TSA: we overreact to tiny threats, ignore big ones
January 12, 2010, 3:45 pm
Filed under:
Airport Security,
corruption,
Dictatorship,
Empire,
government bureaucracy,
government takeover,
mutallab,
nanny state,
Oppression,
Police State,
scandal,
TSA
TSA: we overreact to tiny threats, ignore big ones
McLaughlin: Freedom is Overrated, People Want a Nanny State
January 5, 2010, 1:42 pm
Filed under:
1984,
big bankers,
Big Brother,
Control Grid,
geithner,
Global Warming,
government bureaucracy,
government regulation,
government takeover,
john mclaughlin,
McLaughlin,
mclaughlin group,
nanny state,
orwell,
patriot movement,
Police State,
US Constitution
McLaughlin: Freedom is Overrated, People Want a Nanny State
Steve Watson
Infowars.net
Jan 4, 2010
Proving just how out of touch with the American people political pundits and news anchors have become, John McLaughlin, host of The McLaughlin Group, has declared the concept of freedom as the “most overrated” political issue of 2009.
The host of the long running public affairs show made the announcement during The McLaughlin Group 2009 Year-End Awards special.
While the rest of the panel on the show described global warming, Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner and leading bankers as “most overrated”, McLaughlin himself took a shot at the core concept behind the Bill Of Rights and the U.S. Constitution.
“The most overrated is freedom,” McLaughlin said.
“When faced with economic uncertainty, people don’t want freedom. When they can’t see their economic future, they want the nanny state.” he blathered.
Seemingly McLaughlin was living under a rock throughout the “summer of rage” then, as mass protests were held throughout the nation on every political issue going, including the economy.
Neither has he been monitoring the president’s recent approval ratings, which have hit record lows for a president after one year in office.
McLaughlin must have also missed the recent news that a vast majority of Americans have expressed great dissatisfaction on virtually every single issue polled, once again including the economy.
Perhaps Mr McLaughlin can show us some evidence to suggest the American people are happy living in a nanny state at the expense of their freedom, because we don’t see it.
Cyber-Security Chief Resigns in Protest
January 1, 2010, 6:13 am
Filed under:
cyber security,
DHS,
Dictatorship,
Dissent,
Empire,
government bureaucracy,
government regulation,
government takeover,
Homeland Security,
internet,
internet police,
internet regulation,
Janet Napolitano,
napolitano,
NCSC,
NSA,
Protest,
Uncategorized,
War On Terror | Tags:
Rod A. Beckstrom,
Rod Beckstrom
Cyber-Security Chief Resigns in Protest
New Media Journal
December 29. 2009

Rod A. Beckstrom |
The official in charge of coordinating the US government’s cyber-security operations has quit, saying the expanding control of the National Security Agency over the nation’s computer security efforts poses “threats to our democratic processes.”
“Even from a security standpoint, it is unwise to hand over the security of all government networks to a single organization,” said Rod A. Beckstrom, the head of the Department of Homeland Security’s National Cyber Security Center when speaking to United Press International.
“If our Founding Fathers were taking part in this debate [about the future organization of the government’s cyber-security activities], there is no doubt in my mind they would support a separation of security powers among different [government] organizations, in line with their commitment to checks and balances,” he said.
In a letter to Homeland Security Secretary Janet Napolitano last week, Mr. Beckstrom said the NSA “dominates most national cyber efforts” and “effectively controls DHS cyber efforts through detailees, technology insertions and the proposed move” of the NCSC to an NSA facility at the agency’s Fort Meade, Md., headquarters.
“I believe this is a bad strategy on multiple grounds,” Mr. Beckstrom wrote in the letter, a copy of which was obtained by UPI. “The intelligence culture is very different than a network operations or security culture. In addition, threats to our democratic processes are significant if all top-level government network security and monitoring are handled by any one organization.”
Full-Body Scanners to Fry Travelers With Radiation
December 31, 2009, 4:53 pm
Filed under:
1984,
9/11,
Airport Security,
Big Brother,
biological warfare,
breast cancer,
Britain,
cancer,
Child Abuse,
DHS,
Dictatorship,
EMF,
Empire,
Eugenics,
False Flag,
Fascism,
Flight 253,
full-body scanners,
Genocide,
government regulation,
government takeover,
health and environment,
Hegelian Dialectic,
Homeland Security,
inside job,
mammogram,
Media Fear,
mutallab,
parental rights,
Police State,
Pregnant women,
Problem Reaction Solution,
qui bono,
radiation,
softkill,
State Sponsored Terrorism,
super weapons,
Surveillance,
toxicity,
TSA,
War On Terror | Tags:
christmas bomber,
plane bomber
Full-Body Scanners to Fry Travelers With Radiation

NoWorldSystem
December 31, 2009
A path has been cleared for the government to publicly roll out dangerous full-body scanners after the failed terrorist attempt on flight 253. Neocons are quaking for the government to implement the human x-ray machines on a nationwide scale, radiating travelers with unhealthy amounts of ionic radiation all for the sake of preventing the next Mutallab from boarding another U.S. airliner.
Airport Travelers To Get Ionizing X-Ray Radiation
According to a recent Zogby poll, traveling Americans approve long lines and gridlock at airport passenger screening points. The majority polled appreciate delays and hassles of flying today’s suspicious skies and feel safer because the federal Transportation Security Agency (TSA) is in charge of airport screening. These happy line campers should be delighted to learn about TSA’s grossly invasive new security plans. The good times have just begun.
TSA Security Laboratory Director Susan Hallowell recently announced the agency’s intent to use back-scatter X-ray machines for passenger surveillance. These hugely expensive, closet-sized zappers can find the plastic bombs hidden in grandma’s underpants, while delivering a smacking dose of ionizing radiation to her breasts and thyroid gland.
Snooper X-rays penetrate a few centimeters into the flesh and reflect off the skin to form a naked body image for TSA security personnel to inspect. These machines are already being field tested at several U.S. airports, including JFK, LAX and Orlando.
The most lucrative growth industry of our times is the “terror” business. Legions of companies lusting for government contracts are churning out police state technology at a frantic pace. In the last 17 months, TSA has received over 30,000 proposals for Big Brother technology and equipment needed to keep 280 million citizen-suspects under careful surveillance from the inside out.
Big winners include companies whose equipment is assisting TSA’s Advanced Technology Checkpoint Project to nudify airline passengers. Digital Security Systems of Miami is promoting its ConPass Security Body Scanner, which can perform virtual cavity searches using deeply penetrating X-radiation. Company engineer Thomas Wiggins says the scanner can detect explosives hidden inside bodies or surgically implanted under flabby folds of skin. Wiggins admits that before 9-11, “The thought of using an X-ray system would have been like ordering our own death sentence.” Now Wiggins claims that the ConPass scanner “could scan a pregnant woman around 200 times without a health risk.”
Virtually all passengers and airline crews who pass through airport screening checkpoints in the U.S. may soon be forced to submit to compulsory, whole-body X-ray exposure. Some fliers could be “fried” several times in one day. Frequent fliers could get hit hundreds of times each year. Pregnant women, infants, the chronically ill and immune suppressed would get the rays. Grateful herds of traveling livestock, prodded by TSA drovers through federally-funded “nuke chutes,” are expected to believe Hollowell’s scientifically unsupported assertion that ionizing radiation delivered via backscatter will be “about the same as sunshine.”
Officials must naturally defend compulsory passenger X-rays as harmless. But they are signing no guarantees because ionizing radiation in the X-ray spectrum damages and mutates both chromosomal DNA and structural proteins in human cells. If this damage is not repaired, it can lead to cancer. New research shows that even very low doses of X-ray can delay or prevent cellular repair of damaged DNA, raising questions about the safety of routine medical X-rays. Unborn babies can become grotesquely disfigured if their mothers are irradiated during pregnancy. Heavily X- rayed persons of childbearing age can sustain chromosomal damage, endangering offspring. Radiation damage is cumulative and each successive dose builds upon the cellular mutation caused by the last. It can take years for radiation damage to manifest pathology.
A leading U.S. expert on the biological effects of X-radiation is Dr. John Gofman, Professor Emeritus of Molecular and Cell Biology, University of California, Berkeley. Dr. Gofman’s exhaustive research leads him to conclude that there is NO SAFE DOSE-LEVEL of ionizing radiation. His studies indicate that radiation from medical diagnostics and treatment is a causal co-factor in 50 percent of America’s cancers and 60 percent of our ischemic (blood flow blockage) heart disease. He stresses that the frequency with which Americans are medically X-rayed “makes for a significant radiological impact.”
This highly credentialed nuclear physicist states: “The fact, that X-ray doses are so seldom measured, reflects the false assumption that doses do not matter…[but] they do matter enormously. And each bit of additional dose matters, because any X-ray photon may be the one which sets in motion the high-speed, high energy electron which causes a carcinogenic or atherogenic [smooth muscle] mutation. Such mutations rarely disappear. The higher their accumulated number in a population, the higher will be the population’s mortality rates from radiation-induced cancer and ischemic heart disease.”
A report in the British medical journal Lancet noted that after breast mammograms were introduced in 1983, the incidence of ductal carcinoma (12 percent of breast cancer) increased by 328 percent, of which 200 percent was due to the use of mammography itself. A Lawrence Berkeley National Lab study has demonstrated that breast tissue is extremely susceptible to radiation-induced cancer, confirming warnings by numerous experts that mammograms can initiate the very cancers they may later identify. Dr. Gofman believes that medical radiation is a co-factor in 75 percent of breast cancer cases. So why would girls and women want their breast tissues irradiated every time they take a commercial flight?
Cancer is number two cause of death in the U.S. behind heart disease. The more marathon walks and cookie eating contests we sponsor to fund the “war” on cancer, the more cancer we get. “America isn’t winning the war on cancer after all,” the Wall Street Journal recently reported. The National Cancer Institute admits that America’s cancer rates in almost every category are rising steadily. Airline pilots and cabin crews suffer a significant incidence of leukemia, skin and breast cancer due to chromosomal damage from ionizing cosmic radiation encountered during years of flying at high altitudes.
Dr. Gofman’s research reveals a dose-response relationship between medical X-rays and fatal heart disease, the number one killer of Americans. He found that X-radiation is a powerful atherogen, causing mutations in smooth muscle cells of coronary arteries. These radiation damaged cells are unable to process lipoproteins correctly, resulting in atherosclerotic plaques and mini tumors in the arteries. Radiation used to treat breast cancer can badly damage the heart.
As Dr. Gofman and other experts argue for improved diagnostic techniques and equipment to reduce medically necessary X-ray exposure, TSA gears up to impose frivolous, nonmusical exposure, even though conventional airline security measures have proven adequate since 9/11. To date, the National Institutes of Health, the American Cancer Society and the American Heart Association have been silent about TSA’s sinister plan to deliver unlimited doses of carcinogenic, mutagenic, heart damaging radiation to the flying public. No health studies are planned to gauge short and long-term effects of the radiation TSA will deliver to inspect our innards.
Big Brother’s zap madness is a predictable result of America’s post 9-11 security hysteria. But here’s the irony: Dr. Gofman says X- radiation has the effect of “grenades and small bombs” on human cells. If we permit TSA to continually “bomb” our DNA in the name of security, what have we accomplished?
