noworldsystem.com


Man Videotaped Entire Incident on Flight 253

Man Videotaped Entire Incident on Flight 253

Kurt Nimmo
Prison Planet.com
December 28, 2009

For ABC News and the corporate media, it is a foregone conclusion. The Christmas underwear bomber is al-Qaeda.

“American officials have cause to worry there may be more al Qaeda-trained young men in Yemen planning to bring down American jets,” report Brian Ross and Richard Esposito. “Umar Farouk Abdulmutallab, charged with the attempted Christmas Day bombing of Northwest Airlines flight 253, told FBI agents there were more just like him in Yemen who would strike soon.”

And then there is the supposed tape released four days before the attempted underwear bombing. It shows what ABC describes as “the leader of al Qaeda in Yemen” who says he will kill Americans. “We are carrying a bomb to hit the enemies of God.”

“Yemen has become a principal al Qaeda training ground and the accused suicide bomber told the FBI he was trained for more than a month in Yemen, given 80 grams of a high explosive cleverly sewn into his underpants, undetected by standard security screening.”

On Sunday, the neocon Joe Lieberman said the U.S. needs to bomb Yemen and pronto. “Iraq was yesterday’s war, Afghanistan is today’s war. If we don’t act preemptively, Yemen will be tomorrow’s war,” the “hawkish” (neocon) senator from Connecticut told Fox News.

Lieberman, who helms the Senate Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs Committee, said Yemen is the new home of al-Qaeda. A script on Yemen and al-Qaeda is now being uniformly followed by the corporate media.

Meanwhile, more suspicious information about the underwear bombing has surfaced. An eye witness told the news talk radio station 620 WTMJ in Milwaukee that a man on the flight had videotaped the entire flight.

Patricia “Scotty” Keepman and her daughter witnessed the alleged botched bombing. Keepman’s “daughter said that ahead of them was a man who videotaped the entire flight, including the attempted detonation.”

“He sat up and videotaped the entire thing, very calmly,” said Patricia. “We do know that the FBI is looking for him intensely. Since then, we’ve heard nothing about it.”

On Saturday it was reported that a “sharp-dressed man” had escorted Umar Farouk Abdul Mutallab when he boarded Northwest Airlines Flight 253 in Amsterdam. Mutallab was allowed on the plane without a passport. It was later reported that Mutallab seemed to be in a trance.

The alleged videotaping of the underwear bomber and his fudged attack is another oddity that the corporate media should zoom in on. Unfortunately, we no longer have a functioning investigative media in this country.

Instead we will hear endless pabulum about a resurgent al-Qaeda and murderous idiocy from neocons like Joe Lieberman who are screaming for another small and defenseless country to be bombed and more innocents slaughtered as the U.S. chases a phantom terror group created by the CIA.

Terrorist Was Escorted on Flight 253 by Wealthy-Looking Indian Man

Terrorist Allowed on Plane Without a Passport AND He Was on a Terrorist Database

 



Obama Will Occupy Afghanistan Beyond 2011 Deadline

White House: We Will Occupy South Asia “For a Long Time”

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vIt7raIZbRY

 

A long, protracted occupation of Afghanistan

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UT01jvGShds

 

Robert Fisk: Obama is a disaster for the Middle East

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=t4ynybVuwXQ

 



U.N. Chief Meddles in the U.S. Senate

New World Order Arrives

U.N. Chief Meddles in the U.S. Senate

Washington Post
November 11, 2009

The New World Order came into being at 4:25 Tuesday afternoon.


U.N. chief Ban Ki-Moon (R) speaks to the media with Joe Lieberman (L) and John Kerry following the committee’s meeting on global climate change, including the steps leading up to December’s International negotiations in Copenhagen, Denmark, where Obama is to sign a global climate treaty that will surrender U.S. national sovereignty to a World Government controlled by the United Nations.

It arrived at the Capitol, until that moment the seat of American government, in the form of the stooped and bespectacled figure of Ban Ki-moon, who as U.N. secretary general is the de facto leader of what conspiracy theorists call the One World Government. One floor beneath the Senate chamber, Ban, a South Korean national, took his place behind a lectern bearing the Senate seal and spelled out his demands.

“I would certainly expect the Senate to take the necessary action; that’s what I have encouraged the senators,” he told reporters as a trio of lawmakers stood at his side. He added an admonition for the chamber to deliver “as soon as possible.”

The One World Government has specific requirements, Ban added, namely a “legally binding” commitment to “25 to 40 percent greenhouse gas reduction . . . as recommended by the IPCC, the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change.”

Uh-oh. A U.N. official standing in the Capitol telling U.S. lawmakers what binding commitments intergovernmental authorities expect from them? Glenn Beck was going to burst a blood vessel.

But the man who orchestrated this putsch by the New World Order, Senate Foreign Relations Chairman John Kerry (D-Switzerland), did not appear concerned by the imagery. He called the secretary general “Your Excellency.” Sen. Richard Lugar of Indiana (a Republican, but he drives a Prius) was equally deferential as he spoke of “the privilege of this distinguished visitor.”

And Sen. Joe Lieberman (I-Conn.) hailed Ban for “the accelerated leadership role” that the United Nations has taken. “Your vision, that in Copenhagen there can be a politically binding agreement that will lead to a legally binding agreement to follow . . . is a very reasonable, sensible and hopeful course.”

Somewhere in Manhattan, Sean Hannity was tearing up his script for the night’s broadcast.

Kerry invited Ban to lecture the Foreign Relations Committee, but it’s not clear what the chairman hoped to gain from the photos of him standing with Ban in the Capitol’s Brumidi Corridors. Indeed, it seemed quite possible that a U.N. endorsement of Kerry’s climate efforts would embolden its foes, who like the world body even less than they like cap-and-trade. In the pantheon of conspiracy theories, the United Nations is right up there with the Illuminati, the Trilateral Commission, the Federal Reserve and the Council on Foreign Relations — which, as it happens, Kerry addressed a couple of weeks ago.

Even Americans who don’t come from the grassy-knoll tradition tend not to regard the United Nations with great confidence. A Gallup poll earlier this year found that 65 percent of respondents thought it was doing a bad job, compared with 26 percent who think it is doing a good job. Ban himself is not terribly nefarious, if only because he is unknown. A Wall Street Journal poll found that 81 percent of those surveyed didn’t know who he was. The others may have confused him with the Unification Church’s Rev. Sun Myung Moon.

Ban’s profile could become much higher, and not in a good way, if Americans start to perceive him as meddling in Senate consideration of climate legislation. Even before he stormed the Capitol, Fox News was drawing a connection between global warming talks in Copenhagen next month and One World Government.

“America, if you believe this country is great but you’re not really into that whole One World Government thing, watch out,” Fox News Channel’s Beck warned a couple of weeks ago. His guest, Lord Christopher Monckton of Britain, told Beck that “at Copenhagen, a treaty will be signed that will, for the first time, create a world government with powers to intervene directly in the economy and in the environmental affairs of individual nations.” Earlier on Fox News, Dick Morris informed Hannity that President Obama “believes in One World Government.” And author Jerome Corsi went on Hannity’s show to warn about a One World Government in which “our sovereignty would be subject to the dictates” of the United Nations and other international organizations.

The One World Government was on open display at the Capitol on Tuesday, as international U.N. staffers waited outside the room where Ban spoke to the senators. The secretary general had come with his own world government (armed?) security detail, who stood alongside the Capitol police.

Ban, wearing a gold U.N. lapel pin, unfolded his speech. “Less than a month from now, the leaders of the world will gather in Copenhagen,” he said. “They must conclude a robust global agreement,” that is “comprehensive, binding, equitable and fair.”

Speaking softly but firmly, the South Korean cautioned the Americans that “the world is not standing still,” and that “all the eyes of the world are looking to the United States.”

After a few minutes, Kerry cut off questioning. “Folks, the secretary general has to get to the airport.”

Ban needed to catch the U.S. Airways shuttle to New York. The One World Government Air Force isn’t what it’s cracked up to be.

Ban Ki-Moon: ‘A climate deal must include an equitable global governance structure’

Obama Will Surrender America To World Government

Climate Treaty Will Create World Government Dictatorship

Jerome Corsi: America Will Be Sold To World Government

Chuck Norris: Copenhagen Talks To Forge “One World Order”

 



VA Guide Urges Sick Vets To End Their Own Lives

VA Guide Urges Sick Vets To End Their Own Lives

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WviKP23XyS8

Lieberman: Time not right for health care reform

ObamaCare: Government mandates program for orders for end of life for senior citizens

Obama To Deny Health Care To Elderly, Very Sick & Poor People

Obama Science Advisor Advocates Forced Abortions

 



John McCain Facing Felony Charges for Violating the Logan Act

John McCain Facing Felony Charges for Violating the Logan Act

Nation Builder
August 16, 2008

Apparently the President of Georgia has been paying John McCain for months via a lobbyist. McCain’s chief foreign policy advisor, Randy Scheunemann, has received hundreds of thousands from the President of Georgia.

