![]() |
Filed under: Canada, Congress, DHS, DoA, DoE, George Bush, Globalism, Homeland Security, Media, Mexico, NAFTA, North American Union, paul martin, Propaganda, public relations, SPP, Texas, US Treasury, Vicente Fox | Tags: Montebello, NACC, North American Competitiveness Council, Quebec
New Documents Reveal North American Union PR Campaign
Journalist acquires memos detailing secretive group’s efforts to counter critics
Steve Watson
Infowars.net
March 7, 2008
New documents have been uncovered that reveal how heads of state of the U.S., Mexico and Canada are beseeching business leaders they privately meet with to launch public relations campaigns in order to counter critics of the secretive Security and Prosperity Partnership of North America (SPP).
The documents detail how corporate representatives have been urged to “humanize” North American integration, promote NAFTA success stories to employees and unions and evolve the harmonization agenda “without fueling protectionism”.
The documentation consists of internal memos from Canada’s Foreign Affairs and Internal Trade ministry, which were obtained by the World Net Daily reporter Jerome Corsi under an Access to Information Act request.
“The text of the undated memo is an internal government summary of the third SPP summit meeting held Aug. 20-21, 2007, in Montebello Quebec,” writes Corsi.
The memo details the SPP’s behind closed doors inaugural meeting with the North American Competitiveness Council (NACC), an advisory Council Comprised of 30 senior private sector representatives of North American corporations that were selected by the American, Canadian and Mexican governments at the June 2006 trilateral meeting in Cancun, Mexico.
The “PR offensive”, as Corsi puts it, is detailed in the several paragraphs of the memo, the author of which and the persons referred to within are unknown.
Excerpts of the memo read:
“Leaders had a successful meeting with the members of the NACC, which had been launched at the leader’s meeting in Cancun in March 2006, to counsel governments on how they might enhance North American competitiveness,”
“He also urged NACC members to assist in confronting and refuting critics of the Security and Prosperity Partnership of North America (SPP).”
“In closing, all leaders expressed a desire for the NACC to play a role in articulating publicly the benefits of greater collaboration in North America.”
“Leaders discussed some of the difficulties of the SPP, including the lack of popular support and the failure of the public to understand the competitive challenges confronting North America.”
“Governments are faced with addressing the rapidly evolving competitive environment without fueling protectionism, when industry sectors face radical transformation.”
“In terms of building public support, President Bush suggested engaging the support of those who had benefited from NAFTA and from North American integration (including small business owners) to tell their stories and humanize the impressive results.”
“NACC members should have a role in communicating the merits of North American collaboration, including by engaging their employees and unions.”
The NACC is expected to meet annually with SPP ministers and will engage with senior government officials on an ongoing basis.
The media and the public are not invited to participate in or observe the meetings and the minutes of the meetings are to be kept secret.
The memo highlights how those advancing the North American integration agenda are concerned about the exposure and subsequent public backlash they have encountered recently.
The initial Security and Prosperity Partnership agreement was signed by President Bush, Mexican President Vicente Fox and then-Canadian Prime Minister Paul Martin in Waco, Texas, March 23, 2005. It established working groups, under the North American Free Trade Agreement office.
Jerome Corsi brought attention to the SPP two years ago when he obtained SPP documents, under the freedom of information act, showing that a wide range of US administrative law is being re-written in stealth under a program to “integrate” and “harmonize” with administrative law in Mexico and Canada, just as has become commonplace within the EU.
The documents contained references to upwards of 13 working groups within an entire organized infrastructure that has drawn from officials within most areas of administrative government including U.S. departments of State, Homeland Security, Commerce, Treasury, Agriculture, Transportation, Energy, Health and Human Services, and the office of the U.S. Trade Representative.
More recently representatives within Congress have petitioned the government on the secretiveness of the SPP and multiple states have introduced resolutions calling on their federal representatives to halt work on the so called “North American Union”.
http://www.infowars.net/articles/december2007/031207NAU.htm
Filed under: Bushehr, Coup, daniel ellsberg, department of energy, DoE, False Flag, Iran, Israel, Nuke, Russia, State Sponsored Terrorism, Tehran, WW3, ww4
Why is the U.S. is paying for Iran’s nuclear program?
Herald Tribune
February 6, 2008
The U.S. Energy Department is subsidizing two Russian nuclear institutes that are building key parts of a reactor in Iran that the United States spent years trying to stop, according to a House committee.
The institutes, both in Nizhny Novgorod, gave U.S. officials sales presentations describing their capabilities, and listing the Bushehr reactor, which Russia has agreed to fuel, as one of their projects. One institute is providing control systems, including control room equipment, and the other is providing hundreds of pumps and ventilation fans.
The Energy Department is subsidizing the institutes under the Initiatives for Proliferation Prevention, a program set up after the collapse of the Soviet Union to prevent newly impoverished scientists and their institutions from selling their expertise to states that might be developing nuclear weapons. The United States supplements the salaries of scientists, and pays overhead at those institutes, among others.
It was not immediately clear if the Energy Department was paying the salaries of the scientists involved in the Bushehr reactor. Representative John Dingell, chairman of the House Committee on Energy and Commerce, and Bart Stupak, chairman of the Oversight and Investigations subcommittee, asked that question in a letter sent Wednesday to Energy Secretary Samuel Bodman.
