noworldsystem.com


Ted Turner Wants You Dead To Solve Global Warming

Ted Turner Wants You Dead To Solve Global Warming

Rogue Government
April 5, 2009


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AEfPEtCAcp4

Ted Turner the largest U.S. land owner and wealthy media mogul has stated yet again during a PBS interview with Charlie Rose that the world’s population needs to be reduced. Turner also used the interview as an opportunity to continue the non stop irrational fear mongering of global warming. He stated that if something isn’t done about global warming that people would soon be forced to resort to cannibalism. Turner also stated that he believes that global warming is directly related to the fact that there are too many people on the planet using too much stuff. Therefore, to fight global warming you’d need to have a dramatic reduction in population. As ridiculous as his comments are, this is nothing new from Turner. Turner has promoted eugenics driven policies like one and two-child policies for many years and has consistently touted the virtues of global government through the United Nations (UN). For Turner, it doesn’t matter that the UN has consistently made problems it supposedly attempts to resolve, worse. This is because for Turner and the global elite it is about control. What better way for the rulers of the planet like Turner to gain more control by reducing the world’s population through eugenics and implementing a global carbon tax that will further their aims for a one world government. The proposed solution to solve the phony problem of global warming by the elites has always been the implementation of a global carbon tax. The carbon tax will simply serve as a way to extract wealth from the poor and middle class of the world and into the hands of the elite. These are the true aims of Turner and the individuals who seek to build this New World Order enslavement system through the promotion of the global warming scam. Simply put, Turner and the elites want you dead and they want to implement their population reduction plans under the guise of saving the planet.

Below is taken from the Atlanta Journal Constitution’s report on Turner’s recent comments.

If steps aren’t taken to stem global warming, “We’ll be eight degrees hotter in 30 or 40 years and basically none of the crops will grow,” Turner said during a wide-ranging, hour-long interview with PBS’s Charlie Rose that aired Tuesday.

“Most of the people will have died and the rest of us will be cannibals,” said Turner, 69. “Civilization will have broken down. The few people left will be living in a failed state — like Somalia or Sudan — and living conditions will be intolerable.”

One way to combat global warming, Turner said, is to stabilize the population.

“We’re too many people; that’s why we have global warming,” he said. “Too many people are using too much stuff.”

Turner suggested that “on a voluntary basis, everybody in the world’s got to pledge to themselves that one or two children is it.”

First off, there is no hard scientific evidence indicating that global warming is being caused by man’s activities on this planet. In fact, global warming might not even be occurring at all. Many scientists dispute the claims of Al Gore and other people that have been promoting this theory of global warming and that man is causing it through their activities. There have also been reports of planets in the solar system warming in conjunction with the Earth getting warmer indicating that this is the result of solar activity. In the 1970s, the hysteria of global cooling and the coming ice age was heavily reported on and now only 30 years later, we see the hysteria of global warming. There’s absolutely no way that the threat of global warming can be taken seriously considering this information but that doesn’t stop Turner from promoting the global warming fraud. It is simply an excuse to implement their mass eugenics based extermination programs.

Turner has been at the forefront of promoting eugenics and the threat of phony environmental problems for quite sometime. Back in the 1990s, Turner who was unsatisfied with the original Ten Commandments released his own Ten Voluntary Initiatives as a replacement. Although some of his initiatives sound reasonable, it is clear that Turner’s intention with these initiatives is to promote the virtues of population reduction, governance by the United Nations to solve all of our problems and the new age religion of earth worship that is being promoted heavily by the elites. Turner’s Ten Voluntary Initiatives are listed below.

1. I promise to have love and respect for the planet earth and living things thereon, especially my fellow species–humankind.

2. I promise to treat all persons everywhere with dignity, respect, and friendliness.

3. I promise to have no more than two children, or no more than my nation suggests.

4. I promise to use my best efforts to save what is left of our natural world in its untouched state and to restore damaged or destroyed areas where practical.

5. I pledge to use as little nonrenewable resources as possible.

6. I pledge to use as little toxic chemicals, pesticides, and other poisons as possible and to work for their reduction by others.

7. I promise to contribute to those less fortunate than myself, to help them become self-sufficient and enjoy the benefits of a decent life, including clean air and water, adequate food and health care, housing, education, and individual rights.

8. I reject the use of force, in particular military force, and back United Nations arbitration of international disputes.

