noworldsystem.com


9/11 Truth In New York – September 11th, 2009

9/11 Truth In New York – September 11th, 2009

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bMB7FyZwMjM

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XBOWAtLhR_Q

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KcJJi6vGlmA

Held In A Psychiatric Ward & Called “Delusional” For Saying 9/11 Was An Inside Job

Shaped Charges and the World Trade Center Collapses

World Architecture News: Explosives and Thermitic Material Brought Down Buildings on 9/11

 



9/11 Truth March in New York
Please Give to the Sick & Neglected First Responders
http://fealgoodfoundation.com/WaysToGive.html

9/11 Truth March in New York

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6eoiXTJGBHI

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FfwFAJJdNRg

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ew97V8d1rvY

 

Rosie O’Donnell & William Rodriguez On 9/11/2008

Olbermann: Bush Administration “Allowed 9/11 Attacks To Occur”
http://www.prisonplanet.com/olbermann-bush..ur.html/comment-page-14/#comments

Global Poll: Less Than Half Believe Al-Qaeda Behind 9/11
http://www.prisonplanet.com/global-poll-less-than-half-believe-al-qaeda-behind-911.html

Russian Poll: 84% Say Truth About 9/11 Being Deliberately Hidden
http://www.infowars.net/articles/September2008/120908truthmovement.htm

9/11 First Responders Benefit – Cynthia McKinney
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Zbzm3s6Ikwo

Jesse Ventura Slams “911 Conspiracy Debunkers”, for 30 Minutes
http://thestateoftruth.com/2008/09/jesse-ventura-body-slams-911-conspiracy-debunkers-for-30-minutes/

French Comic Forced To Apologise For Citing 9/11 Theories
http://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/europe/sarkozys-comic-friend-says-sorry-for-911-comments-925142.html

9/11 Truth Film To Be Broadcast On Prime Time Russian TV
http://www.infowars.net/articles/September2008/100908Russia911.htm

Dear Reporter: Looking for a Story about 9/11?
http://georgewashington2.blogspot.com/2008/09/dear-reporter-looking-for-story-about.html

 



BBC edits Silverstein’s ’pull it’ comment in WTC-7 Documentary


BBC Hit Piece Edits Silverstein Comment In Dirty Tricks Scam

Paul Joseph Watson
Prison Planet
July 8, 2008

The BBC’s embarrassing attempt to dig itself out of a hole that keeps getting deeper was again exemplified during their latest yellow journalism hit piece on 9/11 truth, in which they played Larry Silverstein’s “pull it” comment but edited out the most important part of the statement, and in doing so changed its context altogether.

An army of informed truth activists are almost tripping over each other to point out the gargantuan number of errors, ad hominem smear tactics, bias and shoddy investigative techniques displayed in the program which aired Sunday in the UK.

Just one such example concerns WTC complex leaseholder Larry Silverstein’s infamous “pull it” comment which can be viewed in its entirety below with other clips included for context in confirming that the term “pull it” is industry jargon for deliberately demolishing a building.

However, in the BBC’s attempt to convince the viewer that “pull it” meant to withdraw firefighters from the building, despite the fact that according to NIST’s WTC collapse lead investigator Shyam Sunder, “There was no firefighting in WTC 7,” and additionally the FEMA report, which stated “No manual firefighting actions were taken by FDNY,” the editors carefully snipped out the last portion of Silverstein’s comments where he states, “and then we watched the building collapse.”

Cycle through to 20 minutes into the clip to spot the edit.

By deliberately removing “and then we watched the building collapse,” the BBC has performed a hatchet job on the whole context of the statement by censoring the fact that the collapse of WTC 7 was a consequence of the decision to “pull” the building.

The BBC’s zealous efforts to redeem its name by ceaselessly attacking the 9/11 truth movement accelerated after the broadcaster was shamed when footage from 9/11 emerged of their correspondent Jane Standley reporting that WTC 7 had collapsed even as it remained standing in the shot behind her head.

