Filed under: 9/11, 9/11 architects, 9/11 Firefighters, 9/11 Mysteries, 9/11 Physics, 9/11 steel, 9/11 Truth, 9/11 workers, AIA, Alex Jones, C-Span, Controlled Demolition, False Flag, Ground Zero, inside job, iron oxide, iron spheres, Media, metal spheres, microscopic spheres, molten metal, molten steel, nano thermite, New York, Official 9/11 Theory, pre-knowledge, richard gage, steven e. jones, steven jones, thermate, thermite, World Trade Center, wtc-7 | Tags: evaporated steel, iron oxide, iron spheres, metal spheres, microscopic spheres, molten metal, molten steel, nano thermite, steven e. jones, sulfur, thermate
AIA Architect: Evidence of 9/11 Controlled Demolition
Filed under: 9/11, 9/11 engineers, 9/11 Explosions, 9/11 Firefighters, 9/11 Physics, 9/11 planes, 9/11 Truth, 9/11 workers, al-qaeda, bin laden, Controlled Demolition, FBI, FDNY, first responders, George Bush, Ground Zero, kevin ryan, madrid, neocons, New York, NIST, NYPD, Official 9/11 Theory, Pancake Theory, spain, steven jones, War On Terror, windsor building, World Trade Center | Tags: frank de martini, underwriters laboratory, underwriters labs
Zero Investigation Into 9/11 (movie)
Filed under: 9/11, 9/11 commission, 9/11 commission report, 9/11 demolition countdown, 9/11 engineers, 9/11 Explosions, 9/11 Firefighters, 9/11 Mysteries, 9/11 Physics, 9/11 Truth, 9/11 workers, BBC, BBC foreknowledge, CNN, Controlled Demolition, FEMA, first responders, Ground Zero, kevin ryan, Media, New York, NIST, Official 9/11 Theory, Pancake Theory, pre-knowledge, steven jones, thermite, World Trade Center, wtc-7 | Tags: Danny Jowenko, Dr. David L. Griscom, Dr. James Quintiere, evaporated steel, Graham John Inman, heat transport, iron oxide, Kamal S. Obeid, molten metal, peer review, steel, steven e. jones, sulfur, thermal expansion, thermate, UL tested steel
Debunking NIST’s Conclusions about WTC 7: Easy as Shooting Fish in a Barrel
George Washington’s Blog
August 20, 2008
The Government’s side (ever changing)
9/11 truth’s side
NIST lamely tried to explain the symmetrically collapse as follows:
WTC 7’s collapse, viewed from the exterior (most videos were taken from the north), did appear to fall almost uniformly as a single unit. This occurred because the interior failures that took place did not cause the exterior framing to fail until the final stages of the building collapse. The interior floor framing and columns collapsed downward and pulled away from the exterior frame. There were clues that internal damage was taking place, prior to the downward movement of the exterior frame, such as when the east penthouse fell downward into the building and windows broke out on the north face at the ends of the building core. The symmetric appearance of the downward fall of the WTC 7 was primarily due to the greater stiffness and strength of its exterior frame relative to the interior framing.
NIST can’t have it both ways. If the exterior frame was so stiff and strong, then it should have stopped the collapse, or – at the very least – we would have seen a bowing effect where tremendous opposing forces were battling each other for dominance in determining the direction of the fall.
In real life, the thick structural beams and “stiff [and strong]” exterior frame used in the building should have quickly stopped any partial collapse, unless the support columns were all blown. At the very worst, we should see a 1 or 2 floor partial collapse.
Freefall Speed
NIST said that WTC 7 fell at 40% slower than freefall speed. But it collapsed alot faster than it would have if the structural supports were not all blown away at the same instant. 40% slower isn’t very impressive — that’s like arguing that a rock falling through concrete 40% slower than a rock falling through the air is perfectly normal.
Again, why did the building collapse at all, given that the thick structural beams should have quickly stopped any partial collapse?
Fires Knocked Down Steel-Frame Buildings
NIST said fires alone brought down Building 7, but other office fires have burned longer and hotter without causing collapse.
No Explosive Sounds
NIST also said:
“No blast sounds were heard on the audio tracks of video recordings during the collapse of WTC 7 or reported by witnesses.”
Oh, really?
What about this, this, this, this, this and this?
Moreover, as discussed below, high-tech explosives don’t necessarily make the same loud “booms” that dynamite make.
High-Tech Explosive Residues
And why were there residues for high-tech explosives at ground zero (and see this)?
Molten and Partially Evaporated Steel
And what about the pools of molten metal at ground zero for months? And why was the at and under the ground at the site of WTC 7 as hot as the ground under WTC 1 and 2?
And the New York Times wrote that partly EVAPORATED steel beams were found at WTC 7. But normal office and diesel fires are not NEARLY hot enough to evaporate steel. Hydrocarbon fires fueled by diesel (which was apparently stored at WTC 7) and normal office materials cannot evaporate steel. Steel does not evaporate unless it is heated to at least 5,000 degrees Fahrenheit. Everyone agrees that fires from conventional building fires are thousands of degrees cooler than that.
Pre-Knowledge
And why didn’t NIST address the obvious pre-knowledge by everyone around and well in advance that 7 was going to come down?
Experts
And why didn’t NIST address what these experts say?:
- The former head of the Fire Science Division of the government agency which claims that the World Trade Centers collapsed due to fire (the National Institute of Standards and Technology), who is one of the world’s leading fire science researchers and safety engineers, a Ph.D. in mechanical engineering (Dr. James Quintiere), called for an independent review of the World Trade Center Twin Tower collapse investigation. “I wish that there would be a peer review of this,” he said, referring to the NIST investigation. “I think all the records that NIST has assembled should be archived. I would really like to see someone else take a look at what they’ve done; both structurally and from a fire point of view. … I think the official conclusion that NIST arrived at is questionable.
- Two professors of structural engineering at a prestigious Swiss university (Dr. Joerg Schneider and Dr. Hugo Bachmann) said that, on 9/11, World Trade Center 7 was brought down by controlled demolition (translation here).
- Kamal S. Obeid, structural engineer, with a masters degree in Engineering from UC Berkeley, of Fremont, California, says:
“Photos of the steel, evidence about how the buildings collapsed, the unexplainable collapse of WTC 7, evidence of thermite in the debris as well as several other red flags, are quite troubling indications of well planned and controlled demolition”
- Ronald H. Brookman, structural engineer, with a masters degree in Engineering from UC Davis, of Novato California, writes:
“Why would all 47 stories of WTC 7 fall straight down to the ground in about seven seconds… ? It was not struck by any aircraft or engulfed in any fire. An independent investigation is justified for all three collapses including the surviving steel samples and the composition of the dust.”
- Graham John Inman, structural engineer, of London, England, points out:
“WTC 7 Building could not have collapsed as a result of internal fire and external debris. NO plane hit this building. This is the only case of a steel frame building collapsing through fire in the world. The fire on this building was small & localized therefore what is the cause?”
