Filed under: 2000 election, 2008 Election, CNN, corporations, Dictatorship, Diebold, election, election fraud, Empire, hackers, internet, ISP, lou dobbs, maryland, Media, scandal, vote fraud, vote scam, voter fraud | Tags: cybrinth, SAIC, stephen spoonamore, stolen elections, vote, voting, wireless modem
Diebold Admits Voting Machines Don’t Count Votes Correctly
Diebold Coverup, Says SAIC Report And Stephen Spoonamore
Filed under: 2000 election, 2008 Election, Diebold, election, election fraud, hackers, internet, ISP, vote fraud, voter fraud | Tags: cybrinth, stephen spoonamore, stolen elections, vote, voting
Here’s how they steal your vote
Filed under: 2004 election, Dick Cheney, Diebold, election fraud, George Bush, GOP, House, John Kerry, John McCain, mukasey, neocons, ohio, vote scam, voter fraud | Tags: Cliff Arnebeck, Kenneth J. Blackwell, mike connell, stolen election, White House
Attorneys assert claim against Karl Rove for theft of 2004 Election
Ohio News Bureau
July 17, 2008
COLUMBUS, OHIO: Plaintiff attorneys for a lawsuit filed in 2006 that sought voting records to prove whether their suspicion that Republicans conspired to suppress the votes of two active Democratic demographics that helped President Bush win the state and a second term in the White House, changed the focus of their lawsuit Thursday, saying they will now focus on learning more about the roles played by Karl Rove, Bush’s political architect and Mike Connell, a long-time Bush family confidant and Information technology guru – now working for Sen. John McCain – who as an information technology tradesman, built various computer systems that produced election irregularities that favored Republicans and whose work, if not ferreted out and stopped now, may do the same this year for McCain as it did for Bush against Kerry four years ago.
Ohio became famous, or infamous depending on your political persuasion, for catapulting George W. Bush into a second term as the nation’s president. In 2004 the state was run by Republicans, who held all statewide offices and controlled both houses of the legislature. The Secretary of State at the time was Kenneth J. Blackwell, an African American from Cincinnati who previously had served as State Treasurer and was in his second term as the state’s chief elections officer. At the time, Blackwell was also the co-chairman of the Bush-Cheney re-election committee. When the narrow election was over, Bush won Ohio from his Democratic rival, Massachusetts’ Sen. John Kerry, by the slim margin of about 118, 000 plus votes, or few than a dozen votes for each of Ohio’s 11,000 polling locations.
Rove Threatened GOP I.T. Guru to “’take the fall’ for election fraud in Ohio”
Letter Sent to Attorney General Mukasey Requesting ’Protection for Mr. Connell and His Family From This Reported Attempt to Intimidate a Witness’ After Tip from ’Credible Source’
UPDATE: OH AG Reportedly Asked to Provide Immunity Protection…
Brad Blog
July 25, 2008
Karl Rove has threatened a GOP high-tech guru and his wife, if he does not “’take the fall’ for election fraud in Ohio,” according to a letter sent this morning to Attorney General Michael Mukasey, by Ohio election attorney Cliff Arnebeck.
The email, posted in full below, details threats against Mike Connell of the Republican firm New Media Communications, which describes itself on its website as “a powerhouse in the field of Republican website development and Internet services” and having “played a strategic role in helping the GOP expand its technological supremacy.”
Filed under: 2008 Election, alaska, Albert Howard, bev harris, Black Box Voting, California, colorado, Denver, Diebold, election fraud, GOP, minnesota, montana, New Hampshire, new jersey, New York, north dakota, recount, republican primaries, Ron Paul, ron paul delegates, super tuesday, vote scam, voter fraud
‘Message’ candidate doesn’t plan to drop out
Star Telegram
February 6, 2008
Republican presidential hopeful Ron Paul speaks during the West Virginia Republican presidential convention Tuesday in Charleston, W.Va.
One month into the 2008 presidential primaries, Texan Ron Paul has outlasted a half-dozen other GOP hopefuls.
The 72-year-old doctor-turned-politician says he has no plans to quit no matter how everything shakes out today after the Super Tuesday votes are counted.
“There were 11 candidates, and now we’re down to four,” he told a Minnesota crowd this week. “We started low and we keep going.
“If I dropped out, my supporters wouldn’t be happy.”
That’s exactly right, said Jeremy Blosser, a 31-year-old Paul supporter from Arlington.
“We have no intention of going anywhere,” he said.
“Ron Paul has been fighting for our rights and for a constitutional government for over 30 years, and this campaign has spread those ideas to an entire generation. We see no reason to not keep going.
“We are Texans — we don’t run away when the chips are down and the stakes are high.”
Paul may have greater staying power on the campaign trail because his fundraising has been fairly healthy, pulling in more than $28 million since his campaign kicked off, new federal election records show.
He has come in third and fourth in several primaries and took second in Nevada’s primary last month.
To many, he is seen as a “message” candidate — trying to get the word out about his desire to end the war, bring home troops, reduce the size of government and get leaders to more literally follow the Constitution.
“His fundraising has been substantial, and he’s trying to get his message out,” said Bruce Buchanan, a government professor at the University of Texas at Austin who specializes in presidential politics.
“There will come a point when it’s truly down to two and he doesn’t have a percentage to make it into the debates anymore, and then he may fold his tent.
“I don’t think he will until he has to.”
Neither Paul nor spokesman Jesse Benton could be reached for comment Tuesday, as they were campaigning in Super Tuesday states.
But few expect him to go quietly into the night.
“He is certainly the un-cola of Republican candidates,” said Tom Marshall, a political science professor at the University of Texas at Arlington.
“Message candidates don’t drop out as easily or as quickly.”
Ron Paul 2nd In Montana
Ron Paul garnered 24.54% in Montana, 21.16% in North Dakota, and gained respectable percentages and delegates elsewhere.
Nolan Chart
February 6, 2008
While Paul supporters may be tempted to despair as they look over the results of Super Tuesday, there are some gems among the general rubble indicating that not all Americans are asleep in front of their TV sets.
Here are the Montana results:
- Romney 38.34%
- Paul 24.54%
- McCain 21.96%
- Huckabee 15.03%
Here are the North Dakota results:
- Romney 35.47%
- McCain 22.61%
- Paul 21.16%
- Huckabee 19.79%
Dr. Paul also achieved respectable percentages in Alaska and Minnesota with 16.41% and 15.25% respectively. In other states he has received or has the prospect of gaining delegates, if not high percentages.
Maybe the folks in some of these states aren’t big TV addicts? My guess would be that Dr. Paul’s results are probably inversely proportional to television addiction on a state by state basis. Anyone have viewership statistics by state?
Ron Paul is in this for the long haul, and as his supporters, we need to stand behind him and fight for our liberty!
Recent News:
http://www.nolanchart.com/article2495.html
Ron Paul Rolls On Despite Super Tuesday Primary Results
http:=”” www.nolanchart.com=”” article2490.html=””>
Ron Paul National Delegate Count Now 42 or More
http://ronpaul2008.typepad…8/2008/02/ron-paul-nation.html
“Super Tuesday” or “Stupor Tuesday” – The Property Party Wins Again…
http://911blogger.com/node/13735
What Really Happened in Alaska
http://www.nolanchart.com/article2518.html
http://blog.wired.com/27..2/republican-web.html
776,000 CA Voters May Not Have Ballots Counted
http://blogs.laweekly.com/ladaily/..e-bubble-toil-and-trouble/
NH Recount Albert Howard needs you
http://www.ronpaulwarroom.com/?p=5117
Problems In Early Super Tuesday Voting
http://rawstory.com//printstory.php?story=9152
Voting issues in Arizona. Voters turned away: ‘You can see people’s vote in front of you’
http://www.azcentral.com/..0205super-azprimary0205.html
Bev Harris: Eye witness report of ballot stuffing in Colo. caucus: miscounts against Ron Paul
http://www.bbvforums.org/cgi-bin/forums/show.cgi?73/71718
Ron Paul Backer Cries Foul In Brooklyn
http://www.nydailynews.com/blo..paul-backer-cries-foul-in.html
Video proof of California Election fraud
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zWKxwVZmomc
NJ Gov. unable to vote due to malfunctioning voting machines
http://www.nj.com/news/index.s..cant_vote_because_of_p.html
CNN – Ron Paul’s Best Friend is the Internet
Ron Paul Rally – University of Minnesota
Diebold voting machine key copied from pic on Diebold site
Filed under: Alabama, Arizona, California, CBS, Delaware, Diebold, election fraud, Fox News, georgia, Massachusetts, new jersey, New York, Oklahoma, princeton, super tuesday, tennessee, utah, vote scam, voter registration
FOX News Exposes Diebold Electronic Vote Flipping
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=u4FPuLNjvAc
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aZws98jw67g
CBS: Little e-voting accountability on Super Tuesday
http://rawstory.com/news/2007/CBS_Little_…per_0203.html
California Republicans Limit Their Primary To Those Registered in Party
http://youdecide08.foxnews.com/2008/02…y-to-those-registered-in-party/
http://www.allheadlinenews.com/articles/7009906426
Filed under: 2008 Election, Diebold, election fraud, florida, florida primary, Fox News, Media, new hampshire primaries, poll, republican primaries, Ron Paul, Ron Paul Banned, Ron Paul Exclusions, vote scam, voter fraud
Multiple Voting Machine Problems Reported In Florida
Media reports switching of machines, non functioning machines as “glitches”
Steve Watson
Infowars.net
January 29, 2008
Multiple problems with electronic voting machines have been reported in Florida today as people take to the polls in the latest presidential primary.
