noworldsystem.com


Conspiracy Theory With Jesse Ventura: Global Warming

Conspiracy Theory With Jesse Ventura: Global Warming
Airs Wednesdays at 10PM on TruTV

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=svRUcX9Q9yU

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=A0rtJ9CYSdY

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YhFTgN13weA

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HuifVNofEtk

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aSmnD-MAifg

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ObUAAqoSWlo

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QRuzVbAODHw

 



UN Propaganda Posters Depict Humans as Evil Monsters

UN Propaganda Posters Depict Humans as Evil Monsters
Eugenicists who view people as a plague upon the earth are crafting policies that are killing millions in the third world

Paul Joseph Watson
PrisonPlanet.com
December 16, 2009

A new poster campaign sponsored by the United Nations depicts humans as evil horror movie monsters intent on slaughtering wildlife, another abhorrent example of how eugenicists are following through on the Club of Rome’s 1991 promise to portray Homo sapiens as the enemy in an effort to construct a world government around the pretext of saving the earth.

The three posters reverse the roles of famous horror movies Jaws, King Kong, and Tarantula, characterizing humans as rampaging monsters out to kill defenseless species. They were produced by the Convention on Migratory Species.

The poster campaign is being sponsored by the United Nations Environmental Program (UNEP), the world’s would-be environmental arm of the global government now being advanced in Copenhagen. Each poster features the UNEP logo at the bottom of the image.

UNEP is the regulatory body that established the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), the politicized organization that has attempted to slam the lid shut on global warming skepticism by claiming it is the supreme authority, despite the fact that scientists used by the IPCC were caught manipulating data and conspiring to “hide the decline” in global warming during the climategate scandal.

The first poster portrays a man as some kind of sub-aquatic killing machine bearing his teeth next to the words “Evil Jaws.”

The next poster reverses the classic King Kong imagery, with the beautiful blonde woman recast as a gnarling murderer waiting to crush a defenseless ape in her hands. The woman is labeled, “The Horrifying Human Being (Homo-sapiens)”.

The third image shows a man’s boot about to squash tarantula spiders below the words, “Giant Terror 6 Feet High”.

Global warming alarmists have ceased to hide their genocidal tendencies behind euphemistic language and have now brazenly announced that humans are the enemy, and that they must be eradicated en masse in the name of mother nature.

From websites that tell children to commit suicide after they have used their allotted amount of CO2, to award-winning cartoons that depict humans as a deadly virus upon the planet, bloodthirsty eugenicists have re-emerged with their sick rhetoric couched in the righteous cause of environmentalism.

The most disturbing aspect of the poster campaign is that it is sponsored by the United Nations. The fact that powerful globalist organizations who view humanity as an evil plague upon the earth are also crafting policies around the fraudulent premise of global warming that are already devastating poorer countries is frightening.

As we highlighted recently, measures introduced in the name of cutting CO2 emissions are already killing millions of people in the third world, with a doubling in food prices as a result of the introduction of biofuels causing mass starvation and death.

The entire climate change takeover is being spearheaded by self-hating psychotics who want to impose a global one child policy in the name of curbing overpopulation. As we have vehemently proven, the overpopulation hype is a debunked myth with no basis in reality. The real reason global eugenicists want to implement such policies, along with taxing the life-giving gas carbon dioxide, is because it would give them absolute control over every single aspect of our lives – a control freak’s utopia.

The propagandistic method of depicting humans as the enemy is perfectly tailored to this agenda, because it elicits the response of making people call for their own kind to be regulated, controlled, and even killed under the contrived pretext of preventing an ecological apocalypse.

The global elite resolved to take this approach back in 1991 when the Club of Rome, a powerful globalist NGO committed to limiting growth and ushering in a post-industrial society, said in their report, The First Global Revolution, “In searching for a new enemy to unite us, we came up with the idea that pollution, the threat of global warming, water shortages, famine and the like would fit the bill…. All these dangers are caused by human intervention… The real enemy, then, is humanity itself.”

The decision to make humans the culprit of the manufactured global warming crisis is now manifesting itself on every level, with the EPA declaring the gas that we all exhale as a threat to public health, and the United Nations attempting to ram through an agreement in Copenhagen that would impose taxes on financial transactions and GDP that would go straight into the coffers of the World Bank and the IMF – bankrolling the implementation of what contrived climate fearmongering was always geared towards achieving – a one world government and a new world order.

Pope Speaks on Church’s “Grave Misgivings” about Modern Environmentalism

Gordon Brown: Hurricanes, Floods, Typhoons, Droughts Are All Acts Of Man

The Anti-Human Mindset Of Environmentalists

 



Climate Cultists Assault Global Warming Skeptic

Climate Cultists Assault Global Warming Skeptic on Live TV

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dqZRmsYszn4

 

McAleer’s Inconvenient Question to Al Gore

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1FtFsRQ7SCQ

U.N. Kicks-Out Journalist For Asking ClimateGate Question

 



The Anti-Human Mindset Of Environmentalists

The Anti-Human Mindset Of Environmentalists

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oe4A-TvtR4g

 

Wa Post Columnist Decries eugenicist mindset on climate change

Anne Applebaum
Washington Post
December 15, 2009

There is no nihilism like the nihilism of a 9-year-old. “Why should I bother,” one of them recently demanded of me, when he was presented with the usual arguments in favor of doing homework: “By the time I’m grown up, the polar ice caps will have melted and everyone will have drowned.”

Watching the news from Copenhagen last weekend, it wasn’t hard to understand where he got that idea. Among the tens of thousands demonstrating outside the climate change summit, some were carrying giant clocks set at 10 minutes to midnight, indicating the imminent end of the world. Elsewhere, others staged a “resuscitation” of planet Earth, symbolically represented by a large collapsing balloon. Near the conference center, an installation of skeletons standing knee-deep in water made a similar point, as did numerous melting ice sculptures and a melodramatic “die-in” staged by protesters wearing white, ghost-like jumpsuits.