Besides ionizing beams, the feds are also testing other types of surveillance radiation. A flubbed holographic scanner developed by Pacific Northwest National Laboratory allows officials to strip search humans with ultra-high frequency radio waves. Millivision of Amherst, Mass., has engineered a millimeter wave scanner using radio frequencies 1,000 times higher than those of an FM broadcast. These waves pass through clothing, packaging and building materials. Ultra-high radio frequencies include radar, a spectrum of radiation known since WWII to cause cancer and neurological disability in humans. Microwave frequencies are documented by recent studies on cell/cordless phone radiation to be carcinogenic and teratogenic (causing abnormal embryonic development).
An example of unexpected health repercussions caused by high frequency radiation used on humans is fetal ultrasound technology. Ultrasound equipment bombards a fetus for up to one hour with megahertz radiation. This radiation, which cycles millions of time per second, can cause mutation and bleeding in the intestinal cells of rodents. Swedish scientists say routine ultrasound scanning of pregnant women may be causing subtle brain damage in unborn babies. Approximately half of all pregnancies in the U.S. result in prenatal or postnatal death, or an otherwise less than healthy baby. Many wonder if routine exposure of America’s fragile unborn to megahertz radiation might be a factor, among others, of this shocking national statistic. Is fetal ultrasound exposure playing some part in the national epidemic of delayed development in infants, plus learning and behavior difficulties suffered by millions of our school children? Exposing the unborn to ionizing X-radiation at airport checkpoints is an even more dangerous game of roulette.
Fedgov’s planned use of health damaging radiation on the traveling public seems especially tragic and abusive to those of us convinced that the War on Terror is a giant con job. Massive evidence indicates that the terrorist attacks of 9/11 were intentionally staged to justify increased power over and surveillance of Americans. Key NORAD and other military officials had to be in on the ruse. President Bush ambushed himself when he openly lied about what he knew and when he knew it on the day the Twin Towers went down.. He has been caught lying about so many issues that Homeland Security should issue a red alert every time he is about to move his lips. The Bush administration’s ongoing cover-up of 9/11 is so blatant that even Bush’s own investigatory commission has expressed outrage at his efforts to block its requests for vital information and resources.
Meantime, TSA claims concern that Americans may feel humiliated at being viewed naked by X-ray screeners. But whatever airport nuke-nazis see through our clothing is nothing that the undertaker won’t see after excessive, state-mandated radiation puts us “down” for good. Mandatory airport surveillance radiation delivered to an already grossly ill population would afford our financially strapped government an ingenious “final solution” to numerous political and economic problems. No muss, no fuss, this cull in the Cuckoos’ nest. Each useless eater lines up for his deferred-lethal dose. The weak will die soonest, the strong will eventually become the weak–no questions asked and nothing proven. It’s hard for a Prozac nation to imagine such sinister motives behind the terror industry, but the documented truth is, our amoral leadership has been brazenly murdering Americans for decades. Genocide specialists have been especially fond of unleashing various forms of deadly radiation on the unwitting masses, as documented by the federal Advisory Committee on Human Radiation Experiments. Now here we go again!
Consumers could derail TSA’s sinister surveillance projects in a heartbeat. It’s called boycott: We simply refuse to get nuked to naked. If we stop booking flights, the airline industry must grind to a halt. TSA would have little choice but to scrap its plans to endanger the national health with unnecessary radiation.
Americans who are still able to think must launch an effort to save ourselves and warn others. 1. Let’s demand that Congress mandate TSA’s radiation experiments be strictly voluntary. 2. We must demand the right to request that TSA conduct a non-radiation search of our persons. 3. We must demand our right to abstain from security procedures that may harm our children. 4. We must initiate an e-mail campaign to convince TSA and the airlines that forcible assault by radiation makes the cost of an airline ticket impossibly prohibitive.
TSA’s consumer e-mail address is: TSAContactCenter@dhs.gov. It’s toll free comment line is: 1-866-289-9673. [Source]
Approaching Epidemic: Brain Damage from Mobile Phone Radiation
More Government Crackdown in Airports After Flight 253
December 29, 2009, 2:23 pm
Filed under:
1984,
4th amendment,
9/11 Truth,
Airport Security,
alqaeda,
amsterdam,
Big Brother,
campaign for liberty,
Dictatorship,
Empire,
False Flag,
Fascism,
fearmongering,
Flight 253,
government bureaucracy,
government control,
government takeover,
Hegelian Dialectic,
Homeland Security,
inside job,
LIHOP,
MIHOP,
military strike,
mutallab,
nanny state,
nation building,
Nigeria,
obamas war,
occupation,
Oppression,
orwell,
plane bomber,
Police State,
Problem Reaction Solution,
Propaganda,
Ron Paul,
Saudi Arabia,
State Sponsored Terrorism,
Surveillance,
US Constitution,
War On Terror,
yemen | Tags:
Alhaji Umaru Mutallab,
christmas bomber,
Umar Farouk Abdul Mutallab
Ron Paul Says More Government Crackdown on Americans at Airports After Flight 253 Incident
The Dollar Bubble
November 29, 2009, 3:25 pm
Filed under:
agriculture,
bernanke,
brazil,
cash for clunkers,
China,
credit collapse,
Credit Crisis,
DEBT,
deed per lease,
defict,
despotism,
devaluation,
Dictatorship,
dollar bubble,
dollar collapse,
dollar dump,
Economic Collapse,
economic depression,
Economy,
Empire,
Fascism,
food crisis,
food inflation,
food market,
food prices,
free market,
gas prices,
global economy,
gold,
government control,
government takeover,
Great Depression,
Greenback,
health care,
Healthcare,
hyperinflation,
imf,
India,
Inflation,
interest rate cuts,
interest rates,
jim rogers,
monetization,
Oil,
oligarchy,
paul faber,
paul vlocker,
peter schiff,
Petrol,
rate cut,
Ron Paul,
silver,
silver shortage,
socialism,
Stock Market,
US Economy,
Wall Street,
White House
MUST SEE
The Dollar Bubble
Obama Stating He’s Against Forced Insurance
November 14, 2009, 4:41 pm
Filed under:
2008 Election,
Barack Obama,
big pharma,
Communism,
Congress,
Dictatorship,
Empire,
Fascism,
forced health care,
forced health insurance,
government control,
government regulation,
government takeover,
H.R. 3962,
health care,
health insurance mandate,
Healthcare,
Hillary Clinton,
House,
mandatory health care,
mandatory health insurance,
marxism,
medical care,
medical industrial complex,
Nancy Pelosi,
Neolibs,
obama,
obama care,
obama deception,
obama fines,
obama tax,
obamacare,
Oppression,
pelosi,
Senate,
socialism,
tax,
universal health care | Tags:
JCT,
Joint Committee on Taxation
Obama Stating He’s Against Forced Insurance
‘Health Reform’ Passes House, Mandatory Insurance Nears
Schiff: Obama is accelerating the U.S. collapse
November 11, 2009, 3:47 pm
Filed under:
2-party system,
auto bailout,
bank bailout,
Barack Obama,
Communism,
DEBT,
Dictatorship,
Dollar,
dollar collapse,
Economic Collapse,
economic depression,
Economy,
Empire,
Federal Reserve,
George Bush,
government control,
government regulation,
government takeover,
Great Depression,
Greenback,
health care,
health care reform,
Healthcare,
hyperinflation,
Inflation,
insurance companies,
left right paradigm,
obama,
obama care,
obama deception,
obamacare,
peter schiff,
socialism,
Stock Market,
u.s. economy,
universal health care
Schiff: Obama is accelerating the U.S. collapse
‘Health Reform’ Passes House, Mandatory Insurance Nears
November 9, 2009, 3:16 pm
Filed under:
Barack Obama,
big pharma,
civil disobedience,
Communism,
Dictatorship,
Dissent,
Empire,
Fascism,
forced health care,
government control,
government regulation,
government takeover,
H.R. 3962,
health care,
Healthcare,
House,
mandatory health care,
marxism,
medical care,
medical industrial complex,
Nancy Pelosi,
Neolibs,
obama,
obama care,
obama deception,
obama tax,
obamacare,
Oppression,
prison industrial complex,
Protest,
Senate,
socialism,
tax,
universal health care | Tags:
JCT,
Joint Committee on Taxation
‘Health Reform’ Passes House, Mandatory Insurance Nears
NoWorldSystem.com
November 9, 2009
The House of Representatives passed the ominous health reform bill (H.R. 3962) on Saturday night with a tight vote of 220-215, it’s now up to the Senate to pass this disastrous act that will criminalize Americans who don’t buy into the mandate, if you refuse to comply you could face the maximum of five years in prison or fined up to $250,000.
Ranking Member of the ‘House Ways and Means Committee’, Dave Camp (R-MI) released a letter from the non-partisan Joint Committee on Taxation (JCT) confirms that the failure to comply with the individual mandate to buy health insurance contained in this health care bill that passed (H.R. 3962) could land people in jail. The JCT letter makes clear that Americans who do not maintain “acceptable health insurance coverage” and who choose not to pay the bill’s new individual mandate tax (generally 2.5% of your income, ex: you make 50k a year you will be taxed $1,250 per month), are subject to numerous civil and criminal penalties, including criminal fines of up to $250,000 and imprisonment of up to five years.
In response to the JCT letter, Camp said: “This is the ultimate example of the Democrats’ command-and-control style of governing – buy what we tell you or go to jail. It is outrageous and it should be stopped immediately.”
Key excerpts from the JCT letter appear below:
H.R. 3962 provides that an individual (or a husband and wife in the case of a joint return) who does not, at any time during the taxable year, maintain acceptable health insurance coverage for himself or herself and each of his or her qualifying children is subject to an additional tax.”
[page 1]
“If the government determines that the taxpayer’s unpaid tax liability results from willful behavior, the following penalties could apply…”
[page 2]
– – – – – – – – – –
“Criminal penalties
Prosecution is authorized under the Code for a variety of offenses. Depending on the level of the noncompliance, the following penalties could apply to an individual:
Section 7203 – misdemeanor willful failure to pay is punishable by a fine of up to $25,000 and/or imprisonment of up to one year.
Section 7201 – felony willful evasion is punishable by a fine of up to $250,000 and/or imprisonment of up to five years.” [page 3]
When confronted with this same issue during its consideration of a similar individual mandate tax, the Senate Finance Committee worked on a bipartisan basis to include language in its bill that shielded Americans from civil and criminal penalties. The Pelosi bill, however, contains no similar language protecting American citizens from civil and criminal tax penalties that could include a $250,000 fine and five years in jail.
“The Senate Finance Committee had the good sense to eliminate the extreme penalty of incarceration. Speaker Pelosi’s decision to leave in the jail time provision is a threat to every family who cannot afford the $15,000 premium her plan creates. Fortunately, Republicans have an alternative that will lower health insurance costs without raising taxes or cutting Medicare,” said Camp.
According to the Congressional Budget Office the lowest cost family non-group plan under the Speaker’s bill would cost $15,000 in 2016. [Source]
This will take away the individual right to have health insurance or not, this is complete control giving the government power to decide who will pay for the mandate depending on the level of disobedience they will decide if you pay up to quarter-of-a-million dollar fine or face up to five years in prison! This will systematically destroy the middle class, break up the families and will increase poverty turning America into a despotic socialist nanny state. The ultra rich one-percent class along with big pharma, the psychology lobby, insurance companies and the prison industrial complex are the only ones that will benefit from this bill.