Eagle eyed members of the prisonplanet forum are scouring media reports and keeping a close watch on events in Florida in light of the ongoing saga with the New Hampshire primary and the recount fiasco.
Keep track of events at this live thread where members are posting the latest information.
So far multiple reports have indicated that voters are experiencing problems throughout the state, particularly with the electronic machines.
The Palm Beach Post reports:
At Kings Point in suburban Delray Beach, voters encountered delays after a poll worker mistakenly shut down the voting machines, Elections Supervisor Arthur Anderson told reporters.
“They were on and then someone mistakenly, accidentally turned them off,” Anderson said while visiting H.L. Johnson Elementary School in Royal Palm Beach. “Allegedly someone tripped over a line or something like that.”
The machines couldn’t be turned back on, so workers had to bring in replacement machines and program them. “It’s going to delay the process,” he said.
This will have resulted in lost votes and once again goes to show that the machines are unreliable and detrimental to the democratic voting process.
According to other reports, machines in some precincts were delivered late and so voting was delayed, causing some to abandon the lines.
Other problems with the machines have been reported by voters. The Sun Sentinal reports:
Rabbi Richard Yellin said he was first in line at the polling location at Congress Avenue and Woolbright Boulevard in Boynton Beach, but that did him little good when it came to casting his vote.
“There has been a major failure of the voting, at least at this precinct,” he said.
He said he tried five times to use the voting machine but it would not allow him to vote. About a dozen people were also at the precinct to vote, Yellin said. “None of the machines worked,” Yellin said.
Poll workers were attempting to obtain help from the main elections office, but were still struggling to activate the machines when Yellin said he had to leave to attend to his duties at the synagogue.
Another voter reported that she noticed that the poll worker in her precinct pushed the non-partisan button for her when assigning her card, even though she’s a registered Democrat. Nonpartisan voters cannot vote in the presidential primary. From The Palm Beach Post:
When Monzon pointed this out, she says the poll worker sought out help from a supervisor, who then called the supervisor of elections office.
Monzon says that after the supervisor got off the phone with the elections office, she told Monzon and the poll worker that this problem is happening around the county and that there is nothing that can be done about it.
Monzon says other voters present had the same problem. In one case, a wife was able to vote and but her husband was not because his ballot was changed to nonpartisan.
In Broward County, which was subject to recounts and hanging chads in 2000, some machines also malfunctioned or did not function whatsoever, as reported by NBC:
In Broward County Fla., minor delays were reported this morning at a half dozen polling locations. Voters who provide a driver’s license for identification have their license run through a machine that reads the magnetic stripe on the back. (The machine is called an EVID). At least six of those EVID machines at different polling locations did not work this morning.
Today’s primary will be the last time for at least 4 years that residents will use the machines as they have been judged to be too unreliable and detrimental to voter confidence.
FOX snubs Ron Paul in Florida – (2/29/2008)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FJ_Dtuz1dnw
FLA Voters Report Problems At Polls
http://www.orlandosentinel.com/..908,0,5071870,print.story
Multiple Voting Machine Problems In FLA
http://www.palmbeachpost.com..r/2008/01/29/0129pbcvoting.html
Filed under: 2008 Election, bev harris, Black Box Voting, butch & hoppy, California, Diebold, election fraud, GOP, handcount, Hillary Clinton, John Edwards, louisiana caucus, louisiana primary, nashua, New Hampshire, new hampshire district, new hampshire primaries, republican primaries, Ron Paul, Ron Paul Banned, Ron Paul Exclusions, south carolina, south carolina primary, vote scam, voter fraud
Harris Calls For Resignations In New Hampshire Recount Fiasco
Vote fraud expert convinced chain of custody is corrupt, says “criminal enterprise” is at work
Paul Joseph Watson
Prison Planet
January 29, 2008
Fresh from her confrontations in New Hampshire during which public officials were grilled about slapdash chain of custody and ballot box tampering issues, Bev Harris told the Alex Jones Show that a “criminal enterprise” is running the primary recount and has called for Secretary of State William Gardner to resign and his assistant to be fired.
Harris was fundamental in the vetting and production of the HBO special Hacking Democracy, and has contributed towards bringing charges against vote fraudsters who cheated in Ohio in 2004.
Harris traveled to New Hampshire personally to discover for herself the disgraceful lapses in chain of custody for the memory cards and ballot boxes used in the recent primary.
Harris is featured in the video below asking public officials about slits in ballot boxes as they bizarrely deny that the slits are big enough to allow tampering, amongst a myriad of other disturbing questions about chain of custody. Follow-up questions are frowned upon and one official calls security to have Harris removed.
http://youtube.com/watch?v=hHL_YMBolRs
Following Republican candidate Albert Howard’s attempts to oversee the recount, Harris said “I knew that somebody needed to get to New Hampshire and protect or find out what they’re doing with chain of custody of the ballots….New Hampshire has the memory cards for 81 per cent of its votes counted by this one company – we found there was a convicted felon involved in that….that’s why I wanted to see what the chain of custody was”.
After hooking up with other vote fraud experts, Harris confronted public officials and asked pointed questions about chain of custody.
“The problem was we were either not getting answers or we were getting bizarre answers,” said Harris.
New Hampshire Secretary of State William Gardner was questioned on the whereabouts of the memory cards that hold electronic records of the votes.
“She kept asking him and ultimately he had to admit he didn’t know where they were, and this is days after the election,” said Harris.
One of the observers followed the ballots back to the vault where they were being stored overnight and noticed slits in the ballot boxes that had not been counted, a complete violation of federal election laws.
“I then came in the next day and asked the assistant Secretary of State David Scanlan – what about that slit in the end of the box?” said Harris, after which Scanlan attempted to dismiss the concern by claiming the slits weren’t big enough to allow tampering (an OJ tries on the glove moment, according to Harris).
One of the observers then proceeded to shame Scanlan by easily sticking her whole hand into the ballot box.
Officials then claimed that a special tape was in place to seal the box, bt as Harris proves in the video, the tape can easily be peeled off and re-applied.
“It’s a post-it note,” said Harris, “You can rip it on and off, on and off.”
Harris then discovered that the ballot boxes were not being transfered from state to state by police as should be the case, but by “Butch and Hoppy,” two truck drivers who raced around the state at high speed endangering people and and employing evasive manoevers to escape from observers who were following them.
“We caught them meeting up with a green jeep in the middle of nowhere half way through their route and we walk up to them and they drive off in a different direction,” said Harris.
“I wanted to see what the ballots looked like when Butch and Hoppy take them off the truck, well sure enough they didn’t have seals on them and some of them weren’t even closed – they had the box top open with big gashes and tears in them,” said Harris, who also revealed how officials left ballots in their offices and did not store them in secure vaults.
“Every way that it could break down it seemed to have broken down,” said Harris, “Even to the extent of just not following procedures”.
“How can you say that you can open someone’s ballot box without them present?” asked Harris.
Based on her experiences with the sham nature of the process, Harris called for the resignation of the Secretary of State Gardener and his assistant David Scanlan.
“I think assistant Secretary of State David Scanlan, who is actually their operations guy, should be dismissed from his position and the Secretary of State should resign, and they need to refund the money for both candidates and recount all those ballots in public,” said Harris.
“What they’re doing here is a criminal enterprise,” she added, “It has all the earmarks of it.”