Questions as to how this could have happened and allegations that news corporations, whether wittingly or unwittingly, were being fed a script on the day of 9/11 as it unfolded were met with hostility, and the BBC claimed it had “lost” the tape.

The tape was miraculously “discovered” again on the eve of the broadcast of their latest hit piece but the footage was not shown in the program, presumably to avoid further embarrassment.

Read Full Article Here

 

Judge dismisses case over 9/11 remains

Reuters
July 7, 2008

A U.S. judge on Monday dismissed a case brought by families of victims of the Sept. 11 attacks who said the city denied proper burials by sending debris containing possible human remains to a garbage dump.

The lawsuit, filed in 2005 by a group called WTC Families for a Proper Burial, sought to have the estimated 1.2 million to 1.8 million tons of rubble originally from the World Trade Center site transferred out of the Fresh Kills landfill located on New York’s borough of Staten Island.

The families said the city should move the residue that had been finely sifted multiple times to a more suitable location and have a cemetery created.

U.S. District Judge Alvin Hellerstein, saying the city’s decisions about where to off-load the debris “were difficult and complicated,” found the city had “acted responsibly” in bringing about a “swift and efficient recovery from the terrorists’ attack.”

“Plaintiffs have no property right in an undifferentiated, unidentifiable mass of dirt that may or may not contain the remains of plaintiffs’ loved ones,” he said.

There are no New York laws that require burying the debris in a different location, he said, “however worthy the citizen and however honorable the deceased.”

About 1,100 out of the 2,749 people killed at the World Trade Center site perished without leaving a trace. Full bodies were recovered for only 292 victims and partial remains for 1,357, sometimes only a fragment of a bone, the ruling noted.

Almost immediately after the attacks, all visible human remains were removed from the debris, bagged and taken to collecting points.

Victims’ families argued that debris surrounding some remains would have contained other bone fragments and remains.

The president of the WTC Families, Diane Horning, lost her son, Matthew Horning, in the attacks. His wallet and a piece of his occipital bone were recovered from debris at Fresh Kills.

Hellerstein concluding his ruling by suggesting a “beautiful nature preserve” and memorial at the garbage site and said the families of victims “have suffered a wrong for which there can be no remedy.”

“No matter the authority and power of this court, it cannot bring back the loved ones lost, and it cannot bring peace to the plaintiffs or surcease to society’s collective grief around the events of September 11, 2001.”

 

First responders who suffer and Dennis Kucinich – Spoke up

The BBC Believes In 9/11 Conspiracy Theories
http://www.roguegovernment.com/news.php?id=10525

The BBC’s Atrocious Effort to Debunk 9/11 Truth
http://www.prisonplanet.com/the-bbcs-..unk-911-truth.html

WeAreChange Boston Questions Dr. Michio Kaku about 9/11
http://www.911blogger.com/node/16516

BBC keeps digging, the hole gets bigger
http://www.911blogger.com/node/16540

1-Sentence Debunking of NIST’S Report on WTC 7
http://georgewashington.blogspot.co..bunking-of-nists-report-on.html

“Shockingly Calm”: The Phone Calls From the Planes on 9/11
http://www.911blogger.com/node/16498

No BBC, WTC 7 Did Not Collapse “Due To Fire” & The Final 9/11 Mystery Is Not Solved
http://www.prisonplanet.com/no-..l-911-mystery-is-not-solved.html

The Top Ten Connections Between NIST and Nano-Thermites by Kevin Ryan
http://911blogger.com/node/16497

 



The 9/11 Chronicles – Truth Rising (FULL)

The 9/11 Chronicles – Truth Rising (FULL)

 



BBC Anchor Agrees WTC-7 Collapse May Be a Conspiracy


BBC Anchor Who Reported on WTC7 Collapse Early Agrees There May Be a ’Conspiracy’

We Are Change UK Question former BBC Report Phil Hayton– who is ’amazed’ that such a ’significant’ event has no official explanation

Aaron Dykes
Prison Planet
April 25, 2008

Members of We Are Change UK questioned ex-BBC reporter Phil Hayton about the early reporting of WTC 7’s collapse during a speaking appearance.