9. I support the total elimination of all nuclear, chemical, and biological weapons of mass destruction.

10. I support the United Nations and its efforts to collectively improve the conditions of the planet.

Also during the 1990s, Turner was responsible for the launch of the propaganda laced cartoon series Captain Planet. Turner claimed that he launched the cartoon as a way to make children aware of the environmental problems that the planet is facing. In reality, Captain Planet was a way to indoctrinate the youth of the world into the pagan concepts of earth worship as well as the New World Order. In the cartoon series, Gaia the spirit of earth can no longer stand the destruction of the planet and gives five special rings to young people around the world. The five young people represented the elemental powers of fire, wind, water, earth and heart each of which came from a different region of the world. Together, the powers allowed them to summon Captain Planet to battle the evil polluters of the world. There is no doubt that Turner sought to use this cartoon in order to indoctrinate young people into the environmental agenda that the global elite would be pushing much more aggressively later.

Back in 1996, Turner stated in an interview with Audubon Magazine that a 95% population reduction would be ideal. Below is his quote.

“A total population of 250-300 million people, a 95% decline from present levels, would be ideal.”

Turner has also donated $1 billion to an organization known as the United Nations Foundation. The organization created by Turner is dedicated to the goals of population control, condom distribution, promotion of abortion and other methods to promote the stealth eugenics agenda. Turner and others like Bill and Melinda Gates have donated large amounts of money to so called charitable organizations which really serve to promote the eugenics movement. The public thinks they are doing a good thing with their money, when in fact they are contributing their wealth behind a much more evil and sinister agenda.

Amazingly, Turner was also given an award from the UN for his work in sustainable development which is really nothing more than code for population reduction.

Turner is suffering from the same disease that elites throughout history have had. Once these people have all the money that they could ever want, they seek power and they seek to do evil things with that power. By advocating population reduction and claiming that global warming is directly tied to the belief that there are too many people on the planet, Turner is simply promoting a softer variation of the eugenics programs that Hitler and his Third Reich implemented during World War II. No government or group of people should have the power to enforce population reduction. By giving governments and assorted institutions this power, this gives the people who have control over these organizations god like power. Of course, people like Turner and other elites seek to be living gods on this planet and want to ensure that their power is not challenged. Turner is simply out of his mind, and if he really believed in population reduction, it is hypocritical that he has decided not to kill himself in order to begin the process.

 



Overfilled Garbage Bins Can Lead to Fines of £110

Overfilled Garbage Bins Can Lead to Fines of £110

Daily Express
August 4, 2008

MINISTERS have ordered people who overfill their bins to be punished more severely than shoplifters, drug users and dangerous drivers.

Official guidance from the Department of the Environ-ment to local councils says they must impose fines of “not less than £75” and up to £110 on taxpayers who disobey rubbish rules.

The crackdown from the so-called “Talibin” will apply to virtually all UK households.

Anyone caught leaving their wheelie-bin lid even slightly open, placing bins or rubbish out on the day before collection or putting their bin in the wrong place could get a fixed penalty or end up in court.

Tory spokesman Eric Pickles yesterday accused Labour of creating “an army of municipal bin bullies”.

He warned they were targeting “law-abiding families with massive fines while professional criminals get the soft touch. It is clear Whitehall bureaucrats are instructing town halls to target householders with fines for minor breaches.

Anyone caught leaving their wheelie-bin lid even slightly open, placing bins or rubbish out on the day before collection or putting their bin in the wrong place could get a fixed penalty or end up in court.

Tory spokesman Eric Pickles yesterday accused Labour of creating “an army of municipal bin bullies”.

He warned they were targeting “law-abiding families with massive fines while professional criminals get the soft touch. It is clear Whitehall bureaucrats are instructing town halls to target householders with fines for minor breaches.

“Yet with the slow death of weekly collections and shrinking bins, it is increasingly hard for families to dispose of their rubbish responsibly.

“It is fundamentally unfair that householders are now getting hammered with larger fines than shoplifters get for stealing.”

Read Full Article Here

 

Eco-Nazi Youths urged to report on family’s eco-crimes

National Post
August 1, 2008

In a recent series of ads aimed at school children, a leading British energy company has assigned a controversial summer project: police their family’s global-warming crimes.

Launched last week by NPower — the country’s fourth-largest provider — the campaign is part of a larger program to educate children about global warming and the wasteful habits that might exacerbate it.