- A Dutch demolition expert (Danny Jowenko) stated that WTC 7 was imploded
- A prominent physicist with 33 years of service for the Naval Research Laboratory in Washington, DC (Dr. David L. Griscom) said that the official theory for why the Twin Towers and world trade center building 7 collapsed “does not match the available facts” and supports the theory that the buildings were brought down by controlled demolition
Paul Joseph Watson
Prison Planet
August 22, 2008
In its final report on the collapse of WTC 7 that news outlets are reporting “puts 9/11 conspiracy theories to bed,” NIST claims that the never before observed “new phenomenon” of “thermal expansion” was to blame for the destruction of the building, a completely ludicrous conclusion in a report that simply ignores eyewitness testimony and hard evidence that points to the deliberate demolition of the structure.
NIST completely fails to address prior knowledge of the building’s collapse, including why news outlets like the BBC and CNN reported that the building had collapsed an hour before it actually fell, as well as firefighters on the scene who are heard on video saying, “Keep your eye on that building, it’ll be coming down soon.”
If the collapse of WTC 7 came as a result of a “new phenomenon” and an “extraordinary event” that had never happened before in the history of building collapses, then why did news stations and ground zero workers know it was about to happen a hour or more in advance?
This on its own completely destroys the very foundation of NIST’s assertion that a “new phenomenon” was responsible for the collapse.
Which is the more likely scenario – that ground zero officials and media outlets got word that the building was going to be “pulled” – or that they employed clairvoyant powers of deduction that enabled them to foresee an event that had never happened before in history to a building that was structurally reinforced and had suffered limited fires?
NIST claims that the collapse of Building 7 is “The first known instance of fire causing the total collapse of a tall building”.
We are actually being asked to believe the impossible – that WTC 7 was the only building in history to have defied all precedent and suffered a complete and almost instantaneous collapse from fire damage alone, despite this being an impossibility if one accepts the basic laws of physics as accurate.
The issue of molten metal, which was discovered under both the twin towers and WTC 7, suggesting an extremely hot burning agent was used in the demolition process, is completely ignored in NIST’s report, despite it being acknowledged in Appendix C of FEMA’s World Trade Center Building Performance Study, which stated:
Evidence of a severe high temperature corrosion attack on the steel, including oxidation and sulfidation with subsequent intergranular melting, was readily visible in the near-surface microstructure. A liquid eutectic mixture containing primarily iron, oxygen, and sulfur formed during this hot corrosion attack on the steel… The severe corrosion and subsequent erosion of Samples 1 and 2 are a very unusual event. No clear explanation for the source of the sulfur has been identified.
Speaking during a press conference that was called to counter NIST, Richard Gage, founder of Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth and a member of the American Institute of Architects, dismissed the report.
“Tons of [molten metal] was found 21 days after the attack,” said Gage in an interview with a Vancouver, Canada television station. “Steel doesn’t begin to melt until 2,700 degrees, which is much hotter than what these fires could have caused.”
“There are holes in this story that you can drive a truck through,” he added, citing NIST’s claim that no evidence suggested loud explosive booms accompanied the collapse of the building by reminding that Thermite, a steel cutting agent, makes no explosive sound.
Even aside from this argument, there were numerous close proximity eyewitnesses who reported loud explosions, including NYPD officer Craig Bartmer and ground zero first responder Kevin McPadden (who also experienced the countdown before the building fell), but this fact was again simply ignored by NIST.
“FEMA found it,” said Gage. “Dr. Steven Jones found it, in the dust that landed in the entire area of lower Manhattan. And he finds it in the chunks of previously molten metal [from the towers].”
The core of NIST’s explanation, that an “extraordinary event” called “thermal expansion” was to blame for the sudden total collapse of the building is of course on the face of it a fraud when one considers the innumerable number of buildings that have suffered roaring fires across the majority of their floors and remained standing, whereas WTC 7 suffered limited fire damage across a handful of floors.
NIST also claims that the building only fell at 40% free fall speed, as if this isn’t suspicious in itself. Remember that this 47-story behemoth took just 7 seconds to completely collapse within its own footprint falling through the path of most resistance.
As the George Washington blog points out, “NIST said that WTC 7 fell at 40% slower than free fall speed. But it collapsed a lot faster than it would have if the structural supports were not all blown away at the same instant. 40% slower isn’t very impressive — that’s like arguing that a rock falling through concrete 40% slower than a rock falling through the air is perfectly normal.”
BYU Professor Steven E Jones WTC Lecture UVSC
http://rawstory.com/news/2008/B..oses_theory_on_0821.html
NIST Claims Fires Brought Down WTC-7
http://www.nytimes.com/2008..em=&pagewanted=print
Filed under: 9/11, 9/11 Explosions, 9/11 Eyewitness, 9/11 Physics, 9/11 survivors, 9/11 Truth, 9/11 workers, Barack Obama, boston, Chris Matthews, Ground Zero, Media, NIST, obama, rhode island, Saudi Arabia, Truth Action, We Are Change, William Rodriguez, World Trade Center, wtc-7 | Tags: freedom tower
Chris Matthews: William Rodriguez is a 9/11 Conspiracy Theorist
http://www.911blogger.com/node/17211
Obama Fanatics Slam Author For Questioning 9/11
http://www.prisonplanet.com/oba…or-for-questioning-911.html
WTC Memorial To Cost $1 Billion
http://nymag.com/daily/intel/2008/08/world_trade_center_memorial_an.html
U.S. court rules Saudi Arabia immune in 9/11 case
http://www.reuters.com/article/newsOne/idUSN1448612320080814
Filed under: 9/11, 9/11 Firefighters, 9/11 Physics, 9/11 survivors, 9/11 Truth, 9/11 workers, Alex Jones, BBC, bilderberg, christy todd whitman, Controlled Demolition, EPA, first responders, global elite, global government, Globalism, health and environment, Hillary Clinton, New World Order, New York, NIST, Rudy Giuliani, Truth Action, We Are Change, World Trade Center, wtc-7
A Message from the New World Order to Alex Jones (Truth Rising Trailer)
9/11 Hero Speaks Out For Help
TRUTH RISING: The 9/11 Chronicles
http://www.bbc.co.uk/blogs/theeditors/..and_conspiracies_2.html
Leaked NIST Docs: “Unusual” Event Before Collapse Of WTC- 7
http://www.prisonplanet.com/articles/june2008/062508_unusual_event.htm
http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/200806..aj8Nn95Kys0NUE
City Questions 9/11 Workers’ Claims of Illness
http://www.nytimes.com/2008/..=1&ref=nyregion&oref=slogin
Filed under: 9/11, 9/11 commission, 9/11 commission report, 9/11 Explosions, 9/11 Eyewitness, 9/11 Firefighters, 9/11 Mysteries, 9/11 Physics, 9/11 survivors, 9/11 Truth, 9/11 workers, barry jennings, BBC, Controlled Demolition, first responders, History Channel, Loose Change, New York, NYPD, Popular Mechanics, Rudy Giuliani, smear champaign, William Rodriguez, World Trade Center, wtc-7 | Tags: michael hess
In exclusive video, Barry Jennings discusses explosions in Building 7 before collapse of twin towers
Paul Joseph Watson
Prison Planet
June 23, 2008
Exclusive video of emergency official Barry Jennings discussing explosions inside WTC 7 before either of the twin towers had collapsed and having to step over dead bodies of victims as he attempted to vacate the building has been released for the first time.
