noworldsystem.com


Pentagon Fabricated “Non Event” Iranian “Provocation”

Journalist: Pentagon Fabricated “Non Event” Iranian “Provocation”
Echoes of faked Gulf of Tonkin incident as Pentagon distortions exposed

Steve Watson
Infowars.net
January 16, 2008

Fbiiraqisbein_mn

A respected American Journalist has accused a Pentagon spokesman of falsifying events surrounding the recent encounter between Iranian patrol boats and a US navy vessel in the Strait of Hormuz, which was eventually labeled a “provocation” by the White House.

Gareth Porter, a journalist who previously broke a story regarding a secret Iranian peace overture to the Bush Administration in 2006, writing for the Asia Times states that the event was hyped up into a major incident after the original press release described the event as somewhat routine and did not refer to any threat to “explode” US ships or any similar confrontation.

the release reported that the Iranian “small boats” had “maneuvered aggressively in close proximity of [sic] the Hopper [the lead ship of the three-ship convoy]. But it did not suggest that the Iranian boats had threatened the boats or that it had nearly resulted in firing on the Iranian boats.

On the contrary, the release made the US warships handling of the incident sound almost routine,” Porter adds. “‘Following standard procedures,’ the release said, “Hopper issued warnings, attempted to establish communications with the small boats and conducted evasive maneuvering.’

The release did not refer to a US ship being close to firing on the Iranian boats, or to a call threatening that US ships would “explode in a few minutes”, as later stories would report, or to the dropping of objects into the path of a US ship as a potential danger.

That press release was ignored by the news media, however, because later that Monday morning, the Pentagon provided correspondents with a very different account of the episode.

The fact that several mainstream reports then emerged at the same time all carrying almost identical accounts of the incident, including the details of threats to explode vessels and dropping white boxes, can be traced back to a press briefing by a top Pentagon official in charge of media relations, Porter divulges.

He identifies Pentagon spokesman Bryan Whitman’s off the record comments to journalists as the catalyst for the ensuing pandemonium. Porter states that Whitman hadn’t wished to be identified as the source:

In an apparent slip-up, however, an Associated Press story that morning cited Whitman as the source for the statement that US ships were about to fire when the Iranian boats turned and moved away – a part of the story that other correspondents had attributed to an unnamed Pentagon official.

Three days later, at the height of the hype, the Pentagon released a video of the incident into which had been inserted audio of a strange voice threatening to “explode” the US vessel.

Porter reveals that according to Lieutenant Colonel Mark Ballesteros of the Pentagon’s Public Affairs Office the decision on what to include in the video was “a collaborative effort of leadership here, the Central Command and navy leadership in the field”. Porter also reveals that according to an official in the US Navy Office of Information in Washington, who asked not to be identified, the decision was made in the office of the Secretary of Defense.

Shortly after Iranian officials had denounced the video as a fake and had released alternative footage of their boats in contact with the US warship, it became apparent that the audio spliced into the video had not originated from the boats themselves but must have instead come from hecklers, often referred to as the “Filipino Monkey”, who cut in on VHF ship-to-ship radios and make rude comments or threats.

The Pentagon then backed away from claims that it knew the source of the audio or had ever known the source.

By January 11, Pentagon spokesman Geoff Morrell was already disavowing the story that Whitman had been instrumental in creating only four days earlier. “No one in the military has said that the transmission emanated from those boats,” said Morrell.

No one said it but that doesn’t excuse the fact that they spliced the audio into the video of an unrelated incident!

The story then essentially fell apart altogether and dropped off the radar as Navy officials began to discredit the rest of the distortions perpetuated by the Pentagon.

Porter also spoke to a Pentagon consultant who asked not to be identified who told him that many officers have experienced similar encounters with small Iranian boats throughout the 1990s, and that such incidents are “just not a major threat to the US Navy by any stretch of the imagination”.

These revelations show just how easy it is for a non event to be hyped to serve an agenda and how the mainstream media is eager to swallow whole whatever the government feeds them.

The event mirrors that of the August 1964 Gulf of Tonkin incident, where an attack on US warships by North Vietnamese PT Boats, was cited by President Johnson as a legitimate provocation mandating U.S. escalation in Vietnam. However Tonkin was revealed as a staged charade that never took place. Declassified LBJ presidential tapes featured discussions on how to spin the non-event to escalate it as justification for air strikes. In addition, the NSA faked intelligence data to make it appear as if two US ships had been lost. This information was again reiterated in a report released last week.