Hayton failed to recollect even being in the studio on the day of 9/11– at first– but then recalls the situation when it is described in detail, including the actions of Jane Standley, who reported the collapse some 26 minutes in advance with WTC Building 7 still visible in the background.

“A lot of eyebrows were raised,” We Are Change reporters point out in summary, because many saw it as a clear controlled demolition, including a number of engineers.

Hayton responded, pointing out that he was not aware of the situation with WTC 7. “This sounds so significant– I’m just amazed I didn’t know about this… This is completely news to me.”

“So, is there no official explanation?” Hayton further probed.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BzMlFFQ2oqQ

We Are Change continues to explain the delayed NIST report on WTC 7 as well as the response from a BBC editor who claimed 9/11 tapes were “lost” in a ’cock-up.’

“I sense that you think there’s a conspiracy here– but you might be right,” Hayton concluded.

On a previous occasion, We Are Change UK reporters contacted Jane Standley by phone about the telling incident. Standley, unlike Hayton, was not surprised by the revelation, but became uncomfortable and hurriedly ended the conversation, only commenting that she had been “harassed” about the situation already.

Surely, it is clear that neither Standley nor Hayton were ’in on a conspiracy’– rather they were used and fed information. However, Hayton seems willing to admit it while Standley has thus far been unable to answer for the suspicious incident ahead of the unexplained collapse.

The suspicion surrounding early media reporting of WTC7’s collapse– which Aaron Brown of CNN also announced– only exacerbates the demolition apparent that many police, fire fighters and other emergency workers were told about in advance and which many other news anchors described as being like a ’deliberately destroyed’ building.

Further, WTC lease holder Larry Silverstein said that the building was “pulled” and rescue worker Kevin McPadden has reported hearing a countdown to Building 7’s demolition.

 



Silverstein trying to milk 9/11 for another $12.3 Billion
March 29, 2008, 8:32 am
Filed under: 9/11, 9/11 Financiers, 9/11 Truth, larry silverstein, qui bono, World Trade Center

Silverstein trying to milk 9/11 for another $12.3 Billion

New York Times
March 27, 2008

Larry A. Silverstein, who has won nearly $4.6 billion in insurance payments to cover his losses and help him rebuild at the World Trade Center site, is seeking $12.3 billion in damages from airlines and airport security companies for the 9/11 attack.

Mr. Silverstein, the developer of ground zero, sought the damages, whose amount was not previously known, in a claim filed in 2004, that says the airlines and airport security companies failed to prevent terrorists from hijacking the planes used to destroy the buildings.

His case was consolidated last week with similar, earlier lawsuits brought by families of some victims of the attack and by other property owners. But in seeking $12.3 billion, he is by far the biggest claimant in the litigation.

Read Full Article Here

 



Larry Silverstein Confronted on WTC-7

Larry Silverstein Confronted on WTC-7

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EtPC0W4HII8

 



C.H.A.N.G.E. confronts Larry Silverstein

We Are Change confronts Larry Silverstein

http://youtube.com/watch?v=7YWpW4Vpo6w

 



Martin Sheen Questions Official 9/11 Story


Martin Sheen Questions Official 9/11 Story
Follows in footsteps of son Charlie Sheen, highlights implausible collapse of WTC 7, asks why building was “rigged”

Paul Joseph Watson
Prison Planet
October 29, 2007

Actor Martin Sheen questioned the official 9/11 story, as well as the collapse of Building 7 and Larry Silverstein’s “pull it” comment during an anti-war march this past weekend in Los Angeles, saying that recent revelations about the attacks had caused him to have doubts.

Sheen was interviewed by We Are Change L.A. along with fellow actor Mark Ruffalo during an event hosted by the ANSWER Coalition at which around 20,000 people attended.

Emmy and Golden Globe Award-winning Martin Sheen, star of blockbuster films like Apocalypse Now and hit series The West Wing, follows in the footsteps of his son Charlie Sheen, who publicly spoke of his doubts about the official 9/11 story back in March 2006.