The clip, which was originally intended to feature in Loose Change Final Cut but had to be withdrawn according to Jennings’ wishes after he had received threats, has now been made public in anticipation of a BBC documentary about Building 7 which is expected to skew Jennings’ account in an attempt to reinforce the official story.
In reality, what Jennings witnessed completely contradicts the official story of what happened to Building 7.
On the morning of 9/11 in his capacity as Deputy Director, Emergency Services Department, New York City Housing Authority, Jennings and Michael Hess, who is a founding Partner and Senior Managing Director of Giuliani Partners LLC, visited the Office of Emergency Management inside Building 7 only to find it had been abandoned.
“Upon arriving into the OEM EOC, we noticed that everybody was gone,” said Jennings. “I saw coffee that was on the desk, the smoke was still coming off the coffee, I saw half-eaten sandwiches,” he stated, adding that he and Hess were told to leave the building right away.
Jennings and Hess found a stairwell and descended the stairs.
“When we reached the 6th floor the landing that we were standing on gave way, there was an explosion and the landing gave way, I was left there hanging, I had to climb back up and walk back up to the 8th floor,” said Jennings.
“The explosion was beneath me….so when the explosion happened it blew us back….both buildings (the twin towers) were still standing,” he added.
“I was trapped in there for several hours, I was trapped in there when both buildings came down – all this time I’m hearing all kinds of explosions, all this time I’m hearing explosions, said Jennings, adding that when firefighters took them down to the lobby it was in “total ruins”.
“For me to see what I saw was unbelievable,” said Jennings.
The firefighters kept saying to Jennings “do not look down” because, according to Jennings, “we were stepping over people and you can tell when you’re stepping over people.”
A police officer then told Jennings, “you will have to run because we have reports of more explosions.”
“I’m just confused about one thing….why World Trade Center 7 went down in the first place – I’m very confused about that – I know what I heard I heard explosions,” said Jennings, adding that the explanation that the explosions were as a result of fuel oil tanks in the building did not add up.
“I’m an old boiler guy, if it was a fuel oil tank it would have been one side of the building,” he stated.
Footage inside the Millennium Hilton building lobby, which was closer to the WTC twin towers than Building 7, shows minimal damage after both towers had collapsed in comparison with devastating damage in the lobby of WTC 7, as reported by Jennings, before either tower had even collapsed.
Jennings’ eyewitness report of explosions inside WTC 7 before the towers had collapsed as well as dead bodies inside the building completely contradicts the official story, which maintains that there were no fatalities inside Building 7.
If WTC 7 collapsed as a result of damage it sustained from the fall of the twin towers, as the official version claims, then why were explosions taking place inside the building before either tower had collapsed?
The BBC hit piece documentary, which airs on July 6th, features an interview with Jennings but according to Loose Change’s Jason Bermas, the program will distort Jennings’ comments in an attempt to sideline the shocking nature of what he witnessed and the blatant manner in which his experiences contradict the official story.
According to Bermas, during their interview with members of Loose Change, the BBC denied that Jennings had stepped over dead bodies when he left the building, a claim disproved by Jennings’ own statements in the video below.
http://www.petitiononline.com/MarkDice/petition.html
Former Giant Walks Across the U.S.A. for 9/11 Rescue Workers
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=c725e3Z1aeY
In Their Own Words: Admissions from the people who wrote the 9/11 Commission Report that it was compromised
http://www.911blogger.com/node/16274
Filed under: 9/11, 9/11 Eyewitness, 9/11 Physics, 9/11 survivors, 9/11 Truth, Controlled Demolition, first responders, howard stern, John McCain, Karl Rove, rosie o' donnell, William Rodriguez, World Trade Center, wtc-7 | Tags: CORRS, Jim Corr
Rosie O’Donnell Talks About 9/11 on Howard Stern
Karl Rove: 9/11 Truther?!?…
Watch the very end of the video…
http://www.independent…911-an-inside-job-1391867.html
http://www.azcentral.com/news/articles/2008/06/03/20080603johnson0604.html
Filed under: 9/11, 9/11 Firefighters, 9/11 Mysteries, 9/11 Physics, 9/11 Truth, 9/11 workers, Controlled Demolition, daniel sunjata, first responders, Flight 93, neocons, New York, NYPD, rosie o' donnell, UN, We Are Change | Tags: Darrell Issa
GOP Rep Opposes 9/11 Fund For Sick Workers
UPI
April 3, 2008
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ubp2Ectij1E
A California congressman said Wednesday he has reservations about a proposed new fund for rescuers sickened by the 2001 terror attacks, not supporting victims.
At a hearing in Washington Tuesday, Rep. Darrell Issa, R-Calif., balked at the idea of a new compensation fund for emergency responders who fell ill after the Sept. 11 attacks in New York, the New York Daily News reported.
Issa insisted the airliners that crashed into the World Trade Center towers in New York were not weapons. He suggested the cause of illness for the responders was simply debris from the collapse of the towers.
“It simply was an aircraft, residue of two aircraft and residue from the materials used to build this building,” Issa said.
Issa issued a statement Wednesday clarifying his position.
“During (Tuesday’s) hearing, I asked tough questions. … I continue to have reservations about the specific bill (Tuesday’s) hearing focused on and I have questions about the appropriate way to determine federal and local responsibility to victims,” Issa said. “I want to make clear that I strongly support help for victims who suffered physical injury as a result of an attack on America, including support from Congress and the federal government.”
WeAreChange Meets Rosie O’ Donnell
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kf7F1b9lJDM
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fCmRTiUA0Wk
http://infowars.net/articles/april2008/100408Official.htm
9/11: The Case For Controlled Demolition
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=v4biSy4-mxs
Flight 93: Proof of 9/11 Lies by the US Government and Media
http://www.whatreallyhappened.com/shootdown.html
Daniel Sunjata to Students: “Join Student Scholars for 9/11 Truth!”
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=98PUqvJZOVg
Every Eleventh Until Justice
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VF4Ku9m5OI0
UN Could Lead New 9/11 Investigation
http://www.infowars.com/?p=1174
Confirmed: 9/11 Planes Were Tracked even With Transponders Turned Off
http://georgewashington.blogspot.co..nes-were-tracked-even.html
Filed under: 2-party system, 9/11, 9/11 commission, 9/11 Mysteries, 9/11 Physics, 9/11 Truth, Alex Jones, Barack Obama, Controlled Demolition, Hillary Clinton, jesse ventura, Larry King, left right paradigm, Loose Change, michelle malkin, neocons, Neolibs, Official 9/11 Theory, willie nelson, World Trade Center, wtc-7
Former Governor Jesse Ventura: WTC Collapse A Controlled Demolition
Paul Joseph Watson
Prison Planet
April 2, 2008
Former Minnesota Governor Jesse Ventura vehemently savaged the official 9/11 story on a syndicated national radio show today, saying the WTC collapsed like a controlled demolition and was pulverized to dust as he also highlighted the impossible 10 second free fall speed of the towers.
