noworldsystem.com


Israel News Warns Of Biblical War With Iran

Israel News Warns Of Biblical War With Iran

Israel International News
October 22, 2007

(IsraelNN.com) US President George W. Bush said a nuclear Iran would mean World War III. Israeli newscasts featured Gog & Magog maps of the likely alignment of nations in that potential conflict.

Channel 2 and Channel 10 TV showed the world map, sketching the basic alignment of the two opposing axes in a coming world war, in a manner evoking associations of the Gog and Magog prophecy for many viewers. The prophecy of Gog and Magog refers to a great world war centered on the Holy Land and Jerusalem and first appears in the book of Yechezkel (Ezekiel).

On one side were Israel, the United States, Britain, France and Germany. On the other were Iran, Russia, China, Syria and North Korea.

US President Bush said Wednesday during a press conference that Iran attaining nuclear weapons raises the risk of “World War III.”

“If Iran had a nuclear weapon, it’d be a dangerous threat to world peace,” Bush said. “So I told people that if you’re interested in avoiding World War III, it seems like you ought to be interested [in preventing a nuclear Iran]…I take the threat of Iran with a nuclear weapon very seriously.”

Russian President Vladimir Putin visited Iran Tuesday and slammed the US’s refusal to rule out the use of force against Iran’s nuclear project. “Not only should we reject the use of force, but also the mention of force as a possibility,” he said.

Russia has blocked tougher UN sanctions in the UN Security Council, where it has veto power. The Russian president asserts that there is no evidence Iran is pursuing nuclear weapons rather than a peaceful nuclear power program.

Israel’s Foreign Minister Tzipi Livni called for a new Security Council resolution against Iran at a press conference following her meeting with US Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice Wednesday. “I do believe there is a need for another Security Council resolution,” she told reporters. “In the past, the need to get everybody on board – including Russia and China – led to some compromises on the nature of the sanctions. I hope this will not be the case this time.”

Prime Minister Ehud Olmert announced Wednesday a sudden trip to Moscow Thursday morning, where he will meet with Putin about Iran. Other topics of discussion will reportedly be Russia’s continued supply of weapons to Syria, which have then made their way into the hands of various terrorist groups based there as well.

 

Horowitz & Islamo-Fascism Awareness Week

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ktl7yWvXo3I

Related News:

VIDEO: purported Bin Laden tape tells insurgents to unite
http://mediamonarchy.blogspot.com/

US: AlCIAda Using Government Vehicles
http://blogs.abcnews.com/theblotter/2007/10/us-al-qaeda-usi.html

Iran would need 3-8 years to produce bomb: IAEA chief
http://www.reuters.com/artic….SL2214711120071022

70 Punished In B-52 Nuke Incident
http://apnews.myway.com/article/20071020/D8SCT67O0.html

Iran To Fire 11K Rockets In One Minute If Attacked
http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=….4b1&show_article=1

Mullen: U.S. Can Strike Iran
http://www.washingtontimes.com/apps/pb….plate=nextpage

Military Resistance Forced Shift on Iran Strike
http://ipsnews.net/news.asp?idnews=39716

Iran backing terror, says Blair
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/americas/7052080.stm

We can attack Iran, says US commander
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/ma….0/wiran120.xml

Who Will Rule Us After the Next 9/11?
http://www.slate.com/id/2176185/

‘If action is going to be taken, it’s not going to be Israel alone’
7/Uhttp://www.jpost.com/se…ame=JPost%2FJPArticle%2FShowFull

