Filed under: diabetes, food contamination, fructose, health and environment, HFCs, high fructose corn syrup, mercola, obesity, softkill, toxicity | Tags: dr. richard johnson, fatty liver, high blood pressure, kidney disease
Fructose: The major cause of obesity, diabetes and other health problems
Filed under: 1984, Al Gore, Barack Obama, Big Banks, Big Brother, cap-and-trade, CH4, Charles Krauthammer, Clean Air Act, climate bubble, climate change, climate science, climategate, Co2, Congress, Control Grid, copenhagen, Copenhagen treaty, corruption, Dissent, Eugenics, Fox News, global warming hoax, global warming skeptics, Goldman Sachs, government control, government regulations, Henry Waxman, HFCs, Hoax, hydrofluorocarbons, Lisa Jackson, main street, man made global warming, methane, middle class, N2o, Nancy Pelosi, nanny state, New World Order, nitrous oxide, NWO, obama, obama deception, Oppression, orwell, pelosi, perfluorocarbons, PFCs, Population Control, Protest, revolution, scam, scandal, Senate, SF6, sulfur hexafluoride, Taxpayers, UEA, Wall Street, White House | Tags: Anthropogenic Global Warming, Climate Research Unit, East Anglia University
EPA to Regulate All Aspects of American Life
Krauthammer: EPA Move May Bring a ‘Revolution on the Administration’s Hands’
“Look, it’s blackmail, a way of saying to Congress: ‘either you do cap-and-trade or we’re gonna do cap, no trade. We’re gonna regulate every aspect of American life.’ This is – if the EPA now has in its power – perhaps it will when acted over time – to intrude into every aspect of American life.” -Charles Krauthammer
The EPA Steps In To Regulate Greenhouse Gases In Case Of Cap And Trade Failure
Tyler Durden
Zero Hedge
December 8, 2009
Goldman’s tentacles are smart, and know all about contingency planning. With so much of the firm’s future strategy contingent on Cap And Trade derived profits, the firm is hedging for a downside case scenario. The attached presentation by the Environmental Protection Agency is just the fall back plan. UEA debate notwithstanding, the EPA, after “careful consideration of the full weight of scientific evidence and a thorough review of numerous public comments received on the Proposed Findings published April 24, 2009″ has found that “six greenhouse gases taken in combination endanger both the public health and the public welfare of current and future generations.” Truly an opportune timing for the EPA to come up with this report, seeing how suddenly scientific evidence does not really mean as much as it used to…oh, one month ago. And not to mention that whole Goldman/Cap And Trade backlash of course.
Here are the “definitive” conclusions from the report:
CO2 is dangerous (p.8):
- Pursuant to CAA section 202(a), the Administrator finds that greenhouse gases in the atmosphere may reasonably be anticipated both to endanger public health and to endanger public welfare. Specifically, the Administrator is defining the “air pollution” referred to in CAA section 202(a) to be the mix of six long-lived and directly-emitted greenhouse gases: carbon dioxide (CO2), methane (CH4), nitrous oxide (N2O), hydrofluorocarbons (HFCs), perfluorocarbons (PFCs), and sulfur hexafluoride (SF6). In this document, these six greenhouse gases are referred to as “well-mixed greenhouse gases” in this document (with more precise meanings of “long lived” and “well mixed” provided in Section IV.A)
noworldsystem.com 