Appearing on The Alex Jones Show, Ventura said that his initial reaction to 9/11 was much like most people at the time, and he accepted the official story outright, a response he now regrets because he was in a position of power and could have used it to raise a lot of pointed questions.
“I kicked myself when it initially happened that the light didn’t go off but I was so shocked that this thing had even taken place that I apologize for not being more aware,” said Ventura, adding that watching Loose Change at the insistence of his son was part of the catalyst for his wake up call.
Host Alex Jones is executive producer of Loose Change (get it here), the most watched Internet movie of all time. Ventura said he ran through a rollercoaster of emotions when he saw the film.
“When I finally did watch it I went through every emotion you could imagine, from laughing, crying, getting sick to my stomach, to the whole emotional thing,” said the former Governor.
“To me questions haven’t been answered and are not being answered about 9/11,” said Ventura, before highlighting the collapse of Building 7, a 47-story tall skyscraper that was not hit by a plane but collapsed in its own footprint in the late afternoon of September 11.
“Two planes struck two buildings….but how is it that a third building fell 5 hours later?” asked Ventura, “How could this building just implode into its own footprint 5 hours later – that’s my first question – the 9/11 Commission didn’t even devote one page to that in their big volume of investigation,” added the former Governor.
Ventura then explored how it was possible that all three buildings could rapidly collapse at almost free fall speed.
“How could those buildings fall at the speed of gravity – if you put a stopwatch on them both of those World Trade Center buildings were on the ground in ten seconds – how can that be?” asked Ventura.
“If you took a billiard ball and dropped it from the height of the World Trade Center in a vacuum it would hit the ground in 9.3 seconds and if you took that same billiard ball and dropped it 10 stories at a time and merely stopped it and started it it would take 30 seconds – if you dropped it every floor of the World Trade Center to the ground, simply stopping and starting it on gravity it would take over 100 seconds to reach the ground,” he surmised.
The former wrestling star then questioned how low-temperature burning jet fuel could melt steel.
“Jet fuel is four fifths kerosene – which is not a hot burning fuel – and they wanted us to believe it melted these steel structured girders and caused these buildings to pancake collapse to the ground?” he stated.
“I was on the site within two weeks after it happened and I saw none of these pancakes – wouldn’t they all be piled up in a huge mass on the ground and yet everything was blown into dust – when you look at it from that aspect none of it makes any sense,” said Ventura.
“Never before in the annuls of history has a fire caused a steel structure building to fall to the ground like these two did,” he concluded.
Having undergone Basic Underwater Demolition Seal training, Ventura is speaking from an experienced standpoint and he unequivocally stated that he thought the buildings were deliberately imploded.
“Upon looking at the film in super-slow motion and the way the buildings fell and comparing that to the way that they do like a controlled demolition of a hotel in Las Vegas, they both fell identical.”
“I did watch the film of Building 7 going down and in my opinion there’s no doubt that that building was brought down with demolition,” said the former Governor.
Ventura also questioned the lack of wreckage outside of the Pentagon after Flight 77 allegedly struck the building.
“When I was watching Loose Change with a friend of mine – he happens to work for a company that helps build the Boeing airplanes and they said that when the engines completely disappeared and were destroyed, his response was, excuse my French – bullshit!,” said Ventura.
“I turned to him and said why and he said because they’re made of titanium steel – they can’t disintegrate.”
Ventura said that the corporate media were going to continue to cover-up the truth about 9/11, but that the number of credible people speaking out and increasing education and knowledge about the subject would eventually reap dividends.
“We don’t want to lose our country, after all it’s still our country and until they put us down we have the power,” Ventura concluded.
The Governor’s bold comments about 9/11 come on the heels of similar views expressed by American icon Willie Nelson during an interview on the same radio show in February.
Click here to listen to the full interview.
Jesse Ventura Speaks the Truth on Larry King Live
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wRjmwKnz1G4
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=y5mdwFLY4WQ
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uPNnUAr_DsM
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Hk7nYA4–aU
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yq2iqGRxrdM
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UzBb427tb9A
http://www.rawstory.com/comments/47251.html
Malkin’s Hot Air Targets Jesse Ventura
http://www.infowars.com/?p=1248
Ventura wrestles with what really happened on 9/11
http://www.minnpost.com/politica..tles_with_what_really_happened_on_911
Former Governor Jesse Ventura Says WTC Collapse a Controlled Demolition
http://www.send2press.com/newswire/2008-04-0403-004.shtml
Ventura says he regrets initial acceptance of 9/11 explanations
http://wkbt.com/Global/story.asp?S=8115056
Filed under: 9/11, 9/11 engineers, 9/11 hijackers, 9/11 Mysteries, 9/11 Physics, 9/11 Truth, al-qaeda, Alex Jones, charlie sheen, False Flag, George Bush, humor, inside job, katrina, New York, Official 9/11 Theory, Pentagon, willie nelson, World Trade Center | Tags: Margaret Cho
Comedian Margaret Cho Believes 9/11 Truth
Actress Cho says Americans will be angry when they realize true agenda behind attacks
Top comedian and actress Margaret Cho has joined Willie Nelson and Charlie Sheen in questioning the official 9/11 story, stating that the public were going to become very angry when they realized there was a conspiracy behind the terror attacks.
Appearing on the nationally syndicated Alex Jones Show, Cho said her doubts about 9/11 were sparked by President Bush’s non-reaction to the unfolding crisis.
“I got concerned right after 9/11 where the plane had hit the World Trade Center and he was in that classroom with all those children and they told him what was going on and he did nothing,” said Cho.
“We were attacked for the first time on American soil and he did nothing – that’s when I realized there was something very very wrong,” she added.
http://youtube.com/watch?v=373rxwSspwI
http://youtube.com/watch?v=o2OsHEmJawU
Cho questioned the official story of what happened at the Pentagon, asking why so much footage of the twin towers being attacked was available in comparison with not even a clear picture of what occurred at the Pentagon – a far more sensitive and symbolic target.
“Why are they not focusing on that? What are they hiding?” asked Cho, “Of course it’s going to be monitored from every angle at every second and yet we have no footage of it – it’s very mysterious.”
Cho said that there was usually a conspiracy behind every major event in American history and that when the conspiracy behind 9/11 was fully uncovered, people were going to be very angry.