And McCain’s declaration back in April that Russia was undermining Georgia’s sovereignty gave the President of Georgia a false sense of security. Now he probably wants his money back.

This seems like US Ambassador April Glaspie telling Saddam that oh we don’t care if you invade Kuwait right before we invaded him.

The McCain campaign says Randy Scheunermann hasn’t taken a dime from Georgia since May 15th, 2008 but between January 1, 2008 and May 15, 2008 Georgia paid him $290,000 for lobbying.

Read Full Article Here

McCain’s Russia Lobbyists Confuse Georgia Defense
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2008/08/20/what-about-the-russia-lob_n_120123.html

McCain Aggressively Defends Scheunemann’s Work For Georgia
http://tpmmuckraker.talkingpointsmemo…ain_aggressively_defends_sc.php

McCain Announces That Lieberman And Graham Are Going To Georgia
http://tpmelectioncentra../mccain_announces_that_lieberma.php

 



Jon Stewart Mocks Bush, McCain & Condi for Scolding Russia

Jon Stewart Mocks Bush, McCain & Condi for Scolding Russia

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EclJB4RrJdM

 



Lieberman says he has no evidence WTC-7 collapsed

Lieberman says he has no evidence WTC-7 collapsed

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tpQQu9AIl3Q

 



Pat Robertson: Israel Should Strike Iran Before 2008 Election

Pat Robertson: Israel Should Strike Iran Before 2008 Election

Think Progress
July 23, 2008

http://youtube.com/watch?v=La1F68IWA4o

On yesterday’s edition of The 700 Club, Christian broadcaster Pat Robertson sharply criticized the “moderate tone” the Bush administration has allegedly taken toward Iran and its nuclear weapons program. Robertson advocated that Israel look out for the “survival of its nation” and “make some kind of a strike” against Iranian nuclear facilities. He also predicted that it will likely happen before the 2008 elections:

But nevertheless, I think we can look in the next few months for Israel to make a strike — possibly before the next election — because I think George Bush — to use the term an “amber light” — he’s given the amber, the yellow light, saying, “Caution, but go ahead.”

Robertson’s predictions often turn out to be wrong. In 2004, Robertson claimed that the Lord told him it would “be like a blowout” re-election for President Bush. (Bush ended up receiving just 51 percent of the vote.) In 2006, he incorrectly predicted that “the outcome of the war and the success of the economy will leave the Republicans in charge.”

He does, however, have an inside track into the Bush administration. Last year, Robertson’s Regent University estimated that one in six of its graduates were employed in government work. Approximately 150 served in the Bush administration.

Today, top McCain surrogate Sen. Joe Lieberman (I-CT) is also talking to controversial Pastor John Hagee’s organization. In 2006, Hagee declared:

The United States must join Israel in a pre-emptive military strike against Iran to fulfill God’s plan for both Israel and the West… a biblically prophesied end-time confrontation with Iran, which will lead to the Rapture, Tribulation, and Second Coming of Christ.

Other members of the right wing have also been unifying around the idea of striking Iran before Bush leaves. Both John Bolton and Bill Kristol have made the same argument.

 

Kagan: ‘The only way’ to ‘force’ Iran to halt its nuclear program is an ‘attack.’

Think Progress
July 23, 2008

Appearing on MSNBC this afternoon, Iraq surge architect Fred Kagan criticized direct talks with Iran and made his case for attacking Iran, claiming it is the only means to “force” the country to halt its nuclear program:

Well, there’s nothing we can do short of an attack to force Iran to give up its nuclear program. … At the end of the day, the only way that you can make for sure that [a nuclear arm’s race] doesn’t happen is with an attack. There are a variety of things you can do short of an attack and hope that they will work, but hope is not a method here.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=l1LnQkCccZk

 

Top Israeli official: If nuclear talks fail, Bush will order Iran attack between November and January

DEBKAfile
July 19, 2008

This assessment was reported by Israeli national radio Saturday overnight quoting a high-placed “security-political” official.

The source predicted that President George W. Bush would order Iran attacked between the November 4 presidential election and his exit from the White House in January. The quote was aired shortly after the six-power talks with Iran in Geneva – with US official participation for the first time – failed, and just before Israel chief of staff Lt. Gen. Gabi Ashkenazi set out for Washington. He is to spend a week there as guest of Adm. Mike Mullen, chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff.

DEBKAfile’s political sources describe the disclosure as a step aimed at slowing down the collapse of Israel’s stated policy of relying on international diplomatic pressure to thwart Iran’s acquisition of nuclear arms. It is expected to raise a furious outcry from the powers spearheading the diplomatic effort and prompt extreme reactions from Tehran.

Read Full Article Here

Recent News:

Brown criticized for misquoting Iranian president on Israel
http://mathaba.net/0_index.shtml?x=599460

Iran To Get New Russian Air Defenses
http://www.alertnet.org/thenews/newsdesk/L21512727.htm

US warns Iran of more sanctions
http://www.spacewar.com/2006/080723134123.0twdz48k.html

European Union says it won’t support military action against Iran
http://canadianpress.googl..Dq8w_ZN5JpCcFUP8oO-6wbVUxg

Rice warns Iran of ‘punitive measures’
http://www.spacewar.com/2006/080721081110.pmmh5rvd.html

Iran nuclear talks stall, even with US at table
http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20080719/ap_on_re_mi_ea/nuclear_iran_talks

Ex-Mossad chief: Iran not bluffing
http://www.presstv.ir/detail.aspx?id=64129&sectionid=351020104

Benny Morris Justifies Israel’s Coming Attack on Iran
http://www.huffingtonpost…ris-justifies-is_b_113725.html

New York Times Op-Ed: Israel Will Attack Iran
http://dissentmag.wordpress.com/200..p-ed-israel-will-attack-iran/

Iran has two-week deadline for nuclear answer
http://www.spacewar.com/2006/080720083049.cg7ietpo.html

Iran’s Ahmadinejad, Russia’s Medvedev talk on nuclear issue
Iran hopes nuclear talks will create negotiating framework
Iran, EU to resume nuclear talks in 2 weeks
Sextet agree to hold off on new sanctions against Iran
Brown warns Iran to end ‘totally abhorrent’ threat to destroy Israel
Iran must choose between cooperation and confrontation: US

Coup on Iran & False Flag News Archive

 



Christie Todd Whitman Confronted on 9/11 Air Quality

Christie Todd Whitman Confronted on 9/11 Air Quality
On September 11, 2001 former NJ governor Christie Todd Whitman was the Environmental Protection Agency Director. The agency issued false statements and declared the air safe to breathe. Here is the former EPA Director’s response to critical questions nearly seven years later.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PMVUrk4ZWS0

 

John McCain questioned about PNAC, 9/11

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RBeU6llGDkA

London Guardian Hit Piece On 9/11 Truth
http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2008/jul/14/september11.usa

Christie Todd Whitman should be tried for manslaughter!
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=axdzkvW90Rs

 



Radical Iranian Bloggers Could Face Death

Radical Iranian Bloggers Could Face Death

Daily Tech

July 8, 2008

A draft bill in the Iranian parliament is set to give bloggers the death penalty, if the government deems their writing as advocating corruption, prostitution, or desertion of Islam.

If so classified, bloggers will join those guilty of the above crimes in the real world to be branded as mohareb (an enemy of God) and “corrupt of the earth” – making him or her eligible for punishments ranging from exile, to amputations, to execution.

Further, if the bill becomes law, punishment bestowed by the system “cannot be commuted, suspended, or changed.”

Iranian bloggers and human rights activists fear the ease in which the government could casually accuse bloggers of offending the country’s strict interpretation of Islamic law.

Anti-censorship activist group Global Voice Online notes that about 18 months ago the Iranian government demanded bloggers register their websites, although the initiative failed to produce meaningful results. Bloggers widely considered registration as an enabler for future government suppression, and many proudly displayed an “I do not register my blog/site” badge in defiance of the mandate.

“Mentioning ‘blogging’ among crimes such as kidnapping, raping, armed robbery makes accusing bloggers easier than before… Such a law will harm the mental security of society more than the poor bloggers, who do not know what awaits them,” said Iranian blogger Mojtaba Saminejad. According to a Wikipedia bio linked by his “About Me” page, Saminejad spent 21 months in an Iranian prison beginning in 2005, including an alleged 88 days of solitary confinement and torture, due to a 2004 post reporting the arrest of three other bloggers. His official charges listed Saminejad as having insulted Iran’s head of state and “endangering national security.”

Another Iranian blogger notes that Iranian Parliament president Ali Larijani said the bill was discussed for “hours” with the country’s Judiciary before a draft was settled. After the number of executions last year almost doubled, from 177 to 317 according to Amnesty International, the Iranian government said the punishment is not given casually, and results only after an extensive legal process.