Danish police arrested about a thousand people on Saturday for smashing windows and burning cars, and on Sunday arrested 200 more (they were carrying gas masks and seem to have been planning to shut down the city harbor). Nevertheless, in the long run it is those peaceful demonstrators, the ones who say the end is nigh, who have the capacity to do the most psychological damage.

[…]

Over the years there have been many radical statements of this latter creed. In the infamous words of a National Park Service ecologist, “We have become a plague upon ourselves and upon the Earth. . . . Until such time as Homo sapiens should decide to rejoin nature, some of us can only hope for the right virus to come along.” A former leader of People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals once declared that “humans have grown like a cancer; we’re the biggest blight on the face of the earth.” But it is a mistake to think that this is the language of only a crazy fringe.

Read Full Article Here

Alex Jones to Climate Cultists and Eugenicists: KILL YOURSELF FIRST

 



California considers ban on big-screen TV’s

California considers ban on big-screen TV’s
Energy-consumption standards for televisions to be phased in over two years beginning in January 2011. A vote could come as early as Nov. 4

Examiner
October 14, 2009

In a recent report from the Los Angeles Times, it appears that California is about to take yet another choice away from its residents. Big Screen T.V.’s are apparently such a power drainer, that the legislators in California are working on legislation that would make them illegal to operate. What is the estimated annual cost of operating a big screen t.v. in your house? About $30 according to the Los Angeles Times.

Meanwhile, industry lobbyists are fighting to get this legislation revoked from the state government, saying that the free market is actually eliminating the t.v.’s in question and replacing them with more energy efficient LCD and Plasma models. Their cries are apparently falling on deaf ears though, as the legislators in California are still pushing this needless bill through.

While the proposed bill would unlikely create much additional cost to the manufacturers, who are already, primarily creating only the LCD and Plasma t.v.’s, there are two costs to consumers. The first cost is simply the cost of having to replace the older t.v. While a lot of people are already doing this, not everyone can afford to. The second cost is to the freedom for the people of California to choose what kind of television they want to own. This is just another loss of another freedom.

I suspect, that with laws like this being even considered, that there must not be enough crime to write laws about in California. It seems that California legislators are focusing more attention on buzz word laws such as gay marriage, and green energy. Bare in mind, it was also California legislators that put a stop to the electric car. I guess they are just making up for lost time.

Read Full Article Here

 



Greenpeace Leader Admits Arctic Ice Exaggeration

Greenpeace Leader Admits Arctic Ice Exaggeration

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NC7bE9jopXE

About Human Caused Global Warming – Another Malthusian Fraud

Global Warming Hoax News Archive

 



Obama Will Declare CO2 a “Dangerous Pollutant”

If Elected Obama Will Declare CO2 a “Dangerous Pollutant”

Kurt Nimmo
Infowars
October 17, 2008

In an interview with Bloomberg’s Jim Efstathiou Jr., Barack Obama’s energy adviser, Jason Grumet, said if elected Obama will classify carbon dioxide as a dangerous pollutant. Obama will tell the Environmental Protection Agency that it may use the 1990 Clean Air Act to set emissions limits, according to Grumet, and he will likely do this immediately upon taking office, David Bookbinder, chief climate counsel for the Sierra Club told Bloomberg.

“The U.S. has to move quickly domestically so we can get back in the game internationally,” Grumet said. In other words, an Obama administration would impose draconian carbon emission regulations on the American people and “help clear the deadlock in talks on an international agreement to slow global warming,” according to Rajendra Pachauri, head of a United Nation panel of climate-change scientists. Negotiators from almost 200 countries will meet in December in Poznan, Poland, to discuss ways to limit CO2, that is to say they will work on a global carbon taxation structure.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pVmk3lUYdPA

A global carbon tax is not so much about limiting CO2 as it is a scheme designed to pay for world government and corporate globalization. “The Climate Change Control Bill strongly supported by Obama calls for an international governing regime to monitor and regulate carbon dioxide and ‘carbon footprints’ from discovery, to production, to consumption at a cost of $50 trillion globally and at a cost of $8 trillion for US taxpayers, all to be paid for by a global tax, whose monies will be used to establish a world government body,” writes Patrick Briley.

Obama has worked closely on this global taxation and world government scam under the cover of environmentalism with Zbigniew Brzezinski, Al Gore, and former communist leader Mikhail Gorbachev, an advocate of the so-called Earth Charter and the author of Manifesto for Earth. Brzezinski co-founded the Trilateral Commission with David Rockefeller in 1973. Rockefeller and fellow globalist Maurice Strong of Canada were instrumental in the creation of the Earth Charter. As noted above, the Sierra Club will play a decisive role in Obama’s administration. The organization takes money from the Rockefeller Brothers Fund and is closely aligned with the United Nations Environmental Program. Strong was UNEP’s first executive director.

It is a well documented fact the environmental movement receives huge disbursements from chartered institutions such as the Rockefeller Foundation, Ford Foundation, W. Alton Jones Foundation, Turner Foundation, The Pew Charitable Trusts, the David and Lucille Packard Foundation, the Alfred W. Mellon Foundation, and others, including Bill and Melinda Gates, the Heinz family and the Carnegie Corporation. It is no mistake foundation funded environmental groups are now calling for a global carbon tax structure and an international governing regime to monitor and regulate carbon dioxide, as this serves the plan of their masters well.

An Obama administration will kick this scheme into warp drive and hasten the implementation of a world government of the sort members of the global elite have worked toward for many years. A phony environmental crisis, with carbon emissions playing the role as chief villain, is a perfect storm for the global elite. “We are on the verge of a global transformation,” David Rockefeller once quipped. “All we need is the right major crisis and the nations will accept the New World Order.”

 

France: Turmoil Must Not Affect Climate Change Bill

AP
October 21, 2008

France and Germany urged smaller European Union economies not to use the world financial meltdown as an excuse to gut legislation that aims to combat global warming with deep cuts in greenhouse gas emissions.