 

Fox News Reverses Course After Initially Calling For U.S. Navy To Blow Iran Boats ‘Out Of The Water’

Think Progress
January 16, 2008

On January 7, the media reported that five Iranian speedboats had harassed three U.S. warships in the Strait of Hormuz, almost instigating a military confrontation. The next day, Fox News anchor Brian Kilmeade angrily claimed the Navy should have blown the Iranian boats out of the water. Speaking on the morning show Fox & Friends, Kilmeade said the following:

KILMEADE: Was this a mistake not to blow these other Iranian speedboats out of the water? […] Why did we not destroy these speedboats? […] We had an opportunity to send a message to a nation that has been needling us for 20 years.

Today, a week after his call for war with Iran, Brian Kilmeade was forced to concede that the verbal threats made against the U.S. ships are “a possible hoax from a man called the ‘Filipino Monkey.'” Kilmeade’s co-host Gretchen Carlson claimed that she knew it all along. “I remember sitting in my office thinking, you gotta be kidding me? That voice does not sound to me like an Iranian accent.” She didn’t say that on-air, however, prior to this morning.

Kilmeade’s other co-host, Steve Doocy, piped in with this comment:

DOOCY: But can you imagine, had we blown those little boats out of the water to find out, you know, that they didn’t have bombs and in fact it was the Filipino Monkey who was somewhere on shore pulling a prank?

Indeed, we would have have, if Fox News had its way. Watch a compilation:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nZmb3fa22Ek

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WDfDHNZdLsI

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NHt_r7hWVUA

Carlson wrapped up the segment by stating, “Let’s hope it’s not the Filipino Monkey, for our sake. Because I think it’s a humongous embarrassment.”

 

Olbermann accuses U.S of trying to FAKE new Gulf of Tonkin

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WADchtd0Hms

 

Norman Podhoretz: Bush will bomb Iran before he leaves office

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2bLq6pzOc5w

Related News:

Ex-Lawmaker Charged With Funding Al-Qaeda
http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D8U767QO0&show_article=1

Rogue HAM Operator Blamed For Iran Incident
http://www.guardian.co.uk/iran/st..ss&feed=networkfront

Olmert: All options on table regarding Iran
http://www.jpost.com/servlet/S..rticle%2FShowFull

Iran sees end to nuclear crisis ‘very soon’
>http://www.spacewar.com/2006/080116130609.bqenkh5g.html

U.S. option to bomb Iran still on the table
http://www.kavkazcenter.com/eng/content/2008/01/15/9255.shtml

Iran says Bush’s accusations “words without value”
http://uk.reuters.com/article/oilRpt/idUKHAF45102720080114

Bush accuses Iran of undermining peace
http://www.mercurynews.com..091?nclick_check=1

Bush: Iran is the “Worlds Leading State Sponsor of Terror”
http://edition.cnn.com/2008/POLITIC..index.html

Things Have Gotten So Crazy Now a Prankster Could Start World War III!
http://mparent7777-2.blogspot.com/..-so-crazy-now.html

Mullen: ‘I Have Not Seen’ Iran Act So Provocatively, But Admits ‘I Haven’t Seen The Full Video’
http://thinkprogress.org/2008/01/14/iran-speedboats-mullen/

Gulf allies turn their backs on Bush
http://www.atimes.com/atimes/Middle_East/JA16Ak02.html

Huckabee: Deliver Iran to “Gates of Hell”
http://www.truthnews.us/?p=1643

Navy Says It Fired Warning Shots At Iranian Boats
http://ap.google.com/article/A..d09QD8U3TFRG0

Bogus Iran story was product of Pentagon spokesman, reporter says
US using 1994 Argentine bombing investigation to pressure Iran
Pentagon backs down over Iranian boat claims
UN Inspector Scott Ritter: Fools would Bomb Iran
US-Iranian naval clash: Radio trolls probably to blame
US blacklists Iranian commander, Syrian-based TV station
George Bush to push $20bn Saudi arms deal
Unraveling the Myth of Al Qaida – part 1
US, Israel on ‘same page’ on Iran
Tehran: U.S. trying to spread ‘Iran-phobia’
Sarkozy says pressure on Iran should be increased
U.S. Navy Withdraws Claims Against Iran
Israel’s Netanyahu Claims President Bush Promised Unilateral Nuclear Bomb Attack Against Iran
US Navy threat may not have been Iranian
Bush in Kuwait to seek Gulf backing against Iran
Israel stressed to Bush that Iran is a nuclear ‘threat’: general
Iran Encounter Grimly Echoes ’02 War Game
Official Version of Naval Incident Starts to Unravel
Ron Paul: “People are looking around for an excuse to bomb Iran”

Coup on Iran & False Flag News Archive

 



New Al-CIAda To Fight Old Al-CIAda

U.S. creating gangs of mercenaries to fight Taliban, Al Qaeda

Kavkaz Center
November 19, 2007

The US is considering a plan to create gangs of mercenaries from local population in the border areas of Pakistan to fight al-Qaida and the Taliban, emulating its tactics in Iraq’s Anbar province.