If you have children and cannot pay the $15,000 family plan, your kids will be in the hands of the government whom are most likely to rape or molest your child, this is ultimately about destroying the middle class, breaking up families so more are subservient to the federal government. Fortunately we still have time before this legislation reaches the pen of Barack H. Obama, more than ever do we need each other to participate in the fight against this tyrannical nightmare, we have no choice but to fight. Contact your RAPEsentatives and demand the death of this bill, reach as many people as you can about the above information and together we will prevail.
New Healthcare Bill: Buy Insurance or Go To Jail
Obama Declares National Emergency
October 25, 2009, 2:57 pm
Filed under:
Barack Obama,
big pharma,
Bio Weapons,
biological warfare,
Continuity of Government,
Detention Camps,
DHS,
Dictatorship,
door to door,
emergency declaration,
Empire,
Fascism,
Genocide,
government takeover,
H.R. 645,
h1n1,
h1n1 vaccine,
Homeland Security,
hr 5122,
internment camps,
involuntary detention,
involuntary transport,
involuntary vaccinations,
knock and talk,
mandatory detention,
mandatory quarantine,
Martial Law,
medical Experiments,
obama,
Police State,
political prisoners,
Posse Comitatus,
presidential directive,
re-education camps,
swine flu,
swine flu vaccine,
u.s. constitution,
Vaccine,
vaccine teams,
White House
Obama Has Declared National Emergency Over Swine Flu
Kurt Nimmo
Prison Planet.com
October 24, 2009
Obama has declared a 2009 H1N1 swine flu national emergency. It is not clear if this declaration falls under the National Emergencies Act (50 U.S.C. 1601–1651). The act is not mentioned in media reports.
The National Emergencies Act was passed in 1976. It has been extended six times. In 2007, the declaration was strengthened with the issuance of National Security Presidential Directive 51 (NSPD-51) which gave the president the authority to do whatever he deems necessary in a vaguely defined “catastrophic emergency” including everything from canceling elections to suspending the Constitution.
NSPD-51 (National Security and Homeland Security Presidential Directive) is unconstitutional. It was created on May 4, 2007, as a “presidential directive” (bypassing Congress) and signed by George W. Bush. It claims the power to execute procedures for continuity of the federal government in the event of a “catastrophic emergency.” Such an emergency is construed as “any incident, regardless of location, that results in extraordinary levels of mass casualties, damage, or disruption severely affecting the U.S. population, infrastructure, environment, economy, or government functions.”
In other words, it is a martial law directive. On May 10, 2007, The Washington Post characterized NSPD-51 is a “shadow government” directive.
The John Warner National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA) for Fiscal Year 2007 states that the military may be used during a “national emergency.” Sec 1076 is extremely explicit, notes Michel Chossudovsky, and “virtually creates a Pinochet style environment for the mass arrest of political dissidents without trial, the storming of public rallies, etc.”
NDAA specifically mentions “epidemic” as an excuse to declare martial law.
Prior to Warner and NSPD-51, legislation passed by the Clinton administration allowed the military to intervene in judicial and civilian law enforcement activities. In 1996, legislation was passed which allowed the military to intervene in the case of a national emergency. In 1999, Clinton’s Defense Authorization Act (DAA) extended those powers (under the 1996 legislation) by creating an “exception” to the Posse Comitatus Act, which permits the military to be involved in civilian affairs “regardless of whether there is an emergency,” according to Chossudovsky.
In 2005, a month after Hurricane Rita, a so-called bird flu “crisis” was hyped by the government and the corporate media. “I am concerned about avian flu. I’m concerned about what an avian flu outbreak could mean for the United States and the world… I have thought through the scenarios of what an avian flu outbreak could mean,” Bush declared at the time. “One option is the use of a military that’s able to plan and move. So that’s why I put it on the table. I think it’s an important debate for Congress to have” (emphasis added).
Bush’s directive, signed two years later, did not bother to involve Congress in the “debate.”
Obama’s declaration of a national emergency sets the stage for forced vaccination and internment of people who refuse to be vaccinated.
In January, the National Emergency Centers Establishment Act (HR 645) was introduced in Congress. It calls for the establishment of six national emergency centers in major regions in the US to be located on existing military installations to be used to quarantine people in the case of a public health emergency or forced vaccination program. HR 645 remains in committee.
Read Full Article Here
President Obama declares national emergency over swine flu pandemic, but why?

Mike Adams
NaturalNews
October 24, 2009
According to the CDC, swine flu infections have already peaked, and the pandemic is on its way out. Peak infection time was the middle of October, where one in five U.S. children experienced the flu, says the CDC. Out of nearly 14,000 suspected flu cases tested during the week ending on October 10, 2009, 99.6% of those were influenza A, and the vast majority of those were confirmed as H1N1 swine flu infections. (http://www.cdc.gov/flu/weekly/)
Your rights as an American are no longer recognized under this national emergency declaration.
Even though the H1N1 pandemic appears to have peaked out, U.S. President Barack Obama has now declared a national emergency over swine flu infections. The reasoning behind such a declaration? According to the White House, it’s designed to “allow hospitals to better handle the surge in patients” by allowing them to bypass certain federal laws.
Emergency powers trump the Bill of Rights
That’s the public explanation for this, but the real agenda behind this declaration may be far more sinister. Declaring a national emergency immediately gives federal authorities dangerous new powers that can now be enforced at gunpoint, including:
• The power to force mandatory swine flu vaccinations on the entire population.
• The power to arrest, quarantine or “involuntarily transport” anyone who refuses a swine flu vaccination.
• The power to quarantine an entire city and halt all travel in or out of that city.
• The power to enter any home or office without a search warrant and order the destruction of any belongings or structures deemed to be a threat to public health.
• The effective nullification of the Bill of Rights. Your right to due process, to being safe from government search and seizure, and to remain silent to avoid self-incrimination are all null and void under a Presidential declaration of a national emergency.
None of this means that federal agents are going to march door to door arresting people at gunpoint if they refuse the vaccine, but they could if they wanted to. Your rights as an American are no longer recognized under this national emergency declaration.
What emergency?
The declaration of this national emergency seems suspicious from the start. Where’s the emergency? The number of people killed by swine flu in the United States is far smaller than the number of people killed each year from seasonal flu, according to CDC statistics. People obviously aren’t dropping dead by the millions from H1N1 influenza. Most people are just getting mild flu symptoms and a few days later they’re fine.
So where’s the emergency?
The only emergency I can see is the emergency fabricated by Big Pharma to sell more vaccines. By declaring a national emergency over the H1N1 pandemic, Obama is playing right into their hands.
I find the timing of all this curious. Two days ago, New York gave up on its efforts to require mandatory vaccinations of health care workers. This was designed to defuse a large number of planned protests from health freedom-conscious people who don’t want government-mandated chemicals pumped into their veins.
The planned protests in New York would have fueled yet more resistance among health care workers across the country, and had it been allowed to continue, it could have resulted in a huge nationwide backlash against swine flu vaccines. By backing off the vaccine mandate and blaming it on a vaccine shortage (http://www.naturalnews.com/027313_N…), and then having Obama declare a national emergency, our state and national leaders have halted the protests and put in place a pro-vaccine Big Brother mandate that can be enforced at gunpoint.
Big Pharma must be pleased with all this. With these emergency powers in place, all that’s necessary to force vaccinations upon the entire population is a larger supply of the vaccines — and that’s coming in November.
Prediction: Barack Obama will order Martial Law during the economic depression
Government Uses Flu Shot Propaganda in Kid Shows
October 24, 2009, 11:44 am
Filed under:
1984,
ABC,
abc news,
angela merkel,
autism,
avian flu shot,
Big Brother,
big pharma,
Bio Weapons,
biochemicals,
biological warfare,
Boeing,
brain damage,
brainwashing,
California,
CDC,
Child Abuse,
Conditioning,
deception,
Dictatorship,
education,
education system,
Empire,
Fascism,
fearmongering,
flu shot,
flu vaccine,
government bureaucrat,
government control,
government propaganda,
government takeover,
h1n1,
h1n1 clinic,
h1n1 vaccine,
health and environment,
HHS,
human rights,
immune system,
indoctrination,
influenza,
influenza vaccine,
innoculation,
Kathleen Sebelius,
LA,
Mainstream Media,
manipulation,
Media,
media deception,
Media Fear,
media fears,
Media Manipulation,
mediaopoly,
medical Experiments,
medical industrial complex,
Mercury,
Military,
Military Industrial Complex,
nanny state,
Nazi,
orwell,
PBS,
PR,
PR campaign,
Propaganda,
propaganda campaign,
psychological operations,
psychological warfare,
Psyops,
public school,
stasi,
stasi tactics,
subliminal messages,
super weapons,
swine flu,
swine flu vaccine,
Thimerosal,
toxicity,
vaccinations,
Vaccine | Tags:
department of education,
flashforward,
Jim Henson,
KCET,
Lisa Henson,
Sid the Science Kid
Government Uses Flu Shot Propaganda in Kid Shows
Desperate brainwashing campaign to coerce suspicious parents into giving their children dangerous H1N1 vaccine accelerates

Paul Joseph Watson
Prison Planet.com
October 22, 2009
The federal government has accelerated its $16 million dollar PR campaign to brainwash and coerce increasingly suspicious Americans into taking the swine flu vaccine by weaving their propaganda into a popular pre-school show for children currently airing on PBS Kids.
Sid the Science Kid is a half-hour series produced by Jim Henson Productions and KCET in Los Angeles, California. The program is bankrolled in part by The Boeing Company, a titan of the military-industrial complex.
During an episode of the show set to air on Monday, the computer-generated characters are shown dancing around and singing about how their are taking their flu vaccine.
Indeed, the entire episode is devoted to pro-vaccine propaganda and was created in association with Health and Human Services. The episode is entitled, “Getting a Shot: You can do it!”
According to a press release, “Health and Human Services Secretary Kathleen Sebelius, Education Secretary Arne Duncan, and Lisa Henson, CEO of the Jim Henson Company, will join Washington-area school children for a screening of the new “Sid the Science Kid” special episode on the flu at the U.S. Department of Education Auditorium.”
Children will also be directed to the Sid the Science Kid website to play games focused around the issue of vaccines.
“In this special episode, Sid explains how vaccines work and shows millions of children what they can do to prevent the spread of the flu,” said Secretary Sebelius. “Sid will be a great messenger as we continue to find new and creative ways to reach out to children, adults, and families about how to stay healthy during flu season.”
As we have reported, the government is openly embedding propaganda about its health care agenda into the plots of major network shows all this week. We also discovered a separate example of almost subliminal brainwashing where the watching audience are told to get the flu shot via a deceptive and insidious insert during an episode of FlashForward, a sci-fi series currently airing on ABC.
What ‘Sid the Science Kid,’ the pharmaceutical lobby and Kathleen Sebelius won’t tell you about the swine flu vaccine is that children are already dying after taking similar vaccines, that healthy young women are getting brain disorders after being injected with flu vaccines, that the H1N1 shot contains dangerous additives like mercury which cause autism, and that a child is 40 times more likely to be struck by lightning than have their life saved by a swine flu vaccine.
While children are having this crap shoved down their throats on television, the New York Times‘ educational division is teaching them in schools across the country that openly admitted facts about the dangers of the swine flu vaccine are all in fact “myths”.