Placed in prominent newspapers such as The Sunday Times and The Telegraph, the ads offer giveaway diaries in which kids can note domestic infractions, such as leaving a mobile phone charging for too long or a Nintendo game left flickering in the dark, as well as Post-It notes, which can be left at the crime scene as a warning to the offenders. Equally important, the campaign seeks to attract kids to its controversial Web site, Climate Cops, which encourages children to monitor and report on their domestic energy crimes to their classrooms.

Some activists and marketers see the site as a clever marketing gimmick to teach children to preserve their planet. Others see excessive indoctrination tactics lifted from the pages of the George Orwell novel 1984, in which children are set against their parents, or worse, the Hitler Youth, who were encouraged to betray their loved ones for the greater glory of the state.

Last Tuesday, a satirical article on the British Web site Anorak referred to these cadets as “Greenshirts” and compared them to the young Blackshirts of yore. “NPower, the electricity people, want you, the Britisher Jungvolk, to inform on your mums and your dads if they disobey the rules on climate change.”

Read Full Article Here

NASA Urged to Debunk the Current Hysteria Over Global Warming
http://www.rightsidenews.com/2..he-current-hysteria-over-global-warming.html

Old ships’ logs show temporary global warming in 1730s
http://www.theregister.co.uk/2008/08/04/ships_log_climate_change/

Drivers face higher parking charges under controversial new car tax band linked to engine emissions
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/ne..-car-tax-band-linked-engine-emissions.html

Spain Cuts Speed Limit To Fight Global Warming
http://www.independent.co.uk/..and–turns-out-lights-to-save-fuel-881401.html

SF Mayor Wants Fines For Unsorted Trash
http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-b..2008/08/01/MN47122A98.DTL

Global Warming Hoax News Archive

 



Eco-Nazis Call For Limiting Amount Of Children

Eco-Nazis Call For Limiting Amount Of Children

Daily Mail
July 25, 2008

British couples should have no more than two children to save the world from global warming, according to a green think tank.

Campaigners from the Optimum Population Trust said limiting family size was the ‘simplest and biggest’ contribution people could make to saving the planet.

While Britain need not follow the example of China and ban large families, having more than two children should be frowned upon in the same way as using a patio heater or driving a gas guzzling car.

But critics said doctors and governments had no right to tell parents how many children to have – and that population control could lead to more problems than it solved.

The controversial call comes from Prof John Guilleband, emeritus professor of family planning at Imperial College London, and GP Dr Pippa Hayes.

The Optimum Population Trust was at the centre of a row in 2003 after suggesting the ideal population for the UK was 30 million – around half its current level.

Writing in the British Medical Journal, they called on family doctors to ‘break their silence’ on the links between large families and climate change.

‘Unplanned pregnancy, especially in teenagers, is a problem for the planet, as well as the individual concerned. But what about planned pregnancies?” they said.

‘Should we now explain to UK couples who plan a family that stopping at two children, or at least having one less child than first intended, is the simplest and biggest contribution anyone can make to leaving a habitable planet for our grandchildren?’

A child born in the UK will be responsible for 160 times more greenhouse emissions than a child born in Ethiopia, they said.

‘We must not put pressure on people, but by providing information on the population and the environment, and appropriate contraception for everyone, and by their own example, doctors should help to bring family size into the arena of environmental ethics, analogous to avoiding patio heaters and high carbon cars,” they added.

In the UK which has the highest rate of teenage pregnancies in western Europe, population is officially projected to rise from 60.6 million to 77 million in 2050 – more than another two Londons. A ‘two child’ policy would reduce the figure to 55 million, they said.

The researchers warn with world population exceeding 6.7 billion, humans consumption of fossil fuels, fresh water, crops fish and forests is outstripping the planet’s biological capacity.

Countries such as Costa Rica, Sri Lanka and Thailand, have reduced their fertility rates by improving access to contraception and through education, they said.

Critics of population control say it fails to tackle the real threats to the environment. And reducing Britain’s population could lead to huge social problems if there were not enough young people to pay for the care of the elderly.

Robert Whelan, of the Civitas think tank, said the way to tackle environmental problems was through eradicating poverty – not limiting population.

‘These people think that they know how many children people should have. But the only people who should make that decision are parents themselves,” he said.

‘We have to treat with great suspicion any attempt to interfere with the choices of parents either in the third world or in the first world.’ Most mainstream green groups shy away from discussing overpopulation, believing the subject is too controversial.