A censored version of the internet sees wide use in Iran, and young, tech-savvy Iranians have joined the rest of the world in blogging about everything from menial personal gossip to obscenities and questioning the government. The Iranian government actively filters out content it considers obscene, including websites promoting pornography, heresy, or political dissent.

The Iranian government considers blogging a threat to “mental security,” a doctrine that human rights advocates consider to be a scapegoat used in the government’s historically oppressive policies. It joins a variety of other countries, including Yemen and China, in monitoring online expression for politically and morally sensitive material.

The draft bill still needs inspection from the Guardian Council, which ensures the bills’ adherence to the Iranian constitution and Islamic law, and then needs to be “rubber-stamped” by a conservative government watchdog before being made into law.

 

Russian blogger sentenced for “extremist” post

Chris Baldwin
Reuters
July 7, 2008

A Russian man who described local police as “scum” in an Internet posting was given a suspended jail sentence on Monday for extremism, prompting bloggers to warn of a crackdown on free speech online.

Savva Terentiev, a 28-year-old musician from Syktyvkar, 1,515 kilometres (940 miles) north of Moscow, wrote in a blog last year that the police force should be cleaned up by ceremonially burning officers twice a day in a town square.

Convicted on charges of “inciting hatred or enmity”, Terentiev was given a one-year suspended term on Monday, Russian news agencies reported.

Free speech campaigners said the ruling could create a dangerous precedent for free speech on the Internet, a vibrant forum for political debate in a country where the mainstream traditional media is deferential to authority.

“This was an absolutely unjustified verdict,” Alexander Verkhovsky, director of the SOVA centre in Moscow, a non-governmental group that monitors extremism, told Reuters. “Savva for sure wrote a rude comment … but this verdict means it will be impossible to make rude comments about anybody.”

Read Full Article Here

Joe Lieberman all set to label US Jews as more likely to be “homegrown terrorists”
http://mparent7777-1.livejournal.com/814290.html

Fearmongering On An Internet Meltdown
http://technology.timesonline.co.uk/t..web/article4271879.ece

AP: Right to free speech not guaranteed online
http://rawstory.com/news/2008/AP..ctions_not_guaranteed_online_0707.html

Congress Studies How Online Use Is Tracked
http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/200807..=AuMBBb0JkMsxGvh4ui0tdwlk24cA

Web & Media Moguls Conduct Meeting
http://biz.yahoo.com/ap/080707/media_uncertainty.html?.v=4

Internet Flaw Could Let Hackers Take Over Web
http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?..zxdxcmkx&show_article=1

 



No matter who’s elected in 2008, New World Order persists

No matter who’s elected in 2008, New World Order persists

http://youtube.com/watch?v=9AvSQuqQb5c

http://youtube.com/watch?v=_SlIHqdVEmc

New World Order Quotes
http://nwsarchive.wordpress..w-world-order-quotes/

 



Lieberman: U.S. May Be Attacked In 2009

Lieberman: U.S. May Be Attacked In 2009

http://youtube.com/watch?v=VgrvdZbUgmg

 

Bolton: Israel Strike On Iran ‘During Bush’s Term Makes A Lot Of Sense’

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=X9XbobXvZ1Q

 

Olbermann: Next Terrorist Attack Might Be “October Surprise”

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EJ01IUkNcK0

Kristol: Bush May Attack Iran If Obama Win Likely
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PuUnFIpSb-4

Bolton: Israel Will Attack Iran After U.S. Election
http://noworldsystem.com/2..k-iran-after-us-election/

Rumsfeld: Another Terror Attack Could Help War on Terror
http://noworldsystem.com/2008/06/2..-attack-could-help-war-on-terror/

Gingrich: Habeas Corpus ruling ‘could cost us a city’
http://noworldsystem.com/2008/06/..%98could-cost-us-a-city%e2%80%99/

Pipes: Iran war definite if Obama wins
http://www.presstv.ir/detail.aspx?id=58949&sectionid=351020101

Newt Gingrich: “It’s almost like they should every once in awhile allowed an attack to get through just to remind us. . .”
http://noworldsystem.com/20..-allowed-more-terror-attacks/

 



Senate’s Carbon Tax Enslavement Bill Fails
Vote On Climate Bill Is Blocked In Senate

AP
June 6, 2008

Senate Republicans on Friday blocked a global warming bill that would have required major reductions in greenhouse gases, pushing debate over the world’s biggest environmental concern to next year for a new Congress and president.

Democratic leaders fell a dozen votes short of getting the 60 needed to end a Republican filibuster on the measure and bring the bill up for a vote, prompting Majority Leader Harry Reid to pull the legislation from consideration.

The Senate debate focused on bitter disagreement over the expected economic costs of putting a price on carbon dioxide, the leading greenhouse gas that comes from burning fossil fuels. Opponents said it would lead to higher energy costs.

“It’s just the beginning for us,” proclaimed Sen. Barbara Boxer, D- Calif., a chief sponsor of the bill, noting that 54 senators had expressed support of the legislation, although that’s still short of what would be needed to overcome concerted GOP opposition.

“It’s clear a majority of Congress wants to act,” Boxer said at a news conference.

Read Full Article Here

 

Senate Democrats May Pull Climate Bill

Washington Post
June 6, 2008

If this week’s Senate debate on a proposed cap-and-trade system for greenhouse gases was supposed to be a dress rehearsal for climate legislation, things are not looking too good for opening night.

The week has been marked by parliamentary maneuvers and bitter accusations over divergent estimates of the bill’s future costs. On Wednesday, a group of GOP senators asked that the clerk of the Senate read the entire 491-page bill aloud, an extremely rare request. That took more than 10 hours.

Read Full Article Here

 

Senate To Push Carbon Tax Enslavement Bill

Lee Rogers
Rogue Government
May 29, 2008

The establishment is getting ready to push forward with Joe Lieberman’s proposed carbon credit enslavement bill. The bill otherwise known as America’s Climate Security Act of 2007 or S 2191 will give the Environmental Protection Agency draconian powers to implement a carbon credit system here in the United States. Read my full analysis of the bill here. This is nothing more than a carbon tax and the bill intends to reduce the amount of available carbon credits on a year to year basis starting in the year 2012. This will effectively make it more difficult for small and medium sized businesses to compete with the large multinational corporations who will have the resources to deal with this ridiculous enslavement tax. The threat of man made carbon emissions causing global warming is a documented fraud. Over 31,000 scientists have recently come forward refuting the claims of Al Gore and others who are promoting this lie. The fact that the corporate controlled media can continue to promote this huge lie as propaganda to pass this carbon credit initiative is utterly insane.

According to the Seattle Post Intelligencer, debate is scheduled to begin on this legislation next week.

For years the Senate Committee on Environment and Public Works was the burial ground for legislation addressing among other things coal powered electricity generation. The U.S. has about a quarter of the world’s known supply of coal and coal is the primary source of electricity in this country. (Hydroelectric power is not as prominent elsewhere as in this region.) It is commonly said that reducing the emissions of coal used to generate electricity is vital to controlling greenhouse gas emissions here. Most seem to believe that this is the cornerstone to any effective policy. In December the committee, with a Democratic majority, passed America’s Climate Security Act of 2007 and the bill will be debated in the Senate next week.

The Republicans are split on this bill. Larry Craig and other Republicans did all he could to prevent the bill from getting out of committee. The bill though is sponsored by Joe Lieberman and John Warner. (Warner is on the committee.)

Even though there is absolutely no difference between the Republicans and the Democrats, it is pretty clear that the establishment is hell bent on pushing this thing through. The majority of Democrats are going to support this bill and if the Republicans are split on this bill, it means it will pass the U.S. Senate relatively easy. It doesn’t matter that the vast majority of Americans oppose the measures in this bill. The establishment wants this carbon credit initiative passed so they can effectively enslave the majority of free humanity.

The GOP has said that they are going to try to form some opposition to this bill, but in reality it will be nothing more than a staged debate. This piece of legislation is going to get passed and any opposition will be for the purposes of the theater played out in the media to make the masses believe that we actually have Senators that represent the people.

San Francisco has already passed a carbon tax on businesses which is just a warm up for what we are going to see across this country if S 2191 gets passed. It is incredibly insane that these people are going forward with an agenda to establish a system of carbon credits on the basis of man made carbon emissions causing global warming. With over 31,000 scientists many with high level degrees refuting the doomsday claims of Al Gore, this global warming crap along with this carbon tax push is becoming more and more of a sick joke.