Click here to listen to the MP3 interview.
http://www.bbvforums.org/cgi-b..i?file=/1954/71605.html
Bev Harris: New Hampshire Recount a “Criminal Enterprise”
http://www.prisonplanet.com/ar..riminal_enterprise.htm
Howard Highlights Ease Of Recount Fraud
http://www.prisonplanet.com/articles/january2008/012908_recount_fraud.htm
New Hampshire Recount Delay Stokes Suspicions
http://www.prisonplanet.com/articles/january2008/012808_recount_delay.htm
Is California Throwing out Electronic Voting Machines?
http://www.latimes.com/new..tory?ctrack=1&cset=true
Filed under: 2008 Election, bev harris, Black Box Voting, butch & hoppy, Diebold, election fraud, GOP, handcount, Hillary Clinton, John Edwards, nashua, New Hampshire, new hampshire district, new hampshire primaries, republican primaries, Ron Paul, Ron Paul Banned, Ron Paul Exclusions, south carolina, south carolina primary, vote scam, voter fraud
New Hampshire Primary – Sham Chain of Custody
http://youtube.com/watch?v=PKQEQ7qHvgM&feature=bzb302
South Carolina bans paper votes
http://mparent7777-2.blogspot.com/..ans-paper-votes.html
SC GOP Primary Vote Fraud Update
http://mparent7777-2.blogspot.com/2..-fraud-update.html
Insider confession: ‘Election operatives like myself make sure idealists can’t win elections. Only the cynics are making the laws’
http://www.washingtonpos..17/AR2008011703582.html
Unprecedented Vote Fraud About To Come
http://apnews.myway.com/article/20080121/D8UA8VGG0.html
Italian Paper Says NH Primary Vote Rigged
http://www.agoracosmopolitan.com/home/Frontpage/2008/01/22/02148.html
NH Election Contest Update: 7.5% Vote Count Discrepancy Found in Nashua, Ward 5 for Clinton, Edwards
http://www.bradblog.com/?p=5591
European press: It wasn’t a miracle – Hillary won via a rigged vote
http://www.globalresearch.ca/index.php?c..va&aid=7794
“The Diebold Effect”: Hillary’s Votes Higher From Diebold Machines Even Controlling for Demographics (education, income, population, etc)
http://scienceblogs.com/developingin.._diebold_effect_hillarys_vo.php
Filed under: 2008 Election, Diebold, election fraud, GOP, New Hampshire, new hampshire primaries, republican primaries, Ron Paul, south carolina, south carolina primaries, south carolina primary, vote scam, voter fraud
SC voting machines not set to zero before voting started
January 20, 2008
But the Commission blamed the delay on human error, even though Election Systems & Software voting machines used in South Carolina were decertified by the California Secretary of State last year, after the company refused to provide information necessary to review the voting systems, as required by state law.
“Some voters cast paper ballots today in 15-20 precincts because voting machines were not ready to accept votes,” the Commission stated. “This issue was due to a human error in preparing the machines for the primary.
The 2008 Primary season has been wracked by allegations of vote fraud stemming from the use of unreliable and easily hackable voting machines belonging to Diebold and ES&S and other vendors.
New Hampshire was forced to carry out a state-wide manual recount after discrepancies emerged between hand counted and machine counted votes.
Election Chaos In Horry Count SC
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yJqSxZ7RFH0
http://edition.cnn.com/2008/POLITIC..uth.carolina.gop/index.html
Primary Voters Turned Away Amongst Complete Chaos in Horry County, South Carolina
http://www.ronpaulwarroom.com/?p=2354
Train Wreck 2008: The SC Voting Machine Disaster
http://www.bradblog.com/?p=5579
Filed under: 2008 Election, 9/11, Barack Obama, bev harris, Censorship, cocaine trafficking, democratic debate, Diebold, digg, ebay, election fraud, Fox News, GOP, Hillary Clinton, joe rogan, John Edwards, LHS, lou dobbs, Meg Whitman, Mitt Romney, nevada, nevada caucus, New Hampshire, new hampshire primaries, paypal, recount, republican caucus, republican primaries, republican primary, Ron Paul, Ron Paul Banned, Ron Paul Exclusions, Russia, south carolina, south carolina primary, vote scam, voter fraud
Huge Diebold Disparities Uncovered In New Hampshire Recount
Memory cards missing as attorney voices concerns about transparency
Paul Joseph Watson
Prison Planet
January 18, 2008
Huge disparities between votes cast on Diebold electronic voting machines and actual hand counted tallies are emerging during the New Hampshire recount, with Hillary Clinton gaining the most from over a hundred unaccounted for votes in one Manchester Ward.
The recount in Manchester’s Ward 5 revealed a disparity whereby establishment candidates received over a hundred ‘black hole’ votes between them that could not be tallied during the hand count.
| Diebold Result | Hand Count | |
| CLINTON | 683 |
619
|
| EDWARDS | 255 | 217 |
| OBAMA | 404 | 365 |
At the moment there is no indication of where these extra votes came from, but the figures again cast the accuracy of Diebold voting machines into severe doubt and provide further evidence of the need for a return to hand counted paper ballots only in all federal elections.
Brad Friedman at The Brad Blog continues to provide great coverage of the recount, unlike New Hampshire’s foremost news outlet WMUR, whose “only source seems to be whatever (New Hampshire Secretary of State) Gardner tells them,” according to Friedman.
In addition, 550 ballots in Stratham were not read by the Diebold machines at all and were rejected as blank ballots.
Voting Rights attorney John Bonifaz also told Friedman of his deep concerns about the transparency of both the initial election as well as the recount.
“I’m very concerned that this is not a fully transparent process that is happening there,” he said.
Diebold memory cards used in New Hampshire, which have been proven to be vulnerable to hacking and could easily be used to steal an election, are “missing” according to state officials.
Bonifaz, “Says he was told by Secretary of State William Gardner that his office doesn’t get involved in tracking what happens to those memory cards. Some have reportedly been returned to LHS, and may have had their memory erased already,” reports Friedman.
“When you have a private company counting 80% of the votes, and you later learn that the memory cards are unaccounted for, you have a serious question about the transparency and accountability in that process,” Bonifaz said.
Federal law mandates that all materials from elections be preserved for 22 months thereafter, so if the memory cards have been wiped then LHS Associates, who it was revealed last week had hired a narcotics trafficker to a high-level executive position, would be facing criminal charges.
In another shocking development, vote fraud expert Bev Harris witnessed first hand that a majority of ballot boxes had 8 inch slits in their side. Election Defense Alliance’s Sally Castleman followed the boxes back to the ballot vault and also noticed the cuts. Read Bev’s report here.
New Hampshire ballot boxes found slit
Black Box Voting
No worries, say New Hampshire officials when cuts up to eight inches long are spotted in newly delivered ballot boxes. “The only seal that counts is the one on top.” Except the seal on top can be peeled off without leaving a trace, then reaffixed.
I confirmed this morning that many if not most of the boxes scheduled to be counted today had slits in them. I went out when a vanload of ballots arrived, and saw that they were slit at the time they arrived by van. Susan Pynchon and I drove to two nearby towns and watched as they handed over their ballot boxes to “Butch and Hoppy”, the two men who drive around in the state in a van picking the ballots up. We observed as they loaded boxes of ballots into the van with no slits at all in them. We videotaped each of these up close. They arrived at the destination without slits. The label on the top was affixed, but in some cases was crumpled, or also damaged.Of course, the label affixed to the top can be removed and reattached without telltale signs.No vault tonightA significant departure from the normal chain of custody path occurred tonight. They decided not to use the vault to store the ballots.