US intelligence does not show Syrian nuclear weapons program, officials say
Afghanistan says no proof Iran govt arming Taliban
World War III Is Going To Be Hilarious
How a Second Terrorist Attack Will Benefit George W. Bush
US general implicates Iran military in Afghan weapons find
Iran brushes off Bush ‘World War III’ warning
Bush Warns Of World War III If Iran Goes Nuclear
Rachel Maddow: Bush says ‘World War III is worth starting’ over Iran
Middle East peace envoy Blair launches attack on Iran
Former Mossad chief says Iran does not present threat to Israel’s existence
The Iran hawks
Republicans saber rattle on Iran
DEBKAfile Exclusive: Warning letters delivered to thousands of Jewish families in Iran advise them to leave the country without delay
Minot B-52 scandal hardly an accident
FLASHBACK: Hillary shifts right with talk of military strike on Iran
FLASHBACK: Edwards: ‘Iran must know world won’t back down’
FLASHBACK: Obama would consider missile strikes on Iran
Gates says all options on table for Iran
Clinton would use violence against Tehran
Juan Williams: Kristol Is Pushing For ‘The Next World War’
Congress must approve U.S. attack vs Iran: Pelosi
Analysts Find Israel Struck a Nuclear Project Inside Syria
AIPAC is pushing us to war with Iran for Israel
Russia: Stop threatening Iran
Wesley Clark’s new memoir casts light on Bush Admin’s Secret Strategy for regime change in Iran
USA prepares 14-ton super bomb to blow up Iran’s nuclear objects
Giuliani Ramps Up Iran Hawkishness, Hires Neocon Michael Rubin
Rice Says Iran ‘Lying’ About Nukes
Neocons coming to your campus to promote Iran war. Horowitz, Coulter, Santorum, hundreds more.
Iran builds air base near Afghan border
NATO, U.S. Aiding PKK Terrorists In Turkey
White House denies leaking al-Qaeda info
War clouds loom ever more menacingly over Iran
No evidence of Iranian nuclear bomb plan: Putin
Hillary prods Bush to go after Iran
Al-CIAda Video Released Prematurely
Probe Into Leaked AlCIAda Video

Coup on Iran & False Flag News Archive

 



Republicans saber rattle on Iran

Republicans saber rattle on Iran

AFP
October 16, 2007

WASHINGTON (AFP) – Republican White House candidates pounded Iran Tuesday, with Rudolph Giuliani warning of a military strike to deprive it of a nuclear bomb, and a top rival lashing “terror masters” in Tehran.

The candidates talked tough before the receptive audience of the Republican Jewish Coalition, fleshing out already hawkish stands on the Iran, emerging as a dominant foreign policy issue in the 2008 campaign.

Giuliani, running on his legacy as New York’s mayor after the September 11 attacks in 2001, sharpened his rhetoric as the campaign raced towards first party nominating contests in less than 90 days.

The date of the first of those contests, the fabled Iowa caucuses was expected to be set by Republicans in the state later Tuesday for January 3, in the earliest start ever to a US electoral contest.

Giuliani said every new American president prayed to avoid war, but accused Tehran of backing attacks on US troops in Iraq, and ruled out the notion of America learning to live with a nuclear Iran.

“We have seen what Iran will do with ordinary weapons,” Giuliani told a forum of presidential candidates organized by the coalition.

“If I am president of the United States, I guarantee you, we will never find out what they will do if they get nuclear weapons, because they are not going to get a nuclear weapon.”

“The military option is not off the table. If America is clear that we will exercise the military option, the chances that we will have to do it decline.”

Giuliani, who leads national Republican polls, said there was no doubt Iran was building nuclear weapons — a charge Tehran denies, saying its effort is designed to meet energy needs.

Fred Thompson, the former actor and senator who jumped into the race last month, hit out at Iran and Syria, a tactic popular with the hawkish base of core Republican voters candidates are trying to woo.

“The terror masters in Tehran and Damascus make only the most minor distinction between America and Israel,” Thompson said.

“They say America is the ‘Great Satan’ and Israel is the ‘Little Satan’ and both must be destroyed.

“The US must make it clear that we will not allow Iran to be a nuclear threat,” Thompson said, calling for greater steps to get rid of the “hated regime” in Tehran.

Attacking Iran is good politics for Republican candidates, allowing them to pose as robust on national security, paper over differences with the party’s social conservative wing, and detract attention from the issue of what to do about Iraq.

Hawkish rhetoric is part of every US election campaign, though it is not always followed up with action, once the victorious candidate faces the reality of conducting foreign policy in a difficult world.

Giuliani also used the issue of Iran to hammer another rival, former Massachusetts governor Mitt Romney.

At a debate on October 9, Romney, asked whether he would seek authorization from Congress before launching a military strike against Iran, replied: “You sit down with your attorneys and they tell you what you have to do.”

Giuliani compared the moment to when he threw late Palestinian leader Yasser Arafat out of a United Nations concert in New York.

“I didn’t call for a team of lawyers, to tell me, ‘on the one hand we can throw him out, but on the other, maybe we can partially throw him out'”.

“I just made a decision. I led.”

Romney joined other Republicans Tuesday in accusing Democratic 2008 candidates, particularly front-runner Hillary Clinton and her chief rival Barack Obama, of weakness on Iran.

“It is time for Democrats to break their silence and answer this question — will you act to stop a nuclear Iran? Let me assure you I will,” he said.