The Optimum Population Trust’s supporters include actress Susan Hampshire and environmentalist Jonathan Porritt.

Its views echo those of Malthus – the 18th century economist who claimed population would rise more quickly than food production triggering mass starvations.

Until it was discredited by Nazism, population control in the first half of the 20th century was most closely associated with eugenics – the belief that ‘undesirable’ qualities should removed from populations to improve future generations.

The rise of the green movement in the 1970s and 1980s led to a revival in calls for population control.

Population Control: The Eugenics Connection
http://noworldsystem.com/2008/06/25/population-control-the-eugenics-connection/

Ted Turner: World Needs a ’Voluntary’ One-Child Policy for the Next Hundred Years
http://noworldsystem.com/2008/05/13/ted-turner-confronted-on-population-control/

Science Chief: Cut Birthrate To Save Earth
http://www.guardian.co.uk/science/2007/jul/22/climatechange.climatechange

BABY TAXES Needed to Save Planet
http://www.news.com.au/story/0,23599,22896334-2,00.html

China Says One-Child Policy Helps Protect Climate
http://www.reuters.com/article/environmentNews/idUSL..hs_response&sp=true

 



Penn & Teller: Bullshit! – Being Green

Penn & Teller: Bullshit! – Being Green

http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-5329857034306331360&hl=en

Crackdown On Bottling Plant Over Climate Change
http://cbs13.com/local/nestle.bottling.plant.2.782999.html

Arnold Vetoes Mandatory Global Warming Classes
http://www.mercurynews.com/politics/ci_10010291?nclick_check=1

British Kids Encouraged To Become “Climate Cops”
http://www.prisonplanet.com/british-kids-..-become-climate-cops.html

Western Governors Propose Carbon Tax Plan
http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20..ylt=AhwHbLoegTJ_LIdURyZ2DSdH2ocA

UN Chief: Human Race Faces Oblivion from Global Warming
http://www.naturalnews.com/023687.html

Global Warming Hoax News Archive

 



UK: 1,043 laws that will let the state in your home

UK: 1,043 laws that will let the state in your home

Daily Mail
July 20, 2008

The march of the Big Brother state under Labour was highlighted last night as it was revealed that there are now 1,043 laws that give the authorities the power to enter a home or business.

Nearly half have been introduced since Labour came to power 11 years ago. They include the right to:

• Invade your home to see if your pot plants have pests or do not have a ’plant passport’ (Plant Health England Order 2005).

Survey your home and garden to see if your hedge is too high (Anti-Social Behaviour Act 2003).

• Check that accommodation given to asylum seekers is not being lived in by non-asylum seekers (Immigration and Asylum Act 1999).

Raid a house to check if unlicensed gambling is taking place (Gambling Act 2005 Inspection Regulations 2007).

Seize fridges without the correct energy rating (Energy Information Household Refrigerators and Freezers Regulations 2004).

The rise in clipboard-wielding state inspectors flies in the face of repeated pledges by Ministers to curb the power of bureaucrats.

The full extent of the state’s ’powers of entry’ is revealed in documents slipped out quietly by the Government last week.

The information was posted on the Home Office website, but in a highly unusual move, the computer file was locked to prevent it being copied or printed. A secret Home Office password was required to access the file.

A Home Office spokeswoman denied the restrictions were an attempt to stop the state’s powers being circulated more widely.

She claimed it was a ’mistake’ and the file would be unlocked tomorrow.

Some 420 new powers of entry are the product of laws introduced since 1997. A further 16 are in laws due to be approved by Parliament in the next few weeks.

A recent study by the Centre for Policy Studies think-tank warned that the ’proliferation and variety’ of such laws mean householders can no longer ’realistically be aware’ of their rights and legal obligations.

Gordon Brown last year announced a review of ’powers of entry’ laws and said they would be subjected to a ’liberty test’ to stop abuses by the state.

However, new powers set to be approved by Parliament include inspecting for non-human genetic material, for looted cultural property from Iraq and for ’undeclared’ carbon dioxide, as well as enforcing bin tax.

Town hall ’bin police’ already have the right to enter homes, take photographs, seize contents of bins, and ’investigate as required’.

Householders can be fined up to £5,000 if they refuse entry or ’obstruct’ an official.

Shadow Communities Secretary Eric Pickles said: ’Day by day under Labour, the rights and liberties of law-abiding citizens are being eroded.’