Ron Paul: South Carolina Primary Already Stolen
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JUpN5GaOjkY
Joe Rogan talks about Ron Paul and Diebold
http://au.youtube.com/watch?v=oKi_VrYbeBg
Russian Media Covers Ron Paul
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jzdcDroNH2E
Related News:
http://www.prisonplanet.com/articles/january2008/011708_digg_caught.htm
Ron Paul Campaign Concerned About Incorrect Caucus Locations Provided by the Nevada State Republican Party
http://www.kolotv.com/home/headlines/13861937.html
Ron Paul and 9/11
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4NhUexbY98s
Did Ron Paul Break Faux News?
http://www.newhavenadvocate.com/article.cfm?aid=5323
A Simple Way Paul Voters Can Beat Fraud
http://www.nationalexpositor.com/News/919.html
Ron Paul Excluded, AGAIN
http://www.ronpaulwarroom.com/?p=1890
Paul a hit with young voters
http://news14.com/content/top..oung-voters/Default.aspx
Bill Advocates Paper Ballots and Audits
http://channels.aol.ca/news/article.adp?id=20080117043809990004
Paypal Freezes New Hampshire Recount Funds
http://prisonplanet.com/articles/january2008/011608_paypal_freezes.htm
‘Romney Steering Committee Member Blocks New Hampshire Vote Recount’
http://mparent7777-2.blogsp..e-member-blocks.html
PayPal/Ebay Owner Meg Whitman Donated $2300 to Romney’s Campaign and serves on his Finance Team
http://www.ronpaulwarroom.com/?p=1806
Ron Paul Air Corps Covers Lancing, Michigan
Reasons Why Ron Paul Opposes a National ID Card
Diebold Machine Failures Found Across NH
Paul campaign hopes to attract Upstate voters with blimp
California Experiences Problems with Voting Machines
The mainstream media detests Ron Paul
Richard Viguerie Goes Online for Paul
Filed under: 2008 Election, Barack Obama, Diebold, election fraud, FEC, Fox News, Fox News Debate, GOP, John McCain, las vegas, michigan, michigan primaries, michigan primary, Mike Huckabee, Mitt Romney, nevada, nevada caucus, New Hampshire, new hampshire primaries, Republican Debate, republican primaries, Ron Paul, Rudy Giuliani, Russia, vote scam, voter fraud
Ron Paul Beats Fred and Rudy in Michigan
Paul’s 4th Place Finish is a sign to the lesser candidates to make a move or get out.
Nolan Chart
January 16, 2008
Watching the Michigan returns come in on CNN and Fox News, it was clear that Ron Paul wasn’t going to get more than about 7% and finish in fourth placed after Romney, McCain, and Huckabee. For a candidate that wasn’t worthy to get an invitation to the Fox News debate before the New Hampshire primary, he finished ahead of two other candidates who did.
In a previous article, I mentioned that there is a Ron Paul Mendoza Line, where a candidate must at least beat Ron Paul, or should consider getting out. As of tonight, Rudy Giuliani, Fred Thompson, and Duncan Hunter have all fallen below that line. Unlike Paul, with his fanatical grassroots supporters, these candidates do not have backers who will raise millions of dollars in a single day to keep a second-place or worse finish going. Even Mike Huckabee ought to be bleeding at the edges of his campaign coffers by now. We’ll know at the end of the month when the FEC reports come out. Paul and Romney are the only ones with the cash to keep going beyond Feb 5–even if they don’t win another state by then.
Russia Today Reports on Diebold
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rzBFIH-96O4&e
Ron Paul “Paul-A-Palooza” Las Vegas
http://youtube.com/watch?v=1j6H9livLdk
Ron Paul supporter on Nickelodeon
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=x19drkJwBjk
Related News:
http://prisonplanet.com/articles/january2008/011608_paypal_freezes.htm
http://www.nolanchart.com/article1192.html
Ron Paul the Second Biggest Winner in Michigan?
http://www.gambling911.com/Ron-Paul-011608B.html
http://www.gambling911.com/Ron-Paul-011608.html
Rudy gives shout-out to Ron Paulites
http://www.palmbeachpost.co.._gives_shoutout_to_ron_pau.html
Ron Paul Supporters to Raise Funds to Advertize in Jones vs. Trinidad Fight
http://infowars.net/articles/january2008/140108Knockout.htm
Most Republicans: There’s a Nevada caucus?
http://www.lasvegassun.com/n..cans-theres-nevada-caucus/
Michigan primary vote fraud underway
http://mparent7777-2.bl…primary-vote-fraud-underway.html
Passion of Ron Paul’s fans knows no bounds
http://www.concordmonitor.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AI…37/0/NEWS04
FreeAtLast2008.com Now is the Time to Rise
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kURSoo-u5Mo
Ron Paul is the Real Candidate for Change, Not Barack Obama
http://mparent7777-2.blogspot.com.te-for-change.html
WSJ Disapproves of Ron Paul
http://www.lewrockwell.com/blog/lewrw/archives/018605.html
Ron Paul Could Capitalize on Michigan Primary Gaffes
Ron Paul draws a crowd in Carson City
Ron Paul: Legislative Forecast for 2008
The Battle for Michigan: Ron Paul Revolution
Filed under: Dennis Kucinich, Diebold, election fraud, Fox News, Fox News Debate, Hillary Clinton, Iowa, iowa caucus, Karl Rove, Keith Olbermann, New Hampshire, new hampshire primaries, princeton, Republican Debate, republican primaries, Ron Paul, Ron Paul Banned, Ron Paul Exclusions, vote scam, voter fraud
Official Statement from Ron Paul On New Hampshire Recount
Ron Paul
Prison Planet
January 13, 2008
After a careful investigation, I have decided against seeking a recount in New Hampshire. I am confident that not asking for a recount is the right decision.
I carefully considered the arguments for and against a recount before instructing my campaign staff not to pursue it. Without a firm belief that vote fraud had taken place, and without the possibility that a recount would have increased the chances for success of our campaign, a recount would have diverted campaign resources, time, and energy away from crucial battles elsewhere.
We have taken concerns about vote fraud seriously. In Iowa, campaign volunteers carefully monitored the caucuses. Campaign staff placed Paul supporters in every precinct to watch and verify the voting and count. We had supporters phone in results from their precincts to a campaign hotline while others ensured that those numbers were reflected on the official display board at the Polk County Convention Center. The numbers our caucus watchers reported agreed with the official tally, and both results also aligned with the campaign’s internal polling. In relatively pro-Paul counties, our sampling pegged support at 11.5%. This is consistent with an overall 10% finish for the entire state.
In New Hampshire, while I would have hoped for a better result than eight percent, I am convinced that vote fraud played no role in this result. Rumors of vote fraud were investigated, and in the end they proved to be the result of errors in early media reports that were not reflected in the official numbers. In one notable case, when a campaign staff member contacted an individual who had on the evening of January 8 claimed that his vote had not been counted, the person said that he had made a mistake and that the next morning the error in reporting on a newspaper website had been corrected both in the media and — most importantly — in the official tally.
Many have expressed concerns that those ballots counted by machine yielded a 2% lower total than those counted by hand. However, machine counted vote totals were more than 2% lower for both John McCain and Mike Huckabee. Hand counted votes were more likely to be cast in rural areas. Results almost always vary between urban and rural areas.
My campaign staff and I have analyzed the numbers in New Hampshire and I have reached the conclusion that it was the high turnout — not vote fraud or counting errors — that left us with eight percent of the vote. Our total vote count of over 18,000 votes was well within what we projected given the efforts of our extensive statewide get-out-the-vote program, giving me no reason to believe that vote fraud played any role in the results of the Granite State’s primary.
In both Iowa and New Hampshire there is much to be proud of. Taking both states together, I am honored that over 30,000 people cast their vote for me — more than either Rudy Giuliani or Fred Thompson. Unlike many other candidates’ efforts, our campaign for freedom is growing and our message is spreading.
Now is the time to redouble our efforts. Our resources must be spent on the upcoming primaries and caucuses, and on ensuring that, with your help, we organize every state yet to vote with our Precinct Leaders program.
We can’t win primaries and caucuses that have already happened — but we can win those yet to come. To become the Republican presidential nominee, a candidate must have 1,191 delegates. Iowa, Wyoming and New Hampshire determined only 32 delegates, so we have much opportunity remaining.
Today, I ask you to join me in focusing on the battles ahead as we continue our fight for liberty and our Constitution.
Sincerely,
Ron Paul
Olbermann On NH Recount
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sLD0MzmRuYc
Related News:
http://www.house.gov/paul/press/press2008/pr011108.htm
Republicans, except Ron Paul, are pro-war
http://alaskareport.com/upi5/u41318_republicans_love_war.htm
Kucinich: Surprise Hillary Victory A “Mystery That Needs To Be Solved”
http://prisonplanet.com/articles/january2008/011108_kucinich_mystery.htm
Diebold Programmers Were Allowed to Access Vulnerable Optical-Scan Systems Throughout NH Election Day
http://thecaucus.blogs.nytimes.com/2..andidates-push-for-a-nh-recount/
http://www.dailymail.co…tml?in_article_id=507558&in_page_id=1811
http://mparent7777-2.blo..nh-vote-count-corruption.html
Princeton University Exposes Diebold Flaws
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aZws98jw67g
Clinton employing voter suppression tactics right out of Rove’s playbook
http://blogs.abcnews.com/politicalpunch/2008/01/tough-guy-pol-1.html
Ron Paul Air Corps Over Grand Rapids
Ron Paul’s backers keep his campaign humming in Nevada
Diebold Again: Did Hillary Really Win New Hampshire?