Martin Sheen said that he was dubious about questioning the official story until his son introduced him to new information about the anomalies of what happened on that day.

“Up until last year, I was very dubious,” said Sheen, “I did not want to believe that my government could possibly be involved in such a thing, I could not live in a country that I thought could do that – that would be the ultimate betrayal,” he added.

“However, there have been so many revelations that now I have my doubts, and chief among them is Building 7 – how did they rig that building so that it came down on the evening of the day?” said Sheen.

Sheen also questioned the comments of Larry Silverstein, the leaseholder of the WTC complex, who told a September 2002 documentary that the decision was made to “pull” Building 7, a demolition industry term for the deliberate implosion of a structure.

“How convenient,” said Sheen, “When did they rig that building? That’s the most interesting question and I have not received a satisfactory answer – nobody could give me an answer to how you rig the building – what a coincidence – two weeks prior and then bring it down on the day, that is the one thing that I have not got a sensible answer about from anyone,” he concluded.

Sheen also stated that NORAD’s failure to follow its standard operating procedure on 9/11 was “something to wonder about”.

Watch the video below.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ocUxplGLnT4

Click here to listen to the audio MP3.

Though Fox News and other attack dogs are likely to seize upon Sheen’s comments and run hit pieces, the National Institute of Standards and Technology itself had to admit recently that the total collapse of the twin towers at free fall speed could not be explained.

NIST also promised to investigate whether explosive devices were involved in the collapse of Building 7 in August last year.

The issue of Building 7 stoked controversy earlier this year when archive footage from news networks including BBC and CNN emerged that showed correspondents reporting the collapse the 47-story skyscraper over 20 minutes before it fell, leading some to charge that people with foreknowledge of the collapse were feeding networks a script as the events of 9/11 unfolded.

Actor Ruffalo “Baffled” At Collapse Of Twin Towers
http://prisonplanet.com/articles/october2007/301007_ruffalo_baffled.htm

George Carlin Questions “Received Reality” Of 9/11 Story
http://www.prisonplanet.com/articl…91007_carlin_questions.htm

 



9/11 Mysteries Hits Japan

9/11 Mysteries Hits Japan

http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-4633271838183936896

 



9/11 New World Rising: Final Director’s Cut

9/11 New World Rising: Final Director’s Cut

http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=2020789241047516411&hl=en

New World Order Quotes
http://nwsarchive.wordpress.com/2007/09/30/new-world-order-quotes/

 



MN C.H.A.N.G.E confronts Senator Norm Coleman
October 13, 2007, 3:53 am
Filed under: 9/11 Truth, 9/11 workers, larry silverstein, Senate, We Are Change, wtc-7

MN C.H.A.N.G.E confronts Senator Norm Coleman

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QbjlOR66O8Q

 



The Third Tower

The Third Tower

http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=5712953049463929480

 



Attorney General Nominee: Pro-Patriot Act, Giuliani Campaign Advisor, Contributor

Attorney General Nominee: Pro-Patriot Act, Giuliani Campaign Advisor, Contributor
Also presided over Larry Silverstein WTC litigation

Steve Watson
Infowars.net
September 17, 2007

President Bush’s nominee to replace Alberto Gonzales as Attorney General has written op ed pieces and given speeches praising the virtues of the Patriot Act, and is also a contributor and legal advisor to Rudy Giuliani’s presidential campaign.

A brief scan of the bio of Michael B. Mukasey reveals some issues that have conservative groups concerned.

From Wikipedia:

In May 2004, while still a member of the judiciary, Judge Mukasey delivered a speech (which he converted into a Wall Street Journal opinion piece) that defended the Patriot Act; the piece also doubted that the FBI engaged in racial profiling of Arabs and criticized the American Library Association for condemning the Patriot Act but not taking a position on librarians imprisoned in Cuba.

Mukasey’s son, Marc L. Mukasey, leads the white-collar criminal defense practice in the New York office of Bracewell & Giuliani. The Mukaseys are justice advisers to Rudy Giuliani’s presidential campaign, with Mukasey himself also having made campaign contributions to Giuliani for president.