“What policy logic justifies DOE funding Russian institutes which are providing nuclear technology to Iran?” the letter asked, referring to the acronym for the Department of Energy. “How does this advance our nonproliferation goals?”
http://mparent7777-2.blogspot.com/..srael-lobbies-support.html
Whistleblower Daniel Ellsberg: Bush Likely to Attack Iran, Impeachment a Must
http://www.truthout.org/docs_2006/020408A.shtml
Order given to fire on Iranian speedboat, but it turned away: Joint Chiefs chairman
http://afp.google.com/article/ALeqM5..8KHVxbwNubxA
Buchanan: McCain win would mean war with Iran
http://youtube.com/watch?v=ee4XoVSMsJo
Bush’s State of the Union: Mandate for Iran Attack
http://www.truthnews.us/?p=1824
Coup on Iran & False Flag News Archive
Filed under: Al Gore, Bio Weapons, Canada, carbon dioxide, Carbon Tax, chemtrails, Co2, corporations, corporatism, department of agriculture, department of energy, department of interior, DHS, DoE, Dupont, energy, EPA, Fascism, Ford motors, general motors, health and environment, Homeland Security, Iraq, kyoto, Military Industrial Complex, NASA, Oil, peak oil, Petrol, Saudi Arabia, weather modification
Global Warming Engineered By Chemtrails?
Josh Reeves
Rogue Government
January, 8, 2008
New revelations have revealed startling new evidence concerning the use of a toxic greenhouse gas being sprayed in the atmosphere to modify the weather and create global warming.
Independent studies as well as Department of Energy and Department of Homeland Security websites have stated that SF6 Sulfur Hexafluoride emitted by the electric power industry, paint industry, automobile industry, and is a bi-product of the aluminum industry is now among six greenhouse gases specifically targeted by the international community, through the Kyoto protocol, for emission reductions to control global warming.
But according to several government websites, aerosol spraying campaigns that have been admittedly conducted over such places as Salt Lake City, Utah in 2001 and Oklahoma City, Oklahoma in 2003 and 2007 have used SF6 in various operations.
The initial consideration of government operations spraying a compound that is about 23,900 times more destructive, pound for pound, than carbon dioxide over the course of 100 years, would indicate a clear and direct intention to create global warming for the benefit of the oil and energy industry, to enable them to create artificial bottlenecks on oil and usher in a global carbon tax to ensure they maintain the empire for years to come.
According to www.narsto.org some of the agencies involved in these operations include,
Coordinating Research Council Instituto Nacional de Ecologia Environment Canada NASA
National Institute of Standards National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration National Renewable
Energy Laboratory
National Science Foundation Ontario Ministry of the Environment
US Department of Agriculture US Department of Energy
US Department of Interior US Department of Transportation
US EPA/Office of Air & Radiation US EPA/Office of R & D
Instituto Nacional de Ecologia
As well as energy companies,
California Energy Commission Commonwealth of Pennsylvania
Lake Michigan Air Directors Consortium Lousiana Department of Environmental Quality
Maryland Department of the Environment Mass. Dept. of Environ. Protection
Mid-Atlantic Regional Air Mgmt. Association New Jersey Dept. of Envir. Prot.
New York Dept. of Environmental Conservation New York State Energy R&D Authority
Northeast States for Coordinated Air Use Management South Coast Air Quality Management District
Tennessee Valley Authority Texas Natural Resource Cons. Comm.
California Air Resources Board
And private industry,
American Petroleum Institute Dunn-Edwards Corporation
E.I. Dupont de Nemours & Company Eastman Kodak
EPRI Ford Motor Company
General Motors Instituto Mexicano del Petroleo
Penreco PPL Corporation
Public Service Enterprise Group Southern Company
Xcel
So the question that begs to be answered is why are the energy and private industries as well as NASA and the national science foundation who all share a common bond in the fact that they all produce high levels of the greenhouse gas SF6 Sulfur Hexafluoride are funding and being on board with groups like NARSTO who are spraying this gas into the atmosphere creating the phenomenon of “Chemtrails”.
One can only come to the conclusion that the chemtrail operations using SF6 are being conducted in order to keep the myth of man-made global warming afloat in order to allow the energy companies, oil industry, and corporations to not only have a use for their waste SF6 but to also charge exorbitant prices for the products under the guise of environmental safety and the impending doom of the global warming myth.
Readers are encouraged to research SF6, chemtrails, as well as the industries that produce this compound.
http://www.narsto.org/members.src?Type=1
http://ju2003.pnl.gov/default.htm
Related News:
Snow day in the sands of Baghdad?
http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/200..mi_ea/iraq_first_snow_in_memory
Global Cooling? Saudi Arabia covered with snow in coldest winter for 20 years
http://en.rian.ru/world/20080111/96210251.html
Newscast’s Chemtrail Investigation Reveals Dangerous Aerosolized Compounds
http://www.jonesreport.com/article/01_08/080108_chemtrails.html
Global Warming Planned in 1961
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SvcuylMrkXk
NASA Scientist Predicts CO2 Bottom Line for the Plane
Russian Scientists Talk About Global Cooling
Global Cooling?
SNOW in FLORIDA – must be GLOBAL WARMING right?
Bush Signs Lightbulb Ban for Global Warming
French Scientist: Al Gore A Crook
Global Warming Hoax News Archive