Hope For Climate Bill Passage In 2009
http://www.reuters.com/article/latestCrisis/idUSN06383064

Carbon’s Power Brokers
http://www.washingtonpost.com..08053002521_pf.html

Let’s Just Call It ‘Cap and Tax’
http://www.newsweek.com/id/139454

Comments On U.S. Carbon Tax Bill
http://www.reuters.com/article/newsOne/idUSN0229748720080602

Are you ready for WW2-style energy rationing?
http://www.theregister.co.uk/2008/05/29/carbon_rationing_no/

 



McCain’s YouTube Problem Just Became a Nightmare

McCain’s YouTube Problem Just Became a Nightmare

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GEtZlR3zp4c

McCain: Pull Money Out Of Iran
http://www.usatoday.com/news/politic..-02-mccain-aipac_N.htm?csp=1

McCain vows tough sanctions on Iran
http://news.yahoo.com/s/afp/200806..cainiran_080602143826

McCain Reacts To McClellan: ‘Every Intelligence Agency In The World And Every Assessment’ Said Iraq Had WMD
http://thinkprogress.org/2008/05/29/mccain-mcclellan/

McCain consultant’s wife worked for Libya’s terrorist regime
http://mparent7777-1.livejournal.com/319398.html

McCain Official: Bush Has Near Dictatorial Powers
http://www.salon.com/opinion/greenwald/2008/06/02/goldfarb/print.html

 



Top Source Says Bush To Strike Iran By August


Top Source Says Bush To Strike Iran By August
Asia Times says two U.S. Senators already briefed on attack plan

Paul Joseph Watson
Prison Planet
May 27, 2008

The Bush administration is planning to carry out air strikes against Iran by August and two U.S. Senators have already been briefed on the attack according to a report in the highly respected Asia Times, which cites a former assistant secretary of state and U.S. career diplomat as its source.

Muhammad Cohen’s article claims that Senator Diane Feinstein, Democrat of California, and Senator Richard Lugar, Republican of Indiana, were informed of the attack plan and planned to voice their opposition to it in a New York Times editorial in an attempt to offset the air strike. The editorial is yet to materialize.

According to Cohen’ source, the Neo-Cons believe that they can perpetrate a “limited” air strike aimed more at sending a message than destroying Iran’s supposed nuclear program, but the consequences of such a move are likely to provoke a massive Iranian retaliation, as President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad has consistently warned.

The George W Bush administration plans to launch an air strike against Iran within the next two months, an informed source tells Asia Times Online, echoing other reports that have surfaced in the media in the United States recently.

Two key US senators briefed on the attack planned to go public with their opposition to the move, according to the source, but their projected New York Times op-ed piece has yet to appear.

The source, a retired US career diplomat and former assistant secretary of state still active in the foreign affairs community, speaking anonymously, said last week that that the US plans an air strike against the Iranian Revolutionary Guards Corps (IRGC). The air strike would target the headquarters of the IRGC’s elite Quds force. With an estimated strength of up to 90,000 fighters, the Quds’ stated mission is to spread Iran’s revolution of 1979 throughout the region.

The source said the White House views the proposed air strike as a limited action to punish Iran for its involvement in Iraq. The source, an ambassador during the administration of president H W Bush, did not provide details on the types of weapons to be used in the attack, nor on the precise stage of planning at this time. It is not known whether the White House has already consulted with allies about the air strike, or if it plans to do so.

Speculating on whether such a strike will benefit either McCain or Obama on the eve of the presidential election, the report points out that McCain has built his candidacy around an aggressive foreign policy therefore would be the likelier to take advantage.

“A strike on Iran could rally American voters to back the war effort and vote for McCain,” states the article.

“On the other hand, an air strike on Iran could heighten public disenchantment with Bush administration policy in the Middle East, leading to support for the Democratic candidate, whoever it is.”

Iran’s inevitable response would send oil prices skyrocketing towards $200 dollars a barrel as global instability threatened to boil over into numerous different regions in the aftermath of any attack. McCain’s ability to grandstand as a tough war leader would no doubt be amplified by a compliant corporate media and a sizable proportion of the American public would rally behind the Arizona Senator, especially if American interests were the subject of terrorist attacks on behalf of Hezbollah and Hamas.

China’s response to any attack, with the Communist nation being Iran’s biggest customer for oil, would also be key. Any inkling of a hostile reaction would place the world under the greatest threat since the height of the cold war.

Lugar and Feinstein’s public opposition to the plan “would likely create a public groundswell of criticism that could induce the Bush administration reconsider its plan,” states the article but, “Given their obligations to uphold the secrecy of classified information, it is unlikely the senators would reveal the Bush administration’s plan or their knowledge of it.”

The impending invasion of Iran has been on the grapevine for the past three summers running and many are beginning to fear that the “boy who cried wolf” mentality is starting to discredit those who repeatedly warn of the coming attack. However, rhetoric has notably heated in the past few months.

During Bush’s recent visit to Israel, an Israeli official claimed that a senior member in Bush’s entourage had stated in a closed meeting that Bush and Vice President Dick Cheney had resolved to attack Iran before they left office.

During a recent news conference at Israel’s parliament, US House Speaker Nancy Pelosi and House majority leader Steny Hoyer stated that the military option against Iran was still on the table.

Prominent political figures such as Zbigniew Brzezinski and Gary Hart have warned that an attack on Iran won’t arrive absent a staged provocation or a new Gulf of Tonkin style incident.

During a 2007 Senate Foreign Relations Committee meeting, Brzezinski alluded to the potential for the Bush administration to manufacture a false flag Gulf of Tonkin type incident in describing a “plausible scenario for a military collision with Iran,” which would revolve around “some provocation in Iraq or a terrorist act in the US blamed on Iran, culminating in a ‘defensive’ US military action against Iran that plunges a lonely America into a spreading and deepening quagmire eventually ranging across Iraq, Iran, Afghanistan and Pakistan.”

In an open letter to Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, former Senator and current CFR member Hart warned the Iranian President that he would be, “Well advised to read the history of the sinking of the U.S.S. Maine in Havana harbor in 1898 and the history of the Gulf of Tonkin in 1964,” two false flag events manufactured by the U.S. itself to kick start a war.

 

Neo-Con General Calls For Terror Attacks In Iran
McInerney urges U.S. government to support terrorist organization MEK, Bush administration already bankrolling Al-Qaeda-linked Jundullah group

Paul Joseph Watson
Prison Planet
May 16, 2008

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9GUVTbLEKgA

Fresh off the revelation of Donald Rumsfeld’s 2006 audio tape admission that a method to reinvigorate the Neo-Con agenda would be another terror attack, Neo-Cons like Ret. Gen. Thomas McInerney, who was part of the Pentagon’s “message force multipliers” propaganda program, have been calling for the Bush administration to commit acts of terror in Iran.

According to the Crooks and Liars blog, McInerney has appeared on Fox News 144 times since Jan 2002. In one of his recent appearances he publicly called for the U.S. government to support groups like MEK, which is listed by the State Department as a terrorist organization, and carry out deadly bombings in Iran.

McInerney: Here’s what I would suggest to you. Number one, we take the National Council for Resistance to Iran off the terrorist list that the Clinton Administration put them on as well as the Mujahedin-e Khalq at the Camp Ashraf in Iraq. Then I would start a tit-for-tat strategy which I wrote up in the Wall Street Journal a year ago: For every EFP that goes off and kills Americans, two go off in Iran. No questions asked. People don’t have to know how it was done. It’s a covert action. They become the most unlucky country in the world. …

McInerney’s frothing desire to see women and children blown to bits in the streets of Tehran may have something to do with the fact that “McInerney is on the Board of Directors for several companies with defense-related contracts that would seem to benefit from his pro-war propaganda. For example, Alloy Surfaces Company (ASC), whose contracts for “ammunition and explosives” with the Department of Defense appear to have grown from $15 million in 2002 to more than $169 million in 2006. A conflict of interest, perhaps?”

McInerney “tit-for-tat” strategy, to support MEK-run terror bombings in Iran in retaliation for Iran supposedly killing U.S. troops in Iraq, a baseless claim in itself, is all the more horribly ironic when one considers the fact that MEK “has killed US troops and civilians before back in the 1970s”.

As Crooks and Liars points out, the U.S. government is already funding MEK and the group has been linked with numerous bombings inside Iran over the course of the last few years.

In addition – British SAS have been caught training insurgents in Iraq to carry out hi-tech bombings that are later blamed on Iran.

Another Iranian-based terror group that the Bush administration is already funding as a means of regime change in Iran is Jundullah – a Sunni Al-Qaeda terrorist group formerly headed by the alleged mastermind of 9/11, Khalid Sheikh Mohammed.

“The CIA is giving arms-length support, supplying money and weapons, to an Iranian militant group, Jundullah, which has conducted raids into Iran from bases in Pakistan,” the London Telegraph reported last year.

The group has been blamed for a number of bombings inside Iran aimed at destabilizing Ahmadinejad’s government and is also active in Pakistan, having been fingered for its involvement in attacks on police stations and car bombings at the Pakistan-US Cultural Center in 2004.

Crooks and Liars documents White House efforts to censor reports about MEK and other Iranian terror groups in the U.S. corporate media.