Some of the “myths” claimed by the Times include manifestly provable facts such as the potential that flu shots will have side-effects. This is clearly stated on the inserts of vaccine batches by the pharmaceutical companies themselves, but the NY Times is teaching children in American schools that it is a myth!
According to the Times, it is also a myth that any of the batches of H1N1 vaccine contain thimerosal, a mercury based preservative, despite the fact that this again is openly admitted by the pharmaceutical companies who produce the vaccines.
If none of the vaccines contained mercury, then maybe the NY Times can tell us why top officials in the German government, including Chancellor Angela Merkel, as well as German soldiers, have been given an additive-free version of the vaccine that doesn’t contain thimerosal?
With rapidly expanding numbers of parents refusing to allow their children to take the seasonal or swine flu shot, the government has a problem on its hands having already bought over 300 million doses of the vaccine. This is manifesting itself in the form of bellicose and fearmongering propaganda being gleefully spewed out by the compliant networks as the feds start to panic about the fact that the idiot public are waking up to the real agenda behind the toxic vaccines and the record windfall profits currently being reaped by pharmaceutical companies who are laughing all the way to the bank.
Watch the clip from Sid the Science Kid below.
Americans gave up liberty for homeland security
October 22, 2009, 2:19 pm
Filed under:
1st amendment,
2-party system,
4th amendment,
9/11,
Barack Obama,
benjamin franklin,
big government,
bill of rights,
DHS,
free speech,
George Bush,
government bureaucracy,
government bureaucrat,
government control,
government regulation,
government regulations,
government takeover,
Habeas Corpus,
Homeland Security,
left right paradigm,
obama,
Oppression,
patriot movement,
Posse Comitatus,
Surveillance,
truth movement,
u.s. constitution,
War On Terror,
warrantless search,
warrantless wiretap,
White House | Tags:
make mine liberty
Americans gave up liberty for homeland security
This educational video made in 1948 should remind us all how America has lost so much freedom since 9/11 when the American people believed the government that Alqaeda hates our liberties and that we should let them wiretap without a warrant and violate your privacy for the good of the homeland and that we must wage expensive wars or the terrorists might hit us again. Benjamin Franklin once said “If you give up your liberty for a bit of security, then you deserve to lose both”. Watch the video:
One Mainframe To Rule Them All
October 18, 2009, 8:18 am
Filed under:
1984,
3rd reich,
4th reich,
Big Brother,
biometrics,
brain manipulation,
cameras,
cancer,
Concentration Camp,
Control Grid,
corporatism,
data mining,
death camps,
Dictatorship,
digital angel,
Echelon,
Empire,
endgame,
Eugenics,
Fascism,
final solution,
Genocide,
global takeover,
Globalism,
government control,
government takeover,
gps,
health and environment,
Hitler,
hollerith,
Holocaust,
IBM,
internet of things,
IOT,
mandatory microchipping,
manipulation,
microchip,
microchips,
nanny state,
Nazi,
nazi germany,
New World Order,
NWO,
Oppression,
orwell,
Police State,
Population Control,
Raytheon,
RFID,
RFID bracelet,
Science and technology,
slavery,
Spy,
Surveillance,
surveillance cameras,
swine flu,
swine flu vaccine,
Total Information Awareness,
traffic cameras,
Verichip,
WHO | Tags:
internet regulation,
Ubiquitous computing,
Ubiquitous living,
Ubiquitous positioning,
utopia,
verimed,
Video and Image Retrieval and Analysis Tool
One Mainframe To Rule Them All
Obama Admin. using Hollywood to push propaganda
October 18, 2009, 6:29 am
Filed under:
1984,
Barack Obama,
Big Brother,
big government,
brainwashing,
CBS,
celebrity manipulation,
Communism,
Conditioning,
cultism,
Dictatorship,
Empire,
Fascism,
FOX,
Fox News,
gestapo,
government control,
government propaganda,
government takeover,
health care reform,
Hitler,
mandatory servitude,
mandatory volunteerism,
manipulation,
Media,
media deception,
Media Fear,
media fears,
Media Manipulation,
mediaopoly,
nanny state,
Nazi,
Neolibs,
New World Order,
NWO,
obama,
obama cult,
obama deception,
obamacare,
orwell,
psychological operations,
psychological warfare,
Psyops,
socialism,
stasi,
stasi tactics,
White House | Tags:
EIF,
Entertainment Industry Foundation,
network tv propaganda,
TV shows
Obama Admin. using Hollywood to push propaganda
Government Propaganda To Infest Network TV Shows
ObamaCare: Just Another Tax On The Middle-Class
October 17, 2009, 12:51 pm
Filed under:
AARP,
Barack Obama,
baucus bill,
Communism,
Dictatorship,
doctors,
Empire,
eugenicist,
Eugenics,
excise tax,
Fascism,
fines,
Genocide,
government bureaucrat,
government control,
government health care,
government regulation,
government takeover,
health and environment,
health care,
health care companies,
health care insurance,
health care mandate,
health care reform,
Healthcare,
healthcare rationing,
hospital care,
mandatory health care,
mandatory health insurance,
max baucus,
medicaid,
medical care,
medical industrial complex,
medicare,
middle class,
nanny state,
Nazi,
Neolibs,
obama,
obama care,
obama deception,
obama fines,
obamacare,
obamacare fines,
Oppression,
patients,
Population Control,
private insurance,
public option,
ration,
rationing,
Senate,
senior citizens,
single payer,
socialism,
tax,
Taxpayers,
universal health care,
universial health care
Baucus Bill Will Impose 23% Tax Rate Increase on Middle Class
TaxProf
October 14, 2009
Following up on last week’s post (80% Marginal Tax Rates After Health Care Reform), there is an op-ed in today’s Wall Street Journal by former Director of the Congressional Budget Office Douglas Holtz-Eakin, The Baucus Bill Is a Tax Bill; Middle-Class Families Would Get Hit With a Double-Digit Increase in Their Marginal Tax Rate:
Most astounding of all is what this Congress is willing to do to struggling middle-class families. The bill would impose nearly $400 billion in new taxes and fees. Nearly 90% of that burden will be shouldered by those making $200,000 or less.
It might not appear that way at first, because the dollars are collected via a 40% tax on sales by insurers of “Cadillac” policies, fees on health insurers, drug companies and device manufacturers, and an assortment of odds and ends.
But the economics are clear. These costs will be passed on to consumers by either directly raising insurance premiums, or by fueling higher health-care costs that inevitably lead to higher premiums. Consumers will pay the excise tax on high-cost plans. The Joint Committee on Taxation indicates that 87% of the burden would fall on Americans making less than $200,000, and more than half on those earning under $100,000.
Industry fees are even worse because Democrats chose to make these fees nondeductible. This means that insurance companies will have to raise premiums significantly just to break even. American families will bear a burden even greater than the $130 billion in fees that the bill intends to collect. According to my analysis, premiums will rise by as much as $200 billion over the next 10 years—and 90% will again fall on the middle class.
Senate Democrats are also erecting new barriers to middle-class ascent. A family of four making $54,000 would pay $4,800 for health insurance, with the remainder coming from subsidies. If they work harder and raise their income to $66,000, their cost of insurance rises by $2,800. In other words, earning another $12,000 raises their bill by $2,800—a marginal tax rate of 23%. Double-digit increases in effective tax rates will have detrimental effects on the incentives of millions of Americans.
Obamacare Means $1,700 More in Insurance Premiums for a Typical Family
Dick Morris
Townhall
October 14, 2009
Will a young, healthy, childless individual or couple buy health insurance costing 7.5 percent of their income as required by Obama’s health legislation? Not until they get sick. Then, they can always buy the insurance — and the Obama bill requires the insurance companies to give it to them. And, if the premiums come to more than 7.5 percent of their income because they are now sick, no problem. Obama will subsidize it.
Instead, young, healthy, childless people will likely opt to pay the $1,000 fine (a.k.a., slap on the wrist) mandated in the bill. After all, even if they make as little as $50,000 a year, the fine is a lot cheaper than 7.5 percent of their income (or $3,500 a year)!
So … these young households will not contribute to the coffers of any health insurance company until they are sick and need the coverage. By then, their costs will come to vastly more than their premiums.
Who will subsidize the difference? We will.
The insurance industry estimates that the bill will drive up premiums for the average family by $1,700 a year. By the time the bill takes effect in 2013, it estimates that the average annual family health insurance premiums (now $12,300) will rise to $17,200 if the Obama bill is passed, but only to $15,500 if it is defeated.
And who do you think the voters will blame for the hike in their premium? The Democrats who passed the bill.
Supporters of the bill are quick to counter that greater efficiency, etc. will hold down premiums. But they have little to answer the argument that, without higher fines, the young and healthy will not consent to pay an arm and a leg for insurance they don’t need.
Any lingering motivation to pay the premiums will disappear once the Obama bill requires insurance companies to cover them when they do, finally, limp in the door, desperately in need of insurance. Why pay now when you can always pay later? And, with a government subsidy, you gain nothing by paying for all those years when you don’t need insurance.
So Obama’s program turns out not to be one to spread insurance and thus spread the risk of costly illness, but one to make people pay 7.5 percent of their incomes once they get sick, with the government picking up their remaining premium and the health insurance customers paying for the medical expenses. Some deal!
So tote up the cost of this bill on the middle class:
— $1,700 more in insurance premiums for the average family.
— Medical devices like wheelchairs and hearing aids get taxed.
— Those who are sick must pay an average of about $600 more a year in income taxes because the bill raises the threshold for deducting medical expenses from 7.5 percent of income to 10 percent.
— A $404 billion cut in Medicare.
— Ending the subsidized Medicare Advantage insurance for costs over and above Medicare. Without Medicare Advantage, the elderly can only augment Medicare by buying Medigap coverage for which no subsidy is available and whose premiums are higher (offered, conveniently enough, by Obama’s buddies at the AARP).
— No importation of Canadian medicines and no competitive bidding to hold down prescription drug costs (Obama’s deal to get Pharma’s support and advertising dollars).
— A shortage of medical personnel and equipment as 30 million new patients are added without any expansion of the population of doctors and nurses. This shortage will make rationing inevitable, even if it shortens life expectancies among the elderly.
And, all of this assumes that the House bill, which imposes a 4.5 percent payroll tax (which will discourage new employment), does not pass — and that the cost estimates of this program prove realistic. Despite the Congressional Budget Office’s concurrence, one can’t help noticing that Massachusetts’ program was estimated to cost $200 million in 2005 and now costs $700 million!
This health care bill is, indeed, Obama’s first tax on the middle class.