French Environment Minister Jean-Louis Borloo said at an EU environment ministers’ meeting that “the European Union must keep its leadership role” in climate change to nudge the United States and others into a global deal on slashing emissions.

The bill, which aims to cut EU greenhouse gas emissions 20 percent by 2020, is to be adopted in December. The EU hopes it will lead to a deal that month at UN climate negotiations in Poznan, Poland.

“We cannot afford to delay,” German Environment Minister Sigmar Gabriel said.

In last-minute objections, Italy said the bill would hurt its industries because Chinese and US competitors face no equivalent emission burdens. Italian officials pushed for a clause that would force the European Commission to do a new cost analysis of the climate change bill in 2009.

Poland, Hungary, Romania, Bulgaria, Slovakia, Latvia, Lithuania and Estonia say they have already made great cuts in carbon emissions since emerging from communism.

Borloo said “there was a very strong willingness” to work toward a deal by December.” But, he added, “the financial markets crisis must not delay this. The EU must keep its leadership role or there will be no point in going to Poznan.”

The financial turmoil has triggered fears of a global recession that would make governments less eager to get major polluters such as energy generators, steel makers and cement producers to pay billions into a cap-and-trade emissions scheme.

The EU cap-and-trade program could impose up to 50 billion euros ($68.8 billion) a year in polluter fees.

EU Environment Commissioner Stavros Dimas said critics exaggerated the costs.

“Approving the EU bill in December will be consistent with tackling the financial crisis,” because it will promote investments in clean energy, creating jobs and easing the EU’s dependence on oil imports, he said.

The European Commission estimates the cost of the climate change bill at 0.5 percent of the bloc’s gross national product by 2020.

 

Eco-Surveillance Agents To Scan Homes

London Guardian
October 23, 2008

Essential surveillance kit for the new green police: the Energy Saving Partnership has taken out a patent on Heatseekers, thermo-imaging vehicles which, at full potential, have the capacity to identify 1,000 properties an hour, or 5,000 properties a night, that are leaking carbon.

“Once the property has been scanned, a dedicated team of energy advisers will visit householders to show them the thermal image scan of their homes,” says Inspector Knock-on-the-Door.

That’ll go down well after midnight.

Hidden Carbon Tax Provisions in Paulson’s Bailout 2.0
http://newsbusters.org/blogs/matthe..vision-paulson-s-bailout-2-0

Eco bulbs emit skin-damaging UV radiation, health experts warn
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/..V-radiation-health-experts-warn.html

Dim Bulbs: Those Squiggly “Green” Light Bulbs Could Hurt the Environment, Study Says
http://blogs.wsj.com/environm..hurt-the-environment-study-says/

Global Warming? Blizzards forecast as temperature set to drop lower than Siberia
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/..iberia–wonder-swans-staying-there.html

Record Low Temperatures Hit America
http://www.prisonplanet.com/..-low-temperatures-hit-america.html

WWF Resorts To Deception In Climate Fearmongering
http://www.prisonplanet.co..eption-in-climate-fearmongering.html

Spotless Sun: Blankest Year of the Space Age
http://science.nasa.gov/headlines/y2008/30sep_blankyear.htm?list878321

Traditional lightbulbs banned by EU
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/world..-banned-by-EU.html

Global Cooling: Alaskan Glaciers Grow For First Time In 250 Years
http://www.prisonplanet.com/global-cooling-a..n-250-years.html

Global Warming Hoax Archive

 



Jury Clears Greenpeace For Damaging Coal-Fired Station

Jury Clears Greenpeace For Damaging Coal-Fired Station

Michael McCarthy
London Independent
September 11, 2008

The threat of global warming is so great that campaigners were justified in causing more than £35,000 worth of damage to a coal-fired power station, a jury decided yesterday. In a verdict that will have shocked ministers and energy companies the jury at Maidstone Crown Court cleared six Greenpeace activists of criminal damage.

Jurors accepted defence arguments that the six had a “lawful excuse” to damage property at Kingsnorth power station in Kent to prevent even greater damage caused by climate change. The defence of “lawful excuse” under the Criminal Damage Act 1971 allows damage to be caused to property to prevent even greater damage – such as breaking down the door of a burning house to tackle a fire.

The not-guilty verdict, delivered after two days and greeted with cheers in the courtroom, raises the stakes for the most pressing issue on Britain’s green agenda and could encourage further direct action.

Kingsnorth was the centre for mass protests by climate camp activists last month. Last year, three protesters managed to paint Gordon Brown’s name on the plant’s chimney. Their handi-work cost £35,000 to remove.

The plan to build a successor to the power station is likely to be the first of a new generation of coal-fired plants. As coal produces more of the carbon emissions causing climate change than any other fuel, campaigners claim that a new station would be a disastrous setback in the battle against global warming, and send out a negative signal to the rest of the world about how serious Britain really is about tackling the climate threat.

Read Full Article Here

‘Environmental volunteers’ will be encouraged to spy on their neighbours
http://www.prisonplanet.com/envi..-on-their-neighbours.html

Global Cooling? Unprecedented Ice Storms In Kenya
http://www.prisonplanet.com/secret-ge..onmental-dangers.html

Secret “Geo-Engineering” Projects Threaten Unknown Environmental Dangers
http://www.prisonplanet.com/s..own-environmental-dangers.html

Climate Scientists: Use Spaceships To Block Out The Sun
http://www.prisonplanet.com/c..ps-to-block-out-the-sun.html

“An Inconvenient Truth” movie exaggerated sea level rise
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/e..l=/earth/2008/09/04/scigore104.xml

WWF Blames Global Cooling On “Carbon Pollution”
http://infowars.net/articles/September2008/030908Cooling.htm

Environment Minister calls global warming fears ‘hysterical psuedo-religion’…
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/northern_ireland/7599810.stm