In Dec 2006, just days after Rumsfeld was forced to step down, the NYT published a heavily redacted op-ed by Flynt Leverett and Hillary Mann. Though none of the info was classified, all of which had previously “been extensively reported in the news media,” much of their article was blacked out because the “White House intervened” before it went to print. In response, Leverett and Mann followed up with an accompanying piece What We Wanted to Tell You About Iran where they provided citations to previously reported sources for all of the redacted info. Raw Story compiled those sources in their “The redacted Iran op-ed revealed” and, surprise, many of the articles refer directly to the MEK terrorist group, but there had been nary a mention in the portions the White House allowed.

So, to recap: One of the Pentagon’s propaganda TV analysts who has clear ties to defense industries that would likely stand to benefit from any increased hostilities is advocating that the US ought to use a terrorist organization to commit acts of terrorism against Iran in response to alleged Iranian involvement in attacks against US forces in Iraq, which might be true, or maybe not. And if that wasn’t outrageous enough, it seems that Bush may have been authorizing such tactics already.

In November 2007, Fox and Friends host Brian Kilmeade openly called for US support for acts of terrorism, such as car bombings, in Tehran. Colonel David Hunt, who has over 29 years of military experience including extensive operational experience in Special Operations, Counter Terrorism and Intelligence Operations, agreed with Kilmeade, stating “absolutely” in response to Kilmead’s question about whether cars should start blowing up in Tehran.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mH3BTaWrQ3I

Last weekend, the Iranian Intelligence Ministry busted a CIA-backed terror group that was planning to bomb scientific, educational, and religious centers, and carry out assassinations in Iran, according to a report in the Tehran Times.

Recent News:

’US evidence against Iran fabricated’
http://www.theregister.co.uk/20..arrested_downloading_book/

Senators say report of planned US strikes on Iran untrue
http://rawstory.com/ne..rt_of_planned_US_0528.html

Ultimatum Being Drafted Towards Iran
http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2008/04/29/eveningnews/main4056941.shtml

Iran No Longer Trades Oil For Dollars
http://www.thaindian.com/newsporta..rs-in-oil-transactions_10043750.html

Zbig: US suffers from Iran paranoia
http://www.presstv.ir/detail.aspx?id=57561&sectionid=351020104

The War Camp in Death throes is intent on striking Iran
http://www.payvand.com/news/08/may/1239.html

Iran: Army will respond to any threat
http://www.presstv.ir/detail.aspx?id=56855&sectionid=351020101

Brit Intel “Leaks” Propaganda: Iran Paying Iraqis to Kill Occupation Troops
http://www.infowars.com/?p=2346

Israel mulling Iran strike
http://www.presstv.ir/detail.aspx?id=57243&sectionid=351020202

China, Russia rule out military actions on Iran
http://english.peopledaily.com.cn/90001/90776/90883/6417395.html

White House denies Army Radio report on plan to attack Iran
http://www.jpost.com/servlet/Satellite?cid..=JPost/JPArticle/ShowFull

Ghoul Lieberman Finds “Appeal” in Slaughtering Iranians
http://www.infowars.com/?p=2167

Bush ’plans Iran air strike by August’
Building a Case for Attack on Iran’s Nuclear Sites

Coup on Iran & False Flag News Archive

 



151 Congressmen Derive Financial Profit From War

151 Congressmen Derive Financial Profit From War

Ralph Forbes
American Free Press
April 28, 2008

Who profits from the Iraq war? More than a quarter of senators and congressmen have invested at least $196 million of their own money in companies doing business with the Department of Defense (DoD) that profit from the death and destruction in Iraq.

According to the latest reports, 151 members of Congress invested close to a quarter-billion in companies that received defense contracts of at least $5 million in 2006. These companies got more than $275.6 billion from the government in 2006, or $755 million per day, according to FedSpending.org, a website of the watchdog group OMBWatch.

Congressmen gave themselves a loophole so they only have to report their assets in broad ranges. Thus, they can be off as much as 160 percent. (Try giving the IRS an estimate like that.) In 2004, the first full year after the present Iraq war began, Republican and Democratic lawmakers—both hawks and doves—invested between $74.9 million and $161.3 million in companies under contract with the DoD. In 2006 Democrats had at least $3.7 million invested in the defense sector alone, compared to the Republicans’ “only” $577,500. As the war raged on, so did the billions of profits—and personal investments by Congress members in war contractors, which increased 5 percent from 2004 to 2006.

Investments in these contractors yielded Congress members between $15.8 million and $62 million in personal income from 2004 through 2006, through dividends, capital gains, royalties and interest. Sen. John Kerry (D-Mass.) and Rep. James Sensenbrenner (R-Wis.), who are two of Congress’s wealthiest members, were among the lawmakers who garnered the most income from war contractors between 2004 and 2006: Sensenbrenner got at least $3.2 million and Kerry reaped at least $2.6 million.

Members of the Senate Foreign Relations and Armed Services committees which oversee the Iraq war had between $32 million and $44 million invested in companies with DoD contracts.

War hawk Sen. Joe Lieberman (IConn.), chairman of the defense-related
Senate Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs Committee, had at least $51,000 invested in these companies in 2006.

Sen. Hillary Clinton (D-N.Y.), who voted for Bush’s war, had stock in defense companies, such as Honeywell, Boeing and Raytheon, but sold the stock in May 2007.

Of the 151 members whose investments are tied to the “defense” (war)
industry, as far as we know, not one of them offered to donate their bloodstained profits to the national treasury to offset the terrible debt they have imposed. Has one of them even offered to donate one cent of their war profits to lessen the debt that increases more than $1 million a minute?

When our boys and girls are wounded the government bills them to return their reenlistment bonus. They have to return any pay they received while they were hospitalized. They have to pay for their helmets and uniforms that are destroyed in the hell of war. But they keep on fighting for these politicians’ right to keep their war profits.

• Sen. John Kerry (D-Mass.) $3,001,006 to $5,015,001
• Sen. Tom Harkin (D-Iowa) $250,001 to $500,000
• Rep. Kenny Ewell Marchant (R-Tex.) $162,074 to $162,074
• Rep. Carolyn B. Maloney (D-N.Y.) $115,002 to $300,000
• Rep. Rodney Frelinghuysen (R-N.J.) $115,002 to $300,000
• Rep. Shelley Berkley (D-Nev.) $100,870 to $100,870
• Rep. James Sensenbrenner Jr. (R-Wis.) $65,646 to $65,646
• Sen. Jeff Bingaman (D-N.M.) $50,008 to $227,000
• Rep. Sam Farr (D-Calif.) $50,001 to $100,000
• Rep. Stephen Ira Cohen (D-Tenn.) $45,003 to $150,000

 



Global Warming Bill Would Inflict New Great Depression


Global Warming Bill Would Inflict New Great Depression
Lieberman-Warner legislation would slash 6.9 percent GDP off U.S. economy

Paul Joseph Watson
Prison Planet
March 21, 2008

A new bill aimed at combating global warming currently being considered by the Senate would, if passed, inflict a new great depression on America by reducing GDP by 6.9 percent – a figure comparable with the economic meltdown of 1929 and 1930.

The shocking consequences of the Lieberman-Warner legislation, known as America’s Climate Security Act, were revealed by the Environmental Protection Agency’s economic analysis of the bill this week, which forecast a whopping $2.9 trillion would be shaved off the economy by the year 2050.

In comparison, despite the fact that America is teetering on the brink of a recession or is already in one according to many experts, GDP still increased by 0.7 percent in 2007. Imagine what effect a -6.9 percent swing would have – an economy ten times worse than it is now.

As JunkScience.com’s Steven Milloy highlights, “For more perspective, consider that during 1929 and 1930, the first two years of the Great Depression, GDP declined by 8.6 percent and 6.4 percent, respectively.”

And what would we get for such a massive self-inflicted wound? It ought to be something that is climatically spectacular, right? You be the judge.

The EPA says that by the year 2095 — 45 years after GDP has been slashed by 6.9 percent — atmospheric carbon dioxide levels would be 25 parts per million lower than if no greenhouse gas regulation were implemented.

Keeping in mind that the current atmospheric CO2 level is 380 ppm and the projected 2095 CO2 level is about 500 ppm, according to the EPA, what are the potential global temperature implications for such a slight change in atmospheric CO2 concentration?

Not much, as average global temperature would only be reduced by a maximum of about 0.10 to 0.20 degrees Celsius, according to existing research.

Sacrificing many trillions of dollars of GDP for a trivial, 45-year-delayed and merely hypothetical reduction in average global temperature must be considered as exponentially more asinine than the dot-bombs of the late-1990s and the NINJA subprime loans that we now look upon scornfully.

Add to this the fact that, as climate cult alarmists are loathe to admit, ice core samples clearly show that carbon dioxide is a consequence of temperature increase and not a cause of it, sometimes lagging behind by as much as 800 years, and the whole issue starts to look even more harebrained.