Government Propaganda To Infest Network TV Shows
October 17, 2009, 5:34 am
Filed under:
1984,
AARP,
ABC,
abc news,
abortion,
bank bailout,
Barack Obama,
Big Brother,
brainwashing,
cap-and-trade,
Carbon Tax,
CBS,
celebrity manipulation,
China,
Co2,
Communism,
Conditioning,
Congress,
cultism,
Dictatorship,
domestic terror,
domestic terrorism,
Empire,
environmental taxation,
Fascism,
FOX,
Fox News,
gestapo,
global tax,
Global Warming,
government control,
government propaganda,
government takeover,
health care reform,
Hitler,
Hoax,
informant,
informant program,
mandatory servitude,
mandatory volunteerism,
manipulation,
Media,
media deception,
Media Fear,
media fears,
Media Manipulation,
mediaopoly,
MSNBC,
nanny state,
Nazi,
NBC,
Neolibs,
New World Order,
NWO,
obama,
obama cult,
obama deception,
obamacare,
orwell,
planned parenthood,
Police State,
psychological operations,
psychological warfare,
Psyops,
rupert murdoch,
socialism,
Spy,
spy force,
stasi,
stasi tactics,
Surveillance,
War On Terror,
White House,
world tax | Tags:
EIF,
Entertainment Industry Foundation,
iparticipate,
iwatch,
network tv propaganda,
TV shows
Government Propaganda To Infest Network TV Shows
Obama to control your television; brainwashing (programming) will be “organically” woven into plots and story-lines all next week

Paul Joseph Watson
Prison Planet.com
October 15, 2009
An insidious brainwashing program set to be launched next week will “organically” weave the government’s political propaganda into prime time network television shows, with positive talking points about Obama’s environmental, bailout, health care and “servitude” agenda being seamlessly integrated into the content of dramas, reality shows and comedies.
Under the auspices of a program run by the Entertainment Industry Foundation (EIF), network TV shows will be used to promote “service and volunteerism” on behalf of the public as part of a “week-long of television programming on all four leading broadcast networks – ABC, CBS, FOX, NBC, and all affiliated broadcast and cable properties as well, and other networks, beginning October 19.”
According to the EIF press release, “Network shows that will feature volunteerism in some way during the week of Oct 19th,” include the following.
ABC
All My Children, America’s Funniest Home Videos, Brothers and Sisters, Castle, Cougar Town, Dancing With The Stars, Desperate Housewives, Extreme Makeover: Home Edition, Flash Forward, General Hospital, Good Morning America, Grey’s Anatomy, Hank, Jimmy Kimmel Live, Modern Family, One Life To Live, Private Practice, The Forgotten, The Middle, The View, Ugly Betty
CBS
Cold Case, Criminal Minds, CSI: Miami, CSI: NY, Gary Unmarried, Ghost Whisperer, Numb3rs
FOX
America’s Most Wanted, Bones, Brothers, COPS, So You Think You Can Dance, Til Death
NBC
30 Rock, Access Hollywood, Community, Days of Our Lives, Heroes, Parks and Recreation, The Biggest Loser, The Office, Today Show
Despite the fact that this was announced back in September, a new investigation by John Nolte has revealed all kinds of surreptitious connections that give a solid indication of what we can expect to be promoted by the TV shows that will effectively be under government control from Monday onwards.
Not only will program makers prostrate themselves to push Obama’s lies about health care, banker bailouts, global warming and creepy public service programs that border on mandatory volunteerism, but they will also lead unsuspecting victims of their brainwashing into the arms of groups like Planned Parenthood.
“Doing the work the Kamikaze Media (many of whom are participating in this event rather than digging for the story) refuses, and with the help of Big Government’s Dana Loesch, Patrick and Stage Right have discovered that when it comes to this White House – whether it’s the NEA conference calls or EIF’s iParticipate programming — all roads funnel into one place: online volunteer portals, including Serve.gov, where if you plug in “health care” all kinds of Planned Parenthood openings pop up along with a video dispelling those ugly “myths” knocking ObamaCare,” writes Nolte.
As a subsequent Big Hollywood report points out, the websites being promoted by the “I Participate” campaign are little more than gateways to organizations like Planned Parenthood and their slice of Obama’s health care agenda, “reproductive freedom,” otherwise known as abortion, otherwise known as killing babies.
Since the websites that act as gateways for Planned Parenthood are being pushed on shows like So You Think You Can Dance, which is popular with teenage girls, the agenda is clear.
“As I said, my nine-year-old daughter loves ‘So You Think You Can Dance’. My wife and I are very careful. We watch the show first and record it via DVR. Then, the next day, if any of the dances are a bit risqué’ we skip through them,” writes Stage Right. “Of course we skip through the commercials because they are often too adult for her. I suppose the week of October 19th we’re going to have to skip most of the shows lest she be encouraged to go to a website promoting an abortion clinic.”
The website also leads to an instructional video about how to regurgitate Obama’s talking points on health care. Watch below.
“This nifty bit of propaganda encourages you to troll on blogs and leave comments, call in to talk radio shows and generally be annoying when people discuss ObamaCare by injecting Administration talking points found on AARP’s web page under the Orwellian header ”Myths vs. Facts,” reports Stage Right.
Another item that is just a quick search away from the website that will be pushed on network TV next week encourages people to become ‘Global Warming Ambassadors’ for the National Wildlife Fund, which is a firm supporter of Obama’s Cap and Trade agenda.
This isn’t the first time the corporate networks have prostituted their integrity and handed over control of their content to the Obama administration. Back in June, ABC News mimicked the likes of Communist China and North Korea by completely turning its news coverage over to the government and excluding any dissenting opinions to promote President Obama’s health care agenda.
Indeed, Rupert Murdoch’s Twentieth Century Fox corporation has admitted to planting political brainwashing within its globally popular TV shows and indeed boasts that it is proud of the fact. A corporate video shows Fox executives and stars of its universally recognized shows bragging about how they use the platform of hit shows that are broadcast worldwide to implant messages about the supposed threat of global warming. Watch below.
If all this wasn’t disturbing enough, one of the “I Paticipate” initiative’s main protagonists is none other than Ashton Kutcher, who along with Demi Moore produced one of the creepiest You Tube videos ever made, in which celebrities pledge their servitude to Barack Obama and encourage everyone to do the same as they repeat mantras with cult-like zeal.
Who remember’s this one?
The fact that corporate TV outlets are openly writing scripts and editing content to incorporate government propaganda, added to the fact that they act like this is some kind of wonderful service to the American people, is a damning indictment of just how deep the alphabet soup networks are in the pocket of the establishment.
It also underscores exactly why they are losing viewers to the Internet and alternative media at an alarming speed while hypocritically attacking the alternative media for being untrustworthy.
We’ll leave it to the reader to decide for themselves. Who’s the most trustworthy? The muckraking blogger or the legions of corporate media whores who brazenly hand over their editorial control to the government and then celebrate the fact as if it’s a major achievement?
MORE PROPAGANDA: iWATCH Stasi-Like Citizen Program Promotes Spying on Your Neighbours
ObamaCare Moves Forward
October 14, 2009, 12:45 pm
Filed under:
Barack Obama,
baucus bill,
Communism,
Congress,
corpoatism,
Dictatorship,
doctors,
Empire,
excise tax,
Fascism,
fines,
gag order,
government bureaucrat,
government control,
government health care,
government regulation,
government takeover,
health and environment,
health care,
health care companies,
health care insurance,
health care mandate,
health care reform,
Healthcare,
healthcare rationing,
House,
Income Tax,
IRS,
John Cornyn,
mandatory health care,
mandatory health insurance,
max baucus,
medicaid,
medical care,
medical industrial complex,
medicare,
medicare cuts,
medicare insurance,
mike enzi,
nanny state,
Neolibs,
obama,
obama care,
obama deception,
obama fines,
obamacare,
obamacare fines,
Oppression,
patients,
Police State,
Propaganda,
public option,
ration,
rationing,
Senate,
senior citizens,
single payer,
socialism,
tax,
Taxpayers,
universal health care,
universial health care
ObamaCare Moves Forward
Senate Finance Committee passes a $829 billion Baucus’ health care bill by a 14-9 vote, with the support of one Republican (Olympia Snowe R-Maine). There are many more bills health care reform has to pass before Obama signs the final bill into law.
The Truth About the Baucus Healthcare Bill
Max Baucus Placed Gag Order On Medicare Companies Concerning Cuts
Senate panel approves Patriot Act renewal
October 12, 2009, 8:32 am
Filed under:
1984,
2-party system,
4th amendment,
ACLU,
amnesty,
AT&T,
Barack Obama,
Big Brother,
bush = obama,
CIA,
civil liberties,
civil rights,
Congress,
DHS,
domeestic terrorism,
domestic terror,
EFF,
FBI,
federal crimes,
FOIA,
George Bush,
government bureaucrat,
government control,
government takeover,
Homeland Security,
immunity,
left right paradigm,
Military,
neocons,
Neolibs,
NSA,
obama,
obama = bush,
obama deception,
orwell,
Patriot Act,
privacy rights,
roving wiretaps,
Russ Feingold,
Senate,
Sprint,
Spy,
Surveillance,
telecoms,
us constituion,
US Constitution,
verison,
War On Terror,
warrantless search,
warrantless wiretap,
White House
Dem-controlled Senate Judiciary Committee extends PATRIOT Act provisions
Capitol Hill Blue
October 9, 2009
Key US lawmakers passed legislation Thursday extending three key provisions of the PATRIOT Act, the sweeping intelligence bill enacted after the September 11, 2001 attacks.
Backing a White House request, the Senate Judiciary Committee passed the measure 11 votes to 8 to extend until 2013 three clauses that would have expired by 31 December. The bill now heads to the full Senate for a vote.
The provisions include the “roving wiretap” clause, used to monitor mobile communications of individuals using multiple telephone lines, and the “lone-wolf” provision, which enables spying on individuals suspected of terrorist activity but with no obvious connection to extremist groups.
Lawmakers also extended the life of controversial section 215, known as the “library records provision” that allows government agencies to access individual’s library history.
The committee had earlier met in a closed-door meeting with members of the Federal Bureau of Investigation and the intelligence community on ensuring their actions would not impede investigations already underway.
The senators also debated freeing up law enforcement actions that have been hampered by legislation and court rulings since the first program was launched by former president George W. Bush in the wake of 9/11, which enabled collecting sensitive information for years without a court order.
Republicans senators have remained critical of placing restrictions on the intelligence community, saying they should more of a free hand in the early stages of investigations.
But their Democratic counterparts have decried the fact that the provisions still do not in their view adequately respect the privacy of ordinary Americans.
Democratic Senator Russ Feingold said he feared handing a “blank check” to law enforcement agencies and criticized the Democrat-controlled committee for not passing safeguards that even Republicans supported during the Bush administration.
“Among the most significant problems is the failure to include an improved standard for Section 215 orders, even though a Republican controlled Judiciary Committee unanimously supported including the same standard in 2005,” he said in a media advisory.
“But what was most upsetting was the apparent willingness of too many members to defer completely to behind the scenes complaints from the FBI and the Justice Department, even though the administration has yet to take a public position on any of the improvements that I and other senators have proposed. … [While] I am left scratching my head trying to understand how a committee controlled by a wide Democratic margin could support the bill it approved today, I will continue to work with my colleagues to try to make improvements to this bill.”
Michael Macleod-Ball, acting director of the American Civil Liberties Union’s Washington legislative office said the rights group was “disappointed” that further moves were not made to protect civil liberties.
“This truly was a missed opportunity for the Senate Judiciary Committee to right the wrongs of the PATRIOT Act,” he said.
“We urge the Senate to adopt amendments on the floor that will bring this bill in line with the Constitution.”