Global Warming Hoax News Archive

 



Penn & Teller: Bullshit! – Being Green

Penn & Teller: Bullshit! – Being Green

Crackdown On Bottling Plant Over Climate Change
http://cbs13.com/local/nestle.bottling.plant.2.782999.html

Arnold Vetoes Mandatory Global Warming Classes
http://www.mercurynews.com/politics/ci_10010291?nclick_check=1

British Kids Encouraged To Become “Climate Cops”
http://www.prisonplanet.com/british-kids-..-become-climate-cops.html

Western Governors Propose Carbon Tax Plan
http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20..ylt=AhwHbLoegTJ_LIdURyZ2DSdH2ocA

UN Chief: Human Race Faces Oblivion from Global Warming
http://www.naturalnews.com/023687.html

Global Warming Hoax News Archive

 



50,000 Scientists Disbelieve Global Warming

50,000 Scientists Disbelieve Global Warming

Daily Tech
July 17, 2008

Related: APS warned not to debate global warming

The American Physical Society, an organization representing nearly 50,000 physicists, has reversed its stance on climate change and is now proclaiming that many of its members disbelieve in human-induced global warming. The APS is also sponsoring public debate on the validity of global warming science. The leadership of the society had previously called the evidence for global warming “incontrovertible.”

In a posting to the APS forum, editor Jeffrey Marque explains,”There is a considerable presence within the scientific community of people who do not agree with the IPCC conclusion that anthropogenic CO2 emissions are very probably likely to be primarily responsible for global warming that has occurred since the Industrial Revolution.”

The APS is opening its debate with the publication of a paper by Lord Monckton of Brenchley, which concludes that climate sensitivity — the rate of temperature change a given amount of greenhouse gas will cause — has been grossly overstated by IPCC modeling. A low sensitivity implies additional atmospheric CO2 will have little effect on global climate.

Larry Gould, Professor of Physics at the University of Hartford and Chairman of the New England Section of the APS, called Monckton’s paper an “expose of the IPCC that details numerous exaggerations and “extensive errors”

In an email to DailyTech, Monckton says, “I was dismayed to discover that the IPCC’s 2001 and 2007 reports did not devote chapters to the central ’climate sensitivity’ question, and did not explain in proper, systematic detail the methods by which they evaluated it. When I began to investigate, it seemed that the IPCC was deliberately concealing and obscuring its method.”

According to Monckton, there is substantial support for his results, “in the peer-reviewed literature, most articles on climate sensitivity conclude, as I have done, that climate sensitivity must be harmlessly low.”

Monckton, who was the science advisor to Britain’s Thatcher administration, says natural variability is the cause of most of the Earth’s recent warming. “In the past 70 years the Sun was more active than at almost any other time in the past 11,400 years … Mars, Jupiter, Neptune’s largest moon, and Pluto warmed at the same time as Earth.”

 

Global Warming Conclusively Debunked As Gore Calls For CO2 Tax
The seven graphs that dispel alarmist claims about climate change

Paul Joseph Watson
Prison Planet
July 18, 2008

Related: Gore lets his mask slip : Tax the poor more than the rich

The world is cooling, sea levels are falling, ice is spreading, there are fewer extreme weather events, and it was hotter 1000 years ago, yet the myth of global warming is providing governments the excuse to micromanage every aspect of our lives, with Al Gore now openly calling for a carbon tax on the energy we use.

Following the end of the Sun’s most active period in over 11,000 years, the last 10 years have displayed a clear cooling trend as temperatures post-1998 leveled out and are now plummeting.

But such figures won’t deter the agenda of control freaks like Al Gore, who last night publicly called for a carbon tax to be imposed on the use of fossil fuels at a time when even middle class families are struggling to pay the bills as a result of a crippled economy, soaring oil prices and inflation.

Andrew Bolt of the Australian Sun-Herald has put together a series of graphs based on numbers from a plethora of scientific bodies to prove that the most alarmist claims about climate change are not only unproven, but in fact the complete opposite of what man-made global warming advocates proclaim is now being observed.

“That’s why 31,000 other scientists, including world figures such as physicist Prof Freeman Dyson, atmospheric physicist Prof Richard Lindzen and climate scientist Prof Fred Singer, issued a joint letter last month warning governments not to jump on board the global warming bandwagon,” writes Bolt.

“There is no convincing scientific evidence that human release of carbon dioxide, methane, or other greenhouse gases is causing or will, in the foreseeable future, cause catastrophic heating of the earth’s atmosphere and disruption of the earth’s climate.”

That’s why Ivar Glaever, who won a Nobel Prize for Physics, this month declared “I am a sceptic”, because “we don’t really know what the actual effect on the climate is”.

And it’s why the American Physical Society this month said “there is a considerable presence within the scientific community of people who do not agree with the (Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change) conclusion that anthropogenic CO2 emissions are very probably likely to be primarily responsible for the global warming that has occurred since the Industrial Revolution.”

The first graph, obtained from the Hadley Centre of Britain’s Meteorological Office, shows how temperatures dropped, leveled off, and are now displaying a clear cooling trend, since their 1998 peak which was caused by the “El Nino” weather phenomenon, which is completely natural and has nothing to do with CO2 emissions.


Click here for full PDF format.

The figures mesh with anecdotal evidence of a cooling pattern – China recently experienced its coldest winter in 100 years while northeast America was hit by record snow levels and Britain suffered its coldest April in decades as late-blooming daffodils were pounded with hail and snow on an almost daily basis. The British summer has also left many yearning for global warming, with temperatures in June and July rarely struggling to get over 16 degrees and on one occasion even dropping as low as 9 degrees in the middle of the afternoon.

A common claim of behalf of Al Gore and the Church of Environmentalism, and one vividly portrayed in the Hollywood movie The Day After Tomorrow, is a predicted catastrophic rise in sea levels as a result of global warming.