Global temperatures have remained reasonably flat since a decline in 1998 and cooling trends are now being observed despite the fact that carbon dioxide levels have increased in the atmosphere (see graph below).

Indeed, the latest evidence from climatological surveys shows that the earth’s upper oceans and the troposphere, the primary indicators of climate change, have not been warming for the last 4 years.

Meanwhile, places like Saudi Arabia and China have experienced their coldest winters for decades if not a hundred years plus.

On the whole, the world is getting colder (see above), which is why “global warming” suddenly became “climate change” when temperature levels since 2003 started to prove the alarmists wrong.

Once again, the enviro-mentalists are proposing measures that would make life hell for the poor and middle classes and completely ransack the economy while creating global financial instability that would make today’s problems look like a walk in the park – all based on the justification of saving the planet from a potential 0.10 degrees Celsius increase in temperature that isn’t even guaranteed because the science behind it is complete bunk.

In another example of outright frothing lunacy, NASA climate scientist Dr. James E. Hansen recently issued a report that called for phasing out coal power completely by the year 2030.

“An initial 350 ppm CO2 target may be achievable by phasing out coal use except where CO2 is captured and adopting agricultural and forestry practices that sequester carbon. If the present overshoot of this target CO2 is not brief, there is a possibility of seeding irreversible catastrophic effects,” states the report.

As the Business and Media Institute points out, coal fired plants account for no less than 50 percent of all electricity generated in the United States. To eliminate coal use would completely cripple the global economy and lead soaring energy costs to at least a doubling of current levels.

As we reported earlier this month, a recent Carnegie Institution report calls for carbon emissions to be reduced to near zero in order to combat global warming, despite the fact that such a move would return man to the stone age if not end civilization as we know it and kill billions.

The proposal was afforded serious gravitas by news outlets like the Washington Post absent even a passing mention of what its disastrous consequences would be for humanity.

 



Senate OKs Telecom Immunity

Senate OKs Telecom Immunity

AP
February 12, 2008

The Senate voted Tuesday to shield from lawsuits telecommunications companies that helped the government eavesdrop on their customers without court permission after the Sept. 11 terrorist attacks.

After nearly two months of stops and starts, the Senate rejected by a vote of 31 to 67 a move to strip away a grant of retroactive legal immunity for the companies.

President Bush has promised to veto any new surveillance bill that does not protect the companies that helped the government in its warrantless wiretapping program, arguing that it is essential if the private sector is to give the government the help it needs.

About 40 lawsuits have been filed against telecom companies by people alleging violations of wiretapping and privacy laws.

The Senate also rejected two amendments that sought to water down the immunity provision.

One, co-sponsored by Republican Arlen Specter of Pennsylvania and Democrat Sheldon Whitehouse of Rhode Island, would have substituted the government for the telecoms in lawsuits, allowing the court cases to go forward but shifting the cost and burden of defending the program.

The other, pushed by California Democrat Dianne Feinstein, would have given a secret court that oversees government surveillance inside the United States the power to dismiss lawsuits if it found that the companies acted in good faith and on the request of the president or attorney general.

Read Full Article Here

 

Bush Admits Telecoms Spied

Raw Story
February 12, 2008

Fbiiraqisbein_mn

In Oval Office address, president pledges veto of any temporary FISA expansions

Well, he finally dropped the “allegedly.” President Bush at long last admitted what everyone has suspected for years — the nation’s telecommunications companies closely cooperated with the National Security Agency and his administration to implement large-scale spying on Americans.

Bush was praising the Senate for approving his long-sought update to a foreign surveillance law. Critics say the bill legalizes his warrantless wiretapping program, which was implemented outside the boundaries of the law, and frees phone and internet companies from any responsibility for violating customers’ privacy.

“The senate bill also provides fair and just liability protections for companies that did the right thing and assisted in defending America, after the attacks of Sept. 11,” Bush said.

As recently as his State of the Union address, Bush would only call for legal immunity for companies “believed to have assisted” in his so-called Terrorist Surveillance Program.

Bush’s admission came a day after his press secretary similarly acknowledged phone company cooperation. Also Tuesday, the Director of National Intelligence sought to suppress as “Top Secret” evidence of a phone conversation between a telecom company representative and a DNI lawyer.

Speaking from the Oval Office Wednesday morning, Bush threw down the gauntlet and issued a stern warning to the House. He admonished the chamber for failing to rubber-stamp the White House approved bill, which 18 Democrats joined every Republican and Joe Lieberman to do Tuesday. Democrats in the House, on the other hand, approved a bill updating the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance without granting legal immunity.

Bush has pleged to veto any bill without immunity, and he said Tuesday that he would not accept any more temporary FISA extensions. By midnight Saturday, when a stop-gap extension expires, Bush said he will get what he wants or do nothing to stop what he says are vital gaps in intelligence collection re-open.

On the eve of a vote to give telephone companies immunity for their alleged participation in the National Security Agency’s warrantless wiretap program, White House spokesperson Dana Perino admitted that the companies actually spied.

Because they were patriotic.

“The telephone companies that were alleged to have helped their country after 9/11 did so because they are patriotic and they certainly helped us and they helped us save lives,” Perino told reporters at Tuesday’s press briefing.

The admission, while possibly a verbal slip-up, was first noticed by Ryan Singer, of Wired.

The Senate gave the phone companies immunity by a 69-29 vote. It passed wiretapping bill in its entirety just before 6pm ET, 68-29.

Earlier this afternoon, the immunity measure’s staunchest opponent, Sen. Chris Dodd (D-CT), announced he would abandon his effort to block the bill with a filibuster, arguing that the House, which has passed an immunity-free bill, would be a better place to try to strip immunity from Congress’s final piece of legislation.

“We lost every single battle we had on this bill,” Dodd said on a conference call Tuesday with reporters and bloggers. “And the question is now, Can we do better with the House carrying the ball on this bill?”

The bill to update the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act, including a provision granting retroactive immunity to telecommunications companies that facilitated government spying, passed the Senate on a 68-29 vote Tuesday evening.

Read Full Article Here

Roll Call Votes: Who are the traitors to the US Constitution
http://www.senate.gov/legislative/LIS..0&session=2&vote=00020

Bush Presses House To Approve Spy Bill
http://www.nytimes.com/2008/…1&hp=&pagewanted=print&oref=slogin

Senator Dodd on retroactive immunity: ‘We’ve just sanctioned the single largest invasion of privacy in American history’
http://www.theseminal.com/2008/02/12/retroactive-immunity-whats-next/

 



Vote Coming On Carbon Credit Enslavement Bill

Vote Coming On Carbon Credit Enslavement Bill

Baltimore Sun
December 4, 2007

A U.S. Senate committee is scheduled for an historic vote on a global warming bill this week, perhaps as early as Wednesday. Environmental groups are planning a flurry of press conferences tomorrow (12/4/2007) to try to influence the vote.

Meanwhile, in Maryland, Gov. Martin O’Malley’s advisory Commission on Climate Change is scheduled to meet tomorrow to discuss possible steps to reduce the state’s greenhouse gas emmissions. The 22-member goup, headed by state Environmental Secretary Shari T. Wilson, is looking to recommend that the state adopt laws to cut greenhouse gases by 25 percent by 2020, and then move aggressively to slash the pollutants by 90 percent by 2050, according to a draft report. To achieve these goals, the state should tighten its energy efficiency standards, strengthen building codes, require more clean energy generation, among other steps.

“As a coastal state with extensive low-lying land on the Eastern Shore and around the Chesapeake Bay, Maryland is exceeded only by Louisiana, Florida and Delaware in the percentage of its land vulnerable to accelerated sea level rise,” the draft report warns.

On the Federal level, the U.S. Senate Environment and Public Works Committee on Wednesday is expected to debate amendments to a bill proposed by Sens. Lieberman of Connecticut and Warner of Virginia that would create a “cap and trade” system designed to cut total U.S. greenhouse-gas emissions. These systems require industries to pay fees when they emit carbon dioxide or other greenhouses gases above a set limit, with the money going to reward cleaner businesses.

Sen. Ben Cardin of Maryland is a co-sponsor of the bill. A group of Maryland environmental groups recently wrote a letter to Cardin (see below) urging him to strengthen the bill. They praise the proposal as a good first step, but they want to end the bill’s free giveaway of pollution credits to power companies and amend the legislation to create a more aggressive target of an 80 percent cut by 2050.

“This is the first time ever a Senate commitee is voting on a global warming bill, and that’s historic,” said Brad Heavner, director of Environment Maryland. “There is some reasonable expectation that this will get to the floor, but the big question is will it get stronger or weaker?….We think it needs to be stronger.”

As this blog reported last month, Europe tried a pollution credit trading system to curb carbon dioxide emissions after it passed the Kyoto Protocol in 1997, and power companies worked the system to make billions in profits. Electricity customers paid higher bills, thinking they were contributing to a cooler planet. But their money just went into the pockets of the electric companies, which didn’t end up actually cutting down on their carbon dioxide emissions.