Obama Supports Renewing The PATRIOT ACT
Telephone Companies Are An Arm Of Government Admits DOJ
October 12, 2009, 8:01 am
Filed under:
1984,
2-party system,
4th amendment,
amnesty,
AT&T,
Barack Obama,
Big Brother,
bush = obama,
CIA,
civil liberties,
civil rights,
Congress,
DHS,
domeestic terrorism,
domestic terror,
EFF,
federal crimes,
FOIA,
George Bush,
government bureaucrat,
government control,
government takeover,
Homeland Security,
immunity,
left right paradigm,
Military,
neocons,
Neolibs,
NSA,
obama,
obama = bush,
obama deception,
orwell,
Patriot Act,
privacy rights,
roving wiretaps,
Senate,
Sprint,
Spy,
Surveillance,
telecoms,
us constituion,
US Constitution,
verison,
War On Terror,
warrantless search,
warrantless wiretap
Telephone Companies Are An Arm Of Government Admits DOJ
Wired News
October 9, 2009

AT&T was the first of many telcos sued for helping the NSA spy on Americans without warrants |
The Department of Justice has finally admitted it in court papers: the nation’s telecom companies are an arm of the government — at least when it comes to secret spying.
Fortunately, a judge says that relationship isn’t enough to squash a rights group’s open records request for communications between the nation’s telecoms and the feds.
The Electronic Frontier Foundation wanted to see what role telecom lobbying of Justice Department played when the government began its year-long, and ultimately successful, push to win retroactive immunity for AT&T and others being sued for unlawfully spying on American citizens.
The feds argued that the documents showing consultation over the controversial telecom immunity proposal weren’t subject to the Freedom of Information Act since they were protected as “intra-agency” records:
“The communications between the agencies and telecommunications companies regarding the immunity provisions of the proposed legislation have been regarded as intra-agency because the government and the companies have a common interest in the defense of the pending litigation and the communications regarding the immunity provisions concerned that common interest.”
U.S. District Court Judge Jeffery White disagreed and ruled on September 24 that the feds had to release the names of the telecom employees that contacted the Justice Department and the White House to lobby for a get-out-of-court-free card.
“Here, the telecommunications companies communicated with the government to ensure that Congress would pass legislation to grant them immunity from legal liability for their participation in the surveillance,” White wrote. “Those documents are not protected from disclosure because the companies communicated with the government agencies “with their own … interests in mind,” rather than the agency’s interests.”
The feds were supposed to make the documents available Friday, but in a motion late Thursday, the Obama administration is asking for a 30-day emergency stay (.pdf) so it can file a further appeal.
Read Full Article Here
Obama Pushes For Renewal of Warrantless Spying
U.S. Gives Up Economic Independence to the IMF
October 10, 2009, 3:16 pm
Filed under:
Argentina,
Australia,
Barack Obama,
brazil,
Central Banks,
China,
Credit Crisis,
DEBT,
deflation,
dick morris,
Dictatorship,
Dollar,
Economic Collapse,
economic depression,
economic world order,
Economy,
Empire,
Fascism,
g20,
global economy,
global elite,
global government,
global treasury,
Globalism,
globalist elite,
globalists,
government bureaucrat,
government control,
government regulation,
government takeover,
Great Depression,
Greenback,
hyperinflation,
imf,
indonesia,
Inflation,
internationalist,
internationalists,
main street,
Mexico,
Nazi,
New World Order,
NWO,
obama,
One World Government,
Oppression,
Pittsburgh g20 summit,
Pittsburgh summit,
Pittsburgh summit 2009,
Russia,
Saudi Arabia,
socialism,
south africa,
south korea,
sovereignty,
Stock Market,
UN,
united nations,
US Economy,
US Treasury,
Wall Street,
world government
U.S. Gives Up Economic Independence to the IMF
Video: Obama Comparison to Hitler
October 5, 2009, 11:08 am
Filed under:
1st amendment,
2nd Amendment,
americorps,
anti gun,
Barack Obama,
boy scouts,
brainwashing,
Charlotte Iserbyt,
civil liberties,
civil rights,
civilian expenditionary workforce,
DHS,
Dictatorship,
Draft,
education,
education system,
Empire,
Fascism,
forced labor,
gestapo,
government control,
government regulation,
government takeover,
Gun Control,
Hitler,
hr 1388,
human rights,
indoctrination,
mandatory military service,
mandatory national service,
mandatory service,
mandatory volunteerism,
Media,
Michelle Obama,
Military Industrial Complex,
nanny state,
natioal service,
national civilian security force,
national guard,
national service,
Nazi,
nazi germany,
Neolibs,
New World Order,
obama,
obama deception,
obama youth,
Oppression,
Police State,
Propaganda,
Psyops,
public schools,
Rahm Emanuel,
selective service,
slavery,
socialism,
stasi,
stasi tactics,
universal civil defense training,
universal service,
US Constitution,
veterans,
War On Terror
Video: Obama Comparison to Hitler
Google-Earth To Track People In Real-Time
October 3, 2009, 3:49 pm
Filed under:
1984,
augmented earth,
Big Brother,
biometrics,
cameras,
cell phone,
cell phones,
CNN,
Control Grid,
Darpa,
data mining,
Dictatorship,
Echelon,
Empire,
global elite,
global government,
Globalism,
google,
google earth,
government control,
government takeover,
gps,
internet,
Internet 2,
internet 3,
internet of things,
internet police,
IOT,
Media,
microchip,
microchips,
Microsoft,
nanny state,
New World Order,
NWO,
Oppression,
orwell,
Pentagon,
Police State,
RFID,
RFID bracelet,
Science and technology,
south korea,
Spy,
Surveillance,
surveillance cameras,
Total Information Awareness,
traffic cameras,
uav,
Verichip | Tags:
intel,
internet regulation,
korea,
motorola,
National Intelligence Council,
new songdo city,
NIC,
seoul,
u-city,
Ubiquitous computing,
Ubiquitous living,
Ubiquitous positioning,
utopia,
Video and Image Retrieval and Analysis Tool
Editor’s Note: This could be the start of the New World Order MATRIX, where every ‘thing’ in the world can be located and tracked on the internet
Augmented Google-Earth Tracks Real-Time People, Cars, Weather
Cryptogon
September 30, 2009
The surveillance side of this is the chickenfeed. There’s something far more sinister than the simple surveillance… an angle we haven’t heard about yet.
Tice never did tell his story to Congress about this different aspect of the program.
Well, my guess is that it has something to do with providing surveillance data for this SEAS World Sim thing, and that individual Americans are being watched and potentially targeted with it. Tice’s background seems to involve a lot of traditional electronic warfare, radar and ELINT stuff. Maybe Tice’s deal involved the collection of the mobile phone GPS and/or triangulation data which would provide realtime spacial/geographic data to the SEAS system. In other words, SEAS sees you. They could bring up a map of a city and plot your path based on the information that your phone is exchanging with the mobile network.
—Synthetic Environments for Analysis and Simulation
Via: Popular Science:
Researchers from Georgia Tech have devised methods to take real-time, real-world information and layer it onto Google Earth, adding dynamic information to the previously sterile Googlescape.
They use live video feeds (sometimes from many angles) to find the position and motion of various objects, which they then combine with behavioral simulations to produce real-time animations for Google Earth or Microsoft Virtual Earth.
They use motion capture data to help their animated humans move realistically, and were able to extrapolate cars’ motion throughout an entire stretch of road from just a few spotty camera angles.
From their video of an augmented virtual Earth, you can see if the pickup soccer game in the park is short a player, how traffic is on the highway, and how fast the wind is blowing the clouds across the sky.
Up next, they say they want to add weather, birds, and motion in rivers.
Ubiquitous Computing: Big Brother’s All-Seeing Eye
DARPA building search engine for video surveillance footage
ObamaCare: Buy Health Insurance Or Go To Jail
October 3, 2009, 2:53 pm
Filed under:
Barack Obama,
Communism,
Congress,
corpoatism,
Dictatorship,
Empire,
excise tax,
Fascism,
fines,
government bureaucrat,
government control,
government health care,
government regulation,
government takeover,
health care,
health care companies,
health care insurance,
health care mandate,
health care reform,
Healthcare,
Income Tax,
IRS,
mandatory health care,
mandatory health insurance,
medicaid,
medical care,
medical industrial complex,
medicare,
nanny state,
Nazi,
nazi germany,
Neolibs,
obama,
obama care,
obama deception,
obama fines,
obamacare,
obamacare fines,
Oppression,
Police State,
Propaganda,
public option,
Senate,
socialism,
tax,
Taxpayers,
universal health care | Tags:
JCT,
Joint Committee on Taxation,
Tom Barthold
Americans threatened with jail time, huge fines for refusing to buy health insurance
Mike Adams
Natural News
September 29, 2009
There’s a popular video circulating on the ‘net right now about how to escape handcuffs without using a key. Americans are watching the video to bone up on essential skills that will soon be needed for health care reform, it seems, since the new laws that are about to be put in place call for Americans to be arrested and thrown in jail if they refuse to buy health insurance.
This has now been confirmed by Tom Barthold, the Chief of Staff of the Joint Committee on Taxation. And it’s not merely about jail time; it’s also about the $25,000 fine that could be levied by the IRS against individuals who refuse to buy health insurance.
That this is even being considered just boggles the mind. If a person is too broke to afford health insurance right now, how are they supposed to be able to buy it after paying a $25,000 fine and spending a year in prison?
As Paul Craig Roberts brilliantly pointed out in a recent essay, this is like trying to solve the homeless problem by forcing homeless people to buy a home, then throwing them in prison when they can’t afford to.
Read Full Article Here
Buy ObamaCare or Face Jail or $25,000 Fine
Govt. Plans To Detain Mentally Ill During Swine Flu Outbreak
October 1, 2009, 2:19 pm
Filed under:
4th amendment,
Bio Weapons,
CDC,
civil liberties,
civil rights,
Concentration Camp,
Continuity of Government,
detention,
Dictatorship,
door to door,
Empire,
Fascism,
federal crimes,
fema camp,
Fema Camps,
forced detention,
forced quarantine,
government bureaucrat,
government control,
government takeover,
h1n1,
h1n1 clinic,
h1n1 vaccine,
health and environment,
human rights,
influenza,
innoculation,
involuntary isolation,
involuntary quarantine,
involuntary vaccination,
knock and talk,
mandatory detention,
mandatory quarantine,
Martial Law,
mental disorder,
mental illness,
Military,
nanny state,
Nazi,
New World Order,
NWO,
Oppression,
Pandemic,
pandemic virus,
parental rights,
Police State,
quarantine,
swine flu,
swine flu pandemic,
swine flu vaccine,
US Constitution,
vaccinations,
Vaccine,
virus pandemic
Govt. Plans To Detain Mentally Ill During Swine Flu Outbreak
Management In Practice
September 23, 2009
The government plans to rush through measures allowing people with suspected mental health issues to be quickly detained because of fears over staff shortages in any forthcoming swine flu outbreak, it has been revealed.
The temporary changes to the Mental Health Act, as laid out in an unusually short consultation lasting just one month, would mean it would only take one doctor, rather than two, to have a person sectioned and put on medication without their consent.
The measures could have a serious effect on the thousands of patients with psychiatric issues who currently live outside state care, meaning many could be detained against their will on the word of just one health professional.
With very little information on the proposed changes published, many mental health experts have warned the government that they risk side-lining an already vulnerable community and have called on it to spell-out the full raft of changes proposed in the consultation.
CDC Drafts “Isolation Order” for H1N1
Kurt Nimmo
Infowars
September 29, 2009
The following draft of an “isolation order” was discovered on the CDC’s website. It is a template for state and local officials to impose quarantines and what would effectively be martial law.
“Your illness [as determined by state and local officials] requires that you be isolated and requires further public health investigation and monitoring.”