In actual fact, figures from the Colorado Centre For Astrodynamics Research show that global sea levels, after having risen since 2000, have been falling significantly over the last 2 years.

In addition, according to the US National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, sea ice has grown rapidly in that same time frame and there is now more ice in the world than usually observed.


Click here for full size PDF of all graphs.

Another common cry from the alarmists is the contention that global warming is causing extreme weather events. Despite there having been far more violent and devastating weather events before the post World War 2 rise in CO2 levels, every flood, hurricane, tornado or cyclone is blamed on human-induced climate change.

The facts tell a different story. According to the American Meteorological Society, global warming hasn’t given us more cyclones, hurricanes, or tornados.

Furthermore, scaremongering about droughts attributed the global warming is disproved by the fact that levels of rainfall have increased.

Hysterical phony environmentalists like to imagine that the world has never been hotter, despite the fact that the planet has violently swung between extremes of temperature for eons.

New figures from the US National Council for Air and Stream Improvement debunk the IPCC’s notoriously controversial “hockey stick” graph and illustrate that the earth was a warmer place 1000 years ago. During such times, farmers in Greenland grew crops and even cultivated vineyards on a land mass that is now over 80% ice covered.

Despite evidence pouring in that the planet has naturally turned course and now embarked on a cooling trend, wild rhetoric, fearmongering, lecturing and bullying about the necessity for us to accept intrusions into our rights of mobility, privacy and behavior in the interests of saving the earth is at an all time high.

Global corporations and governments have joined forces to launch a united propaganda assault about how we must turn “green” while all the real environmental crises – deforestation, GM crops, chemtrails, genetic splicing, and cancer-causing cellphone tower radiation – are completely ignored.

 

Top Rocket Scientist: No Evidence CO2 Causes Global Warming

Paul Joseph Watson
Prison Planet
July 22, 2008

Related: No Smoking Hot Spots

The campaign to force people to accept that “the debate is over” and that man-made CO2 emissions are driving climate change is in deep trouble, with another top global warming advocate – rocket scientist and carbon accounting expert Dr. Richard Evans – completely reversing his position.

Evans was a consultant to the Australian Greenhouse Office from 1999 to 2005 and he wrote the carbon accounting model (FullCAM) that measures Australia’s compliance with the Kyoto Protocol.

In an article for The Australian newspaper, Evans highlights why he was so keen to jump on board the man-made explanation without there being any clear conclusion as to what was driving temperature increases in the period from the end of the 70’s to 1998.

“The evidence was not conclusive, but why wait until we were certain when it appeared we needed to act quickly?” writes Evans. “Soon government and the scientific community were working together and lots of science research jobs were created. We scientists had political support, the ear of government, big budgets, and we felt fairly important and useful (well, I did anyway). It was great. We were working to save the planet.”

“But since 1999 new evidence has seriously weakened the case that carbon emissions are the main cause of global warming, and by 2007 the evidence was pretty conclusive that carbon played only a minor role and was not the main cause of the recent global warming,” he concludes.

Evans points out that the “greenhouse signature” that would indicate CO2 emissions are driving temperature increases – “a hot spot about 10km up in the atmosphere over the tropics” – which would be evident if climate change was man-made, is simply non-existent.

“If there is no hot spot then an increased greenhouse effect is not the cause of global warming. So we know for sure that carbon emissions are not a significant cause of the global warming,” he writes.

Evans highlights data collected from satellites positioned around the globe that indicates temperatures have dropped about 0.6C in the past year – back to 1980 levels. Such figures are complimented by anecdotal evidence of a cooling pattern – China recently experienced its coldest winter in 100 years while northeast America was hit by record snow levels and Britain suffered its coldest April in decades as late-blooming daffodils were pounded with hail and snow on an almost daily basis.

Evans also cites historical climate change and the fact that CO2 does not cause, but in fact lags behind temperature increase by as much as 800 years.

“The new ice cores show that in the past six global warmings over the past half a million years, the temperature rises occurred on average 800 years before the accompanying rise in atmospheric carbon. Which says something important about which was cause and which was effect,” he writes.

“The last point was known and past dispute by 2003, yet Al Gore made his movie in 2005 and presented the ice cores as the sole reason for believing that carbon emissions cause global warming. In any other political context our cynical and experienced press corps would surely have called this dishonest and widely questioned the politician’s assertion,” writes Evans.

Read Full Article Here

 

Two Peer-Reviewed Scientific Papers Debunk CO2 Myth

Paul Joseph Watson
Prison Planet
July 16, 2008

Three top scientists have once again contradicted the claim that a “consensus” exists about man-made global warming with research that indicates CO2 emissions actually cool the atmosphere, in addition to another peer-reviewed paper that documents how the IPCC overstated CO2’s effect on temperature by as much as 2000 per cent.

Professor George Chilingar and Leonid Khilyuk of the University of Southern California, and Oleg Sorokhtin of the Institute of Oceanology of the Russian Academy of Sciences have released a study that they claim completely contradicts the link between CO2 and global temperature increases.

“The writers investigated the effect of CO2 emission on the temperature of atmosphere. Computations based on the adiabatic theory of greenhouse effect show that increasing CO2 concentration in the atmosphere results in cooling rather than warming of the Earth’s atmosphere,” states the preamble to the paper.

The full study, which appears in the Energy Sources journal, is sure to cause ire amongst climate cult adherants.

No global warming has been observed for the past 10 years as temperatures have gradually declined and studies indicate that there will be no further warming for the next 10 years.

In a related development, the peer-reviewed Physics and Society journal has published evidence proving that the UN IPCC’s 2007 climate summary “overstated CO2’s impact on temperature by 500-2000%.”

According to the paper, “Computer models used by the UN’s climate panel (IPCC) were pre-programmed with overstated values for the three variables whose product is “climate sensitivity” (temperature increase in response to greenhouse-gas increase), resulting in a 500-2000% overstatement of CO2’s effect on temperature in the IPCC’s latest climate assessment report, published in 2007.”