The actress said that many of her Arab-American friends doubted the organizational skills of Al-Qaeda in being able to pull off the terror attacks and questioned the plausibility of the passengers on the plane not fighting back against the hijackers.
http://www.iht.com/articles/ap/2008..-Embattled-Engineers.php
Call For New 9/11 Investigation Reaches Crescendo
http://prisonplanet.com/articles/march2008/032808_reaches_crescendo.htm
Govt investigators lied about inability of WTC towers to withstand airliner impacts
http://www.prisonplanet.com/article..032608_wtc_coverup.htm
WTC molten molybdenum cover-up
http://www.wakeupfromyourslumber.com/node/6178
Government-Funded Investigators Accused Of WTC Cover-Up
http://prisonplanet.com/articles/march2008/032608_wtc_coverup.htm
Court Clears Way for 9/11 Illness Lawsuit
http://www.nysun.com/news/new-york/court-clears-way-911-illness-lawsuit
Filed under: 9/11, 9/11 demolition countdown, 9/11 Explosions, 9/11 Families, 9/11 Firefighters, 9/11 Physics, 9/11 Truth, 9/11 workers, bin laden, Controlled Demolition, FBI, New York, We Are Change, World Trade Center, wtc-7 | Tags: Frank A. Demartini, john o' neill
Top New York Cop: ’They had fucking bombs in those buildings’ on 9/11
Former debunker Dietl admits he shares 9/11 truth activist’s questions during confrontation
Paul Joseph Watson
Prison Planet
March 17, 2008
Highly decorated former New York City detective Bo Dietl admits that his first instinct on 9/11 was that the twin towers were downed with explosives, as he conceded that he shared many questions about the official story with 9/11 truth activists he had formerly debunked on national television.
What started out as a adversarial confrontation with members of We Are Change turned into a cordial discussion as Dietl contradicted some of his previous public statements on 9/11 and appeared to agree with the group on several issues, presumably prompted by the fact that his daughter was doing a research paper on 9/11 which lent credence to the suspect nature of the official story behind the attacks.
“I had a perfect view….next thing is I hear screaming, I looked up and when these are coming down you know what the first thing I said is? They had fucking bombs in those buildings – I’m telling you what was in my mind, I said there had to be bombs in the buildings,” said Dietl.
(forward to 6:39 for the quote)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hhOKkVE4v14
“You’re talking about two 110 story buildings that fucking evaporated,” said Dietl, adding, “Where are the people….I ask the same questions it’s such a devastating thing.”
“Where the fuck did all these bodies go – it was pulverized – no bones, no DNA was found, I didn’t see no body parts” added Dietl, who was on the scene to help rescue workers and firefighters shortly after the towers’ collapse.
Dietl confirmed that the collapse of WTC 7 was known ahead of time and that he was told to stay away from the building.
Dietl also described it as a “fucking crime” that members of the Bin Laden family were flown out of the country under FBI supervision in the days following 9/11 when all other air traffic was grounded.
The former detective also mentioned how his former friend FBI agent John O’Neill, who died in the towers, was prevented by the FBI from prosecuting Bin Laden and other Al-Qaeda members.
However, Dietl’s claim that “they never dreamt in a million years the tragedy that happened would happen” in the context of his assertion that the faulty construction of the towers contributed to their sudden collapse is demonstrably false.
Numerous different World Trade Center designers and construction specialists are on record as having ruled out the possibility that multiple commercial jetliner impacts could bring the towers down.
A February 3, 1964 white paper which was written during the design phase of the towers stated, “The buildings have been investigated and found to be safe in an assumed collision with a large jet airliner ( Boeing 707 DC 8 ) traveling at 600 miles per hour. Analysis indicates that such collision would result in only local damage which could not cause collapse or substantial damage to the building and would not endanger the lives and safety of occupants not in the immediate area of impact.”
In 2001, Leslie Robertson, one of the two original structural engineers for the World Trade Center, stated, “The twin towers were in fact the first structures outside the military and nuclear industries designed to resist the impact of a jet airplane.”
Also in early 2001, Frank A. Demartini, on-site construction manager for the World Trade Center, said on camera, “The building was designed to have a fully loaded 707 crash into it. That was the largest plane at the time. I believe that the building probably could sustain multiple impacts of jetliners because this structure is like the mosquito netting on your screen door — this intense grid — and the jet plane is just a pencil puncturing that screen netting. It really does nothing to the screen netting.”
Since Dietl still serves as Chairman of the New York State Security Guard Advisory Council, his comments are of great significance in the quest for a new investigation.
Filed under: 9/11, 9/11 demolition countdown, 9/11 Explosions, 9/11 Firefighters, 9/11 Mysteries, 9/11 Physics, 9/11 Truth, 9/11 workers, Controlled Demolition, first responders, Ground Zero, larry silverstein, Official 9/11 Theory, We Are Change, World Trade Center, wtc-7 | Tags: kevin mcpadden, Manhattan
Larry Silverstein Confronted on WTC-7
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EtPC0W4HII8
Filed under: 9/11, 9/11 Physics, 9/11 Truth, Controlled Demolition, Marion Cotillard, windsor building, World Trade Center | Tags: johnny depp, oscars
Oscar Winner Doubts Official 9/11 Story
London Telegraph
March 1, 2008
Oscar-winning Marion Cotillard was facing embarrasment with her new American public last night after it emerged that she doubted the official account of the September 11 attacks.
The 32-year-old French star has swept this year’s best actress awards, also receiving a Bafta, Golden Globe and a César for her performance as singer Edith Piaf in La Vie en Rose.
Miss Cotillard, who earned under £1 million in 2007, could expect her Oscar success to significantly increase her earning power. She is due to start filming Public Enemies with Johnny Depp.
But the actress faces a potential backlash in the US over comments she made in an interview in France. Footage which surfaced on the internet showed her questioning the New York terrorist attacks of September 11, 2001, and the 1969 moon landing.
“I think we’re lied to about a number of things,” she said, singling out September 11.
Referring to the two passenger jets flown into the World Trade Centre, Miss Cotillard said: “We see other towers of the same kind being hit by planes, are they burned? There was a tower, I believe it was in Spain, which burned for 24 hours.
It never collapsed. None of these towers collapsed. And there [New York], in a few minutes, the whole thing collapsed.”
Miss Cotillard suggested that the towers, planned in the early 1960s, were an outdated “money sucker” which would have cost so much to modernise that it was easier to destroy them.
Turning to America’s space programme, she said: “Did a man really walk on the moon? I saw plenty of documentaries on it, and I really wondered. And in any case I don’t believe all they tell me, that’s for sure.”
Miss Cotillard, who was born and brought up in Paris, made the comments on Paris Première – Paris Dernière (Paris First – Paris Last), a programme first broadcast a year ago.
They were largely ignored at the time, but appeared yesterday on a French website. Miss Cotillard’s film career began in Luc Besson’s 1998 film Taxi. She is an environmental activist, who once worked as a spokeswoman for Greenpeace.
News of Miss Cotillard’s comments comes at a time when Franco-American relations appear to be thawing, following Paris’s refusal to support the US-led invasion of Iraq in 2003.
President Nicolas Sarkozy insists that he is pro-American, supporting so-called Anglo-Saxon economic reforms and going on holiday to America.