Failure to obey will result in imprisonment without bail prior to trial and the possibility of a two year prison term.
In other words, according to this document, officials can impose quarantine without evidence that somebody is actually infected with a virus that is now negligible at best. It may also be used to quarantine potentially millions of people suffering from any number of illnesses — or not suffering from any disease at the discretion of the state — that have nothing to do with H1N1. It is basically a carte blanche for martial law under the cover of protecting the public from a communicable disease that is demonstrably a manufactured and weaponized threat.
Read Full Article Here
Swine Flu Vaccine Recipients Tracked With RFID Bracelets
September 30, 2009, 9:49 am
Filed under:
1984,
Big Brother,
boston,
Checkpoints,
civil liberties,
civil rights,
Concentration Camp,
Continuity of Government,
DHS,
Dictatorship,
door to door,
Empire,
Fascism,
FEMA,
FEMA buses,
fema camp,
Fema Camps,
forced detention,
forced quarantine,
forced vaccination,
forced vaccinations,
government control,
government takeover,
h1n1,
h1n1 clinic,
h1n1 vaccine,
Habeas Corpus,
Homeland Security,
homeland security buses,
human rights,
innoculation,
involuntary detention,
involuntary isolation,
involuntary quarantine,
involuntary vaccination,
knock and talk,
mandatory detention,
mandatory quarantine,
mandatory vaccination,
Martial Law,
Massachusetts,
medical industrial complex,
Military,
Military Industrial Complex,
nanny state,
Nazi,
New World Order,
NWO,
Oppression,
orwell,
Pandemic,
Pandemic Influenza,
pandemic virus,
police brutality,
Police State,
Posse Comitatus,
quarantine,
swat,
swine flu,
swine flu pandemic,
swine flu vaccine,
Troops,
US Constitution,
vaccinations,
Vaccine,
vaccine checkpoints,
vaccine teams
Swine flu vaccine recipients could be tracked with RFID bracelets using Big Brother medical technology

Mike Adams
Natural News
Sept 24, 2009
Here’s the scene from some dark, present-day action movie: David Balfour breathed hard. He could hear the thumping of heavy boots outside his door, down the hall, mixed with the muffled grunts of military men. He had known they would come. It was obvious from the moment he refused the VaxTrax bracelet at the county clinic. They said it would keep him safe because they could pinpoint his location if he ever suffered a heart attack or an accident. As a bonus, his entire medical history was also imprinted in the RFID chip, so even if he was found unconscious, they could determine his medical status and start treatment right away.
But he had refused on the spot. David didn’t want to be tracked. So he walked away from the clinic, without the vaccine and without the bracelet.
That was stupid, he now realized. They had apparently tracked him anyway… somehow… and now they were at his door, and their fists pounded loudly.
“Boston Police! Open up!”
He glanced at the window behind him. Too late to plan an escape route. Maybe he should have thought of that earlier, but no, fleeing out the window was the stuff of Hollywood fiction, not here-and-now reality in Boston, Massachusetts.
“Mr. Balfour!” the police shouted. “You have ten seconds to open this door, or we are coming in.”
They weren’t bluffing. Pretending he wasn’t home clearly wouldn’t work. Maybe he could talk his way out of it. “I’ve broken no law!” he screamed back at the door.
“Mr. Balfour,” came the voice in authoritative tones, “You have refused to wear the VaxTrax bracelet as mandated by the National Pandemic Protection Act, and as we cannot determine your vaccination status, you are considered a danger to the people of this city.”
“You have five seconds.”
There was no way to fight this, he realized. So David stood, reached out to the door and began to slide the locking mechanism open…
BAM! The door burst open, striking David across the chest and forehead, flinging him backwards, stumbling, then collapsing with a gasp onto the living room floor. A mass of armored military men swarmed into the room, grabbed his wrists and forced his hands behind his back to be painfully handcuffed. He tried to scream but discovered himself too disoriented to find his voice. All he could do was hurt.
The scramble was over in seconds. He found himself face down, nose buried into the patterns of his living room rug, half conscious, with a hard knee pressed sharply into his kidney. There was a pause.
Then he heard footsteps… not those of military boots, but the soft shuffling of worn walking shoes. This was someone different, someone more… civilian.
“I’m doctor Argosy,” a voice hummed above and behind him. “Mr. Balfour, you are now going to receive an FDA-approved H1N1 vaccination and be fitted with a VaxTrax bracelet. Please remain calm.”
So this is what it has come to, he thought. Face down on the floor of his own home, a squad of vaccine enforcers standing on his back, a pair of handcuffs, a shattered front door, a probable black eye and a doctor, hidden from view, about to inject him with something he knew couldn’t possibly be safe.
The vaccine shot itself was painless and quick. Maybe it was the adrenaline, he thought, that masked the pain. He felt the cold plastic of a tracking bracelet being zipped around his wrist, then the handcuffs slid away and the pressure in his back released. “There, Mr. Balfour. You’re all set,” said the voice of the doctor. “Have a nice day.”
Before leaving, one of the police officers leaned close to him, almost whispering in his ear, “And don’t try to take off your VaxTrax, or we’ll know, and we’ll have to come back here.”
They marched out almost as quickly as they had entered, stomping down the hall for a few moments, and then the sounds paused. A pounding on another door broke the silence. David heard them shouting through the door of his neighbor’s apartment. “Mrs. Henderson, open up. This is the Boston Police!”…
This may not be fiction for very long
The above fictional account may not remain fiction for long. Late last year, the city of Boston began fitting vaccine recipients with RFID tracking bracelets, allowing health authorities to visually track the vaccine status of city residents on a large digital map. This map shows the location and status of anyone wearing an RFID tracking bracelet, thereby revealing areas of the city where vaccination rates are low, too.
By identifying these “low vaccination” areas, city officials could roll in with mobile vaccination units and law enforcement personnel, then march door to door, vaccinating and tagging residents either voluntarily or at gunpoint, depending on the circumstances. It’s all perfectly legal, by the way, under Massachusetts laws that are being put in place right now to handle the expected swine flu pandemic.
This RFID vaccine tracking technology isn’t fiction. It exists right now and was reported by the Boston Globe (http://www.boston.com/news/local/ma…) which revealed that vaccine-tracking bracelet trials were in place nearly a year ago.
“Several hundred people are expected to queue up for immunizations at the headquarters of the Boston Public Health Commission,” the Boston Globe reports. “Each of them will get a bracelet printed with a unique identifier code. Information about the vaccine’s recipients, and the shot, will be entered into handheld devices similar to those used by delivery truck drivers.”
This effort, says the Boston Globe, is “aimed at eventually creating a citywide registry of everyone who has had a flu vaccination. The resulting vaccination map would allow swift intervention in neighborhoods left vulnerable to the fast-moving respiratory illness.”
This is an open admission that the kind of scenario depicted in the fictional snapshot at the top of this article could potentially become reality. “Swift intervention” means “rapid-fire vaccinations.” And people who resist those vaccines aren’t going to have much of an opportunity to say no.
The worse the pandemic gets, the more aggressive these actions will become.
If people start dying from the pandemic in larger numbers, the “vaccine squads” are likely to be out in full force, injecting victims at road checkpoints and possibly even in their own homes via door-to-door sweeps. People who refuse to be vaccinated can be legally arrested and detailed by authorities, and to use the exact terms that are about to be passed into law in Mass., they can be “involuntarily transported” to a quarantine camp. Almost sounds like fun, huh? A free ride, free food, free showers… oh yeah, and a free vaccine shot, too, courtesy of the state.
To repeat, this part isn’t fiction: It’s written right into proposed laws that are very likely to be passed and aggressively enforced if a runaway pandemic scenario unfolds. You can read about some of these proposed laws right here: http://www.naturalnews.com/026934_h…
Your papers, please
Beyond the RFID tracking technology, there’s another disturbing development you need to be aware of: Law enforcement all over the country are now reportedly being briefed about the possibility of “vaccine checkpoints.” These could be set up on key roads and highways, and people passing through those checkpoints will have to prove they have been vaccinated or they may face being arrested and “involuntarily transported” to a quarantine camp.
Of course, it might not take much documentation to get past the checkpoints. There’s no formalized vaccine ID card that exists yet, so a letter from your doctor (or some reasonably believable rendition of such) will likely be sufficient, unless they actually mandate vaccine tracking bracelets for everyone (but even that would take years to implement simply due to the manufacturing and distribution logistics).
I’m also not too sure that the masses of American sheeple will be willing to wear RFID bracelets that report their real-time positions to the U.S. government. It’s just a little too close to being barcoded like a Jewish prisoner in a Nazi concentration camp. People generally don’t like that.
Then again, as the Boston Globe reported in 2008, hundreds of Bostonians actually lined up and volunteered to wear these bracelets, even knowing they would be tracked in real time by their own government. This is disturbing evidence that lots of people just can’t wait to be medically enslaved by the state. Some will actually raise their hands and line up for the opportunity!
On the other end of the spectrum, there are a whole lot of people who will refuse to be medically enslaved by the state. Known as “refuseniks,” these are the people like you and me who choose not to be injected with some hastily-approved chemical cocktail that’s never been long-term tested on anyone. Let the volunteers be the guinea pigs, if they’re really that anxious to get injected. The rest of us will take care of our own immune systems through more natural methods, thank you very much.
Action items: What to do
Here’s the word for those who wish to avoid problems at vaccine checkpoints: Acquire some “proof” of vaccination as soon as possible after the vaccinations begin. And keep it with you at all times.
I’m not actually suggesting you get vaccinated just to get the paperwork, by the way. In fact, there’s a chance you’re already immune to H1N1. You may already have antibodies for the virus, meaning you’ve been “naturally vaccinated” even without a shot. (http://www.naturalnews.com/027037_s…)
Your healthy immune system, you see, will create its own built-in vaccine upon exposure to the pandemic virus, and within a few days after being exposed, you will generate your own H1N1 antibodies, just like all the other people who were vaccinated. Except your antibodies will be even stronger than theirs, because you were exposed to a live virus, while they were only exposed to a weakened one (via the vaccine). So in effect, you will be far better vaccinated against H1N1 than the people who got the vaccine shots!
Even without the vaccine, H1N1 swine flu is no more fatal than a regular seasonal flu, and why should anybody have to prove they’ve been vaccinated against a flu that’s so mild it only kills roughly 1 out of 100,000 people who get infected?
Do you realize that if a pharmaceutical being tested in clinical trials killed the same percentage of people as the swine flu virus, it would be declared astonishingly SAFE by the FDA? The swine flu, as currently circulating, isn’t dangerous. It’s the vaccines that pose the greater risk to your health, in my view. Only time will tell how many people the vaccines end up killing, of course.
Are nasal vaccines safer?
Should you, for some reason, wish to actually get a vaccine in order to acquire vaccine documentation, I recommend nasal vaccines over injected vaccines. They’re inherently safer, in my view, because the nose is one of the natural pathways through which viruses enter your body anyway (as opposed to a hole in your arm). Nasal vaccines don’t contain thimerosal, either.
The FluMist nasal vaccine, just so you know, contains “Live Attenuated Influenza Vaccine,” meaning it is made out of live viruses (http://www.cdc.gov/FLU/about/qa/nas…). But your uncle Charlie probably also contains live influenza, so this isn’t anything to be too worried about. If you plan to get lots of rest, have strong immune system support, get lots of vitamin D and spend a few days recuperating with little or no stress, your chances of being harmed by the nasal vaccine are virtually nil, unless you’re obese and suffer from a preexisting respiratory condition or immune system problem, in which case you shouldn’t be receiving a nasal vaccine in the first place.