The paper also outlines evidence to confirm that Mars, Jupiter, Neptune’s largest moon, and Pluto warmed at the same time as Earth warmed, a factor attributed to the Sun having been more active than at almost any other time in the past 11,400 years.

The paper concludes, “CO2 enrichment will add little more than 1 °F (0.6 °C) to global mean surface temperature by 2100.”

Recent News:

Gore lets his mask slip: Tax the poor more than the rich
http://worldpressnetwork.net/forum/viewtopic.php?f=2&t=349

Propaganda: Eating Less Helps The Environment
http://www.physorg.com/news136028669.html

Propaganda: Population Growth a Bigger Threat Than Global Warming
http://www.canberratimes.com.au..ticks-louder-than-climate/1173782.aspx

Chemical companies making more money gaming the carbon credit system than producing chemicals
http://blogs.wsj.com/environmentalc..game-the-carbon-markets/

Fossil Suggests Antarctica’s Warmer In Past
http://news.yahoo.com/s/livescience/fossilsuggestsantarcticamuchwarmerinpast

Global Warming Enforcement: The New Segregation
http://www.prisonplanet.com/global-w..ement-the-new-segregation.html

Killing Jobs to Save the Climate
http://www.spiegel.de/international/business/0,1518,566441,00.html

Google Trends (US and UK) illustrates the public’s fading interest in global warming
http://tomnelson.blogspot.com/2008/07/google-trends-us-and-uk-illustrates.html

Green Car Tax Will Hit Poor Hardest
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/motoring/ma..ing/2008/07/10/mroadtax410.xml

Propaganda: Scientists examine cow farts to reduce Global Warming
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/n..stic-tank-for-global-warming-study.html

No Smoking Hot Spots
APS warned not to debate global warming
TV Station Censured Over Climate Change Film
Apocalypse? No! – Why there is no Global Warming Crisis
President George Bush: ’Goodbye from the world’s biggest polluter’

Global Warming Hoax News Archive

 



EPA: American lives less valuable

EPA: American lives less valuable

Associated Press
July 11, 2008

It’s not just the American dollar that’s losing value. A government agency has decided that an American life isn’t worth what it used to be.

The “value of a statistical life” is $6.9 million in today’s dollars, the Environmental Protection Agency reckoned in May — a drop of nearly $1 million from just five years ago.

The Associated Press discovered the change after a review of cost-benefit analyses over more than a dozen years.

Though it may seem like a harmless bureaucratic recalculation, the devaluation has real consequences.

When drawing up regulations, government agencies put a value on human life and then weigh the costs versus the lifesaving benefits of a proposed rule. The less a life is worth to the government, the less the need for a regulation, such as tighter restrictions on pollution.

Read Full Article Here

 



9 Million Brits to Pay Road Tax

9 Million Brits to Pay Road Tax

EE Times
July 9, 2008

Almost half of all car owners will be up to £245 worse off under plans for massive increases in road tax, the Treasury admitted yesterday.

And fewer than one in five will benefit from the controversial move, which was sold as a way to cut greenhouse gas emissions.

The Government’s own figures demolish ministers’ claims that Budget plans to overhaul vehicle excise duty will have little impact on motorists.

In the Commons last month, Gordon Brown said: ‘The majority of drivers will benefit from it.’

But in an apparent contradiction yesterday, Treasury minister Angela Eagle admitted to MPs that from April 2010 it will cost more to keep 43 per cent of all cars on the road – some 9,423,450 vehicles.

More than one million drivers of cars registered between 2001 and 2006 will see road tax jump from £210 to either £430 or £455 depending on emissions, while others face hikes of between £10 and £155.

Read Full Article Here

 

Brown accused of ’misleading’ MPs over car tax increases

This is London
July 10, 2008

Gordon Brown came under pressure to apologise today after being accused of ’misleading’ MPs over the Government’s controversial new car tax scheme.

The Treasury was forced to admit this morning that almost half of all car owners will be up to £245 worse off under plans for massive increases in road tax.

And fewer than one in five will benefit from the controversial move, which was sold as a way to cut greenhouse gas emissions.

At Commons question time Shadow chancellor George Osborne challenged the Prime Minster over his claims the ’majority’ of drivers would be better off.

Osbourne said:’“Gordon Brown appears to have misled Parliament.

’He said that the majority of drivers would benefit from the changes to VED.

’Now even the Treasury have admitted that just a third of drivers will be better off in 2009, dropping to less than 20 per cent in 2010.’

’Will the Prime Minister be apologising to this House?’ asked Osborne.

Chancellor Alistair Darling said the majority would ’pay no more’ as a result of the change.

But Mr Osborne maintained his attack and said: ’Nine million families face higher car taxes at a time that few can afford it.

’Poorer drivers will be penalised because the tax is retrospective and hits drivers of older cars.’

Read Full Article Here

 

Air fares set for dramatic rise under EU emissions scheme

UK Daily Mail
July 8, 2008

The European Parliament on Tuesday approved a proposal to include airlines in the bloc’s strategy to cut carbon dioxide emissions – a move that could dramatically raise the cost of air travel and provoke a dispute with the United States.

Under the plan, all flights starting or landing in the EU, including intercontinental flights, will be included in the EU’s emission trading system from 2012.

Pollution permits granted to airlines initially would be capped at 97 per cent of their average emissions for 2004-2006.

From 2013, the cap would drop to 95 per cent. Eighty-five per cent of those emission certificates will be allocated for free, while the rest will be auctioned.

Airlines that want to fly – and pollute – more will buy more permits But they are likely to pass the cost of the permit on to passengers.

The United States believes the Europeans have no right to force airlines using European air space to participate in their emissions caps program and prefers a voluntary agreement among nations.