Cotillard’s 9/11 Comments Echo Widely-Respected Experts, Public Opinion
http://prisonplanet.com/articles/march2008/030308_comments_echo.htm
AOL Celeb Gossip Site Calls Cotillard a “Bitch” for 9/11 Comments
http://www.truthnews.us/?p=2049
Marion Cotillard ‘in shock’ over 9/11 row, but will not apologise
http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/world/europe/article3477645.ece
Newspaper Fakes Story Of Actress’ “Apology” Over 9/11 Comments
http://prisonplanet.com/articles/march2008/030308_refuses_recant.htm
Filed under: 9/11, 9/11 engineers, 9/11 Mysteries, 9/11 Physics, 9/11 Truth, 9/11 whistleblowers, Controlled Demolition, electrical engineer, richard gage, World Trade Center
Principal Electrical Engineer for WTC: “Fuel and Planes Alone Did NOT Bring the Towers Down”
911 Blogger
February 12, 2008
Richard F. Humenn, PE was the Senior Project Design Engineer for electrical systems for the entire World Trade Center, and he had 60 people working under him. In other words, he was the guy in charge of all electrical at the WTC. A retired licensed professional engineer, he was certified by the States of New York, New Jersey, Connecticut and Washington, D.C.
Humenn stated to Architects and Engineers for 9/11 Truth:
On September 11, I watched the live TV broadcast of the progressive collapse of the World Trade Towers with disbelief, as the mass and strength of the structure should have survived the localized damage caused by the planes and burning jet fuel.
I viewed the presentation of Richard Gage and other related material, which compels me to believe that the fuel and planes alone did not bring the Towers down. I, therefore, support the proposal to form an international group of professionals to investigate all plausible causes for the virtual freefall and the almost total destruction of the WTC structures.Humenn also recently gave a two-hour recorded interview to an attorney and former law school professor (a transcript of the interview will soon be posted to AE911Truth.org). In that interview, Humenn expressed his opinion that the Twin Towers were intentionally demolished. (He stated that he could not believe the U.S. government could have done such a thing; however, he was not asked about rogue elements within the government).
Few engineers have as much first-hand knowledge of the Twin Towers as Humenn, so his opinion carries some weight. As he explains, “Though an electrical engineer by trade, I was also very familiar with the structures and their conceptual design parameters.”
9/11’s Second Round of SlaughterJanuary 17, 2008, 3:37 pm
Filed under: 9/11, 9/11 Firefighters, 9/11 Mysteries, 9/11 Physics, 9/11 Truth, 9/11 workers, Canada, christy todd whitman, Controlled Demolition, david miller, Dennis Kucinich, EPA, fealgood foundation, first responders, Ground Zero, health and environment, Japan, Loose Change, Media, mtv, New York, White House, World Trade Center, wtc-79/11’s Second Round of Slaughter
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-9137295628446919478&hl=en
Loose Change Promoted on MTV Canada
http://youtube.com/watch?v=THaFjqB5V1c
Japanese MP Questions 9/11
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=2680190129949942423&hl=en
First Responder Confronts Kucinich on 9/11 Aid
http://www.jonesreport.com/article/01_08/140108_miller_kucinich.htmlSchool Kids Raising Money For The FealGood Foundation
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Jesr8ZZdOdU
Loose Change Final CutNovember 15, 2007, 11:58 am
Filed under: 9/11, 9/11 commission, 9/11 engineers, 9/11 Explosions, 9/11 Eyewitness, 9/11 Families, 9/11 Financiers, 9/11 Firefighters, 9/11 hijackers, 9/11 Mysteries, 9/11 Physics, 9/11 survivors, 9/11 Truth, 9/11 wargames, Able Danger, al-qaeda, BBC, BBC foreknowledge, bin laden, Bin Laden Tapes, christy todd whitman, CIA, Condoleezza Rice, Controlled Demolition, Department of Defense, Dick Cheney, DoD, Donald Rumsfeld, False Flag, FBI, George Bush, George Tenent, inside job, ISI, Loose Change, Military, Mineta Testemony, mohammed atta, Mystery Plane, New York, NIST, NORAD, Official 9/11 Theory, Pentagon, Rudy Giuliani, secret service, State Sponsored Terrorism, thomas kean, war games, Washington D.C., White House, World Trade Center, wtc-7Loose Change Final Cut
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-3719259008768610598&hl=en
O’Reilly: Questioning 9/11 Will ‘Lead to Death’November 2, 2007, 5:21 pm
Filed under: 9/11, 9/11 Physics, 9/11 Truth, Bill Clinton, Bill Maher, Controlled Demolition, Fox News, inside job, Loose Change, mark cubin, Media, Propaganda, We Are Change, World Trade CenterO’Reilly: Questioning 9/11 Will ‘Lead to Death’
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qPmso7RNEWk
The O’Reilly Factor ambushes Rosie O’Donnell
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1VqTPIuNHjk
Framing The Truth Movement As Terrorists
http://prisonplane…7/011107_framing_terrorists.htmExplosive Evidence – High Temperatures Prove WTC Demolition
http://georgewashington.blogspot.com/2..was-too-hot.htmlOfficial Statement Confirms Detonations on 9/11
http://rinf.com/alt-news/911-truth/d…firmed-in-official-statement/1621/COINTELPRO Redux: Global Order Targets the 9/11 Truth and Patriot Movements
http://www.truthnews.us/?p=621
9/11 Mysteries Hits JapanOctober 29, 2007, 3:01 pm
Filed under: 9/11, 9/11 engineers, 9/11 Mysteries, 9/11 Physics, 9/11 Truth, Controlled Demolition, Japan, larry silverstein, steven jones, World Trade Center, wtc-79/11 Mysteries Hits Japan
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-4633271838183936896
3D Visualization of World Trade Center3D Visualization of World Trade Center
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6HOTAUy_mrQ
9/11 New World Rising: Final Director’s CutOctober 19, 2007, 5:51 pm
Filed under: 9/11, 9/11 Explosions, 9/11 Firefighters, 9/11 Physics, 9/11 Truth, bin laden, catastrophic event, Controlled Demolition, David Rockefeller, Dick Cheney, George Bush, global elite, global government, Globalism, gordon brown, Henry Kissinger, larry silverstein, lou dobbs, Mineta Testemony, New World Order, North American Union, Pentagon, PNAC, wtc-79/11 New World Rising: Final Director’s Cut
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=2020789241047516411&hl=en
New World Order Quotes
http://nwsarchive.wordpress.com/2007/09/30/new-world-order-quotes/
NIST Admits Total Collapse Of Twin Towers UnexplainableOctober 17, 2007, 2:03 pm
Filed under: 9/11, 9/11 Physics, Controlled Demolition, NIST, World Trade Center, wtc-7
NIST Admits Total Collapse Of Twin Towers Unexplainable
Implicitly acknowledges controlled demolition only means by which towers could have fallen at free fall speedPaul Joseph Watson
Prison Planet
October 16, 2007
The National Institute for Standards and Technology has been forced to admit that the total free-fall collapse of the twin towers cannot be explained after an exhaustive scientific study, implicitly acknowledging that controlled demolition is the only means by which the buildings could have come down.