During his tenure on the bench, Mukasey presided over the criminal prosecution of Omar Abdel Rahman and El Sayyid Nosair, whom he sentenced to life in prison for a plot to blow up the United Nations and other Manhattan landmarks uncovered during an investigation into the 1993 World Trade Center bombing.

Mukasey also heard the trial of Jose Padilla, ruling that the U.S. citizen and alleged terrorist could be held as an enemy combatant, but was entitled to see his lawyers. Mukasey also was the judge in the litigation between developer Larry Silverstein and several insurance companies arising from the destruction of the World Trade Center, a case which ultimately ended with a federal court deciding that insurers owed a maximum of $4.6 billion, more than the $3.5 billion term of the insurance policy.

“He knows what it takes to fight this war [on terror] effectively,” Bush told the press today, referring to Mukasey’s experience in terrorism cases.

“Thirty-five years ago, our foreign adversaries saw widespread devastation as a deterrent. Today, our fanatical enemies see it as a divine fulfillment,” Mukasey said, outlining his intentions as Attorney General.

Bruce Fein, a former deputy attorney general in the Reagan administration, has said Mukasey is “not the right person for the job.”

“I do not believe, despite certainly substantial credentials, that he has the national stature and strength in Congress to resist White House overtures to insist that he bend the law to assist the political agenda,” said Fein, a constitutional and international lawyer with Bruce Fein & Associates and the Lichfield Group.

Other conservative groups have also voiced concern over Mukasey’s record on abortion.

Related News:

 

Bird Cage Liner Changed, Illegal Spying Stays
http://www.prisonplanet.com/articles/august2007/280807_bird_cage.htm

Gonzales Helped Cover-Up Bush DUI
http://rawstory.com/news/2007/Paper_details….sty_0730.html

Exclusive: For Alberto Gonzales, a Decade of Scandals, with a Child Molestation Cover-Up to Boot
http://www.realinsidenews.com/governmentnews007.html

Rove’s good-bye kiss: Critics of ‘clear-eyed’ Bush will be wrong like critic of Vietnam war
White House spokesman Tony Snow stepping down
Gonzales Contradicts Prior Statements, Confirms Existence Of Other Spying Programs
Attorney General Gonzales steps down
Rove Going, Executive Privilege Staying
Keith Olbermann on Karl Rove Resigning
Payback Time: FBI Raids Home of Suspected NSA Leaker
FBI raids DOJ attorney’s home in search for warrantless wiretap information leaker
Gonzales: I’m Sticking Around To Fix Problems
Rove blamed for Attorney firings in Gonzales hearing; Specter raises prospect of impeachment

Lawsuit Against Wiretaps Rejected

 



9/11 First Responder Heard WTC 7 Demolition Countdown

9/11 First Responder Heard WTC 7 Demolition Countdown
Former Air Force Special Operations for Search and Rescue expert witnessed officials attempt to conceal planned nature of demolition

Paul Joseph Watson
Prison Planet
September 13, 2007

On the Friday beforeA 9/11 first responder has gone on the record to describe how he heard a demolition-style countdown precede the collapse of WTC 7, eyewitness testimony that dovetails with other EMT’s and rescue personnel who were also told that Building 7 was going to be “brought down”.

Earlier this year, we reported on the testimony of an anonymous EMT named Mike who told Loose Change producer Dylan Avery that hundreds of emergency rescue personnel were told over bullhorns that Building 7, a 47 story skyscraper adjacent the twin towers that was not hit by a plane yet imploded symmetrically later in the afternoon on 9/11, was about to be “pulled” and that a 20 second radio countdown preceded its collapse.

That account was backed up by another ground zero rescue worker who went on the record with her full name. Volunteer EMT Indira Singh described to a radio show how she learned that WTC 7 was going to be “brought down” and the context was clear that it was to be deliberately demolished.

In addition, former NYPD officer Craig Bartmer described hearing bombs tear down the building as he fled the collapse.