On the other side of the political spectrum from these environmental groups, most Republicans on the committee are unlikely to vote in favor of the bill’s current requirements, according to the online journal Grist.

“Right now, there’s little reason to expect that any Republican on the committee other than John Warner (R-Va.) himself will vote for it. Sen. Lamar Alexander (R-Tenn.) spoke critically of it at the first subcommittee hearing last week, and Sen. George Voinovich (R-Ohio) took to the podium of the National Press Club two days later to pillory the bill.

Voinovich said: ‘I have significant reservations about the bill. I have recently heard the concerns of a variety of constituents, including both industry and labor representatives, who are especially concerned that the bill presents an overly aggressive first phase of emissions reductions that will hit well before we can reasonably expect commercially available technologies to deal with the problem.’

Without the support of more Republicans, it’s unclear if the measure will make it out of the full Senate — not to mention survive a veto by President Bush, if he chose to use that power.

Meanwhile, the nonprofit Pew Center on Global Climate Change is releasing a report tomorrow on the impact of global warming on the Chesapeake Bay. Environment Maryland tomorrow morning is releasing a report on changes in local rainfall expected because of climate change.

Related News:

S 2191: The Carbon Credit Enslavement System
http://www.roguegovernment.com/news.php?id=5188

John Stossel Exposes Global Warming on 20/20
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_FI0U5JOtoo

Fall in weather deaths dents climate hysteria warnings
http://www.sott.net/articles/s…nts-climate-hysteria-warnings

Blast from the past? Coldest winter in 15 years, Environment Canada says
http://www.cbc.ca/canada/story/2007/11/30/winter-forecast.html

Global Warming Hoax News Archive

 



S 2191: The Carbon Credit Enslavement System

S 2191: The Carbon Credit Enslavement System

Lee Rogers
Rogue Government
November 21, 2007

The push towards a global carbon credit mechanism continues to be one of the top agendas of the world elite. Despite the fact that numerous scientific studies have concluded that the entire solar system is getting warmer as part of a natural cycle, non-stop propaganda from the major corporate news networks continue to blame man made carbon emissions for planetary warming. In addition, the establishment media pushes unfounded claims that global warming will result in a myriad of environmental disasters. Despite the fact that man made global warming is a complete fraud, the world elite are selling fear as a way for them to bring in a world carbon credit enslavement system. This carbon credit system will be used as a funding mechanism to consolidate wealth into the hands of the big global corporations and to potentially fund regional and global governmental institutions.

In 2005, the European Union began the foundational steps to setup a credit system based off of carbon emissions through the European Union Emission Trading Scheme. Now, they are seeking to expand that system to include airliners. Peter Liese a German member of the European Parliament even stated that they want this carbon credit scheme to be global in scale. Below is a blurb from the International Herald Tribune, in which he advocates the need for this carbon credit enslavement system.

A bold attempt by the European Union to impose caps on aircraft emissions received a boost on Tuesday as legislators voted to raise the costs on airlines and to include international flights sooner than expected.

The measures, approved by the European Parliament, are fiercely opposed by the United States and the airline industry, which could cost companies billions of dollars and lead to sharp price rises for passengers. On the opposing side, some environmental groups criticized the proposed measure, which still must be approved by individual EU states, as far too timid.

But members of the European Parliament said that regulating aircraft pollution would set a important precedent and could be emulated by other countries.

“We want a worldwide system as soon as possible,” said Peter Liese, a German member of parliament who helped to guide the legislation through parliament, which met in Strasbourg, France. “There must be an end to the status quo that nothing is done in the aviation sector and which has predominated for many years now,” Liese said.

As the European Union pushes the carbon credit scam forward in Europe, the United States Senate is now pushing Senate Bill 2191 which is called America’s Climate Security Act of 2007. The bill originally proposed by Joe Lieberman and co-sponsored by establishment hacks on both sides of the phony right-left political paradigm if passed into law will establish a draconian carbon credit system here in the United States that will give the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) extraordinary enforcement powers over this system. Below is a full analysis of this bill which promises nothing short of total enslavement.

Facilities that emit or import fuel that could potentially emit more than 10,000 metric tons of carbon dioxide per year would be affected by this bill. This is described in section 4 of the bill and labels these facilities as a “covered facility” and they would be forced to abide by the rules and regulations established by this bill. Considering that the average automobile emits approximately six tons of carbon dioxide on a yearly basis, 10,000 metric tons is really not a whole lot of carbon dioxide. The relevant subsections of section 4 are listed below.

(5) CARBON DIOXIDE EQUIVALENT- The term `carbon dioxide equivalent’ means, for each greenhouse gas, the quantity of the greenhouse gas that the Administrator determines makes the same contribution to global warming as 1 metric ton of carbon dioxide.

(7) COVERED FACILITY- The term `covered facility’ means–

(A) any facility within the electric power sector that contains fossil fuel-fired electricity generating units that together emit more than 10,000 carbon dioxide equivalents of greenhouse gas in any year;

(B) any facility within the industrial sector that emits more than 10,000 carbon dioxide equivalents of greenhouse gas in any year;

(C) any facility that in any year produces, or any entity that in any year imports, petroleum- or coal-based transportation fuel, the use of which will emit more than 10,000 carbon dioxide equivalents of greenhouse gas, assuming no capture and permanent sequestration of that gas; or

(D) any facility that in any year produces, or any entity that in any year imports, nonfuel chemicals that will emit more than 10,000 carbon dioxide equivalents of greenhouse gas, assuming no capture and destruction or permanent sequestration of that gas.

Based off of the definition of a “covered facility”, the bill defines what an “affected facility” is defined as. It defines any “covered facility” as also being an “affected facility” but the broad language goes well beyond that. In the definition it essentially states that the Administrator of the EPA can actually designate whatever facility they want to designate as to be an affected facility if it emits a greenhouse gas. If you have farm animals, operate a fireplace or any number of things, the EPA at their discretion could declare that you are an “affected facility” and you will be forced to abide by the regulations set forth in the bill. It also states that “in general”, this is what is defined as an “affected facility”, so the bill allows the EPA to bend the rules and use an outrageous amount of discretion. So if you get on the bad side of the people at the EPA, they will have the power to designate your place of business or home as an “affected facility” even if you do not emit or import fuel that could potentially emit over 10,000 tons of carbon dioxide.

SEC. 1102. DEFINITIONS.

In this subtitle:

(1) AFFECTED FACILITY-

(A) IN GENERAL- The term `affected facility’ means–

(i) a covered facility;

(ii) another facility that emits a greenhouse gas, as determined by the Administrator; and

(iii) at the option of the Administrator, a vehicle fleet with emissions of more than 10,000 carbon dioxide equivalents per year, assuming no double-counting of emissions.

Any facility considered to be an “affected facility” would be forced to report annually and quarterly an obscene amount of data to the Administrator of the Environmental Protection Agency. The bill establishes a federal greenhouse gas registry where this information would be collected. Section 1103 describes the reporting requirements of “affected facilities” which would force these facilities to report the quantity and type of fossil fuels utilized, the amount of electricity generated or consumed, the amount of greenhouse gases emitted and more. These facilities would undoubtedly be forced to operate under the carbon credit enslavement system. The full list is shown below.

SEC. 1103. REPORTING REQUIREMENTS.

(a) In General- Subject to this section, each affected facility shall submit to the Administrator, for inclusion in the Registry, periodic reports, including annual and quarterly data, that–

(1) include the quantity and type of fossil fuels, including feedstock fossil fuels, that are extracted, produced, refined, imported, exported, or consumed at or by the facility;

(2) include the quantity of hydrofluorocarbons, perfluorocarbons, sulfur hexafluoride, nitrous oxide, carbon dioxide that has been captured and sequestered, and other greenhouse gases generated, produced, imported, exported, or consumed at or by the facility;

(3) include the quantity of electricity generated, imported, exported, or consumed by or at the facility, and information on the quantity of greenhouse gases emitted when the imported, exported, or consumed electricity was generated, as determined by the Administrator;

(4) include the aggregate quantity of all greenhouse gas emissions from sources at the facility, including stationary combustion source emissions, process emissions, and fugitive emissions;

(5) include greenhouse gas emissions expressed in metric tons of each greenhouse gas emitted and in the quantity of carbon dioxide equivalents of each greenhouse gas emitted;

(6) include a list and description of sources of greenhouse gas emissions at the facility;

(7) quantify greenhouse gas emissions in accordance with the measurement standards established under section 1104;

(8) include other data necessary for accurate and complete accounting of greenhouse gas emissions, as determined by the Administrator;

(9) include an appropriate certification regarding the accuracy and completeness of reported data, as determined by the Administrator; and

(10) are submitted electronically to the Administrator, in such form and to such extent as may be required by the Administrator.