In a recent letter (PDF link) to 9/11 victim’s family representatives Bill Doyle and Bob McIlvaine, NIST states, “We are unable to provide a full explanation of the total collapse.”
A 10,000 page scientific study only offers theories as to how the “collapse initiation” proceeded and fails to address how it was possible for part of a WTC structure to fall through the path of most resistance at freefall speed, completely violating the accepted laws of physics.
In addition, NIST’s own studies confirmed that virtually none of the steel in either tower reached temperatures hotter than 500 degrees. The point at which steel weakens is 1000 degrees and melting point is reached at 1,500 degrees, according to NIST itself.
“NIST’S 10,000-page report purports to explain what it calls “collapse initiation” — the loss of several floors’ vertical support,” writes Kevin Barrett of Scholars for 9/11 Truth. “In order to dream up this preposterous scenario, NIST had to ignore its own tests that showed that virtually none of the steel got hotter than 500 degrees f. It had to claim that somehow the planes took out many core columns, despite the fact that only a direct hit by an engine would have been likely to do so, and that the chances of this happening even once are fairly low. It had to preposterously allege that the plane that nicked the corner of the South Tower took out more core columns than the one that hit the North Tower almost dead center. It had to tweak all the parameters till they screamed bloody murder and say that the steel was far weaker than it actually was, the fire was far hotter than it actually was, the sagging was far greater than it actually was, and so on. And so NIST hallucinated a computer-generated fantasy scenario for “collapse initiation”–the failure of a few floors.”
“But how do you get from the failure of a few floors to total collapse at free-fall speed of the entire structure? The short answer: You don’t. Anyone with the slightest grasp of the laws of physics understands that even if all of the vertical supports on a few floors somehow failed catastrophically at exactly the same moment–a virtually impossible event, but one necessary to explain why the Towers would come straight down rather than toppling sideways–the top part of the building could not fall THROUGH the still-intact, highly robust lower part of the building, straight through the path of most resistance, just as fast as it would have fallen through thin air.”
“Thus total free-fall collapse, even given NIST’s ridiculous “initiation” scenario, is utterly impossible. The probability of it happening is exactly equal to the probability of the whole building suddenly falling upward and landing on the moon,” concludes Barrett.
NIST have yet to properly address the sudden freefall collapse of WTC Building 7, which imploded on the late afternoon of 9/11 despite not being hit by a jetliner.
In August 2006, NIST promised to scientifically evaluate whether explosive devices could have contributed to the 47-story building’s collapse but no answers have been forthcoming.
In August of this year, James Quintiere, Ph.D., former Chief of the Fire Science Division of the National Institute of Standards and Technology, called for an independent inquiry into NIST’s investigation of the collapse of the twin towers.
Quintiere said NIST’s conclusions were “questionable”, that they failed to follow standard scientific procedures and that their failure to address Building 7 belied the fact that the investigation was incomplete.
Will DOJ Look into the First Death of a U.S. 9/11 Researcher?
http://www.911truth.org/article.php?story=20071014221652399
The Third TowerOctober 10, 2007, 1:14 pm
Filed under: 9/11, 9/11 demolition countdown, 9/11 engineers, 9/11 Explosions, 9/11 Eyewitness, 9/11 Physics, 9/11 survivors, 9/11 Truth, 9/11 workers, Controlled Demolition, FEMA, kevin mcpadden, larry silverstein, NIST, World Trade Center, wtc-7The Third Tower
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=5712953049463929480
MIT Engineer Jeff King Says WTC DemolishedSeptember 3, 2007, 4:35 pm
Filed under: 9/11, 9/11 engineers, 9/11 Physics, 9/11 Truth, Controlled Demolition, Jeff King, MIT, World Trade CenterMIT Engineer Jeff King Says WTC Demolished
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=O5HTp9QwFLI
9-11: New World RisingSeptember 1, 2007, 3:59 pm
Filed under: 9/11, 9/11 Firefighters, 9/11 Physics, bilderberg, CFR, Controlled Demolition, Dick Cheney, False Flag, George Bush, global government, Globalism, larry silverstein, Mineta Testemony, New World Order, North American Union, Rudy Giuliani, trilateral commission, World Trade Center, wtc-79-11: New World Rising (First Cut)
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-4452121217035749069&hl=en
History Channel Hit Piece: Dirty Tricks, Malicious Lies & Journalistic FraudAugust 22, 2007, 6:30 am
Filed under: 9/11, 9/11 Families, 9/11 Firefighters, 9/11 Physics, 9/11 Truth, Alex Jones, Controlled Demolition, Dick Cheney, History Channel, Loose Change, Mineta Testemony, Popular Mechanics
History Channel Hit Piece: Dirty Tricks, Malicious Lies & Journalistic Fraud
The real story behind Brad Davis, NBC, Popular Mechanics and the History Channel – media whore stooges who engaged in deliberate deception, manipulation and chicanery to please their corporate bossesAlex Jones & Paul Joseph Watson
Prison Planet
August 21, 2007MP3: Alex Jones Responds to the History Channel Hit Piece
The History Channel 9/11 special that aired last night was by far the worst hit piece we have ever witnessed, a completely savage, dishonest and deceptive abomination, replete with dirty tricks, malicious lies and a level of journalistic fraud that goes way beyond simple bias.
Bradley Davis, the producer of the show, is a paid liar and a hit piece specialist who deceives people by gaining their confidence and then attacking them behind their back.
He is famous for the smear job documentary on Michael Jackson and makes a career out of conning people and then stabbing them in the back. His tongue is so smooth, that even the Loose Change crew were prepared to give him the benefit of the doubt on his impartiality before last night’s hit piece was aired, with Davis having tricked them into believing he was a friend.
Before filming began, Alex Jones asked Davis point blank if the documentary was going to be a hit piece, which Davis denied. After we brought attention to the History Channel’s blurb on their website, which clearly characterized the show as a hit piece, Davis panicked and promised to alter the promo, calling it a “misrepresentation,” as well as re-edit the entire program to make it more balanced. The promo temporarily disappeared from the website and the broadcast of the show was put back by a week.
During the course of this second exchange, Davis again promised Jones that the show was not going to be a hit piece and was very upset that we had discovered he was behind the NBC hit piece on Jackson – seemingly frightened that his cover might be blown and his next victim would be alerted to his scheming tricks. He was terrified and kept repeating that he didn’t want to be quoted on anything he said.
Just like Popular Mechanics swore that their straw man smear job wouldn’t be a hit piece, Davis engaged in journalistic fraud and complete dishonesty by lying directly to Alex Jones’ face in claiming the documentary was to be neutral just so he could secure the interview.
Just like William Randolph Hearst, the progenitor of the term “yellow journalism,” Davis will go down in history as a liar and a fraud.
The show itself was deliberately crafted, edited, shot and manipulated to portray the 9/11 truth movement in a completely negative light, while exalting the so-called experts to almost God-like status.
