noworldsystem.com


New Hampshire District ADMITS Ron Paul Votes Not Counted

New Hampshire District ADMITS Ron Paul Votes Not Counted
Sutton township reported Congressman had zero votes, actual number was 31

Paul Joseph Watson
Prison Planet
January 9, 2008

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MBfmksI_wYY

The head clerk of the New Hampshire town of Sutton has been forced to admit that Ron Paul received 31 votes yet when the final amount was transferred to a summary sheet and sent out to the media, the total was listed as zero. The fiasco throws the entire primary into doubt and could lead to a re-count.

As we reported earlier today, an entire family voted for Ron Paul in Sutton, yet when the voting map on the Politico website was posted, the total votes for Ron Paul were zero.

Vote fraud expert Bev Harris contacted the head clerk in Sutton, Jennifer Call, who was forced to admit that the 31 votes Ron Paul received were completely omitted from the final report sheet, claiming “human error” was responsible for the mistake.

Two or three votes not counted could be a plausible mistake – but 31 votes for one candidate?

“The classic method for rigging a hand count is to write the wrong number on the form,” Harris told the Alex Jones Show.

“They are counting everything in public real nice, they fill out a form in public real nice and then they transfer it to another form and they call that a summary sheet and then that is the one they send in,” explained Harris.

“What happened is she said they did not transfer the number correctly and put zero instead of 31 – that is unacceptable as an answer.”

With 100% of precincts now reporting, the map originally listed zero votes for Ron Paul as you can see below. It has now been updated to reflect the 31 votes Paul actually received.


The remainder of the 31 people in Sutton who voted for Ron Paul need to go public immediately with the charge of vote fraud and make it known that they were cheated out of their right to vote.

Harris estimates that it could cost the Ron Paul campaign as much as $67,000 dollars for a recount, but such a move could throw the entire primary into doubt, especially in light of the fact that Barack Obama appears to have been cheated out of a win by Hillary Clinton.

 


Clear Evidence Of Widespread Vote Fraud In New Hampshire
Paul and Obama cheated out of 3rd and 1st by voting machines, hand count fraud

Paul Joseph Watson
Prison Planet
January 9, 2008

There were several major vote fraud issues to arise out of the New Hampshire primary revolving mainly around Ron Paul and Barack Obama, who were both seemingly cheated out of third and first places respectively as a result of rigged Diebold voting machines and deliberate malfeasance in the counting of hand-written paper ballots.

– Obama had a 13 to 15 point lead over Hillary Clinton heading into the primary. Nothing occured that boosted Hillary’s numbers immediately before the election, in fact immediately after the staged crying incident, many pundits argued it could only have harmed her chances. And yet Hillary somehow managed to instigate a near 20 point swing to defeat Obama by three per cent. If not for her 7% swing as a result of Diebold voting machines, Hillary would have lost to Obama. If Obama was struggling he would probably contest this bizarre outcome, but he is likely to accept the results simply to save face.

The New Hampshire town of Sutton admits that it voided every vote Ron Paul received. The Congressman got 31 votes and yet due to a “human error,” Sutton reported zero votes for Ron Paul. How “human error” can explain not counting 31 votes in succession for one single candidate is beyond the pale and Ron Paul’s campaign should ask for a recount across New Hampshire immediately.

– As soon as people went public with the fact that their votes in Sutton had not been counted, other districts where Paul had supposedly received zero votes, such as Greenville, suddenly changed their final tallies and attributed votes to the Congressman.

– Going into New Hampshire Ron Paul was polling in the early teens and was a strong bet to take third place behind McCain and Romney. Four days before the vote, Rasmussen had Paul at 14% – a significant lead over Huckabee on 11% and Giuliani on 8% – and yet Ron Paul finished with just 8%. Proof of clear vote fraud, allied with the fact that Paul’s numbers show a 6% swing from normally accurate pre-polling forecasts, clearly indicate chicanery was at hand, especially considering the fact that Paul lost those crucial few percentage points to Giuliani as a reuslt of electronic Diebold voting machines which are known to be wide open to tampering and fraud.

Going purely on hand-counts, which as we saw in Sutton were by no means angelic but at least harder to cheat on than Diebold voting machines without getting caught, Ron Paul would have won 15% of the vote and finished third. This figure would have more accurately correlated to the pre-primary polls rather than the ridiculous 8% he was eventually given.

Numerous districts reported totals of anything up to 22% for “other candidates”. What on earth does this black hole of “other candidates” mean? How can one vote for a candidate that is not on the ballot without spoiling the ballot paper? The district of Lisbon reported 22.5% votes for this mysterious “other” candidate, while in the large district of Londonderry, the “other” candidate received 10%. Many are now alleging that these “other” votes were merely siphoned from Ron Paul to keep his final number low.

– Rudy Giuliani, the 9/11 candidate who beat Ron Paul thanks to the aid of a 3% swing on Diebold voting machines, received 9.11% of the vote in three different towns. Coincidence or somebody’s idea of a sick joke?

 

Protect Ron Paul from Vote Fraud

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IQxB5VKWlfg

 

CNN Mentions Possibility Of Vote Fraud

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lcwdKBVt_Ew

 

Is this Fraud??

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qV6qAGigGYY

Related News:

Will Ron Paul authorize an audit of the New Hampshire primary?
http://www.newswithviews.com/Devvy/kidd335.htm

Clear Evidence Of Widespread Vote Fraud In New Hampshire
http://www.prisonplanet.com..08/011008_clinton_fraud.htm

NH Hand Count Results Show Vote Fraud
http://www.dailypaul.com/node/23643

Ron Paul Votes Not Counted In New Hampshire District
http://prisonplanet.com/articles/january2008/010908_not_counted.htm

Clinton Received a 4.5% Boost In “Diebold” Towns
http://benmoseley.blogspot.com/20..how-election.html

Greenville Vote Discrepancy SAME as Sutton
http://www.ronpaulwarroom.com/?p=754

Diebold says Hillary won NH, hand count says Obama
http://presscue.com/node/38034

Results: Precincts where Ron Paul had 0-386 votes total
http://www.ronpaulwarroom.com/?p=686

NH Primary: Pre-Election Polls Wildly Different Than Results Announced for Clinton/Obama
http://www.bradblog.com/?p=5530

NH debacle: BBC wants to hear from you NOW!
http://mparent7777-2.blogs..exit-polls.htmlc4252478287468633249

Giuliani gets 9.11% of the vote in three towns?
http://www.ronpaulwarroom.com/?p=764

Paul Not Swayed By Fifth Place
http://www.nashuatelegraph.com/a..9/NEWS08/149590144/-1/news08

Paul hopes cash gets him to Super Tuesday
http://www.chron.com/disp/story.mpl/headline/nation/5439272.html

New Hampshire Primary – ALL Diebold, ALL the Time
http://www.scoop.co.nz/stories/HL0801/S00057.htm

Ron Paul Statement on The New Republic Smear Regarding Racist Newsletters
http://mparent7777-2.blogspot.com/200..ent-on-new-republic.html

Vote Fraud Plagues NH Primary
http://www.roguegovernment.com/news.php?id=5946

Ron Paul headquarters attracting supporters from both parties
Ron Paul Teaches Laura Ingraham A Few Badly Needed Lessons
Did Diebold rig New Hampshire?
Ron Paul On CNN During New Hampshire Primary
West Virginia Sticks With Electronic Voting Machines
Ron Paul: Vote Fraud Victim
How Big Corporations Choose ‘Your’ Candidates

 


Leave a Comment so far
Leave a comment



Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s



%d bloggers like this: