab Institute, the terrorist network’s media arm.
According to IntelCenter, a U.S. firm that tracks and analyzes al Qaeda’s audiovisual messages for clients, including U.S. agencies, as-Sahab has released more than 75 videos this year — an average of one every three days.
That is double the rate the institute managed last year, when it produced 58 messages. It released just 16 videos in 2005, its first year of operation.
Ben Venzke, chief executive officer of IntelCenter, said the amount of computing power required for the fast turnaround is considerable, and that the group appears to be using the latest widely available off-the-shelf hardware and software.
“They are right on the cutting edge of the adoption of new technologies,” he said. “They grab hold of the new stuff as soon as it becomes available and start using it.”
He said the latest bin Laden video was made available in five different versions, ranging from high-definition to a special format called 3GP that can be downloaded to mobile devices. The versions were downloadable at more than 20 different places on the Web, and most messages are also released on a CD-ROM format disc as well.
“They produce versions [subtitled] in different languages, and for each of those versions the graphics and the content might be different, too,” he said.
U.S. officials are reluctant to talk in detail about as-Sahab, perhaps because a careful monitoring of its operations could offer the best chance of finding bin Laden.
Asked last week about the group, CIA Director Michael V. Hayden said simply that technology and the globalized 21st century “make it possible for a relatively small group of people to exercise tremendously disproportionate power.”
“It might be disappointing, but it shouldn”t be surprising” that they continue to operate, Gen. Hayden added.
The use of subtitles in English, German, Danish and many other languages indicates something else about the messages, according to some analysts: They are aimed at the West.
“These messages are carefully tailored for a Western audience,” said Raymond Ibrahim, a scholar of Islam and Middle Eastern history at the Library of Congress.
That may account for recent polling showing that, despite the increased sophistication of as-Sahab, al Qaeda’s message is just not resonating with Muslims as it once did.
Karen Hughes, undersecretary of state for public diplomacy and public affairs, noted in an opinion article this month that support for al Qaeda has tumbled in Pakistan to just 34 percent, compared with more than 75 percent five years ago.
Recent polling has shown a similar trend in Iraq and Afghanistan, where more than 90 percent of respondents reported unfavorable views of al Qaeda and of bin Laden himself, Mrs. Hughes wrote.
Violence of the sort used by al Qaeda is considered a violation of the principles of Islam by 88 percent in Egypt, 65 percent in Indonesia and 66 percent in Morocco, according to polling by WorldPublicOpinion.org, Mrs. Hughes said.
She also noted a growing revulsion with Islamist terrorism in Algeria and argued that the shift in attitudes accounts for increasing cooperation with U.S. forces by Sunni tribal leaders in Iraq.
Related News:
Computers will be “trained to talk like terrorists”
http://www.pcpro.co.uk/news/124972/computers-will-be-trained-to-talk-like-terrorists.html
Researcher: Bin Laden’s beard is real, video is not
http://news.com.com/8300-10784_3-7-0.html?keyword=digital+forensics
Bin Laden’s beard baffles chief US spy
http://rawstory.com/news/afp/Bin_Laden_s_beard_baffles_chief_US__09102007.html
Former Death Rocker Azzam Pearlman Behind Osama
http://adereview.com/blog/?p=33
Mossad Agent Pearlman Behind New Bin Laden Video
http://www.prisonplanet.com/articles/september2007/090907Pearlman.htm
Fmr. Head of CIA Bin Laden Unit: US Government Marching to the Drum of Al-Qaeda
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=x82oZOMwwCk
Latest Bin Laden Video Is a Forgery: All References to Current Events Are Made During Video Freeze
Neo-Cons Enlist Bin Laden’s Help To Counter 9/11 Truth
Groups: Bin Laden to address Americans on 9/11 anniversary
The full 26 minute 27 second Osama Bin Laden message
Reuters: Bin Laden video may signal new attacks
CIA sees fresh Al-Qaeda plot
Al Qaeda planning fresh attacks on US: CIA chief
Video shows Bin Laden ‘in false beard’
New Bin Laden Tape Transcript Released
Bin Laden tape shows need for resolve in Iraq: Bush
Hannity Says Bin Laden Sounds Like Democrats – Twice
Bin Laden: Still Dead After all these Years
New Videotape From Bin Laden; Al Qaeda’s No. 1 Still Alive
FLASHBACK: Who Makes the ‘Terror Videos’?
When Seeing and Hearing Isn’t Believing
FLASHBACK: Bin Laden Already Dead
No Overt Threats Made In Osama Video
Osama bin Laden: The Newest Fake
ABC: Al Qaeda Videos May Be Doctored
Expert Suspiciously Reverses Stance On Doctored Al-Qaeda Tapes
Analyst: Al-Qaeda Videotapes Digitally Doctored
White House Gets Defensive Over Accusation Bin Laden is Dead
Proof Bin Laden Tape Is 5-Year-Old, Re-Released Footage
“New” Osama video released; Update: Mystery solved — new video matches video shot in 2001
Bin Laden Uncovers Secret Formula to Halt Ageing Process
Another Dubious Osama Tape Appears When The Neo-Cons Need It Most
Filed under: 9/11, al-qaeda, bin laden, CIA, False Flag, George Bush, George Tenent, michael hayden, NSA, Taliban, Troops
CIA Report: Former Director Tenet Ultimately Responsible For 9/11
Glenn Kessler
Washington Post
August 21, 2007
Former CIA Director George Tenet did not marshal his agency’s resources to respond to the recognized threat posed by al-Qaeda before the Sept. 11 attacks, the agency’s inspector general concluded in a long-classified report released today.
The report, which Congress ordered released under a law signed by President Bush this month, also faulted the intelligence community for failing to have “a documented, comprehensive approach” to battling al-Qaeda.
Tenet, now a professor at Georgetown University, heavily criticized the report as “flat wrong” in a lengthy statement, saying the judgments are contradicted by a report issued by the agency watchdog just a month before the 2001 attacks against the World Trade Center and the Pentagon. CIA Director Michael Hayden also said he did not want to release the report, saying it “would distract officers serving their country on the front lines of a global conflict. It will, at a minimum, consume time and attention revisiting ground that is already well plowed.”
A 19-page executive summary of the report, completed in June 2005, said it could not find a “single point of failure nor a silver bullet” that would have prevented the attacks, but went on to fault the senior management of the CIA for failing to deal with the al-Qaeda threat. “The agency and its officers did not discharge their responsibilities in a satisfactory manner,” a team led by CIA inspector general John Helgerson found.
The report, which in part sought to determine whether any intelligence officials should be held accountable for pre-Sept. 11 failures, said that as early as December 1998, Tenet signed a counterterrorism memorandum declaring, “We are at war.” But neither Tenet nor his deputy “followed up these warnings and admonitions by creating a documented, comprehensive plan to guide the counterterrorism effort,” the report said. Tenet’s deputy chaired at least one related meeting, “but the forum soon devolved into one of tactical and operational, rather than strategic discussions.”
Moreover, the Counterterrorist Center (CTC) “was not used effectively as a strategic coordinator of the [intelligence community’s] counterterrorism efforts,” the report added.
The executive summary noted that the spy community’s understanding of al-Qaeda “was hampered by insufficient analytic focus,” which resulted in important issues being “covered insufficiently or not at all.” For instance, the report said, the CIA had made no comprehensive report on Osama bin Laden since 1993, had not examined the potential for terrorists to use aircraft as weapons, and had done only limited analysis on the potential of the United States as a target.
Tenet, in his statement, said “there was in fact a robust plan, marked by extraordinary effort and dedication to fighting terrorism, dating back to long before 9/11” and the report “vastly under appreciates the challenges faced and heroic performance of the hard working men and women of the CIA in general and CTC in specific.”
CIA Missed Chances To Stop Al-Qaeda
AP
August 21, 2007
The CIA’s top leaders failed to use their available powers, never developed a comprehensive plan to stop al-Qaida and missed crucial opportunities to thwart two hijackers in the run-up to Sept. 11, the agency’s own watchdog concluded in a bruising report released Tuesday.
Completed in June 2005 and kept classified until now, the 19-page executive summary finds extensive fault with the actions of senior CIA leaders and others beneath them. “The agency and its officers did not discharge their responsibilities in a satisfactory manner,” the CIA inspector general found.
“They did not always work effectively and cooperatively,” the report stated.
Yet the review team led by Inspector General John Helgerson found neither a “single point of failure nor a silver bullet” that would have stopped the attacks that killed nearly 3,000 people.
In a statement, CIA Director Michael Hayden said the decision to release the report was not his choice or preference, but that he was making the report available as required by Congress in a law President Bush signed earlier this month.
“I thought the release of this report would distract officers serving their country on the front lines of a global conflict,” Hayden said. “It will, at a minimum, consume time and attention revisiting ground that is already well plowed.”
The report does cover terrain heavily examined by a congressional inquiry and the Sept. 11 Commission. However, the CIA watchdog’s report goes further than previous reviews to examine the personal failings of individuals within the agency who led the pre-9/11 efforts against al-Qaida.
Helgerson’s team found that no CIA employees violated the law or were part of any misconduct. But it still called on then-CIA Director Porter Goss to form accountability boards to look at the performance of specific individuals to determine whether reprimands were called for.
The inquiry boards were recommended for officials including former CIA Director George Tenet, who resigned in July 2004; his Deputy Director for Operations Jim Pavitt; Counterterrorism Center Chief Cofer Black and the agency’s executive director, who was not further identified. Other less senior officials were also tagged for accountability reviews, but identifying information was removed from the report’s public version.
In a statement, Tenet said the inspector general is “flat wrong” about the lack of plan.
“There was in fact a robust plan, marked by extraordinary effort and dedication to fighting terrorism, dating back to long before 9/11,” he said. “Without such an effort, we would not have been able to give the president a plan on Sept. 15, 2001, that led to the routing of the Taliban, chasing al-Qaida from its Afghan sanctuary and combating terrorists across 92 countries.”
In October 2005, Goss rejected the recommendation for the inquiry boards. He said he had spoken personally with the current employees named in the report, and he trusted their abilities and dedication. “This report unveiled no mysteries,” Goss said.
Hayden stuck by Goss’s decision.
Providing a glimpse of a series of shortfalls laid out in the longer, still-classified report, the executive summary says:
• U.S. spy agencies, which were overseen by Tenet, lacked a comprehensive strategic plan to counter Osama bin Laden prior to 9/11. The inspector general concluded that Tenet “by virtue of his position, bears ultimate responsibility for the fact that no such strategic plan was ever created.”
• The CIA’s analysis of al-Qaida before Sept. 2001 was lacking. No comprehensive report focusing on bin Laden was written after 1993, and no comprehensive report laying out the threats of 2001 was assembled. “A number of important issues were covered insufficiently or not at all,” the report found.
• The CIA and the National Security Agency tussled over their responsibilities in dealing with al-Qaida well into 2001. Only Tenet’s personal involvement could have led to a timely resolution, the report concluded.
• The CIA station charged with monitoring bin Laden — code-named Alec Station — was overworked, lacked operational experience, expertise and training. The report recommended forming accountability boards for the CIA Counterterror Center chiefs from 1998 to 2001, including Black.
• Although 50 to 60 people read at least one CIA cable about two of the hijackers, the information wasn’t shared with the proper offices and agencies. “That so many individuals failed to act in this case reflects a systemic breakdown…. Basically, there was no coherent, functioning watch-listing program,” the report said. The report again called for further review of Black and his predecessor.
While blame is heaped on Tenet and his deputies, the report also says that Tenet was forcefully engaged in counterterrorism efforts and personally sounded the alarm before Congress, the military and policymakers. In a now well-known 1998 memo, he declared, “We are at war.”
The trouble, the report said, was follow-up.
The inspector general did take exception to findings of Congress’ joint inquiry into 9/11. For instance, the congressional inquiry found that the CIA was reluctant to seek authority to assassinate bin Laden. Instead, the inspector general believed the problem was the agency’s limited covert-action capabilities.
The CIA’s reliance on a group of sources with questionable reliability “proved insufficient to mount a credible operation against bin Laden,” the report said. “Efforts to develop other options had limited potential prior to 9/11.”
The chairman of the Senate Intelligence Committee, Sen. Jay Rockefeller, said the CIA has learned from the past and has corrected many of these shortcomings, but has to do more.
“Sadly, the CIA’s 9/11 accountability review serves as a sobering reminder that the Bush Administration policies for the past six years have failed to capture or kill Osama bin Laden,” the West Virginia Democrat said. “Nor have the administration’s policies deprived Osama bin Laden and other senior al-Qaida leaders of the safe haven they need to plot against the United States.”
Related News:
Former CIA officer: US to attack Iran within 6 months
http://rawstory.com/news/2007/Former_CIA_agent_US_to_attack_0821.html
Nuke Drill Sparks Soros’ Martial Law Speculation
http://www.freemarketnews.com/WorldNews.asp?nid=47564
Bin Laden Supposedly Alive
http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=070822074652.f56v6vm9&show_article=1
U.N. approves planning for possible force in Somalia
http://www.reuters.com/article/worldNews/idUSN2030974220070820
Military exercise in Hawaii Aug 20-24
http://www.jfcom.mil/newslink/storyarchive/2007/pa081007.htm
David Hunt on 9/11 State Sponsored Terrorism
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-1990673692843308164&hl=nl
Neo-Cons: Make Bush Dictator Of The World
http://www.prisonplanet.com/articles/august2007/170807_bush_dictator.htm
World’s Worst: Keith Destroys FOX’s John Gibson
http://www.crooksandliars.com/2007/0….keith-destroys-foxs-john-gibson/
Think Tank Calls For Bush to Be Dictator For Life
http://www.roguegovernment.com/news.php?id=3537
US Funding Al-Qaeda out of VP’s Office to Attack Iran
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7lszIWvu45o
U.S. pre-9/11 memos: Pakistan backs Taliban
Pakistan Provided Military Aid, Troops to Taliban
ABC: Al Qaeda Videos May Be Doctored
Iranian Unit to Be Labeled ‘Terrorist’
Iran: U.S. Supports Terrorists In Iraq
US Actions Against Iran Raise War Risk, Many Fear
Kucinich: ‘Belligerent’ Bush Admin. trying to ‘deceive’ US into ‘yet another war’
US: Military action on Iran ‘not being contemplated’
Woolsey Claims Iran Could Have Nuclear Bomb In ‘A Few Months’
Bush, Congress Could Collide on Iran
Iran’s President ‘Doubts’ Arming Taliban
Iran accuses Britain of digging tunnel to ferry spies into embassy
“Need Another 9/11” Hack Back-Peddles
NY Hikes Security On Dirty Bomb Threat
Bush Says Iraqi Leader Shares His View on Iran
Biological Protection Program Delayed
FOXNews Defends Idea That Another 9/11 Would Help America
Cheney Urging Military Strikes on Iran
Cheney Antsy to Kill Iranian Toddlers and Grandmothers
Fears of US attacks on Iran grow as media campaign heats up
Pitching For More Dead Americans: A Neo-Con Fetish
Ideological Terrorists
We Need Another 8/8
Expert Suspiciously Reverses Stance On Doctored Al-Qaeda Tapes
Italy: U.S. Allegations On Iran Baseless
Analyst: Al-Qaeda Videotapes Digitally Doctored
Novak: Bush Considering Military Action In Turkey
Foxnews: U.S. Terror Attack — ‘Ninety Days at Most’
Al-Qaeda not ‘monolithic’ group: US officials
CNN says “just kidding” after terror scare
Al Qaeda’s Best Publicist: George W. Bush
CNN: TSA knew ‘dry run’ terror alerts were bogus
Martial Law Threat is Real: Lucky that the Military is Breaking Down
Plan Outlines Government to Use Military Force Against U.S. Citizens Over Political Issues
Homeland General: Attack ‘Could Happen Any Day’
CIA Bin Laden Chief: Next Attack ‘Bigger Than 9/11’
Bush Insists Al-Qaeda In Iraq Threatens U.S.
Airports warned about terror dry runs
Neocons Press Pakistan Endgame
U.S. threatens action in Pakistan
US academics admit aiding Iran “Democracy Drive”
Christians United for Israel call on US to attack Iran immediately
Sam Brownback: I’m Ready To Strike Iran
Cheney Pushes Bush to Act on Iran
Neocon Bill Kristol expects Bush to attack Pakistan
White House Gets Defensive Over Accusation Bin Laden is Dead
Senior Qaeda figure in Iraq a myth: U.S. military
Old-line Republican Warns ‘Something’s in the Works’ to Trigger a Police State
White House Preparing to Stage New 9/11 – Reagan Official
Former Reagan Official: Bush May Stage False Flag Events To Reinstate Draft
My wake-up call: Watch for another 9/11-WMD experience
Proof Bin Laden Tape Is 5-Year-Old, Re-Released Footage
“New” Osama video released; Update: Mystery solved — new video matches video shot in 2001
Tonkin Gulf II and the Guns of August?
Absurd Terrorism Theories Invade The Homeland
Bin Laden Uncovers Secret Formula to Halt Ageing Process
Another Dubious Osama Tape Appears When The Neo-Cons Need It Most
London Times: Al-CIAda Terrorist Given Sanctuary By MI5
U.S. Intel Officer: Al Qaeda Leadership Allowed To Operate Freely
AOL Attacks Ron Paul For Tonkin Warning
Terror Commander: New Attack Will Dwarf Failed Bomb Plot
Ron Paul: U.S. In “Great Danger” Of Staged Terror
The Politico Covers Ron Paul’s Staged Terror Warning
Sheehan: Distinct Chance Of Staged Attack, Martial Law
Bush Administration Prays For More Dead Americans
Signal to Attack? Worries Over Latest al Qaeda Tape
Bill Kristol Expects Bush To Attack Pakistan
Bush: Insurgents in Iraq same as 9/11 attackers
Military Analyst: West Needs More Terror To Save Doomed Foreign Policy
White House Claims No Specific Terror Threat
Al-CIAda Has Rebuilt Strength U.S. Says
Iraq’s Al-Qaeda Threatens To Attack Iran
Al-CIAda Cell In The U.S. Or On Its Way
Bush denies al Qaeda as strong today as pre-Sept 11
Olberman Rips Into Chertoff on “Countdown”
Al-CIAda Warns of Fresh Terror Attacks
U.S. Government Uses Al-Qaeda to Attack Iran
Officials worry of summer terror attack
NBC: ‘Dirty bomb’ danger at home?
Secret ..: U.S. Fears Terror ‘Spectacular’ Planned
BREAKING: A Potential Attack on Chicago in the Works?
GOP memo touts new terror attack as way to reverse party’s decline
Basra Bizarre: SAS Commandos Arrested and Sprung
noworldsystem.com 