 



UK: Bin bureaucrats sifting and weighing your trash

’Bin bureaucrats’ secretly taking families’ wheelie-bins to sift and weigh the food they throw out

Daily Mail
June 10, 2008

Householders are having their rubbish secretly sifted and weighed to see how much food they are throwing away, it has emerged.

Wheelie-bins are being taken from residents without their knowledge, and spot checked to see how many scraps of food are in them and how much they weigh.

No permission is sought for the ’sampling’ exercise and the householder is simply presented with a new bin.

Council taxpayers in Sussex have reacted furiously to the latest example of ’bin bureaucracy’ and said officials had no right to snoop on the contents of their refuse.

Officials at Tory-run Mid-Sussex District Council attempted to reassure locals by telling them it is a ’fact-finding’ exercise to gauge how much food is being dumped.

But residents branded the survey – which cost £1,700 – an invasion of privacy and fear it is the first step towards charging residents who fail to meet Government recycling targets.

Mother-of-three Michelle Gregory, 46, of Haywards Heath, received a letter sent to her by the council explaining they were looking through her waste the day after her regular rubbish collection.

She said: ’It just seems to be the way the world is going with CCTV cameras, ID cards and fingerprinting at schools.

Read Full Article Here

Now dustmen won’t take your rubbish away if wheelie bin is too heavy to pull with two fingers
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-10..ns-lift-just-fingers.html

Homeowners Face Possible Rubbish Caps
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article..et-Government-plans.html

Lack Of Sun Activity Could Bring New Ice Age
http://www.livescience.com/space/080611-sunspot-activity.html

In praise of CO2
http://www.financialpost.com/story.html?id=569586

Ban Bon Fires To Fight Climate Change?
http://seattlepi.nwsource.com/local/366025_bonfire06.html

Global Warming Hoax News Archive

 



Litter Police make £35 for every fine handed out

Litter wardens collect £35 for every fine they hand out

UK Daily Mail
May 30, 2008

Wardens in one city are earning their employer £35 for every fine they dole out to those they see dropping litter.

The private company is paid on a commission-only basis by the council – and there is no limit to what it can earn.

Since the scheme was introduced last year, two wardens have raked in tens of thousands of pounds for the firm, called Xfor.

Critics last night described it as ’ outrageous’ and said it encouraged them to collar members of the public ’on the flimsiest evidence’.

Details of the scheme, which has been pioneered by Tory-run Peterborough City Council, emerged after the authority admitted handing out littering fines to 1,772 pedestrians last year, bringing a total of £62,020 in commission.

In addition, a further 119 drivers were posted penalty notices using information from the vehicle registration, adding another £4,165.

Police and community support officers can issue the tickets but the vast majority are understood to have been handed out by two environmental wardens – meaning they could have earned their employer more than £30,000 each. However, they will have been paid a flat rate of £300 a week.

Even when the £75 on-the- spot fixed penalty notice is reduced to £50 when paid within 21 days, the £35 commission remains the same.

It was not clear last night whether any other local authorities operate similar schemes but other councils are likely to adopt it.

 

Watched-as-you-throw: One in five wheelie bins microchipped as councils prepare for bin taxes

UK Daily Mail
May 31, 2008

One in five homes has been given wheelie bins that have been fitted with microchips in preparation for pay-as-you-throw bin taxes, according to research by the Daily Mail.

It shows that a fifth of the town halls that collect household rubbish have equipped their bins with chips or have found other ways of labelling them.

The spread of microchips means that the number of councils prepared to bring in the charges has doubled over recent months.

Microchips or labels that can be read on dustcarts are key component of bin tax schemes which rely on weighing or measuring the rubbish put out by a home in order to sent the right bill to the right family.

The increase in numbers of councils equipping their bins with chips suggests that Gordon Brown’s repeated pledges to kill off bin taxes are unlikely to be fulfilled.

Local authorities are also planning tighter enforcement of bin rules and regulations.

One in four intend to bring in stricter ’bin police’ regimes against families who leave their bin lids open, put their bins out too early, or leave extra rubbish alongside them.

The policing of rubbish bins by teams of council wardens has been a cause of growing public anger.

A bus driver in Cumbria was left with a criminal record because his family left their bin lid open a few inches because it was too full, and a war veteran of 95 in Norwich had his collections stopped because he put a ketchup bottle in the wrong bin.

Read Full Article Here