Read Full Article Here

Theoretical physicist: Global warming skeptics are not anti-environment
http://online.wsj.com/article/SB12..19.html?mod=googlenews_wsj

Doomed to a fatal delusion over climate change
http://www.news.com.au/heraldsu..991257-25717,00.html

Higher CO2 levels may be good for plants (no really?)
http://www.breitbart.com/article.ph..8.8nen8ib9&show_article=1

G8: Half CO2 Emissions By 2050
http://news.yahoo.com/s/afp/..eWa0NGZ20rx9W02ROrgF

Cars In CA To Display Global Warming Score
http://www.greenbiz.com/news..-california-global-warming-score

EU moves to cut back target on biofuel use
http://www.iht.com/articles/2008/07/07/business/fuel.php?page=1

Propaganda: Earth begins to kill people for changing its climate
http://english.pravda.ru/science/earth/105690-earth-0

Global Warming Hoax News Archive

 



Population Control: The Eugenics Connection

Population Control: The Eugenics Connection

Old Thinker News
June 24, 2008

Has eugenics faded away with time, or has the pseudo science morphed and cloaked itself under new auspices? Were some of the original founders of population control efforts themselves eugenicists? How and when did eugenicists shift from Galton era ideals to Malthusian population control?

Ted Turner: World Needs a ’Voluntary’ One-Child Policy for the Next Hundred Years
http://noworldsystem.com/2008/05/13/te..opulation-control/

Kissinger’s Plan For Food Control Genocide
http://www.tehrantimes.com/index_View.asp?code=165442

Official Movie: ENDGAME – Blueprint for Global Enslavement
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=1070329053600562261

Science Chief: Cut Birthrate To Save Earth
http://observer.guardian.co.uk/uk_news/story/0,,2132089,00.html

BABY TAXES Needed to Save Planet
http://www.news.com.au/story/0,23599,22896334-2,00.html

China Says One-Child Policy Helps Protect Climate
http://www.reuters.com/artic..va._techs_response&sp=true

 



Globalists Want a Tax on Television and Video Games

Globalists Want a Tax on Television and Video Games

Kut Nimmo
Truth News
January 23, 2008

David Rockefeller, Maurice Strong, and the Earth Summit folks, including the United Nations Environmental Program, want to tax your television and video games.

“The Sierra Club is proposing a tax on video games and televisions with the proceeds going to programs that encourage families to get kids off of the couch and into the mountains,” reports KOB, New Mexico. “Mike Casaus of the Sierra Club says families hiking a mountain trail together are becoming scarce as childhood diabetes and obesity is soaring, which is why the organization is proposing the one-percent tax.”

In other words, you’re too stupid and lazy to do anything about your diabetes and obesity and yet another tax will get you motivated. Of course, the state doesn’t care if you’re overweight, it is simply looking for another excuse to fleece you. Mike Casaus of the Sierra Club might be distressed at the lack of mountain hikers, but you can bet the people behind the Sierra Club couldn’t care less.

It’s all about the global agenda, not your waistline. Maurice Strong served as director of the International Union for the Conservation of Nature (IUCN) and over the years the IUCN has connived with the Sierra Club, National Audubon, National Wildlife Federation, Nature Conservancy, Natural Resources Defense Council, Environmental Defense Fund, etc., to impose a globalists agenda on us, the witless commoners.

 



Alex Jones Exposes the Global Warming Scam

Alex Jones : U.N. Population Control & Global Warming Scam!

http://youtube.com/watch?v=b5fSm6Opo2M

Global Warming Hoax News Archive

 



Vote Coming On Carbon Credit Enslavement Bill

Vote Coming On Carbon Credit Enslavement Bill

Baltimore Sun
December 4, 2007

A U.S. Senate committee is scheduled for an historic vote on a global warming bill this week, perhaps as early as Wednesday. Environmental groups are planning a flurry of press conferences tomorrow (12/4/2007) to try to influence the vote.

Meanwhile, in Maryland, Gov. Martin O’Malley’s advisory Commission on Climate Change is scheduled to meet tomorrow to discuss possible steps to reduce the state’s greenhouse gas emmissions. The 22-member goup, headed by state Environmental Secretary Shari T. Wilson, is looking to recommend that the state adopt laws to cut greenhouse gases by 25 percent by 2020, and then move aggressively to slash the pollutants by 90 percent by 2050, according to a draft report. To achieve these goals, the state should tighten its energy efficiency standards, strengthen building codes, require more clean energy generation, among other steps.

“As a coastal state with extensive low-lying land on the Eastern Shore and around the Chesapeake Bay, Maryland is exceeded only by Louisiana, Florida and Delaware in the percentage of its land vulnerable to accelerated sea level rise,” the draft report warns.

On the Federal level, the U.S. Senate Environment and Public Works Committee on Wednesday is expected to debate amendments to a bill proposed by Sens. Lieberman of Connecticut and Warner of Virginia that would create a “cap and trade” system designed to cut total U.S. greenhouse-gas emissions. These systems require industries to pay fees when they emit carbon dioxide or other greenhouses gases above a set limit, with the money going to reward cleaner businesses.

Sen. Ben Cardin of Maryland is a co-sponsor of the bill. A group of Maryland environmental groups recently wrote a letter to Cardin (see below) urging him to strengthen the bill. They praise the proposal as a good first step, but they want to end the bill’s free giveaway of pollution credits to power companies and amend the legislation to create a more aggressive target of an 80 percent cut by 2050.

“This is the first time ever a Senate commitee is voting on a global warming bill, and that’s historic,” said Brad Heavner, director of Environment Maryland. “There is some reasonable expectation that this will get to the floor, but the big question is will it get stronger or weaker?….We think it needs to be stronger.”

As this blog reported last month, Europe tried a pollution credit trading system to curb carbon dioxide emissions after it passed the Kyoto Protocol in 1997, and power companies worked the system to make billions in profits. Electricity customers paid higher bills, thinking they were contributing to a cooler planet. But their money just went into the pockets of the electric companies, which didn’t end up actually cutting down on their carbon dioxide emissions.

