Filed under: Al Gore, blackmail, book burning, carbon dioxide, climate change, climate science, climategate, Co2, corruption, CRU, Dictatorship, dr. Phil Jones, Empire, federal crimes, FOIA, GKSS, Global Warming, global warming hoax, global warming skeptics, hackers, Hadley CRU, Hoax, ipcc, man made global warming, Michael Mann, peer reviewed, Phil Jones, scandal, Stefan Rahmstorf, UN, UNIPCC, united nations | Tags: Anthropogenic Global Warming, Climate Research Unit, David Holland, East Anglia University, Eduardo Zorita, Mike Hulme, vincent gray, Zorita
UN Scientist Declares Climategate colleagues ’should be barred from the IPCC process’ — They are ‘not credible any more’
Marc Morano
Climate Depot
November 28, 2009
A UN scientist is declaring that his three fellow UN climate panel colleagues “should be barred from the IPCC process.” In a November 26, 2009 message on his website, UN IPCC contributing author Dr. Eduardo Zorita writes: “CRU files: Why I think that Michael Mann, Phil Jones and Stefan Rahmstorf should be barred from the IPCC process.”
Zorita writes that the short answer to that question is: Short answer: “Because the scientific assessments in which they may take part are not credible anymore.”
Zorita indicates that he is aware that he is putting his career in jeopardy by going after the upper echelon of UN IPCC scientists. “By writing these lines I will just probably achieve that a few of my future studies will, again, not see the light of publication,” Zorita candidly admits, a reference to the ClimateGate emails discussing how to suppress data and scientific studies that do not agree with the UN IPCC views.
Zorita was a UN IPCC Contributing Author of Fourth Assessment Report in 2007. Since 2003, Zorita as headed the Department of Paleoclimate and has been a senior scientist at the Institute for Coastal Research of the GKSS Research Centre in Germany. Zorita has published more than 70 peer-reviewed scientific studies.
Zorita’s stunning candor continued, noting that scientists who disagreed with the UN IPCC climate view were “bullied and subtly blackmailed.”
“In this atmosphere, Ph D students are often tempted to tweak their data so as to fit the ‘politically correct picture’. Some, or many issues, about climate change are still not well known. Policy makers should be aware of the attempts to hide these uncertainties under a unified picture. I had the ‘pleasure’ to experience all this in my area of research,” Zorita explained. [Zorita’s full statement is reprinted below.]
Climategate: University of East Anglia U-turn in climate change row
UEA Climate Scientist: “possible that…I.P.C.C. has run its course”
Leave a Comment so far
Leave a comment