The plan would involve increasing the number of US trainers in Pakistan by dozens from the current number of around 50, and the direct financing of a separate tribal “paramilitary force” that has so far proved largely ineffective. Washington would also pay militias that agreed to fight al-Qaida and foreign “extremists”.

The plan, leaked to the New York Times, comes amid increasing concern over gains made by Islamic rebels in the region of Swat, near the Afghan border. In recent weeks, major battles have left many Pakistani soldiers, rebels and civilians dead.

Pervez Musharraf, the Pakistani president, said one of the main reasons for imposing emergency rule was to deal with the growing threat from Islamic rebels.

The tribal proposal – a strategy paper prepared by staff members of the US special operations command – has been circulated to counterterrorism experts, but has yet to be formally approved by the command’s headquarters in Tampa, Florida, the Times said.

Some other elements of the campaign, approved in principle by the US and Pakistan, await funding.

They include 0m (£170.7m) over several years to help train and equip the frontier corps, a “paramilitary force” that has around 85,000 members and is recruited from border tribes.

In the past, the US has expressed frustration at Musharraf’s tactics in dealing with rebels in the border area, especially a truce, agreed earlier this year, which has backfired, with pro-Taliban forces becoming stronger.

 

Pentagon: Double funds for Pakistani force

AP
November 21, 2007
WASHINGTON (AP) — The Pentagon wants to nearly double the funding to train and equip a Pakistani paramilitary force, saying the locally-based fighters are more effective in the difficult region bordering Afghanistan.

The U.S. military has asked to spend $97 million in 2008, compared with $52.6 million this year, on training and equipping the Frontier Corps, which has personnel of the same ethnicity as the recalcitrant tribes along the border.

Pentagon spokesman Geoff Morrell said the U.S. is not arming the Frontier Corps, but is spending money to build a training center in the region for the fighters while also looking for additional funds to buy them equipment such as helmets, vests and night-vision goggles.

The increased effort comes as violence along the border continues to escalate, raising questions about how long the Pakistanis can continue to battle the pro-Taliban and al-Qaeda militants known to be hiding in the rugged mountains.

“We believe that, particularly in this part of Pakistan, it is more effective to work with a force raised from locals than it is to work with the (Pakistan) army, who is not viewed with the same respect in that part of the country as is the Frontier Corps,” Morrell said.

It is more effective, he said, to deal with the Frontier Corps because it is made up of people who are “locally recruited and have local knowledge, language skills and most of all credibility with the people who live in those areas.”

The 2007 funding is being used to set up eight new Frontier Corps battalions, and the 2008 money would continue the training and equipping efforts as well as set up an additional four battalions. Morrell said the U.S. Army expects to provide the trainers, but some other governments may also participate.

“I don’t think we would be proceeding with a plan of this nature, at this cost, unless we had some degree of confidence that it would be fruitful,” Morrell said, describing the program as a joint venture with the Pakistani government.

Pakistan President Gen. Pervez Musharraf has said his government will provide the fighters with tanks and guns so they can take a lead role next year, allowing the country’s army to take a more supporting role.

Morrell said the Pentagon is also hoping to establish border surveillance centers, and is moving ahead with plans for one on the Afghan side of the border. The 2008 money is tied up in the war funding legislation that has stalled in Congress, he said.

Morrell added that the money will not be used to buy ammunition or weapons for the Frontier Corps, and will only buy equipment that will help them patrol the region.

The retooling of the Frontier Corps is part of a strategy that includes flooding northwestern Pakistan with development aid and propping up beleaguered pro-government elders, dozens of whom have been killed as American spies by militants.

The government hopes that approach will be more effective than a series of peace deals struck in 2005 and 2006 under which tribal leaders were supposed to curb militancy in return for a withdrawal of troops after earlier rounds of bloody fighting.