Nancy Tobi: Need To Eliminate Secret Vote Counting
Filed under: 2008 Election, Albert Howard, Barack Obama, bev harris, Black Box Voting, Connecticut, Dennis Kucinich, Diebold, election fraud, GOP, Hillary Clinton, John Silvestro, LHS, Maine, Massachusetts, Media, New Hampshire, new hampshire primaries, poll, recount, Ron Paul, Ron Paul Banned, ron paul excluded, sutton, Vermont, vote scam, voter fraud
Kucinich Backs New Hampshire Recount
Vote fraud expert Bev Harris warns he could be walking into a trap
Paul Joseph Watson
Prison Planet
January 11, 2008
Citing “serious and credible reports, allegations and rumors” about the integrity of Tuesday’s results, Congressman Dennis Kucinich is backing a full recount of ballots for the Democratic contest in New Hampshire, meaning that both party’s primaries may now both be cast into doubt. However, vote fraud expert Bev Harris has warned that it could all be a trap to validate Diebold electronic voting machines.
As we reported yesterday, New Hampshire Republican candidate Albert Howard is prepared to put his name behind a primary recount in order to ascertain if the example of “human error” in the town of Sutton, where Ron Paul was originally given zero votes, was an isolated case or if wider vote fraud took place.
Kucinich’s motivation for demanding a recount is the highly suspicious way in which Hillary Clinton reversed a 13 point pre-polling deficit to defeat Barack Obama, aided by a 7% swing thanks to the use of Diebold electronic voting machines.
“Kucinich alluded to online reports alleging disparities around the state between hand-counted ballots, which tended to favor Sen. Barack Obama, and machine-counted ones that tended to favor Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton. He also noted the difference between pre-election polls, which indicated Obama would win, and Clinton’s triumph by a 39 percent to 37 percent margin,” reports the Associated Press.
No doubt the Congressman is referring to this website, the Brad Blog and others who led the charge in exposing probable vote fraud in the hours after the primary.
Though Kucinich has cautioned that he doesn’t expect the recount to produce significantly different results, vote fraud expert Bev Harris warns that unless chain of custody issues are addressed before a recount, the recount itself is worthless because it will be overseen by the same people who committed vote fraud in the first place if indeed there was any chicanery.
In addition, should the recount produce exactly the same results it will validate Diebold electronic voting machines despite the fact that they have been proven to be wide open to fraud.
“A candidate asking for a recount may well be a tool used to ‘prove’ everything was okay and then that candidate will be further discredited,” reports Harris.
“We need citizen control and oversight. This is not going to come from the recount. If the election was rigged…don’t you think the riggers would have a backup Plan B for a rigged recount, knowing how easy it is to get a recount in NH?,” she concludes.
New Docs: Exec at NH’s Diebold Vote Counting Firm Convicted of Narcotics Trafficking
Ken Hajjar, Director of Diebold’s Exclusive Sales & Service Provider in New England Pled Guilty to Criminal Charges in 90’s
Brad Blog
January 9, 2008
Does the Secretary of State of New Hampshire have any idea that a key executive in the private firm that programs and “counts” 80% of the state’s ballots on hackable, error-prone Diebold voting machines is a convicted narcotics trafficker?
In 1990, Ken Hajjar, the Director of Sales and Marketing for LHS Associates, and childhood friend of company owner John Silvestro, was arrested and pled guilty to charges which earned him a 12 month sentence, according to documents received via a public records request and posted this evening at BlackBoxVoting.org.
LHS Associates, as BBV’s Bev Harris points out, programs “every single voting machine in New Hampshire, Connecticut, almost all of Massachusetts, Vermont, and Maine.”
Now The Boston Globe Changed Their Story
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Zu0Oaw9tIPM
Related News:
http://www.roguegovernment.com/news.php?id=5981
New Hampshire Recount On The Cards
http://prisonplanet.com/articles/january2008/100108_recount.htm
AUDIO: Bev Harris On New Hampshire Vote Fraud
http://prisonplanet.com/audio/100108harris.mp3
Howard Requests NH Primary Recount
http://www.freep.com/apps/pbcs…6/80110061
Media Struggles To Whitewash Clinton Vote Fraud Suspicions
http://prisonplanet.com/articles/january2008/011008_clinton_fraud.htm
Hillary Clinton’s ‘Diebold Bump’
http://www.bradblog.com/?p=5540
Greenville Vote Discrepancy SAME as Sutton–as of 01-10-08, AP still has Greenville with 0 votes for Ron Paul
http://www.ronpaulwarroom.com/?p=754
NH Race: The OSCE consider an exit poll discrepancy to be prima facie evidence of tampering
http://mparent7777-2.blogspot.co..ce-do-consider-exit-poll.html
Votefraud Obama and Paul in New Hampshire? – It would only be history repeating
http://www.atlanticfreepress.com/content/view/3220/81/
Ron Paul sole GOP hopeful who opposes Bush on foreign policy
Ron Paul left out of CNN pie chart
Bloggers Believe NH Primary Was Rigged
VIDEO: Fox News – Media Control over election process
VIDEO: CNN teasing their audience with Ron Paul
Ron Paul: ‘Government does not own our children’
Kucinich Asks For NH Recount
“Hey Ron Paul, I’m in your primary stealing your v0tez”
Filed under: 2008 Election, 9/11, Alex Jones, Barack Obama, bev harris, Black Box Voting, CNN, Diebold, election fraud, Hillary Clinton, John McCain, LHS, mitt tomney, New Hampshire, new hampshire district, new hampshire primaries, premier, rasmussen, Ron Paul, Ron Paul Banned, Ron Paul Exclusions, Rudy Giuliani, super tuesday, sutton, vote scam, voter fraud
New Hampshire District ADMITS Ron Paul Votes Not Counted
Sutton township reported Congressman had zero votes, actual number was 31
Paul Joseph Watson
Prison Planet
January 9, 2008
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MBfmksI_wYY
The head clerk of the New Hampshire town of Sutton has been forced to admit that Ron Paul received 31 votes yet when the final amount was transferred to a summary sheet and sent out to the media, the total was listed as zero. The fiasco throws the entire primary into doubt and could lead to a re-count.
As we reported earlier today, an entire family voted for Ron Paul in Sutton, yet when the voting map on the Politico website was posted, the total votes for Ron Paul were zero.
Vote fraud expert Bev Harris contacted the head clerk in Sutton, Jennifer Call, who was forced to admit that the 31 votes Ron Paul received were completely omitted from the final report sheet, claiming “human error” was responsible for the mistake.
Two or three votes not counted could be a plausible mistake – but 31 votes for one candidate?
“The classic method for rigging a hand count is to write the wrong number on the form,” Harris told the Alex Jones Show.
“They are counting everything in public real nice, they fill out a form in public real nice and then they transfer it to another form and they call that a summary sheet and then that is the one they send in,” explained Harris.
“What happened is she said they did not transfer the number correctly and put zero instead of 31 – that is unacceptable as an answer.”
With 100% of precincts now reporting, the map originally listed zero votes for Ron Paul as you can see below. It has now been updated to reflect the 31 votes Paul actually received.
The remainder of the 31 people in Sutton who voted for Ron Paul need to go public immediately with the charge of vote fraud and make it known that they were cheated out of their right to vote.
Harris estimates that it could cost the Ron Paul campaign as much as $67,000 dollars for a recount, but such a move could throw the entire primary into doubt, especially in light of the fact that Barack Obama appears to have been cheated out of a win by Hillary Clinton.
Clear Evidence Of Widespread Vote Fraud In New Hampshire
Paul and Obama cheated out of 3rd and 1st by voting machines, hand count fraud
Paul Joseph Watson
Prison Planet
January 9, 2008
There were several major vote fraud issues to arise out of the New Hampshire primary revolving mainly around Ron Paul and Barack Obama, who were both seemingly cheated out of third and first places respectively as a result of rigged Diebold voting machines and deliberate malfeasance in the counting of hand-written paper ballots.