If you actually do get a vaccine, hold on to the paperwork. That’s what will get you through the vaccine checkpoints, if they are indeed put into play. In reality, there are likely to be hundreds of different documents showing “proof” of vaccination, so anything that looks even remotely convincing will probably get you through. What the checkpoint police will really be looking for are people who are completely clueless and haven’t gone through the trouble to come up with any paperwork at all. Those are the ones likely to be injected or detained.
Dealing with a mandatory RFID bracelet
So what happens if everybody is required to wear RFID bracelets that track their whereabouts and vaccination status?
I think this is highly unlikely in the short term, as there probably aren’t enough bracelets to go around (unless huge truckloads of bracelets have been secretly manufactured and stored somewhere, which seems really unlikely). But I wouldn’t put it past these people in the medium term: This is the perfect way to enslave the population under some medical pretext. Some percentage of the population will even line up and volunteer to be outfitted with such devices.
If such bracelets do get forced upon the population, within a few days you’ll start to see websites appearing on the ‘net with instructions for hacking or disabling your bracelet. Since those websites don’t exist yet, I can’t point you to them, but it’s a fairly easy Google search on the term “disable RFID.” That search will pull up sites like this one: http://blog.makezine.com/archive/20…
And that website advises the following:
“The last (and most covert) method for destroying a RFID tag is to hit it with a hammer. Just pick up any ordinary hammer and give the chip a few swift hard whacks. This will destroy the chip, and leave no evidence that the tag has been tampered with. This method is suitable for destroying the tags in passports, because there will be no proof that you intentionally destroyed the chip.”
Obviously, don’t hit the bracelet with a hammer if you are still wearing it, or the RFID chip won’t be the only thing you’ll disable. Anyone who fails this intelligence test should probably just put the bracelet back on and hopelessly do what they’re told.
Don’t worry about being caught with a “failed” chip. Chip failures will be common, so the authorities will be used to the idea that a lot of bracelets just don’t work correctly. If they ask why yours isn’t working, just shrug and say, “Dunno. I thought it was working fine. Maybe it got bumped or something…”
Don’t freak out over this
So is this RFID tracking bracelet a sign of things to come? Possibly. They’re clearly experimenting with the technology not only to see how well the tech works, but more importantly to get some answers on the psychology: Will people accept tracking bracelets? Will they feel protected, or enslaved? Will they try to remove or disable the bracelets?
For now, I’m not aware of any serious talk of tracking bracelets being made mandatory, nor is there even any real chatter about making swine flu vaccinations mandatory for the public at large (although certain professionals such as day care workers and hospital staffers are being told to get vaccinated or lose their jobs…). But all this could change almost overnight. One mutation of H1N1 could rewrite the entire play book on this by increasing the fatality rate of the infection. From there, it would be a simple matter for vaccination mandates to be swiftly put into place, and mandatory tracking bracelets could soon follow.
Let’s hope that scenario doesn’t unfold. I know there are many good law enforcement professionals out there who would never go along with such a Nazi-inspired medical enslavement scheme, but sadly there are more than enough who will be willing to follow orders and carry through with whatever they’re told to do. Let us hope our law enforcement community is never forced to make that decision.
If things get worse, however, be prepared to produce your vaccination documentation (”papers, please”) at roadblocks and checkpoints. And make sure you dutifully wear your vaccination RFID tracking bracelet, too, even if you’ve hammered the RFID chip into scrap.
Lawmakers Refuse To Allow Time to Read Health Care Bill
September 28, 2009, 3:27 pm
Filed under:
Barack Obama,
Censorship,
Communism,
Congress,
Dictatorship,
Empire,
Fascism,
Fox News,
government bureaucrat,
government control,
government health care,
government regulation,
government takeover,
Greta van Susteren,
health care,
health care reform,
Healthcare,
max baucus,
Media,
medicaid,
medical care,
medical industrial complex,
medicare,
Neolibs,
obama,
obama care,
obama deception,
obamacare,
public option,
Senate,
socialism,
universal health care | Tags:
conceptual bill,
Congressional Budget Office,
Mike Crapo,
Senate Finance Committee
Lawmakers Refuse To Allow Time to Read Health Care Bill
Health Insurance Mandate Includes ‘Tax’ Despite Obama Denial
September 28, 2009, 2:14 pm
Filed under:
abc news,
Barack Obama,
Communism,
Congress,
corpoatism,
Dictatorship,
Empire,
excise tax,
Fascism,
fines,
George Stephanopoulos,
government bureaucrat,
government control,
government health care,
government regulation,
government takeover,
health care,
health care companies,
health care insurance,
health care mandate,
health care reform,
Healthcare,
Income Tax,
IRS,
mandatory health care,
max baucus,
Media,
medicaid,
medical care,
medical industrial complex,
medicare,
nanny state,
Nazi,
nazi germany,
Neolibs,
obama,
obama care,
obama deception,
obama fines,
obamacare,
obamacare fines,
Oppression,
Police State,
Propaganda,
public option,
Senate,
socialism,
tax,
Taxpayers,
universal health care | Tags:
Senate Finance Committee
Health Insurance Mandate Includes ‘Tax’ Despite Obama Denial
FOX News
September 21, 2009
A proposed requirement that all Americans buy health insurance does in fact include a “tax” increase, according to the Senate — even though President Obama insisted Sunday that it “absolutely” does not.
Obama gave ABC News’ George Stephanopoulos a stern talking-to Sunday for suggesting that the mandate to buy health insurance would amount to a tax. He even taunted the host for citing the dictionary definition of “tax” to make his point.
“The fact that you looked up Merriam’s Dictionary, the definition of tax increase, indicates to me that you’re stretching a little bit right now,” Obama said.
But the language of the health care reform plan proposed by Sen. Max Baucus, D-Mont., explicitly labels the penalty attached to the mandate as an “excise tax.”
Penalties for failing to obtain coverage would range from $750 to $3,800 under the plan. This is addressed in a section labeled: “Excise Tax.”
“The excise tax would apply for any period for which the individual is not covered by a health insurance plan with the minimum required benefit,” the Baucus plan says.
Republican strategist Brad Blakeman said Obama just got busted.
“The president cannot orate himself out of this one. If it feels like a tax, it says it’s a tax — Mr. President, it’s a tax,” Blakeman said.
House Minority Whip Eric Cantor, R-Va., said Monday at a forum in Richmond that the House treats the penalty the same way.
“The president was on TV last night or yesterday morning saying ‘no no no, it’s not new taxes,’ whereas in this bill and in the Senate bill both, it calls what they are charging employers and individuals a tax. It’s an IRS section of our bill,” he said.
The Baucus plan does not describe the requirement itself as a tax — just the penalty.
But Julian Epstein, former Democratic counsel to the House Judiciary Committee, said the requirement is no different from requirements to obtain auto insurance.
“It’s called personally responsibility,” he said.
Obama and Stephanopoulos got in a testy exchange over the matter Sunday on “This Week.”
“Under this mandate, the government is forcing people to spend money, fining you if you don’t. How is that not a tax?” the host asked.
Obama argued that the government would be providing tax credits for those who have trouble affording coverage, and that Americans who have insurance are already paying hundreds extra in premiums to cover uncompensated care.
“That may be, but it’s still a tax increase,” Stephanopoulos said.
“No. That’s not true,” Obama said. “I absolutely reject that notion.”
FACT CHECK: Coverage requirement enforced with tax
AP
September 21, 2009
Memo to President Barack Obama: It’s a tax. Obama insisted this weekend on national television that requiring people to carry health insurance — and fining them if they don’t — isn’t the same thing as a tax increase. But the language of Democratic bills to revamp the nation’s health care system doesn’t quibble. Both the House bill and the Senate Finance Committee proposal clearly state that the fines would be a tax.
And the reason the fines are in the legislation is to enforce the coverage requirement.
“If you put something in the Internal Revenue Code, and you tell the IRS to collect it, I think that’s a tax,” said Clint Stretch, head of the tax policy group for Deloitte, a major accounting firm. “If you don’t pay, the person who’s going to come and get it is going to be from the IRS.”
Democrats aren’t the first to propose that individuals be required to carry health insurance and fined if they refuse. The conservative Heritage Foundation called for such a mandate in the 1990s’ health care debate, although its proposal differed from the ones pending in Congress. Heritage has since dropped the idea and now favors using tax credits to encourage people to buy coverage — carrots and not sticks.
During the 2008 political campaign, Obama opposed making coverage mandatory because of the costs. His position has shifted now that it’s becoming clear such a requirement will be part of any legislation that Congress sends him. Conservative activists are calling it a violation of his pledge not to raise taxes on the middle class.
“This is exactly what George Bush Sr. did when he said he wouldn’t raise taxes, and it cost him the next election,” said Grover Norquist, president of Americans for Tax Reform. “Obama is doing the same thing, but he’s insulting people by telling them that if you don’t call it a big purple banana, somehow it wouldn’t be a tax.”
Some liberals acknowledge that Obama might be vulnerable on the insurance requirement. But they say most people will understand as long as the legislation provides enough of a subsidy to make the coverage affordable. That’s a central issue this week as the Senate Finance Committee starts voting on legislation.
“I think it’s a metaphysical question as to whether it’s a tax or not,” said Roger Hickey, co-director of the Campaign for America’s Future. “The real question that will determine whether people are upset is whether the insurance is affordable.”
In an interview that aired Sunday on ABC’s “This Week,” Obama insisted that the insurance requirement is not a tax.
“For us to say that you’ve got to take a responsibility to get health insurance is absolutely not a tax increase,” the president said. “What it’s saying is…that we’re not going to have other people carrying your burdens for you anymore.
“Right now everybody in America, just about, has to get auto insurance,” Obama added. “Nobody considers that a tax increase.
“You just can’t make up that language and decide that that’s called a tax increase,” he added.
But a Democratic staff description of Sen. Max Baucus’ bill calls the proposed fines an “excise tax.” Penalties of up to $950 for individuals and $3,800 for families would be imposed on those who don’t get coverage.
The House bill uses a complex formula to calculate the penalties, calling them a “tax on individuals without acceptable health care coverage.”
The coverage mandate is part of a political bargain under which the insurance industry would agree to take all applicants, regardless of prior medical history.
“If we’re going to have coverage without regard to pre-existing conditions, it makes sense,” said economist Roberton Williams of the Tax Policy Center. “Otherwise people will come in the door the day they get sick.” He sees no distinction between the requirement to get coverage and the fines themselves.
“The fact that it is imposed on people and they have no choice in paying it, and the fact that it’s administered through the tax system all make it look like a tax,” Williams said. The center is a joint venture of the Urban Institute and the Brookings Institution.
It wouldn’t be the first asterisk added to Obama’s campaign pledge on taxes. Earlier this year, he signed a tobacco tax increase to pay for children’s health insurance. Even that can be read as a violation of his expansive campaign promise.
“I can make a firm pledge,” he said in Dover, N.H., on Sept. 12, 2008. “Under my plan, no family making less than $250,000 a year will see any form of tax increase. Not your income tax, not your payroll tax, not your capital gains taxes, not any of your taxes.”
He repeatedly promised “you will not see any of your taxes increase one single dime.”