– The program makers pulled out all the stops to hire nationally renowned NBC news anchor Lester Holt (pictured) to narrate the show, a trusted voice that was utilized to brutally debunk 9/11 truth representatives.
– The debunkers, people like James Meigs whose scientific expertise stretches as far as being the editor of Video Review and Entertainment Weekly, were labeled as experts while real experts like Physicist Professor Steven Jones were stripped of any such description.
– The debunkers’ interviews were pristinely shot and framed, with beautiful backdrops and highly sympathetic camera angles and filters, whereas the truthers were shot from bizarre positions, their images were deliberately distorted and even the color filter of the shot had been manipulated to make their appearance look tainted, blurred and contorted. This was an intentional ploy and a crude act of manipulation to detract credibility from the truthers and violates all known ethical standards of journalism.
– The producers of the show failed to offer the proviso that Hearst Publishing, the owner of Popular Mechanics, also holds a controlling stake in the History Channel (via its stake in the A & E Television Network), therefore concealing from the viewer a blatant conflict of interest that negated the neutrality of the show before it had even begun.
– The debunkers were afforded far more time on camera while the truthers were sidelined.
– The narrator of the show would dismiss the questions and evidence raised by the truthers as unproven or debunked in an ad hominem manner without providing any evidence to justify the assertion.
– The truthers were edited so that only hesitant responses to questions were broadcast, casting doubt on the veracity of their claims in the mind of the unsuspecting viewer.
– The show included a clip of Alex Jones’ appearance at the University of Texas, at which around 500 people packed the lecture hall to hear his speech, but deliberately and maliciously edited the footage to include shots taken during recess, so as to make it appear that the lecture hall was mostly empty. In addition, lingering shots of empty chairs were included to further deceive the viewer into thinking few had attended the speech. This is journalistic fraud of the worse kind – a blatant misrepresentation and deliberate skewing of actual events.
– In a similar vein, footage from 9/11 truth protests was broadcast but the angle of the shot was always tight, so as to make out that few people had attended the demonstration, when in fact thousands were present.
– Davin Coburn of Popular Mechanics, mirroring a dirty trick that was also employed in the BBC hit piece, maliciously lied and smeared Alex Jones and others in the program by claiming that most of the 9/11 families hate them and that they are responsible for causing the families more pain. Coburn and the show’s producers know this is an outright lie and that the majority of the family members are asking the same questions as Alex Jones and others. Bill Doyle, representative of the largest group of 9/11 family members told the Alex Jones Show directly that over half of the family members have questions about the official story. Alex Jones and the Loose Change crew offered contact details for numerous 9/11 first responders, firefighters and family members that were asking questions of the official version, but absolutely none were interviewed by Brad Davis and the rest of the show’s producers.
– The producers of the show tried to make out that Loose Change had recanted their position on the issue of controlled demolition, when in fact Dylan Avery and the other members of the crew were merely using their Final Cut version to focus on other topics, having already covered controlled demolition at length in previous versions. This trick was used to claim that evidence for bombs and controlled demolition, which is attested to by scores of firefighters and first responders, none of which were interviewed by the producers, had been debunked.
– Articles and text from 9/11 truth websites were shown, but the actual URL addresses of the sites were blurred out, with the History Channel obviously frightened that people might actually visit such websites and find out that the program was a pack of lies.
– The debunkers attempted to wriggle out of Secretary Norman Mineta’s bombshell testimony about Cheney’s actions in the Emergency Operations Center, by claiming that Mineta was talking about Flight 93 and not the plane that hit the Pentagon. In reality, Mineta makes it clear in his testimony that he is talking about Flight 77, “the airplane coming in to the Pentagon,” and this is then confirmed by Commissioner Lee Hamilton.
– The debunkers admitted that temperatures inside the twin towers were not hot enough to melt steel, but claimed that they were hot enough to weaken steel and cause the collapse. The debunkers uniformly failed to address the fact that firefighters and first responders described witnessing molten steel beneath the rubble of the towers and they also ignored Professor Steven Jones’ scientific analysis of the iron-rich microspheres found in the rubble. In a website posting last night, Professor Jones stated that he emphatically pushed the dust analysis during his interview with the producers, but the topic was completely overlooked. The New York Times reported that the molten steel was “perhaps the deepest mystery uncovered” but the History Channel, mirroring NIST, failed to address the issue.
– The debunkers mentioned WTC 7 only in passing and completely failed to address why the building, which wasn’t hit by a plane, collapsed in 7 seconds into its own footprint after suffering only limited fire damage from falling debris. They also failed to mention why news outlets were reporting the collapse of Building 7 over an hour before it actually fell.
– The wargames that dovetailed 9/11 and deliberately confused NORAD personnel so as to slow response to the real attack were completely excluded.
– The Able Danger program and how the hijackers were discovered before 9/11 was completely excluded.
– The fact that the money man behind the hijackers, Pakistan’s ISI Chief Mahmoud Ahmad, was meeting with U.S. government and intelligence officials before and on the morning of 9/11, was completely excluded.
– William Rodriguez’ first-hand testimony of explosions prior to the impact of the planes was completely excluded, as was the testimony of numerous firefighters who attested to bombs and explosions.
– NBC reporter Pat Dawson claimed that FDNY Chief of Safety Albert Turi had only described explosions, not bombs, going off, contradicting Dawson’s own report at the time which stated, “Reports of a secondary device, that is another ‘bomb’ going off.”
After watching this two hour charade, Alex Jones was left stunned and irate that the producers had deliberately set out to create something that goes way beyond the scope of bias – an intentional propaganda attack piece strewn with manifestly provable lies, dirty tricks and misrepresentation, and that the show’s producers, and in particular Brad Davis, had purposefully lied all along in order to shield the fact that this was a savage hit piece of the highest order.
In comparison, The History Channel makes Fox News look fair and balanced!
Framing Alex Jones as a demon and making out that he is causing pain to 9/11 families, when in fact during our last visit to ground zero most of the firefighters and police personally thanked us, is a very serious allegation and we are waiting to see what kind of damages will accrue as a result while we consider our next step.
As we expected all along, Brad Davis and the rest of the charlatans at NBC, the History Channel and Popular Mechanics, have pleased their corporate masters by unleashing the most twisted, distorted, dishonest and savage hit piece in television history. They have shown their hand by deliberately abandoning any pretense at ethical journalism and delivering exactly what their Hearst “yellow journalism” Publishing and GE bosses demanded – a bias, malicious, deceptive, and manipulative tissue of lies and another reason for Americans to disengage from an establishment media empire that continues to hemorrhage viewers on a daily basis due to its ceaseless lies and propaganda.
“You got shortchanged on this History Channel program….”
http://www.911blogger.com/node/10769The Mother Of All 9/11 Truth Hit Pieces Airs Tonight
http://www.prisonplanet.com/articles/august2007/200807hitpiece.htmViewers See History Channel 9/11 Special As Straw Man Hit Piece
http://prisonplanet.com/articles/august2007/210807_hit_piece.htm
noworldsystem.com 