Now another ground zero first responder has shed more light on how he heard the countdown moments before attempting to escape the collapse of Building 7 as a stampede ensued.

Former Air Force Special Operations for Search and Rescue expert, Kevin McPadden traveled to ground zero completely of his own accord and spent the next four days searching through the rubble and nearby buildings for survivors.

In a speech given at this week’s 9/11 truth events in New York City, McPadden describes the shocking details of what he witnessed shortly before WTC 7 imploded into its own footprint.

Watch the video.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PgAJ4sKUp8g

“While we were on the right side, there was firefighters getting ready, they were bussing them back and forth, and a couple of vets that were there – they got the vibe that something was coming down,” said McPadden.

“We started asking questions, everybody started asking questions, and the next thing you know there was a Red Cross representative pacing back and forth in front of the crowd holding his hand over the radio – I couldn’t hear what it was saying but it was like pulsed – whatever the speech was on there it was pulsed – and that means to me most likely it was a countdown.”

“But he took his hand off at the last three seconds and he gave this heartfelt look – like just run for your life – because he didn’t want to bring it on his conscience – he didn’t want to go to his grave with that – and then we had a couple of seconds to put our heads together,” said McPadden.

McPadden then describes the frantic attempts to escape as the building began to collapse.

McPadden’s account, when added to the testimony of other first responders, clearly suggests that officials knew the building was about to be brought down in a planned demolition, and that they made a conscious effort or were ordered to hide that fact from the first responders, though at the very end onlookers were given a brief warning which enabled them to escape safely.

The following video from CNN clearly shows firefighters and police telling the public to get back because Building 7 was about to come down and in the words of the cameraman was about to “blow up.”

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CwjmqkjwnvQ

In June it was revealed that an individual who had a high level security clearance and was stationed in the Office of Emergency Management in World Trade Center 7 witnessed explosions and damage to the lobby of the building before either twin tower had collapsed.

The testimony of these individuals meshes with others in confirming that Building 7 was deliberately brought down on the day of 9/11, a fact that eviscerates official investigations into Building 7 as nothing more than part of an orchestrated cover-up.

In February of 2002 Silverstein Properties won $861 million from Industrial Risk Insurers to rebuild on the site of WTC 7. Silverstein Properties’ estimated investment in WTC 7 was $386 million. This building’s collapse alone resulted in a payout of nearly $500 million, based on the contention that it was an unforeseen accidental event.

A cursory insight into professional building demolition tells us that experts are required to spend weeks and months planning the demolition of any building, ensuring that the explosives are placed in exactly the right spots, that the collapse will not impact surrounding buildings, and that a myriad of sufficient safety procedures are followed.

To imagine that demolition experts could rig such a huge building amidst the chaos of the day, unsure of whether further attacks were coming, in a matter of hours and bring the building down neatly in its own footprint without afflicting major damage to adjacent buildings is beyond belief.

Even if one entertains the notion that this is within the realm of possibility, the fact is that the federal government, FEMA and NIST and Silverstein Properties are all knowingly lying in claiming that the building collapsed by accident as a result of burning debris from the twin towers.

Now it is established that they lied about Building 7, how can we trust their often changing explanations of the collapse of the twin towers, especially considering the dozens and dozens of eyewitnesses who have gone on the record to report the fact that explosives were seen and heard on all levels of both towers, including underground explosions before the planes even hit?

We are being asked to put our faith in either the federal government, who deliberately lied about 9/11 in the very days after the attack in telling emergency workers and firefighters that the toxic air was safe to breathe , or the emergency workers and other rescue heroes who risked their lives and are still suffering the consequences of their courage.

This testimony demands an immediate grand jury inquiry into both monolithic insurance fraud, potential manslaughter, and a complete re-appraisal and re-investigation into everything else that happened on 9/11 in an effort to discover what else the government lied about concerning the events of that day and its aftermath.

 



9-11: New World Rising

9-11: New World Rising (First Cut)

http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-4452121217035749069&hl=en