– Obama had a 13 to 15 point lead over Hillary Clinton heading into the primary. Nothing occured that boosted Hillary’s numbers immediately before the election, in fact immediately after the staged crying incident, many pundits argued it could only have harmed her chances. And yet Hillary somehow managed to instigate a near 20 point swing to defeat Obama by three per cent. If not for her 7% swing as a result of Diebold voting machines, Hillary would have lost to Obama. If Obama was struggling he would probably contest this bizarre outcome, but he is likely to accept the results simply to save face.
– The New Hampshire town of Sutton admits that it voided every vote Ron Paul received. The Congressman got 31 votes and yet due to a “human error,” Sutton reported zero votes for Ron Paul. How “human error” can explain not counting 31 votes in succession for one single candidate is beyond the pale and Ron Paul’s campaign should ask for a recount across New Hampshire immediately.
– As soon as people went public with the fact that their votes in Sutton had not been counted, other districts where Paul had supposedly received zero votes, such as Greenville, suddenly changed their final tallies and attributed votes to the Congressman.
– Going into New Hampshire Ron Paul was polling in the early teens and was a strong bet to take third place behind McCain and Romney. Four days before the vote, Rasmussen had Paul at 14% – a significant lead over Huckabee on 11% and Giuliani on 8% – and yet Ron Paul finished with just 8%. Proof of clear vote fraud, allied with the fact that Paul’s numbers show a 6% swing from normally accurate pre-polling forecasts, clearly indicate chicanery was at hand, especially considering the fact that Paul lost those crucial few percentage points to Giuliani as a reuslt of electronic Diebold voting machines which are known to be wide open to tampering and fraud.
– Going purely on hand-counts, which as we saw in Sutton were by no means angelic but at least harder to cheat on than Diebold voting machines without getting caught, Ron Paul would have won 15% of the vote and finished third. This figure would have more accurately correlated to the pre-primary polls rather than the ridiculous 8% he was eventually given.
– Numerous districts reported totals of anything up to 22% for “other candidates”. What on earth does this black hole of “other candidates” mean? How can one vote for a candidate that is not on the ballot without spoiling the ballot paper? The district of Lisbon reported 22.5% votes for this mysterious “other” candidate, while in the large district of Londonderry, the “other” candidate received 10%. Many are now alleging that these “other” votes were merely siphoned from Ron Paul to keep his final number low.
– Rudy Giuliani, the 9/11 candidate who beat Ron Paul thanks to the aid of a 3% swing on Diebold voting machines, received 9.11% of the vote in three different towns. Coincidence or somebody’s idea of a sick joke?
Protect Ron Paul from Vote Fraud
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IQxB5VKWlfg
CNN Mentions Possibility Of Vote Fraud
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lcwdKBVt_Ew
Is this Fraud??
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qV6qAGigGYY
Related News:
Will Ron Paul authorize an audit of the New Hampshire primary?
http://www.newswithviews.com/Devvy/kidd335.htm
Clear Evidence Of Widespread Vote Fraud In New Hampshire
http://www.prisonplanet.com..08/011008_clinton_fraud.htm
NH Hand Count Results Show Vote Fraud
http://www.dailypaul.com/node/23643
Ron Paul Votes Not Counted In New Hampshire District
http://prisonplanet.com/articles/january2008/010908_not_counted.htm
Clinton Received a 4.5% Boost In “Diebold” Towns
http://benmoseley.blogspot.com/20..how-election.html
Greenville Vote Discrepancy SAME as Sutton
http://www.ronpaulwarroom.com/?p=754
Diebold says Hillary won NH, hand count says Obama
http://presscue.com/node/38034
Results: Precincts where Ron Paul had 0-386 votes total
http://www.ronpaulwarroom.com/?p=686
NH Primary: Pre-Election Polls Wildly Different Than Results Announced for Clinton/Obama
http://www.bradblog.com/?p=5530
NH debacle: BBC wants to hear from you NOW!
http://mparent7777-2.blogs..exit-polls.htmlc4252478287468633249
Giuliani gets 9.11% of the vote in three towns?
http://www.ronpaulwarroom.com/?p=764
Paul Not Swayed By Fifth Place
http://www.nashuatelegraph.com/a..9/NEWS08/149590144/-1/news08
Paul hopes cash gets him to Super Tuesday
http://www.chron.com/disp/story.mpl/headline/nation/5439272.html
New Hampshire Primary – ALL Diebold, ALL the Time
http://www.scoop.co.nz/stories/HL0801/S00057.htm
Ron Paul Statement on The New Republic Smear Regarding Racist Newsletters
http://mparent7777-2.blogspot.com/200..ent-on-new-republic.html
Ron Paul Teaches Laura Ingraham A Few Badly Needed Lessons
Did Diebold rig New Hampshire?
Ron Paul On CNN During New Hampshire Primary
West Virginia Sticks With Electronic Voting Machines
Ron Paul: Vote Fraud Victim
How Big Corporations Choose ‘Your’ Candidates
Filed under: 2008 Election, alan keyes, Barack Obama, bev harris, Black Box Voting, Diebold, election fraud, Iowa, iowa caucus, John Silvestro, LHS, lou dobbs, New Hampshire, new hampshire primaries, premier, Ron Paul, Ron Paul Banned, Ron Paul Exclusions, south carolina, sutton, vote scam, voter fraud
Vote Fraud Expert Warns Of New Hampshire Chicanery
Key vulnerabilities of Diebold machine identified within ten minutes by programmer
Paul Joseph Watson
Prison Planet
January 8, 2008
“It’s not who votes that counts. It’s who counts the votes.” Joseph Stalin.
Vote fraud expert Bev Harris has warned that New Hampshire’s electronic voting machines are wide open to fraud and that even modestly skilled computer programmers were able to identify key vulnerabilities within ten minutes of assessing them as key Democrat and Republican primaries unfold today.
The contract for programming all of New Hampshire’s Diebold voting machines, which combined will count 81 per cent of the vote today, is owned by LHS Associates, which also holds the contracts for Connecticut, Massachusetts, and Vermont.
LHS is owned by John Silvestro, who has been at the center of a long-running public dispute in trying to deflect accusations made by hacker Harri Hursti that the machines can easily be rigged.
“The exact same make, model and version hacked in the Black Box Voting project in Leon County is used throughout New Hampshire, where about 45 percent of elections administrators hand count paper ballots at the polling place, with the remaining locations all using the Diebold version 1.94w optical scan machine,” writes Harris.
In this You Tube video, Silvestro constantly interrupts Hursti’s testimony in front of the New Hampshire legislative.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PiiaBqwqkXs
After purchasing a Diebold 1.94w machine, a computer repair shop employee picked at random by Black Box Voting was able to zero in on the system’s vulnerable memory card within just ten minutes.
Harris points out that LHS is a private company that will count over four fifths of the New Hampshire vote with no oversight whatsoever.
LHS is not subject to public records requirements, as the government is, at least, not in New Hampshire. The control over memory card contents is absolute; when cards malfunction or get lost, LHS brings the replacements. Since LHS maintains the machines, repairs the machines, and replaces the machines — often on Election Day — when they malfunction, they have intimate access to the chips, sockets, ports, communications devices and other electronic components.
A recent CNN report featured on Lou Dobbs’ show highlights just how easy it is to hack a voting machine and change how votes are tallied with just rudimentary programming skills. Experts warn that it takes only a minute for an unsupervised machine to be inserted with a virus and hacked.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=261IlYmisyE
http://www.ronpaulwarroom.com/?p=681
Bev Harris: Iowa Caucus Had Vote Fraud
http://www.bbvforums.org/cgi-bin/forums/board-auth.cgi?file=/1954/71128.html
Obama and Paul poll workers kicked out of some precincts
http://www.boston.com/news/local/politics/…html?p1=email_to_a_friend
How Obama and Richardson Cheated in the Iowa Caucuses
http://www.revrob.com/content/view/103/48/
81% of New Hampshire ballots are counted in secret by a private corporation named Diebold Election Systems (now known as “Premier”)
http://mparent7777-2.blogs..-hampshire-ballots-are-counted.html
S.C. to use voting machines banned in other states
http://www.charleston.n…oting_machines_banned_other_sta26854/
How to Rig an Election: Convicted Phone-Jammer Tells All
http://www.abcnews.go.com/Politics/Vote2008/story?id=4088097
Filed under: 2008 Election, Diebold, election fraud, florida, florida straw poll, GOP, Mitt Romney, neocons, poll, republican straw poll, romney cheating, Ron Paul, stolen election, voter fraud, voting scam
Romney Supporters Voting More Than Once (Part 2)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=W8wjJieSib0
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bDjPY_ngxNU
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rdCcGWX2SuU
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pOerHpPEMJ4
Romney Supporters Caught Voting Multiple Times In Florida Straw Poll (Part 1)
http://noworldsystem.com/2007/12/0….es-in-florida-straw-poll/
Romney, GOP FL Big Poll Questions?
http://www.freemarketnews.com/WorldNews.asp?nid=52000
Filed under: 2008 Election, Diebold, election fraud, florida, GOP, Mitt Romney, neocons, poll, republican straw poll, Ron Paul, stolen election, voter fraud, voting scam
Romney Supporters Caught Voting Multiple Times In Florida Straw Poll
St. Petersburg Times
November 29, 2007
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nS9Mas0Kt8U
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pljdFb5OjyE
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZzFnrLvszFw
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hZVOgsLwDZc
Mitt Romney bought himself a victory in the straw poll for Republicans at a rain-shortened barbecue in Vinoy Park. Romney got 893 votes, besting second-place Ron Paul’s 534 — despite Paul’s shuttling in supporters on a rented trolley and shuttle. The campaign had a plane sporting pro-Paul slogans and a boat touting him, too.