On the other side of the political spectrum from these environmental groups, most Republicans on the committee are unlikely to vote in favor of the bill’s current requirements, according to the online journal Grist.

“Right now, there’s little reason to expect that any Republican on the committee other than John Warner (R-Va.) himself will vote for it. Sen. Lamar Alexander (R-Tenn.) spoke critically of it at the first subcommittee hearing last week, and Sen. George Voinovich (R-Ohio) took to the podium of the National Press Club two days later to pillory the bill.

Voinovich said: ‘I have significant reservations about the bill. I have recently heard the concerns of a variety of constituents, including both industry and labor representatives, who are especially concerned that the bill presents an overly aggressive first phase of emissions reductions that will hit well before we can reasonably expect commercially available technologies to deal with the problem.’

Without the support of more Republicans, it’s unclear if the measure will make it out of the full Senate — not to mention survive a veto by President Bush, if he chose to use that power.

Meanwhile, the nonprofit Pew Center on Global Climate Change is releasing a report tomorrow on the impact of global warming on the Chesapeake Bay. Environment Maryland tomorrow morning is releasing a report on changes in local rainfall expected because of climate change.

Related News:

S 2191: The Carbon Credit Enslavement System
http://www.roguegovernment.com/news.php?id=5188

John Stossel Exposes Global Warming on 20/20
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_FI0U5JOtoo

Fall in weather deaths dents climate hysteria warnings
http://www.sott.net/articles/s…nts-climate-hysteria-warnings

Blast from the past? Coldest winter in 15 years, Environment Canada says
http://www.cbc.ca/canada/story/2007/11/30/winter-forecast.html

Global Warming Hoax News Archive

 



John Stossel Exposes Global Warming on 20/20

John Stossel Exposes Global Warming on 20/20

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_FI0U5JOtoo

Related News:

Fall in weather deaths dents climate hysteria warnings
http://www.sott.net/articles/s…nts-climate-hysteria-warnings

Blast from the past? Coldest winter in 15 years, Environment Canada says
http://www.cbc.ca/canada/story/2007/11/30/winter-forecast.html

S 2191: The Carbon Credit Enslavement System
http://www.roguegovernment.com/news.php?id=5188

Self Sterilization To Fight Climate Change
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/pages/….ge_id=1879

The truth about global warming – it’s the Sun that’s to blame
U.S. Reduced CO2 Emissions in 2006
Bush and Gore reunited at the White House
World Must Fix Climate In Less Than 10 Years: UN
McCain Takes On Global Warming
Mankind Supposedly Shortening Universe’s Life
San Francisco Mulls Banning Fireplaces
Carbon Tax Bill Could Hit Senate Floor
Weather Channel Founder: Global Warming ‘Greatest Scam in History’
Who Is Hoaxing The Global Warming Skeptics?
Gore: No Equal Time For Non Believers
Myth of ‘thousands’ of UNIPCC climate scientists
Climate change is like ‘World War Three’
Bloomberg Calls for Tax on Carbon Emissions
Al Gore’s ‘nine Inconvenient Untruths’
The deceit behind global warming
Think Tank: Climate Affects Security
Keeping People Poor And Stupid For the Environment

Global Warming Hoax News Archive

 



Global Warming Enslavement Bill Advances

Global Warming Enslavement Bill Advances

AP
November 1, 2007

WASHINGTON – Lawmakers took the first step Thursday on a bipartisan global warming bill that would impose mandatory cuts in greenhouse gases from power plants, industrial facilities and transportation.

Sen. Joe Lieberman, I-Conn., pushed the legislation out of his global warming subcommittee by a 4-3 vote, agreeing to a number of changes aimed primarily at garnering the needed majority to advance it.

The bill calls for setting limits on carbon dioxide and other greenhouse gases that are emitted from power plants, refineries, factories and motor fuels. Polluters could exceed the limits by buying credits from companies whose emissions are under their allowable ceiling.

Lieberman called the vote “potentially a landmark event, the moment at which the United States finally began a serious fight against the threat of unchecked global warming.”

Approval of the bipartisan legislation, whose co-sponsor is Sen. John Warner, R-Va., had been expected, but not without some early horse-trading for votes.

Sen. Frank Lautenberg, D-N.J., who favors more aggressive cuts in greenhouse gases, agreed to support the bill after additional emission reductions from natural gas use were included. Earlier, Sen. Max Baucus, D-Mont., was persuaded to support the measure when changes were made in the bill to help farmers.

Voting against the bill were Sens. John Barrasso, R-Wyo., Johnny Isakson, R-Ga., and Bernard Sanders, I-Vt.

The full Senate Environment and Public Works Committee plans to take up the bill in coming weeks, when its chairman, Sen. Barbara Boxer, D-Calif., is expected to seek greater greenhouse gas cuts.

Some Republicans complain the emission requirements may already be too stringent, especially in earlier years when carbon dioxide, the leading greenhouse gas, would have to be cut by at least 15 percent by 2020.

Sen. George Voinovich, R-Ohio, said earlier this week the bill will have trouble getting the 60 votes need to overcome an expected filibuster on the Senate floor unless there is an easing of the early-year requirements.

Many environmental groups support the legislation, but some environmentalists argue that it gives too much of a break to coal-burning power plants, a major source of carbon dioxide.

 



Power Plant Rejected Over CO2

Power Plant Rejected Over CO2

Washington Post

October 19, 2007

The Kansas Department of Health and Environment yesterday became the first government agency in the United States to cite carbon dioxide emissions as the reason for rejecting an air permit for a proposed coal-fired electricity generating plant, saying that the greenhouse gas threatens public health and the environment.

The decision marks a victory for environmental groups that are fighting proposals for new coal-fired plants around the country. It may be the first of a series of similar state actions inspired by a Supreme Court decision in April that asserted that greenhouse gases such as carbon dioxide should be considered pollutants under the Clean Air Act.

Read Full Article Here