On Monday, Clinton said in a new foreign policy essay that the United States should offer Tehran a calibrated package of incentives for it to renounce nuclear development, reject terrorism and back Middle East peace moves.

But she and her aides clearly also stated that she would not take the military option off the table if negotiations failed.

Related News:

DEBKAfile Exclusive: Warning letters delivered to thousands of Jewish families in Iran advise them to leave the country without delay
http://prisonplanet.com/articles/october2007/181007Jewish.htm

Minot B-52 scandal hardly an accident
http://www.presstv.ir/detail.aspx?id=27349&secti..3510203

FLASHBACK: Hillary shifts right with talk of military strike on Iran
http://www.newsday.com/news/n…6jan19,0,5773049.story

FLASHBACK: Edwards: ‘Iran must know world won’t back down’
http://www.rawstory.com/news/2007/E…orld_wont_0123.html

FLASHBACK: Obama would consider missile strikes on Iran
http://www.chicagotr…304.story?ctrack=1&cset=true

Gates says all options on table for Iran
http://www.reuters.com/article/newsOne/idUSN1534850420071016?sp=true

Clinton would use violence against Tehran
http://www.guardian.co.uk/u…?gusrc=rss&feed=networkfront

Juan Williams: Kristol Is Pushing For ‘The Next World War’
http://thinkprogress.org/2007/10/14/iran-williams-kristol

Congress must approve U.S. attack vs Iran: Pelosi
Analysts Find Israel Struck a Nuclear Project Inside Syria
AIPAC is pushing us to war with Iran for Israel
Russia: Stop threatening Iran
Wesley Clark’s new memoir casts light on Bush Admin’s Secret Strategy for regime change in Iran
USA prepares 14-ton super bomb to blow up Iran’s nuclear objects
Giuliani Ramps Up Iran Hawkishness, Hires Neocon Michael Rubin
Rice Says Iran ‘Lying’ About Nukes
Neocons coming to your campus to promote Iran war. Horowitz, Coulter, Santorum, hundreds more.
Iran builds air base near Afghan border
NATO, U.S. Aiding PKK Terrorists In Turkey
White House denies leaking al-Qaeda info
War clouds loom ever more menacingly over Iran
No evidence of Iranian nuclear bomb plan: Putin
Hillary prods Bush to go after Iran
Al-CIAda Video Released Prematurely
Probe Into Leaked AlCIAda Video

Coup on Iran & False Flag News Archive

 



Report: Cheney ordered nuking Iran

Report: Cheney ordered nuking Iran

Press TV
October 6, 2007

A new report has linked the mysterious flight of a nuclear armed B-52 bomber to the US Vice President’s secret plan to attack Iran.

Earlier, news outlets revealed that, on August 30, a B-52 bomber loaded with six nuclear armed cruise missiles had flown for more than three hours over several states. The incident prompted an Air Force investigation and the firing of one commander.

The report by Webster Tarpley published on Rense website on Saturday claimed that many analysts believed those weapons were destined to be used in a nuclear blitz on Iran, which may have been scheduled for September 6, the day that Israel launched its own aerial attack on Syria.

The report adds ” Even more heinous uses of these cruise missiles here inside the United States can also not be excluded, given the insistence of the Cheney Doctrine on a terrorist act in the US to be blamed on Iran as the immediate pretext for the Iran war ­ as Zbigniew Brzezinski told the Senate Foreign relations Committee on Feb. 1, 2007.”

Many sources (see Wayne Madsen Report, September 24) agree that the transfer of these nuclear weapons to Iran was blocked by US Air Force personnel, backed up by anti-Cheney factions in the intelligence community, who refused to obey an illegal order.

It is also important to note that some half dozen personnel linked to the Minot and Barksdale air bases have reportedly died under mysterious circumstances since July.

Elsewhere in his report, Tarpley quotes his sources as saying that “It is unlikely that a sneak attack on Iran could get through the normal channels of the US national security interagency process. The realization of Cheney’s war plan depends upon an outside manufactured event, along the lines of 9/11, which could be used to engineer the typical neocon end run around the standard operating procedures and launch the wider war. “

Webster Griffin Tarpley is an author, lecturer, and critic of US foreign and domestic policy. He maintains that the events of 9/11 were engineered by the military and arms industries. He envisions a model of false flag terror operated by a rogue network of independent operatives in the privatized military intelligence sector and corporate media.

Vet Questions Why Lost Nukes Sent To Mid-East
http://rawstory.com/news/2007/Navy_v….six_nuclear_1008.html

Covert Attempt To Nuke Iran Foiled By Leak?
http://www.agoracosmopolitan.com/home/Frontpage/2007/09/07/01751.html

Barksdale Nukes: Are the Neocons Attempting to Frame Iran?
http://adereview.com/blog/?p=27

 



False Flag Terror Fear On 14th Is Apparent Hoax
September 14, 2007, 1:21 pm
Filed under: 9/11, 9/11 Truth, Air Force, B-52, Barksdale, False Flag, Hoax, Nuke, Propaganda, Psyops, World Trade Center

False Flag Terror Fear On 14th Is Apparent Hoax
The truth movement needs to be more wary of straw man assertions

Steve Watson
Infowars.net
September 12, 2007

A military stand down scheduled for this friday has kicked started a buzz across the blogosphere that some kind of false flag attack may be planned in the immediate aftermath of the sixth anniversary of 9/11. Wild connections and suggestions have started to be made that have little or no basis in reality, a disconcerting trend that can be damaging to the 9/11 truth movement and those who have set out to expose false flag terrorism in general.

Earlier in the week Air Force Times reported that on Sept. 14 Air Combat Command bases, consisting of about 100,000 active-duty airmen, would be standing down training flights and many other operations as part of a command-wide safety day:

Command boss Gen. Ronald Keys ordered the Sept. 14 safety standdown in the wake of the Aug. 30 nuclear incident at Minot Air Force Base, N.D., in which six cruise missiles armed with nuclear warheads were loaded onto a B-52H and then flown to Barksdale Air Force Base, La., without anyone on the ground or bomber realizing the nuclear weapons were on the plane. It was not until the B-52H was parked at Barksdale that ground crews discovered the cruise missiles were carrying real warheads.

This is indeed interesting and it should be noted that it was reported upon widely in the mainstream media. It does not mean however that the entire military infrastructure will stand down and that America will be totally unprotected.

In addition to this some bloggers have decided to go looking for other indicators that a false flag may be in the pipeline for Friday. The results have unfortunately been somewhat irresponsible

“Strange that the main airline in Israel suddenly has “no flight” from the biggest jewish population center outside of Israel on the very same day that the entire US Air Force will be “standing down.” reports one blogger.

He goes onto provide pictorial evidence that there are no El Al flights from New York scheduled for Friday, and then also ties this in with a notice on Israeli Terrorism and Security news website DEBKA.com that they will be confining their reporting to “special security events” until the 18th of September.

“Is this a HINT? Do the jews know something about Sept 14 the way they seemed to know about 9-11?? ” he asks.

The answer is no, probably not. The reason there are no El Al flights scheduled for Friday is because they rarely ever are any El Al flights on a Friday due to the fact that the airline observes a policy of not flying on the Shabbat, the weekly day of rest in Judaism, which is observed from sundown on Friday until Saturday night.

It is also somewhat revealing that the blogger in question also writes:

“A lot of people said that 4,000 jews didn’t show up to work at the World Trade Center in New York on 9-11. Jews seemed to “know” some big attack was going to take place that day and they didn’t go to work. By the way, on 9-11, the U.S. Air Force was ordered to “stand down” while those attacks were taking place!”

This assertion has been shown to be somewhat inaccurate as there were many different people who received warnings prior to 9/11, not just “the jews”. The story stems from the fact that a Hareetz report on 9/11 stated that TWO workers from the Israeli messaging company Odigo, which had offices NOT IN THE WTC but in New York, had received messages early on the morning of 9/11, warning of the impending attacks. This report was just one example among many of prior knowledge.

It has been used over and over by debunkers of 9/11 truth groups however to imply the entire movement is anti-semitic. The BBC in particular seized on the story in their hit piece earlier this year, using the “4000 jews” angle to set up a straw man and then knock it down with stories of Israeli victims who died in the attacks.

We wish to distance ourselves from such elements of the movement that continue to insensitively hammer out baseless theories which are then easily shot down. We are concerned only with getting to the truth of 9/11 for the sake the 9/11 families and victims, for the sake of our own freedoms and the lives of those that have come in the direct firing line of our government’s actions carried out with 9/11 as justification.

Of course we should be on the lookout for military drills or exercises, given that historically they have coincided with attacks, however the lack of responsibility shown in this case is unhelpful and can lead to our movement being easily discredited, as has been shown in the past.

Rest assured that if criminal elements within the government were planning another false flag operation they certainly wouldn’t advertise the fact so blatantly.