noworldsystem.com


Scientists Challenge UN’s Move For Global Carbon Tax


Over 100 Prominent Scientists Challenge UN Move For Global Carbon Tax
Experts dismiss agenda as “futile,” bureaucratic scheme that will increase human suffering

Paul Joseph Watson
Prison Planet
December 14, 2007

The UN has officially announced what the fearmongering about man-made global warming has been designed to justify all along – a global carbon tax which will do nothing to reduce carbon emissions but everything to feed the trough of world government. Over one hundred prominent scientists signed a letter dismissing the move as a futile bureaucratic scheme which will diminish prosperity and increase human suffering.

Following a discussion entitled “A Global CO2 Tax,” a UN panel yesterday urged the adoption of “a global burden sharing system, fair, with solidarity, and legally binding to all nations,” to impose a tax on plant food (CO2).

Othmar Schwank, one of the participants, said that the U.S. and other wealthy nations need to “contribute significantly more to this global fund.” He also added, “It is very essential to tax coal.”

The bounty from this $40 billion dollars a year windfall will go straight into the coffers of a UN controlled “Multilateral Adaptation Fund”.

What we see unfolding in Bali is one of the major final stepping stones on the road to a complete globalist stranglehold on reducing the living standards of everyone in the industrialized world, and a scheme to prevent the third world from ever lifting itself out of poverty.

Seven years ago former French President Jacques Chirac said the UN’s Kyoto Protocol represented “the first component of an authentic global governance.” The imminent agreement arising out of the Bali summit will be one of the final nails in the coffin aimed at decimating the middle class and the right of free people to strive for prosperity and happiness without laboring under suffocating serfdom imposed by unelected elitists.

As MIT climate scientist Dr. Richard Lindzen warned earlier this year, “Controlling carbon is a bureaucrat’s dream. If you control carbon, you control life.”

Lindzen is one of over 100 prominent scientists who have signed a letter slamming the UN move as a futile bureaucratic scheme, pointing out the results of a recent study in the International Journal of Climatology which concludes that climate change over the past thirty years is largely a result of solar activity and that attempts to reduce carbon dioxide emissions are irrelevant.

In comparison, half that number – just 52 scientists – participated in the IPCC Summary for Policymakers meeting in April 2007.

In the letter addressed to UN Secretary-General Ban Ki-Moon, the scientists state, “Attempts to prevent global climate change from occurring are ultimately futile, and constitute a tragic misallocation of resources that would be better spent on humanity’s real and pressing problems.”

“It is not possible to stop climate change, a natural phenomenon that has affected humanity through the ages. Geological, archaeological, oral and written histories all attest to the dramatic challenges posed to past societies from unanticipated changes in temperature, precipitation, winds and other climatic variables. We therefore need to equip nations to become resilient to the full range of these natural phenomena by promoting economic growth and wealth generation.”

“The United Nations Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) has issued increasingly alarming conclusions about the climatic influences of human-produced carbon dioxide (CO2), a non-polluting gas that is essential to plant photosynthesis. While we understand the evidence that has led them to view CO2 emissions as harmful, the IPCC’s conclusions are quite inadequate as justification for implementing policies that will markedly diminish future prosperity. In particular, it is not established that it is possible to significantly alter global climate through cuts in human greenhouse gas emissions. On top of which, because attempts to cut emissions will slow development, the current UN approach of CO2 reduction is likely to increase human suffering from future climate change rather than to decrease it.”

The letter goes into detail about several conclusions of the IPCC report that are completely contradicted by recent major scientific studies.

Read the full letter here.

Listed below are the names and credentials of the 100 scientists who signed the letter, again dispelling the myth that the man-made explanation behind global warming is an overwhelming”consensus” view:

Read Full List Here

Court Backs California Greenhouse Gas Limits
http://www.reuters.com/article/en…264643320071213?sp=true

Skeptical Climate Scientists Shunned At UN Bali Meeting
http://www.prisonpl…07/121207_scientists_shunned.htm

China’s One-Child Policy Cited for Rise in Juvenile Crime
http://www.reuters.com/article/worldNews/idUSPEK35891820071205

Pope Condemns Climate Change Doom Prophets
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/…page_id=1811&ito=1490

Nobel laureates propose global CO2 tax
http://euobserver.com/9/25312?rss_rk=1

Consensus Shattered As Major Scientific Study Says Global Warming Is Natural
http://prisonplanet.com/articles/decem…global_warming.htm

Climate change hits Mars
BABY TAXES Needed to Save Planet
Gore warns against ‘mutually assured destruction,’ compares global warming to nuclear war
Earth has had several cooling-warming periods
New Peer-Reviewed Study Finds ‘Warming is naturally caused and shows no human influence’
Elite Depopulation Agenda Gains GroundGlobal Warming Hoax News Archive

Global Warming Hoax News Archive