In fact, Paul supporters dominated the crowd, which reached an estimated 1,000 people. Tickets for votes cost $20 each.
So how did Romney do it?
“I voted 20 times,” Derek Gyongzois, 38, of St. Petersburg exclaimed after casting ballots.
He said he works as a volunteer for the Romney campaign (and begged a reporter not to print his 20-vote tally). Did he buy the tickets?
“I don’t have that kind of money,” Gyongzois said.
He wasn’t the only person voting more than once. Paul supporter Mike Wagner, 57, of St. Petersburg: “This thing is rigged.”
Before rain cut short the event, Paul supporters were voting multiple times, too.
“This is the best election money can buy, anywhere,” said Pinellas County GOP chairman Tony DiMatteo, a Rudy Giuliani supporter. Giuliani received 39 votes, followed by Mike Huckabee’s 37 and Fred Thompson’s 21. John McCain had 12; Duncan Hunter, 4, Alan Keyes, 2; and Tom Tancredo, 1.
Filed under: 2008 Election, Alabama, CNBC, Diebold, florida, Fox News, Fred Thompson, GOP, John McCain, Mitt Romney, poll, Propaganda, Republican Debate, republican straw poll, Ron Paul, Rudy Giuliani, Sean Hannity, voter fraud
Ron Paul Supporters Prove CNBC’s Ratings Stink
Mark Anderson
Op Ed News
October 13, 2007
After the most recent Republican Party debate on CNBC, the network ran a post-debate poll, which was promptly removed after too many Ron Paul supporters voted. In all seriousness, the explanation for removal is that Ron Paul supporters voted. In other words: CNBC didn’t like the results, so then removed their own poll.
This prompts the question: if poll results are to be discarded because you don’t like the results, then why even run a poll? This almost causes me to wonder if the “scientific” and “legitimate” polls are also designed to achieve a pre-ordained outcome. If a polling company gets something other than a desired result, do they change the results, or throw the poll out altogether?
In the CNBC editor’s explanation, he writes: “Now Paul is a fine gentleman with some substantial backing and, by the way, was a dynamic presence throughout the debate , but I haven’t seen him pull those kind of numbers in any ‘legit’ poll.”
You see? Pursuant to this calculus, all polls must show the same results – which makes them something other than real polls. If there is a disparity between two polls, then the one showing Ron Paul in the lead must be wrong, and then discarded. If, on the other hand, say, Rudy Giuliani had won the poll by a hefty margin, would they have discarded those results as well?
Which prompts the question: if Rudy Giuliani, Mitt Romney, Fred Thompson, and John McCain are the true front-runners, with legions of fans everywhere, why can’t they replicate the same thing Ron Paul supporters are doing? Where are the supporters for the other candidates?
What exactly makes the offline polls so much more scientific? In those polls, the polling companies get to choose the respondents. In online polls, people can choose to respond. Let’s not forget that elections are not conducted the same way polls are. The media and the polling companies do not get to choose who they want to vote.
Ron Paul has dominated virtually every single post-debate poll, causing the media to ignore and conceal the results of their own polls. The media has ignored so many Ron Paul debate poll victories that I have lost count. After Ron Paul does well in a poll, there is always some status quo conspiracy theorist to come along and accuse Ron Paul supporters of “spamming” or “hacking” polls, albeit without offering any evidence.
Many people who have researched this issue more than I have concluded that “spamming” polls isn’t as easy as pretended. For example: polling software will prevent a single Internet Protocol address (i.e., I.P. address, which is unique for every computer) from voting more than once.
Okay. So it is possible to vote a plurality of times in a single poll. Although I have never attempted to vote more than once in any poll, theoretically, I could have pulled off such a feat by voting once on my computer, and then, I suppose, drive to a friend’s house to vote from their computer as well. But so could any other candidate’s supporter do the same thing.
If we are to assume that if Ron Paul does well in a poll, it must have been due to a certain percentage of spam votes, then it would only be fair to assume the same trend for all of the candidates. Do Ron Paul supporters have super-secret poll spamming technology that nobody else knows of? Are only Ron Paul supporters motivated enough to attempt this?
Or, what about Sean Hannity explaining away the results of FOX News’ own poll by saying that Ron Paul supporters were “re-dialing” in text messages? That one was done via cellular phone text messaging, and it was impossible to vote more than once from one cell phone. Well, I suppose I could own more than one cell phone. But then so could any of the other candidate’s supporters. Only Ron Paul supporters “cheat” now? Is that it?
BTW, I only have one cellular phone, as I can barely afford to pay my only cellular phone bill.
If Ron Paul supporters are so technologically savvy, are so willing to cheat, and possess such secretive technology that seems to escape everybody else, then I must say I feel much more re-assured about the future of U.S. elections. We should have no problem stopping Diebold from tampering with the real election results, right?
It shouldn’t be so hard to believe Ron Paul could do well in polls for those who pay careful attention to the news. Albeit, one has to look hard for the news coverage. Ron Paul has been doing very well at straw polls. “Spamming” a straw poll in which the person must show up and vote in the flesh would be a fairly difficult feat to pull off.
When I looked at the results of the CNBC poll which was removed, the first thought that came to my mind was that CNBC may be trying to conceal more than just another Ron Paul victory.
There were just over 7,000 votes cast in their poll. Ron Paul garnered 75% of the vote. This means approximately 5,250 votes were cast for Ron Paul, leaving the other 8 candidates with a combined total of approximately 1,750 votes.
If we are compelled to abide by the mainstream media’s “scientific” curve, then we are allowed to give Ron Paul no more than, say, 2% of the total. This means we can add approximately 36 votes for Ron Paul onto the 1,750, throwing out 5,214 Ron Paul votes. This leaves us with a grand total of 1,786 votes cast on CNBC’s post-debate poll.
What do I see in this? Either a)There was no spamming, in which case Ron Paul supporters outnumber CNBC viewers by far, or b)As CNBC claims, Ron Paul’s total has to match the “scientific” polls, making everything else “spam,” meaning CNBC had only 1,786 viewers who voted in the poll.
From what I can tell, CNBC should be very concerned about its own ratings. The old media is dead. If polls showed that more than .05% of the population watches CNBC, I couldn’t believe it. I would have to discard those poll results. Maybe CNBC is trying to conceal its piss poor ratings.
How else do you explain the supporters of a man garnering “2%” in the “scientific” polls organizing so effectively that they are able to skew poll results of a network television station 3-to-1 in their favor, against 8 other candidates?