Failure to abide by these reporting requirements will result in draconian fines. Section 1106 declares that the Administrator of the Environmental Protection Agency could bring civil action against owners or operators of facilities that do not abide by the regulations outlined in this bill. It also outlines a fine of $25,000 each day of non-compliance.

SEC. 1106. ENFORCEMENT.

(a) Civil Actions- The Administrator may bring a civil action in United States district court against the owner or operator of an affected facility that fails to comply with any requirement of this subtitle.

(b) Penalty- Any person that has violated or is violating this subtitle shall be subject to a civil penalty of not more than $25,000 per day of each violation.

In Section 1201 the bill gives the Administrator of the EPA authority to enforce a total amount of carbon dioxide emissions allowed in the country. Each year, the EPA will enforce rules in which fewer total carbon dioxide emissions will be allowed. It even states that carbon emissions will not be considered a property right.

SEC. 1201. EMISSION ALLOWANCE ACCOUNT.

(a) In General- The Administrator shall establish a separate quantity of emission allowances for each of calendar years 2012 through 2050.

(b) Identification Numbers- The Administrator shall assign to each emission allowance established under subsection (a) a unique identification number that includes the calendar year for which that emission allowance was established.

(c) Legal Status of Emission Allowances-

(1) IN GENERAL- An emission allowance shall not be a property right.

(2) TERMINATION OR LIMITATION- Nothing in this Act or any other provision of law limits the authority of the United States to terminate or limit an emission allowance.

(3) OTHER PROVISIONS UNAFFECTED- Nothing in this Act relating to emission allowances shall affect the application of, or compliance with, any other provision of law to or by a covered facility.

Even more ridiculous is that facilities that emit more carbon than they are allowed will be subject to more outrageous fines under the authority of the EPA.

The bill states in section 2501 that “affected facilities” would be able to use international allowances or credits to satisfy up to 15% of their carbon emission allowance. This indicates without a doubt that the grand plan is to have an international carbon credit system in place. Why would they include this section in the bill, if there wasn’t discussion of plans for an international system? Section 2501 is listed below.

SEC. 2501. USE OF INTERNATIONAL ALLOWANCES OR CREDITS.

The owner or operator of a covered facility may satisfy up to 15 percent of the allowance submission requirement of the covered facility under section 1202(a) by submitting allowances or credits obtained on a foreign greenhouse gas emissions trading market, on the condition that the Administrator has certified the market in accordance with the regulations promulgated pursuant to section 2502(a).

The bill would also establish a nonprofit private corporation called the “Climate Change Credit Corporation” that would essentially collect money based off of carbon credit auctions. This is outlined in Section 4201 of the bill which is shown below.

SEC. 4201. ESTABLISHMENT.

(a) In General- There is established, as a nonprofit corporation without stock, a corporation to be known as the `Climate Change Credit Corporation’.

(b) Treatment- The Corporation shall not be considered to be an agency or establishment of the Federal Government.

This private corporation in the bill would be run by a board of directors composed of 5 people all appointed by the President and confirmed by the Senate. Essentially, the President and the Senate would have a staged theatrical confirmation hearing much like they do when a new Chairman of the Federal Reserve is selected. It is specifically stated that this institution will not be an agency or establishment of the U.S. government, so therefore it would not be directly accountable to the people. Since that’s the case, why even have a staged confirmation hearing if the corporation is going to exist outside of the scope of the U.S. government?

The bill does state that the intention of the corporation is to use the money they collect to be used towards alternative fuels, but since it operates outside of the scope of the federal government, there is no way to determine how this private corporation would be held accountable for their actions. It would essentially give them a blank check to funnel money back into the military industrial complex under the guise of researching non-carbon emitting alternative fuels. Even the language in section 4401, states that “in general”, the corporation will use the amounts collected via their carbon credit auctions but it doesn’t force them to do this.

SEC. 4401. IN GENERAL.

For each calendar year, the Corporation shall use the amounts described in section 4301(c) and 4302(b) to carry out the programs established under this subtitle, as follows:

(1) Not more than 45 percent of the funds shall be used to carry out the zero- or low-carbon energy technologies program under section 4402.

(2) Not more than 35 percent of the funds shall be used as follows:

(A) Not more than 28 percent shall be used to carry out the advanced coal and sequestration technologies program under section 4403.

(B) Not more than 7 percent shall be used to carry out the cellulosic biomass ethanol technology deployment programs under section 4404.

(3) Not more than 20 percent shall be used to carry out the advanced technology vehicles manufacturing incentive program under section 4405.

The market of carbon credits will be overseen by a new institution called the “Carbon Market Efficiency Board”. This board will essentially serve as a price fixer for the carbon credit market. Section 2601 through Section 2605 describes the duties of the board. The bill gives the board the ability to set interest rates on the borrowing of carbon credits and to determine if at certain periods of time, more carbon credits are needed to ensure the economy functions properly. It will essentially be a Federal Reserve System for carbon credits, and they will be given the power to manipulate the carbon credit market as they see fit.

Boiling the bill down to brass tax, it gives the EPA draconian powers to determine who and who doesn’t need to abide by the regulations in this bill. The language is so broad that the EPA can literally decide that any business or facility must abide by these rules and regulations at their discretion even if they fall outside the scope of a “covered facility”. The EPA could even decide that homes with fireplaces could be considered an “affected facility” by the bill considering the amount of discretion they are given in determining what is considered to be an “affected facility”. Whomever the EPA decides is affected by this bill must report all sorts of ridiculous information detailing their carbon footprint to the EPA on a quarterly basis. It gives the EPA extraordinary powers to enforce a carbon credit system and gives them the mandate to levy draconian fines on those in non-compliance with this legislation. There is no exemption for humans or animals which naturally emit carbon dioxide so the EPA at some point could even include employees and farm animals as contributing to a facilities carbon footprint. The broad language in the bill gives a blank check to the EPA to be the nation’s carbon police where people would need permission from the government by way of carbon credits to conduct normal everyday activities including breathing.

The bill also sets up the carbon credit system so that fewer and fewer carbon credits are issued on a yearly basis. This will not be a problem for the big multinational corporations, but it will be a huge problem for smaller and medium sized businesses trying to grow. The “Climate Change Credit Corporation” which the bill establishes would collect large amounts of money by auctioning off increasingly more valuable carbon credits. The bill authorizes this corporation to auction off an increasing amount of carbon credits over time. Considering that the bill mandates that fewer and fewer carbon credits will be made available over time, these carbon credits will become increasingly more valuable and more money will be funneled into this tax exempt corporation.

The “Carbon Market Efficiency Board” that the bill establishes would serve to be price fixers for the market of carbon credits. Much like how the Federal Reserve manipulates the value of Federal Reserve Notes, the Carbon Market Efficiency Board will manipulate the value of carbon credits.

This is a horrible piece of legislation and essentially gives the EPA the ability to enforce a credit system on life itself. This is nothing more than an enslavement system which will consolidate more wealth into the hands of the military industrial complex and ensure that smaller and medium sized businesses can’t grow and compete with them. This bill represents nothing more than out of control corporate fascism giving broad police powers to the EPA, establishing a board with the power to manipulate the value of carbon credits and establishing a nonprofit corporation with no definitive government accountability that will have a great deal of wealth funneled into it by auctioning off what in the future will be increasingly more valuable carbon credits. Joe Lieberman and the associated gaggle of the bill’s co-sponsors are traitors and care not about the American people or their welfare by introducing this legislation.

It is clear that this global carbon credit system is at the very forefront of the elite’s agenda to completely enslave the middle class and poor in developed nations. This bill needs to be defeated, and the traitors that are supporting this should be removed from office immediately.

Related News:

The truth about global warming – it’s the Sun that’s to blame
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/new…/18/wsun18.xml&s

U.S. Reduced CO2 Emissions in 2006
http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=….w_article=1

Bush and Gore reunited at the White House
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WwYHMRh2Ngk

World Must Fix Climate In Less Than 10 Years: UN
http://www.commondreams.org/archive/2007/11/26/5457/

Self Sterilization To Fight Climate Change
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/pages/….ge_id=1879

McCain Takes On Global Warming
http://www.boston.com/news/polit…/mccain_takes_on.html

Mankind Supposedly Shortening Universe’s Life
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/earth/mai…tviewedbox

San Francisco Mulls Banning Fireplaces
http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/articl…S.DTL

Carbon Tax Bill Could Hit Senate Floor
http://www.ocregister.com/news/bill-is…oxer-global

Weather Channel Founder: Global Warming ‘Greatest Scam in History’
Who Is Hoaxing The Global Warming Skeptics?
Gore: No Equal Time For Non Believers
Myth of ‘thousands’ of UNIPCC climate scientists
Climate change is like ‘World War Three’
Bloomberg Calls for Tax on Carbon Emissions
Al Gore’s ‘nine Inconvenient Untruths’
The deceit behind global warming
Think Tank: Climate Affects Security
Keeping People Poor And Stupid For the Environment

Global Warming Hoax News Archive