Ron Paul on PBS NewsHour with Jim Lehrer – (10/12/2007)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1Ylk69fDO4U
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Q1l0e5Q2nGA
Ron Paul in NYC last night
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KC0EMgYRW14
Ron Paul Grass-roots Amazes CNN
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9vCujXOsFh0
An Open Letter to MSNBC/CNBC
http://www.opednews.com/arti…open_letter_to_ms.htm
A Ron Paul Supporter’s Open Reply to Mr. Wastler’s Open Letter to the Ron Paul Faithful
http://www.americanchronicle.com/articles/viewArticle.asp?articleID=40170
Ron Paul wins Conservative Leadership Conference Straw Poll
http://politicalderby.com/2007/10/13/ron-pa….ip-conference-straw-poll/
Ron Paul Wins Alabama Straw Poll
http://www.al.com/news/birminghamn…8830.xml&coll=2
Ron Paul Signs not allowed in Florida
http://youtube.com/watch?v=cJG3GB4EXag
Letter To “Don De Bats” Concerning Ron Paul
http://prisonplanet.com/articles/october2007/131007Letter.htm
What kind of “journalist” pronounces his own poll void because he doesn’t like the results?
http://members.boardhost.com/libtoday/msg/1192236391.html
Smear Campaign Against Ron Paul Goes Into Overdrive
The International Murdoch Media Smearing Of Ron Paul Begins
CNBC On Why They Pulled Debate Poll
Ron Paul Wins Debate In Another Landslide
Unbelievable Video: How Lawmakers Vote
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eG6X-xtVask
Filed under: 9/11 Truth, Censorship, CIA, Colbert Report, Diebold, Loose Change, Wikipedia
Credibility Of Wikipedia Takes a Dive After Wired Exposé
Online encyclopedia outed as bias tool of intelligence agencies, corporations by new Wikipedia Scanner database
Paul Joseph Watson
Prison Planet
August 14, 2007
The credibility of the online encyclopedia Wikipedia has taken another dive after a newly developed software program exposed how the CIA, corporations like Diebold and others routinely edit entries to bury criticism and manipulate the truth.
In our previous investigation, we revealed how a group of trolls were engaged in a concerted campaign to erase the 9/11 truth movement, along with a host of other controversial subjects, out of cyber existence by voting to delete pages about subjects and individuals that obviously warrant a page on Wikipedia.
Examples we cited included such manifestly provable “conspiracy theories” as “List of Republican sex scandals,” “People questioning the 9/11 Commission Report” and “Movement to impeach George W. Bush”.
Trolls were even allowed to delete the Wiki page for Dylan Avery, who has appeared on Fox News, CNN and in hundreds of newspaper reports. Avery is the producer of the most watched documentary film in Internet history, he clearly merits a biography page on an online encyclopedia, but Wikipedia had no qualms in letting Morton Devonshire and other trolls deep six the entry.
Devonshire and his cohorts have exhibited extreme bias and agenda driven tactics in organizing to purge Wikipedia of material about the 9/11 truth movement, but Wikipedia hasn’t done a damn thing to stop it.
Now a CalTech graduate student has developed a software tool that threatens to slam the final nail in the coffin of any credibility Wikipedia had left.
“Wikipedia Scanner — the brainchild of CalTech computation and neural-systems graduate student Virgil Griffith — offers users a searchable database that ties millions of anonymous Wikipedia edits to organizations where those edits apparently originated, by cross-referencing the edits with data on who owns the associated block of internet IP addresses,” reports Wired News.
“On November 17th, 2005, an anonymous Wikipedia user deleted 15 paragraphs from an article on e-voting machine-vendor Diebold, excising an entire section critical of the company’s machines. While anonymous, such changes typically leave behind digital fingerprints offering hints about the contributor, such as the location of the computer used to make the edits.”
“In this case, the changes came from an IP address reserved for the corporate offices of Diebold itself. And it is far from an isolated case. A new data-mining service launched Monday traces millions of Wikipedia entries to their corporate sources, and for the first time puts comprehensive data behind longstanding suspicions of manipulation, which until now have surfaced only piecemeal in investigations of specific allegations.”
Griffith has compiled a list of different corporations and branches of government that have abused the so-called impartiality of Wikipedia to essentially edit the truth out of existence, replacing it with a PR friendly facade favorable not to the facts or any sense of neutrality, but only to the interests of the parties concerned.
The creVirgil Griffith, creator of a software program that allows users to track who is editing Wikipedia entries.
The Wikipedia Scanner (http://wikiscanner.virgil.gr/) also allows users to type in an IP range and find out which organizations are editing what pages on Wikipedia.
“The result: A database of 5.3 million edits, performed by 2.6 million organizations or individuals ranging from the CIA to Microsoft to Congressional offices, now linked to the edits they or someone at their organization’s net address has made. Some of this appears to be transparently self-interested, either adding positive, press release-like material to entries, or deleting whole swaths of critical material,” concludes the Wired report.
Unless Wikipedia founder Jimmy Wales (pictured top) acts immediately to completely restructure Wikipedia’s entire operating system, the online encyclopedia will gradually combust and degenerate into nothing more than a laughing stock.
From many quarters, the giggles are already being heard.
“I’m going to log on to Wikipedia here and I am going to change it,” said comedian Stepehen Colbert. “You see, any user can change any entry. And if enough other users agree with them, it becomes true.”
Though Wikipedia’s raison d’etre is obviously based around allowing users to edit the content, the checks to prevent abuse and organized partisan attack campaigns against certains subjects or ideas are non-existent and the absence of any kind of reasonable moderation is destroying Wiki’s reputation.
Wikipedia is fast becoming a complete anathema to reliable research and will see its wavering reputation as a trustworthy source for information quickly evaporate if it continues to allow itself to be abused by intelligence agencies, corporations and dedicated trolls.
Diebold & CIA Actively Editing Wikipedia
http://www.wired.com/politics/onlinerights/news/2007/08/wiki_tracker?currentPage=all
Companies and party aides cast censorious eye over Wikipedia
http://www.guardian.co.uk/….=networkfront
Vote On the Most Shameful Wikipedia Spin Jobs
http://blog.wired.com/27bstroke6/2007/08/vote-on-the-top.html
100% Proof Google is Keeping Conspiracy Sites Down
http://www.theultimateconspiracy.com/media_contro….down.htm
California Restricts Voting Machines
AP
August 4, 2007
California’s secretary of state placed rigorous security conditions on voting equipment used in dozens of counties and limited the use of two of the most widely used machines statewide.
Secretary of State Debra Bowen announced the measures minutes before midnight Friday night — making good on a promise to tell counties if their voting equipment would be decertified at least six months before California’s Feb. 5 presidential primary.
The announcement leaves the most affected counties with little time to find alternate equipment in time for the primary. The decision follows an eight-week security review of voting systems used in all but a few of California’s 58 counties.
University of California computer experts found that voting machines sold by three companies — Diebold Election Systems, Hart InterCivic and Sequoia Voting Systems — were vulnerable to hackers and that voting results could be altered.
Bowen said she had decertified the machines for use and then recertified them on the condition they meet her new security standards. When asked what would happen if the companies failed to do so, Bowen responded, ”I think they will.”
She also limited the Diebold and Sequoia machines to one per polling place. That will force some counties to find replacement equipment on a tight schedule.
Bowen ordered the review, which was released last week, to ensure that California would not face the same doubts about the accuracy of its voting systems that hit Florida after the 2000 election and Ohio in 2004.
The additional security requirements she imposed included banning all modum or wireless connections to the machines to prevent them from being linked to an outside computer or the Internet. Each machine that must be recertified also has a lengthy list of additional conditions it must meet, many of them highly technical.
She also required a full manual count of all votes cast on Diebold or Sequoia machines to ensure accuracy.
Bowen said the study revealed some vulnerabilities that would allow hackers to manipulate the systems ”with little chance of detection and with dire consequences.” Her review also found that the machines posed problems for disabled voters.
Steve Weir, president of the state association of registrars, warned that the companies would have to get federal approval if Bowen’s conditions for recertification require any more than minimal changes to a machine’s software and hardware. That process could take up to eight months — well past California’s presidential primary.
Company officials have downplayed the results of Bowen’s review, saying they reflected unrealistic, worst-case scenarios that would be counteracted by security measures taken by the companies and local election officials.
The companies also complained that the examiners had access to computer coding, manuals and other information that is not available to the public.
Officials with Sequoia said they were disappointed with Bowen’s withdrawal of the company’s certification but would make necessary improvements. They defended their equipment as accurate and secure.
”Electronic voting systems have never been successfully tampered with in an actual election,” the company said in a statement. ”That same statement cannot be made about lever machines and paper-based voting systems throughout our nation’s history.”
Messages left with Diebold and Hart InterCivic early Saturday morning were not immediately returned.
Machines made by a fourth company, Election Systems & Software, were not included in the review because it was late providing information the secretary of state’s office needed, said Nicole Winger, a spokeswoman for Bowen.
The secretary of state launched a separate review of that company’s Inkavote Plus system, which is used only in Los Angeles County. On Friday, Bowen said she had decertified that equipment but would review and reconsider it.
A message left for a company spokesman early Saturday morning was not immediately returned.
noworldsystem.com 